WATCH — Is seat 11A really the safest seat on an airplane?
Flying is still the safest mode of transport, experts say
CONTENT WARNING: This story contains information about people dying in plane crashes. Consider reading it with a trusted adult. It's common to have an emotional reaction to the news.
Is there really a 'safest seat' on an airplane?
On June 12, an Air India flight crashed minutes after takeoff in the Indian city of Ahmedabad.
Several people on the ground died, along with 241 on board. One passenger survived.
Why kids should still feel safe to fly despite deadly D.C. plane crash
Vishwashkumar Ramesh was that sole survivor, and was sitting in seat 11A.
He jumped through a nearby emergency exit after the crash.
So why has seat 11A gone viral online?
Turns out Thai singer and actor James Ruangsak Loychusak — who was one of the survivors of a deadly 1998 Thai Airways plane crash — sat in the same seat.
'That was an uncanny coincidence,' he told India's The Telegraph Online after the crash. 'The kind that gives you goosebumps.'
CBC Kids News was not able to confirm that he was actually sitting in seat 11A, but it turns out it may not really matter.
Check the video below to find out more about seat 11A from CBC Kids News contributor Ainara Alleyne. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
Why your seat choice doesn't really matter
Aviation experts say plane crashes are random, and any seat can improve your survivability depending on the unique aspects of a crash.
These include things like the way the aircraft breaks apart, the type of impact, where someone is sitting and timing, for example.
All about airplanes: Aviation experts answer kids' questions about flying
'Each accident is different, and it is impossible to predict survivability based on seat location,' Mitchell Fox, a director at Flight Safety Foundation, a U.S.-based non-profit, told Reuters.
Two men in plane crashes more than 20 years apart both survived sitting in seat 11A. On the left is the recent crash involving a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner aircraft in Ahmedabad, India. The image on the right depicts the 1998 crash of a Thai Airways Airbus A310 in Surat Thani, Thailand. Image credit: (Adnan Abidi/Reuters, and Emmanuel Dunand/AFP/Getty Images)
Also, seat 11A isn't in the same spot on every airplane and may not always be as close to an emergency exit.
That being said, experts say sitting near an emergency exit can improve chances of evacuation in less severe crashes.
In any case, don't let all this talk of crashes scare you — flying is still by far the safest mode of transportation.
You're more likely to be struck by lightning than end up in a plane crash, experts say.
Have more questions? Want to tell us how we're doing? Use the 'send us feedback' link below. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
With files from Natalie Stechyson/CBC News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
4 hours ago
- CBC
WATCH — Is seat 11A really the safest seat on an airplane?
Flying is still the safest mode of transport, experts say CONTENT WARNING: This story contains information about people dying in plane crashes. Consider reading it with a trusted adult. It's common to have an emotional reaction to the news. Is there really a 'safest seat' on an airplane? On June 12, an Air India flight crashed minutes after takeoff in the Indian city of Ahmedabad. Several people on the ground died, along with 241 on board. One passenger survived. Why kids should still feel safe to fly despite deadly D.C. plane crash Vishwashkumar Ramesh was that sole survivor, and was sitting in seat 11A. He jumped through a nearby emergency exit after the crash. So why has seat 11A gone viral online? Turns out Thai singer and actor James Ruangsak Loychusak — who was one of the survivors of a deadly 1998 Thai Airways plane crash — sat in the same seat. 'That was an uncanny coincidence,' he told India's The Telegraph Online after the crash. 'The kind that gives you goosebumps.' CBC Kids News was not able to confirm that he was actually sitting in seat 11A, but it turns out it may not really matter. Check the video below to find out more about seat 11A from CBC Kids News contributor Ainara Alleyne. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ Why your seat choice doesn't really matter Aviation experts say plane crashes are random, and any seat can improve your survivability depending on the unique aspects of a crash. These include things like the way the aircraft breaks apart, the type of impact, where someone is sitting and timing, for example. All about airplanes: Aviation experts answer kids' questions about flying 'Each accident is different, and it is impossible to predict survivability based on seat location,' Mitchell Fox, a director at Flight Safety Foundation, a U.S.-based non-profit, told Reuters. Two men in plane crashes more than 20 years apart both survived sitting in seat 11A. On the left is the recent crash involving a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner aircraft in Ahmedabad, India. The image on the right depicts the 1998 crash of a Thai Airways Airbus A310 in Surat Thani, Thailand. Image credit: (Adnan Abidi/Reuters, and Emmanuel Dunand/AFP/Getty Images) Also, seat 11A isn't in the same spot on every airplane and may not always be as close to an emergency exit. That being said, experts say sitting near an emergency exit can improve chances of evacuation in less severe crashes. In any case, don't let all this talk of crashes scare you — flying is still by far the safest mode of transportation. You're more likely to be struck by lightning than end up in a plane crash, experts say. Have more questions? Want to tell us how we're doing? Use the 'send us feedback' link below. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ With files from Natalie Stechyson/CBC News
