Paetongtarn Shinawatra, Thailand's prime minister, under siege
Since Paetongtarn Shinawatra became prime minister August 2024, she has struggled to deliver on her party's promises. PHOTO: AFP
BANGKOK - After less than a year in office, Thailand's Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has her back to the wall - and little room left to manoeuvre.
For months, the 38-year-old - the second woman and the youngest Thai to hold the position - has grappled with a faltering economy that has stalled her Pheu Thai party's flagship economic scheme while coping with an unwieldy ruling coalition.
But the leaked audio of a phone call with Cambodia's former leader Hun Sen, after weeks of bickering between the two South-east Asian neighbours over a disputed border, could be the final blow to her 10-month term.
'Paetongtarn is untenable now,' said Dr Thitinan Pongsudhirak, a political scientist at Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University.
'The leaked conversation is deeply compromising to her position as prime minister and deeply damaging for Thailand. I think there's no way she's going to last.'
In her June 15 call with Mr Hun Sen, who she referred to as 'uncle', Ms Paetongtarn not only appeared to kowtow before the veteran Cambodian politician but also denigrated a senior Thai military commander - seen as red lines by her critics and allies alike.
Facing an unprecedented backlash, Ms Paetongtarn - a political novice who held no government position before becoming premier - delivered a public apology on June 19 , insisting that she did not know the call with Mr Hun Sen would be recorded.
'This was a private call from my personal phone,' she told reporters.
But it came after the conservative Bhumjaithai party - the third largest in parliament's Lower House - pulled out of the ruling coalition late on June 18 , citing the audio of the call, which was released in full by Mr Hun Sen after the initial leak of a clip.
The Pheu Thai party now only holds a narrow majority in Thailand's 495-member parliament, and the exit of some other coalition partners, some of which are due to hold individual meetings to decide their respective positions, could swiftly bring down the government.
Thailand's main opposition, the People's Party, underlined the lack of public trust in Ms Paetongtarn on June 19 and called on the government to dissolve parliament, which would trigger fresh elections.
'Paetongtarn needs to take responsibility for what has happened,' said Dr Pavin Chachavalpongpun, a Thai academic at Japan's Kyoto University, referring to the audio in which she described a prominent Thai army commander as being part of 'the opposite side'.
'She may not trust the army. But she should not be telling this to foreign leaders.'
Brand Shinawatra
Ms Paetongtarn, educated at Chulalongkorn University and Britain's University of Surrey, was primarily involved in the Shinawatra family businesses before becoming prime minister but has spent much of her life exposed to the tumult of Thai politics.
She was eight when her father, Mr Thaksin Shinawatra, entered politics in 1994 and began a meteoric rise to become prime minister by a landslide in 2001 - only to be ousted in a coup five years later.
In 2011, her aunt and Mr Thaksin's sister, Ms Yingluck, also found her way to the premiership but was ejected by a court ruling, followed by a military coup.
On the campaign trail in 2023, seeking to resuscitate her family's political fortune, Ms Paetongtarn harked back to the track record of previous Shinawatra administrations and promised robust government policies to kick-start South-east Asia's second largest economy.
Ms Paetongtarn, who is married with two children, also made no bones about her closeness to her father, Thailand's most influential but divisive politician who returned to the country in 2023 after over a decade-and-a-half in self-exile to avoid a prison term.
Since she became prime minister August 2024 , following the abrupt removal of her predecessor by a court order, Ms Paetongtarn has struggled to deliver on her party's promises, even as she operated under the long shadow of her father, who is himself facing court cases that could see him return to prison.
In particular, a decision last month to freeze a US$14 billion (S$18 billion) cash handout programme, a key plank in the 2023 election, in the face of potential US tariffs has hit Pheu Thai's popularity.
But this crisis will likely damage the party's standing further, making it even more challenging to head into fresh polls, according to analysts.
A snap election, however, may not be amenable to some current and former members of the ruling coalition, including Bhumjaithai, and instead favour the People's Party, said Mr Olarn Thinbangtieo, a political science lecturer at Burapha University.
'This is more about pressuring the prime minister to resign than dissolving parliament,' said Mr Olarn, outlining the possibility of parliament picking Bhumjaithai's leader Anutin Charnvirakul to replace Ms Paetongtarn.
Move Forward, a forerunner of the People's Party, won most seats in the 2023 election but was blocked from taking power by an unelected senate, paving the way for second-place Pheu Thai to cobble together a coalition and form a government.
