Ukrainian refugee scoops gold at honey awards
A Ukrainian refugee living in Devon who started a business selling honey from her homeland has received national recognition.
Maryna Georgieva, from Moretonhampstead, fled the war in 2022 with her two children and started her company Honeyland, where she imports honey produced in Ukraine to sell in the UK.
Last month her product won gold at the London International Honey Awards.
Ms Georgieva said the award belongs to all the "incredible" Ukrainian beekeepers who had "collecting honey during the most challenging of times".
More news stories for Devon
Listen to the latest news for Devon
Ms Georgieva said she only planned to stay in Devon for six months before returning home but the continuing conflict scuppered her plans.
She said her signature buckwheat honey was "unusual" and "unique in taste", similar to manuka honey.
On her award, she said she was "very happy and proud to win gold".
Ms Georgieva said she has an "ambitious plan" to deliver Ukrainian honey across the country and get it into every major supermarket.
"I'm limited in time so I live on high speed," she said.
"We're on a mission to make people in the UK fall in love with Ukrainian honey."
Follow BBC Devon on X, Facebook and Instagram. Send your story ideas to spotlight@bbc.co.uk.
How bees could help war-hit families in Ukraine
Swarms of rare bees rehomed for house restoration
Devon school trains 'mini beekeepers'
London Honey Awards
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Russia again rejects Anadolu Efes proposal to buy out AB InBev from JV
Russian authorities have again declined Anadolu Efes' proposal to buy Anheuser-Busch InBev's (AB InBev) stake in their joint venture (JV). In a filing on Turkey's Central Securities Depository, Anadolu Efes said, 'pursuant to the notification made by the Russian regulatory authorities and considering the developments during the period, the relevant application has been rejected'. 'We are reviewing next steps with AB InBev,' it added. AB InBev and Anadolu Efes established AB InBev Efes in 2018. The JV combines both their Russian and Ukrainian businesses. The venture operates 11 breweries in Russia, producing beers under brands such as Klinskoe and Efes Pilsen. Following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the Belgium-based brewer announced in April 2022 its intention to divest its stake in the joint venture and began negotiations with Anadolu Efes. In December 2023, AB InBev, known for Leffe, confirmed it would sell its 50% stake in the Russian joint venture to Anadolu Efes. However, Russian authorities blocked the transaction in August of the following year. Two months later, AB InBev and Anadolu Efes finalised a new agreement for the sale of its share in the Russian operations of their joint venture. In exchange, the Belgian brewer planned to acquire Anadolu Efes's stake in the Ukrainian side of the partnership. Moscow assumed control of the Russian segment of the joint venture in January. The Russian government transferred the local assets of AB InBev Efes to a group of companies called Vmeste under "temporary management", according to statements from both brewers at the time. In its first-quarter results for 2025, Anadolu Efes excluded its Russian beer operations from consolidated financials, classifying them as a 'financial investment' due to temporary external management. Announcing the results in May, Anadolu Efes CEO Onur Altürk said: 'Until we gain more clarity on the situation, the Russian operations will no longer be consolidated in our profit and loss statements. 'Our primary focus in Russia remains on navigating the current landscape with resilience, prioritising business continuity, and actively working to minimise potential disruptions.' While not audited or aligned with group results, key metrics were shared for context. The group's beer volumes in Russia rose 7.7% to 6.3 million hectolitres in the first quarter period, but net sales slipped 0.8% to Tl13.72bn ($345.7m) and gross profit dipped 1.2% to Tl5.91bn. EBITDA (BNRI) margin for the region fell 8% to Tl1.96bn, while EBIT (BNRI) jumped 68.4% to Tl2.46bn. Net income dropped by 78.9% to Tl389.9m. "Russia again rejects Anadolu Efes proposal to buy out AB InBev from JV " was originally created and published by Just Drinks, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Miami Herald
20 hours ago
- Miami Herald
U.S. Pushing Allies to Limit Focus on Ukraine in NATO Summit Communique
The United States is pressuring European allies to limit references to Ukraine in the final communique coming out of next week's NATO summit, according to several sources, a symbolic move that would signal a decline in support for Kyiv under U.S. President Donald Trump's administration. Trump officials have pushed NATO allies to agree to limit mentions of Ukraine in the communique, the document issued at the conclusion of the annual conference that lays out the security alliance's priorities, according to multiple sources in Washington and Europe who are familiar with the negotiations. The current draft of the summit's communique only includes one passing mention of Ukraine's defense capabilities and does not include a broad statement of support for Kyiv, a European official who viewed the draft told Newsweek. