Oil jumps nearly 9% after Israel's strikes on Iran
Oil prices jumped nearly 9% on Friday to near multi-month highs after Israel launched strikes against Iran, sparking Iranian retaliation and raising worries about a disruption in Middle East oil supplies.
Brent crude futures were up $6.19, or around 8.9%, to $75.55 a barrel at 1019 GMT, after hitting an intraday high of $78.50, the highest since January 27.
US West Texas Intermediate crude was up $6.22, or 9.1%, at $74.26 after hitting $77.62, its highest level since January 21.
Friday's gains were the largest intraday moves for both contracts since 2022, after Russia's invasion of Ukraine caused a spike in energy prices.
said it had targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders on Friday at the start of what it warned would be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon, while Iran has promised a harsh response.
US President Donald Trump urged Iran to make a deal over its nuclear programme, to put an end to the 'next already planned attacks.'
The National Iranian Oil Refining and Distribution Company said oil refining and storage facilities had not been damaged and continued to operate. The primary concern was whether the latest developments would affect the Strait of Hormuz, said SEB analyst Ole Hvalbye.
The key waterway had been at risk of impact from increased regional volatility previously but had not been affected so far, Hvalbye said.
There also was no impact to oil flow in the region so far, he added.
About a fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait, or some 18 to 19 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil, condensate and fuel.
Analysts at consultancy Sparta Commodities said that any significant crude supply disruptions would lead to sour crude grades being marginally priced out of refineries in favour of light sweets.
Under a worst case scenario, JPMorgan analysts said on Thursday that closing the strait or a retaliatory response from major oil producing countries in the region could lead to oil prices surging to $120-130 a barrel, nearly double their current base case forecast.
'The key question now is whether this oil rally will last longer than the weekend or a week - our signal is that there is a lower probability of a full-blown war, and the oil price rally will likely encounter resistance,' said Janiv Shah, analyst at Rystad.
Oil prices drop as traders gauge ME tensions
'Fundamentals show nearly all Iranian exports going to China, so Chinese discounted purchases would be most at risk here.
OPEC+ spare capacity can provide the stabilizing force,' he added.
In other markets, stocks dived and there was a rush to safe havens such as gold and the Swiss franc.
An increase in oil prices would also dampen the outlook for the German economy, the economic institute DIW Berlin said on Friday.
It is the only G7 nation that has recorded no economic growth for two consecutive years.
'The increased uncertainty speaks in favour of a higher risk premium on the oil price, which is why it is unlikely to fall below $70 on a sustained basis for the time being … Fundamental data is taking a back seat in the current situation,' analysts at Commerzbank said in a note.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
The four-day Indo-Pak spat
Listen to article Five weeks after the Indo-Pak confrontation, although hostilities have come to an end, the pit and cauldron of doubt and antagonism continues to simmer. War shocks still continue after closure of the four-day spat on 10 May 2025 in the shape of bluff and bluster and propaganda and misinformation. On the Pakistan side, there continues to be fear and consternation of a replay of something like Sindoor for which pretexts may be discovered or imagined. On the Indian side, a media blitz continues to be spread about the threat of terrorism from Pakistan. The flare-out between 7 and 10 May of 2025 may have only been four days long but it spewed a plethora of consequences – domestic, regional and international. Both the sides have claimed to gain the upper hand in the conflagration. India declared to have decimated nine terrorist outfits in "POK" and after nearly 27 years attacked sites across the international boundary in the Punjab. It also claimed to have struck several air bases with missiles and an AWACS plane parked in the hangers in the Nur Khan Air Base in Rawalpindi-Islamabad which is only about 6 to 7 minutes distance from a nuclear installation. On the other hand, Pakistan claims to have taken down six Indian jets – three Rafaels, one Sukhoi, one Mirage and one MIG – with the help of Chinese provided J-10C using remotely fired missile PL-15. Just one day before the commencement of the Paris Air Show, the CEO of Dassault, the manufacturers of multi-role French F-35 jet, declared that the claim of Pakistan to have downed three Indian Rafaels "is inaccurate". This claim flies in the face of French intelligence reports confirming the shooting down of the plane as well as the statement in an interview by the Indian defence chief made in the Shangri-La Security Dialogue of admitting the felling of Indian aircraft but refusing to mention the exact number of planes taken down. The possibility of Chinese military technology having the better of cutting-edge western armaments as shown in the taking down of Rafaels by J-10Cs and PL-15 missiles reverberated throughout the world, denoting a sea change in the geo-strategic scenario particularly in the context of the US-China contest. The balance of power between India and Pakistan, supported and armed by Chinese latest technology, suddenly seemed to have undergone a big change with India having to face an uphill task in case of having to face a two-sided opponent in the shape of Pakistan and China. The fusion between Chinese ideology and