National Post
14 hours ago
- National Post
Allow total foreign ownership of domestic-only Canadian airlines: Competition Bureau report
Canada should allow up to 100 per cent foreign ownership of domestic-only airlines in a bid to lower fares and boost flight options, the Competition Bureau says in a new report highlighting the country's 'highly concentrated' aviation industry. Article content In a market study released Thursday, the watchdog suggested a new class of airline that operates only in Canada but has owners outside its borders, opening the gate to global expertise — and cash. Article content Article content Article content The current foreign ownership cap sits at 49 per cent, with sovereignty and national security often cited as the reason. In addition, no more than 25 per cent of a domestic carrier can be owned by any one foreign entity, a proportion the Competition Bureau proposed raising to nearly half. Article content Article content 'Allowing more foreign investment in Canadian airlines improves access to capital, drives growth and promotes competition,' the report said, pointing to Australia and New Zealand as places that permit full outsider ownership of in-country carriers. Article content 'As economist Michael Porter famously put it, unless a firm is forced to compete at home, it will usually lose its competitiveness abroad,' Brad Callaghan, an associate deputy commissioner at the Competition Bureau, said during a press briefing. Article content Weak competition in the airline industry remains a big hurdle to lower prices and better service across the country, and remote communities especially, the report found. Article content Article content 'Competition in Canada's airline sector has struggled to take off,' it said, noting consumers' dissatisfaction with ticket prices, service quality and range of flight choice. Article content Air Canada and WestJet together account for between half and three-quarters of all domestic passengers at major airports, according to the study. Article content Though competition improved between 2019 and 2023 with the arrival of Flair Airlines and the expansion of Porter Airlines, market concentration remains 'extremely high' and competition from new entrants fragile, the bureau said. Article content 'Many Canadians report that international flights are often cheaper than flights within Canada' — partly due to 'cabotage' rules prohibiting point-to-point trips within Canada by foreign airlines — it noted. The watchdog proposed working with other countries to remove foreign competition restrictions in international agreements.
National Post
18 hours ago
- National Post
Why a Toronto-bound flight from Amsterdam turned back after five hours in the air
A flight this week from Amsterdam to Toronto spent more than five hours in the air before landing — in Amsterdam. The cause was a missed scheduled maintenance that was discovered while the plane was over the Atlantic Ocean, requiring it to do a U-turn and return home. Article content The aircraft, an Airbus A330-303, had already been delayed 90 minutes from its original departure time of 11:20 a.m. local time, for what should have been an eight-hour flight from Schiphol airport to Toronto. That was due to a last-minute change of plane because the air conditioning on the original one wasn't working. Article content Article content Article content But the new plane had its own issues. As reported on the website View from the Wing and elsewhere, the crew realized only en route that there was required maintenance for the aircraft that had not been performed. Article content Article content 'During flight KL691 from Amsterdam to Toronto, it was decided to return to Schiphol as a precaution after it became apparent during the flight that the replacement aircraft (PH-AKA) would reach its maintenance deadline,' the airline said in a statement. Article content 'The aircraft was fully airworthy at the time of departure,' it added. 'To prevent the license from expiring during the flight, it was decided to return to perform the maintenance in the Netherlands.' Article content The delay — more than three hours on a flight of more than 3,500 kms — means that, due to European laws, each passenger is entitled to 600 euros in compensation, as well as rebooking by the airline. Article content Article content 'Although all passengers were rebooked upon arrival, we naturally find it very unfortunate for the passengers who were affected by this,' KLM said in its statement. Article content Article content Flight data from shows that the aircraft was south of Iceland and nearly midway across the Atlantic when it turned around. Article content Last-minute aircraft swaps have caused issues in the past. View from the Wing details how, earlier this month, American Airlines swapped out a Boeing 787-8 for a similar 787-9, then sent the latter on a flight from Philadelphia to Naples, Italy. But the runway at Naples wasn't certified for the 787-9, so it had to be diverted to Rome, 200 kms to the north. Article content