Still, there is a possibility that Pheu Thai can engineer a survival strategy to retain power, but Ms Paetongtarn's actions may also determine the future of Thailand's most prominent political dynasty.
'This could be the end of the Shinawatra brand,' said Chulalongkorn University's Dr Thitinan. 'She has really damaged it.' REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Europe-Iran talks yield little in Geneva at ‘perilous' moment, ministers ready to meet again
British foreign minister David Lammy (left) and French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot briefing the media in Geneva on June 20, after their talks with Iran's Foreign Minister on Tehran's nuclear programme. PHOTO: AFP Europe-Iran talks yield little in Geneva at 'perilous' moment, ministers ready to meet again GENEVA - There were few signs of progress after European foreign ministers met their Iranian counterpart on June 20 in a bid to prevent conflict in the Middle East from escalating, although all signalled readiness to keep talking, despite major sticking points. The foreign ministers of Germany, Britain, France - known as the E3 - plus the EU, urged Iran to engage with the United States over its contentious nuclear programme even as Tehran has repeatedly insisted it will not open discussions with the Trump administration until Israeli strikes on Iran end. The talks aimed to test Tehran's willingness to negotiate a new nuclear deal despite there being no obvious prospect of Israel ceasing its attacks soon, diplomats said. 'The Iranian Foreign Minister has expressed his willingness to continue discussions on the nuclear programme and more broadly on all issues, and we expect Iran to commit to the discussion, including with the United States, to reach a negotiated settlement,' said French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot. For his part, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Iran was ready to consider diplomacy once Israel had ceased its attacks and been held accountable for its actions. 'In this regard, I made it crystal clear that Iran's defence capabilities are not negotiable,' he said, following the talks lasting around three hours in Geneva. No date for a follow-up meeting was announced despite Europeans underscoring the small window for diplomacy. US President Donald Trump has said he will decide within two weeks whether to join the Israeli strikes intended to smash Tehran's nuclear capacity. European ministers spoke beforehand with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio who signalled Washington was open to direct talks even as it mulls the strikes, diplomatic sources said. Washington did not confirm that, though broadcaster CNN quoted a US official saying Mr Trump supported diplomacy by allies that could bring Iran closer to a deal. Britain's foreign minister David Lammy said the European countries were eager to continue talks with Iran. 'This is a perilous moment, and it is hugely important that we don't see regional escalation of this conflict,' he said. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi leaving after his meeting in Geneva with the foreign ministers of Germany, Britain, France - known as the E3 - plus the EU. PHOTO: AFP Two European diplomats said the E3 did not believe that Israel would accept a ceasefire in the near term and that it would be difficult for Iran and the US to resume negotiations. They said the idea was to begin a parallel negotiating track, initially without the US, on a new deal that would involve tougher inspections, and potentially on Iran's ballistic missile programme, while allowing Tehran some notional enrichment capacity. Enrichment differences The Trump administration is demanding Iran stop uranium enrichment altogether, whereas the E3 have in past talks left it some scope to enrich for civil ends in exchange for extremely strict international inspections. On June 20, French President Emmanuel Macron shifted closer to Mr Trump's position, saying that any new deal with Tehran needed to go towards zero enrichment. A senior Iranian official told Reuters Iran is ready to discuss limitations on its uranium enrichment but said the prospect of zero enrichment would undoubtedly be rejected. In a speech at the United Nations in Geneva before the E3 meeting, Mr Araqchi accused Israel of a 'betrayal of diplomacy', while Israel's envoy in Geneva raised a 'vehement objection' to the minister addressing the UN's Human Rights Council. Geneva was the scene of an initial accord between Iran and world powers to curb its nuclear programme in return for sanctions lifting in 2013 before a comprehensive deal in 2015. Separate talks between Iran and the US collapsed when Israel launched what it called Operation Rising Lion against Iran's nuclear facilities and ballistic capabilities on June 13. France's Mr Barrot spoke to Mr Rubio on June 19, during which Mr Rubio said Washington was ready for direct contact with the Iranians, a diplomatic source said. The Europeans wanted to make clear to Iran that the US is ready for direct talks, but that Iran must give a serious signal, two diplomats said, without defining what that could be. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
International Business Times
3 hours ago
- International Business Times
Thailand's Gas Gamble: How Policy Missteps and Private Gains Drive Up Power Bills