military equipment and Pakistan army strategy and tactics is something of great concern for India. Another special aspect of the short confrontation was the use of social media war, hysteria and misinformation from both sides. In fact making outlandish claims of Karachi port having been destroyed and an attack on Lahore not only made a mockery of Indian media but indelibly dented the credibility of news emanating from Indian media. Shivshankar Menon, former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan and former foreign secretary, in an interview with Karan Thapar made a claim typical of Indian mindset , saying, "Sindoor may not have deterred terrorism in Pakistan and may have only provided a temporary respite since militarism is hard wired into the security structure" and weltanschauung "of Pakistan." Operation Sindoor, Menon claims, has not deterred terrorism but it has imposed costs for Pakistan to think twice before launching another terror attack. Now it is for India, according to Menon, how best to manage increasing the costs for Pakistan and gains for India. Adil Shah of Georgetown University, USA, has averred that Sindoor did not deter Pakistan but rather emboldened it by giving it the impression of victory. Trump's effort at bringing about a ceasefire between India and Pakistan to prevent the situation from escalating into a non-conventional nuclear flare-out has led to two consequences. Trump has reiterated on several occasions that he was responsible for effecting a ceasefire between the two South Asian neighbours and that he could bring about a solution to the Kashmir dispute. American efforts in the Indo-Pak spat has led to the internationalisation of Kashmir dispute much to the chagrin of India which insists that the Kashmir dispute could only be resolved through bilateral measures. Trump's attempt has also led to the rehyphenation of India and Pakistan after several years of dehyphenation of US relations vis a vis the two South Asian opponents. The May 2025 flare-out makes it all the more essential to bring an end to confrontation between India and Pakistan since another such occurrence could go out of hand due to escalation or accident. There is paramount need therefore for detente, peace and deterrence of confrontation between the two neighbours who suffer from similar problems of poverty, shelter, potable water and lack of health cover. The expenditures incurred on military and arms would be best spent upon education and health. In this day and age, two poor countries to be in possession of nuclear capabilities and increasing expenditures on ever advanced arms and armaments is a self-defeating policy depriving millions of the basic essentials of a civilised life.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Iran-Israel conflict: what it means for Pakistan
Listen to article The ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel has taken a heavy human toll in Iran and some in the Israel. How could this conflict affect Pakistan? Iran, after all, is one of the four neighbors of Pakistan. The other three are Afghanistan, China and India. It is only with China that Pakistan has good relations. It is cooperating with Beijing in several areas, including defence production. Pakistan is also partnering with China to build a regional communication network. That Israel was well informed about the targets that it hit resulted in the deaths of Mohammad Bagheri, the chief Iranian military staff and three other top military generals. Israel has also assassinated two top nuclear scientists. It is obvious that the Jewish state was helped by those Iranian who oppose the clerics' regime in their country. As one observer put it, when the senior people in Tehran meet, you can't be sure whether the person sitting next to you works as a spy for Israel. When the Israelis began their campaign against Tehran on June 13, it was obvious that the targets hit were well selected, with information coming from those who worked as spies for the Jewish state. Video footage from Tehran confirmed the precision of the attacks – showing one floor of an apartment building hit, for example, but not others. The hit apartment housed the person the Israelis wished to kill. Even after the devastating attacks in Lebanon on Hezbollah – a Tehran ally that had a large supply of armaments meant to be used against Israel – Tehran has not lost all of its allies. The Al-Qaeda affiliate in Yemen may pose a special danger for those who are supporting Israel and the latter's activities in the Middle East. It is likely to pose a special danger to Israeli supporters. The group is headed by Assa bin Saad bin Atef al-Awlaki, who posted a chilling video. The video named several people who should be targeted for assassination. These included President Donald Trump, Vic President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and former DOGE chief Elon Musk. "There are no red lines after all that has been happening to our people in Gaza," he said in the message. According to The Jerusalem Post, an Israeli newspaper, Awlaki urged all Muslims in America and Europe to make sure there is "not a single safe place in the world for Jews". David Ignatius, who contributes to The Washington Post, wrote in his column published by the newspaper on June 14, 2025, "Israel's tactical mastery is unquestionable. But in this latest assault on Iran – as in earlier campaigns in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen – Israel appears to have given relatively little thought to 'its day after' ambitions. Does Israel seek regime change in Iran, to permanently bend Iran away from its revolutionary course? That appears to be Netanyahu's message in a June 13, 2025, televised pitch to the Iranian people. 