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Newsweek. If the U.S. and other NATO members approve the draft, it would represent a departure from the strong statements of support for Ukraine issued at the end of the NATO summits held under former President Joe Biden after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. "People in Moscow, Beijing and in other major capitals of the world look carefully at how the United States and NATO characterize the international security situation," said Jeff Rathke, the president of the American-German Institute at Johns Hopkins University. "If NATO backs away from what it has previously committed to [at the summit], it's a signal of weakness that will very much be picked up on." NATO members are expected to take some steps at the summit to show support for Ukraine. Secretary-General Mark Rutte has called on member states to increase their annual defense spending to deter Russia. The alliance is expected to announce new spending targets of 5 percent at the summit, according to several sources. The figure would consist of 3.5 percent spending on core defense programs and 1.5 percent on military-related infrastructure and logistics. The plan represents a significant victory for Trump, who has long called on NATO members to step up their defense spending. In recent months, the United Kingdom, France, and other countries have also pledged greater military aid to Ukraine, which has relied on Western support in its fight against Russia. The aid has raised tensions between Europe and the U.S. since Trump took office, vowing to bring a swift end to the war in Ukraine. The administration brokered peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, but the negotiations haven't resulted in any meaningful breakthroughs so far. Trump has expressed frustration with both countries for failing to reach a deal, but he has more frequently criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky than Russian President Vladimir Putin. It remains unclear whether Trump will support a Senate bill to impose new sanctions on Moscow or a new military aid package for Ukraine once the current funding for Kyiv expires. A final NATO summit communique that barely mentions Ukraine would be a marked contrast to the statements issued by the security alliance over the past several years. The alliance expressed unequivocal support for Ukraine at the conclusion of the annual summit last year, which was hosted by the Biden administration in Washington. "Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine has shattered peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic area and gravely undermined global security," the 2024 communique said. NATO pledged in the document to "bolster our long-term support to Ukraine so it can prevail in its fight for freedom." Ukrainian officials said they hoped NATO allies would prioritize Ukraine at the summit without angering Trump, who has spent the past week focused on the escalating war between Israel and Iran. "They're thinking about how to diplomatically promote Ukraine at the NATO Summit and how to not antagonize Trump. It's a difficult challenge," Oleksandr Merezhko, a member of Ukraine's parliament, told Newsweek. "In the final communique, I'd like to see something said about supporting Ukraine," he added. Related Articles "Hitler" Comments Deepen NATO Ally Turkey's Feud With IsraelRussia Accuses UK of Sabotage Plans With US in 'NATO Lake'US and NATO Ally Patrol Waters Near ChinaRussia Feigns at Peace. Congress Must Sanction Putin's War Machine | Opinion 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
a day ago
How Trump's threats to abandon Ukraine war pose battlefield conundrums for Kyiv
LONDON -- President Donald Trump -- frustrated by the failure of his diplomatic efforts to date -- has raised the prospect of entirely abandoning U.S. engagement in Russia's 3-year-old invasion of Ukraine. "Sometimes you see two young children fighting in the park," Trump said in June about the ongoing war, which is the largest armed conflict in Europe since World War II. "Sometimes you're better off letting them fight more before you pull them apart," the president added -- his remarks the latest in several months of public skepticism over the U.S. continuing to back Ukraine. In practice and rhetoric, American aid to Ukraine appears to be drying up. The administration approved a $50 million sale of military aid to Ukraine in April, but only after Kyiv signed off on a controversial minerals sharing deal. But the White House is also yet to dip into some $3.9 billion earmarked to fund military aid to Ukraine -- to be drawn from existing U.S. stocks, meaning it can be delivered quickly -- that Biden was not able to spend before the end of his term. It would be Russia that would benefit from a permanent halt to U.S. aid, Ukraine has warned. "Without American weaponry, the situation on the battlefield will of course be more difficult," Oleksandr Merezhko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament representing President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's party and the chair of the body's foreign affairs committee, told ABC News. Zelenskyy said early this year that American aid accounts for 30% of Ukrainian weaponry. Though other estimates go as low as 20%, it is clear that Washington remains a key benefactor. A nine-month pause on U.S. aid in 2024, due to a gridlocked Congress, forced Kyiv to consider a future without American assistance. Those fears materialized in March 2025 when Trump imposed a week-long freeze on all American military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine. The flow soon resumed, but Trump's frustration has only deepened as U.S.