In a nation where more than two-thirds of electricity is generated by gas-fired plants, Thailand's deepening reliance on expensive liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports is not just an energy strategy—it's a growing burden on its people. As global LNG prices spike and domestic gas output dwindles, questions are mounting over whether energy policy mismanagement and elite profiteering have come at the expense of the average Thai household. At the center of this complex web lies Gulf Energy Development Public Company Ltd., a powerful conglomerate helmed by Thailand's richest man, Sarath Ratanavadi. Together with the state-owned PTT Group, Gulf has secured long-term rights to import, store, and distribute LNG under lucrative government contracts. And while energy prices for consumers rise, so too do the profits of these well-connected corporate giants. The Cost of Policy Paralysis The roots of the crisis trace back to delays and dysfunction in the management of Thailand's domestic gas fields. The Erawan and Bongkot concessions in the Gulf of Thailand—once key pillars of the country's energy independence—saw production plummet following administrative upheavals. Chevron, which had operated Erawan since 1981, was ousted in 2021 in favor of a state-backed bidder, PTTEP. The handover was anything but smooth. By 2022, output from Erawan had dropped by over 50%. Despite promises from successive energy ministers to fast-track exploration and development, a combination of bureaucratic gridlock and deliberate policy choices has led Thailand to import nearly a third of its gas as LNG, compared to under 5% in 2011. These LNG imports are often priced at two to seven times more than domestically produced gas. In 2022, LNG hit a jaw-dropping $38.66 per million BTU, while Thai-sourced gas was only $5.51. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) reports that LNG imports surged 34% in 2023 alone. The financial toll on Thailand's state utility, EGAT, has been staggering—losses of 150 billion baht ($4.3 billion) between late 2021 and the end of 2022. A Tale of Two Winners: Gulf and PTT Gulf Development, once a challenger to PTT's monopoly, now appears to be its most strategic partner. The two firms jointly operate the Gulf MTP LNG Terminal, one of the country's main LNG import facilities. The terminal's capacity is set to double from 5 to 10.8 million tons annually. Gulf was granted its import license in 2020, becoming only the second private player after EGAT. Since then, the firm has expanded its influence across the LNG supply chain—from procurement to regasification to pipeline distribution. Critics argue that the system has been gamed to benefit a handful of actors. Two senior officials within the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC), which oversees procurement policy, previously held advisory or executive roles at Gulf and PTT. The appearance of conflict of interest has eroded public trust in regulatory oversight. "This is a classic case of regulatory capture," said an IEEFA analyst who requested anonymity. "You have regulators with corporate ties making decisions that steer the country toward imported gas, which just happens to benefit their former—or future—employers." The Public Pays the Price The fallout is increasingly visible in Thai households and businesses. Electricity prices have remained elevated despite a fall in global LNG prices in 2024. EGAT, which purchases over 85% of Gulf's power output, absorbs the higher input costs, eventually passing them down to consumers. Small businesses, already recovering from the pandemic, have seen utility bills cut into margins. Rural provinces have protested rolling blackouts and unaffordable tariffs. Meanwhile, Gulf's profits have soared, bolstered by long-term contracts and a guaranteed buyer in EGAT. The government's response has been muted. While officials acknowledge rising costs, they continue to cite energy "security" and global volatility as justification for their reliance on LNG. Yet, a growing chorus of energy economists and civil society groups argue that the crisis is self-inflicted. "Thailand had the resources," said Dr. Nakornthap, a respected energy expert. "What it lacked was the political will and administrative competence to develop them." What Lies Ahead With elections on the horizon and household discontent simmering, energy policy is emerging as a political flashpoint. Some opposition leaders are calling for a full audit of LNG contracts and regulatory appointments. Others propose reforms that would prioritize domestic exploration and overhaul procurement transparency. As the Thai people pay for these missteps at the meter, the broader lesson may echo beyond Bangkok: in energy policy, inaction and insider influence can be just as costly as imported gas.
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Israel tells UN Security Council ‘we will not stop' Iran attacks
Israeli UN Ambassador Danny Danon speaking at a meeting of the UN Security Council on June 20. PHOTO: AFP WASHINGTON - Iran said it would continue to defend itself against Israel during a UN Security Council session on June 20, while Israel's UN ambassador vowed that his country would not stop its attacks until Iran's nuclear threat is dismantled. 'We will not stop,' Israeli UN Ambassador Danny Danon said. 'Not until Iran's nuclear threat is dismantled, not until its war machine is disarmed, not until our people and yours are safe.' Iran's UN Ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani urged the Security Council to take action. 'Israel apparently declared that it will continue this strike for as many days as it takes. We are alarmed by credible report that the United States... may be joining this war,' he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