'This is your opportunity to stand and let your voices be heard,' he said. But there is a danger of overreach. Netanyahu may have to settle for a strike that will neuter the Iranian nuclear threat for a few more years but set up a future conflagration." Gerry Shih and Susannah George, who also cover the Middle East for the Post, wrote that "the Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear and military sites, along with the targeted killing of at least a dozen senior military officials and scientists, represents the latest sign of Israel's shift away from a decades-old policy favoring containment, restraint and short wars." They continued with their analysis by highlighting that "in the past 20 months, the Israeli Defense Force has occupied territory and carried out frequent airstrikes in neighboring Lebanon and Syria, reflecting what Israeli military officials say is a new border security doctrine. Netanyahu has vowed not to cease the military campaign in Gaza until he achieves total victory over Hamas, displaying tolerance for prolonged conflicts that runs against traditional Israeli strategic thinking." Aaron David Miller, who has advised seven US secretaries of state on the Middle East, said there has been a shift within the Israeli security establishment which now appears comfortable with leading Israel as a "regional hegemon". In 2020, for instance, Netanyahu declined to participate in a US operation that resulted in the assassination of Maj Gen Qasem Soleimani, Iran's top military commander. Netanyahu "was very risk averse, very reluctant to use force," said Miller who dealt with Netanyahu over a long career at the State Department. "He was always one step forward, two steps to the side, one step back. Now he's become risk ready." Since Netanyahu lunched the operation known as the 'Rising Lion', he is not in favour of the Trump administration and Iran to return to the negotiating table. After carrying out operations in Gaza and Lebanon, Israel has blocked the new government in Syria which assumed control in December 2024 from establishing itself as a military power. It has launched hundreds of airstrikes on strategic stockpiles and demanded that Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa demilitarise an entire region running south of Damascus to the Israeli border. According to Danny Citrinowicz, a former military Israeli military intelligence official who specialises in Iran and the regional allies, "when you don't have Syria, when Hamas is nonexistent, and without Hezbollah, you can do almost whatever you want." But he warned that Israel had not done enough long-term planning beyond the immediate use of force. "So we expand attacks into Iran's energy sector, so we fight a war of attrition that never ends. And then what?" Miller, the former State Department official, said that Netanyahu had demonstrated Israel's military superiority and his willingness to use it, but his Arab neighbours wanted to see him turn that into lasting stability. "The more Netanyahu is on a course in which he's not going to translate his escalation dominance into more stable arrangements or peace deals, the more wary the neighbors will become." China is working with Pakistan to develop plans to expand CPEC, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, into Afghanistan and Iran. Eventually the road network would extend to the countries of Central Asia that were once part of the dissolved Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the USSR. This would make it possible for China to tap and transport minerals from the area to feed its rapidly expanding industrial system. With the possible participation of the United States in the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict, these plans would be disrupted.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Russia, China and Pakistan urge ceasefire as UN meets over US strikes on Iran
Iran requested the UN Security Council meeting, urging the 15-member body 'to address this blatant and unlawful act of aggression, to condemn it in the strongest possible terms.'PHOTO: REUTERS The UN Security Council started meeting to discuss US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, as Russia, China, and Pakistan proposed that the 15-member body adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East. It was not immediately clear when the resolution could be put to a vote. The three countries circulated the draft text, diplomats said, and asked members to share their comments by Monday evening. A resolution requires at least nine votes in favour and no vetoes by the United States, France, Britain, Russia, or China to pass. The United States is likely to oppose the draft resolution, seen by Reuters, which also condemns attacks on Iran's nuclear sites and facilities. The text, however, does not name either the United States or Israel. The world awaited Iran's response on Sunday after President Donald Trump said the US had 'obliterated' Tehran's key nuclear sites, joining Israel in the largest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution. Iran requested the UN Security Council meeting, urging the 15-member body 'to address this blatant and unlawful act of aggression, to condemn it in the strongest possible terms.' Israel's UN Ambassador Danny Danon said in a statement on Sunday that the US and Israel 'do not deserve any condemnation, but rather an expression of appreciation and gratitude for making the world a safer place.' UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Saturday called the US strikes on Iran a 'dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge — and a direct threat to international peace and security.' 'At this perilous hour, it is critical to avoid a spiral of chaos. There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy. The only hope is peace,' Guterres said in a statement.