-brokered peace talks floundered. The costs of war The U.S. remained the most generous single contributor of aid to Ukraine as of April 2025, according to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a research group based in Germany that tracks support from foreign governments toward Ukraine. The U.S. has contributed around $130 billion in total aid to Ukraine since 2022, of which $74 billion is military assistance. Combined, European Union nations have contributed more overall -- $157 billion -- but less than the U.S. on the military front, at slightly less than $73 billion. Ukraine's budget for military and security spending approved by lawmakers in late 2024 was around $53.7 billion. Oleksandr V. Danylyuk, an associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute think tank in the U.K., told ABC News that American military assistance is important but not vital. "I wouldn't underestimate it, but I wouldn't overestimate it either," he said. Around half of American weapons systems and ammunition provided could be replaced by alternatives, he said. How to find replacements for weapons the U.S. would withhold may be the most salient question, Pavel Luzin -- an analyst at The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts -- told ABC News. "The previous administration decided that the American taxpayers should" shoulder the burden, he said. "The current administration wants to share this burden." "Europe can pay for the American arms for Ukraine and it has enough money for this," Luzin said. "Ukraine also can pay for the arms using long-term European and/or American loans. Even the Russian frozen assets could be used for this purpose." Europe has been criticized for its slow mobilization of its vast resources. But Tina Fordham, a geopolitical strategist and the founder of Fordham Global Foresight, told ABC News, "I think we saw during the during the pandemic, for example, and after the Russian invasion, that Europe is initially slow to act, but then it can act decisively." 'There will be more civilians dying' Perhaps the most vital single U.S. weapon system now in Ukrainian hands is the Patriot surface-to-air missile system, which has proven its value in downing drones, ballistic missiles and Russian aircraft since arriving in the country in the spring of 2023. Ukraine now fields at least six Patriots, two of which were provided by the U.S. and the others by different NATO allies. Ukraine has other air defense platforms -- among them the European IRIS-T and SAMP-T systems -- but none have been so publicly celebrated by Ukraine for blunting Russian attacks. The system, which entered U.S. service in the 1980s, has even been able to shoot down Russian hypersonic missiles. Zelenskyy said this month that his nation needs to "urgently" strengthen its air defense capabilities in response to Russia's intensifying missile and drone attacks on cities nationwide. "We urgently need positive signals from the United States -- concrete signals regarding air defense systems," he said. "We are still waiting for a response to our request to purchase systems that can help -- concrete signals, not words." Danylyuk said air defense is one area in which American support is particularly key. American-made defenses help enhance Kyiv's security in particular, he said. Without them, "Kyiv would be hit in the same way as Odesa or Zaporizhizha," Danylyuk said. "That's not nice. It will make life -- especially for Western diplomats including the U.S. diplomats -- much worse," he continued. "Will it change our will to fight? No. There will be more civilians dying, that's the only difference." Behind and far above the front line, America's enormous intelligence capabilities have also been helping Kyiv resist Russia's war. American reconnaissance flights over eastern Europe, for example, have offered Kyiv otherwise unattainable forewarning on Russian activity and assistance in targeting. The Center for Strategic and International Studies said in May that U.S. intelligence aid has been "extensive," including signals, imagery and human intelligence. "This support has enabled Ukraine to counter missile barrages, disrupt covert operations and track force movements," CSIS wrote. Notably, Ukraine's air raid alerts are heavily informed by U.S. satellite data. When intelligence sharing was frozen in March, Ukrainian politicians warned that the result would be more dead civilians from Russia's nightly barrages. Shell hunger has also been a major problem for both sides throughout the war. Russia has turned to North Korea and Iran for sustenance, while Ukraine has turned to the West. During President Joe Biden's term, the U.S. sent more than 3 million 155mm shells to Ukraine. Any loss of supply could prove deadly for frontline Ukrainian units. America in retreat? The disappearance of other weapons from the battlefields would serve as a potent signal of an American pivot. Kyiv relies on the U.S. for ammunition for the HIMARS rocket artillery system, for example, including the long-range ATACMS. British-French Storm Shadow/SCALP cruise missile, Ground Launched Small Diameter Bombs, M777 howitzers, AGM-88 HARM anti-radiation missiles and F-16 fighter jets are all systems either produced by the U.S. or relying on American components and systems -- thus giving Washington power to veto their transfer to Kyiv. An end to American aid, Danylyuk said, "Would create some problems," though would not "be a complete disaster" if Kyiv is able to quickly source replacements. Regardless, "Ukraine is not going to collapse," Danylyuk said, recalling the two past windows during which American aid flows froze over. "We could survive that terrible nine months without U.S. aid. So, it's not like Ukrainians are going to surrender."
