NFO Alert: Groww Mutual Fund launches Nifty 500 Low Volatility 50 ETF
Groww Mutual Fund
has announced the launch of the
Groww Nifty 500 Low Volatility 50 ETF
, an open‐ended scheme that aims to track the Nifty 500 Low Volatility 50 Index - TRI.
The
New Fund Offer
(NFO) is currently open for subscription and will close on June 11. The scheme will reopen for continuous sale and repurchase on or before June 25.
The investment objective of the scheme is to generate long-term capital growth by investing in securities of the Nifty 500 Low Volatility 50 Index in the same proportion/weightage, with the aim of providing returns (before expenses) that closely track the total return of the index, subject to tracking errors.
Best MF to invest
Looking for the best mutual funds to invest? Here are our recommendations.
View
Details
»
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Ampliar segurança e conveniência nas compras online é prioridade para 2025
Estúdio Folha
Leia mais
Undo
The scheme will be benchmarked against the Nifty 500 Low Volatility 50 Index - TRI and will be managed by Nikhil Satam, Aakash Chauhan, and Shashi Kumar.
During the NFO period, the minimum investment amount is Rs 500, with subsequent investments in multiples of Re 1. Units will be allotted in whole figures, and any balance amount, if below the minimum, will be refunded.
Live Events
The passive fund will allocate 95–100% of its assets to the constituents of the Nifty 500 Low Volatility 50 Index, and 0–5% to money market instruments, debt securities, and/or units of debt/liquid schemes of domestic
mutual funds
.
Also Read |
Fund Consistency: 29 equity mutual funds offer more than 25% CAGR over 3 and 5 years
The Groww Nifty 500 Low Volatility 50 ETF will be managed passively, with investments made in the same proportion as the index constituents. The investment strategy is to replicate the index closely and minimize tracking error through regular rebalancing based on changes in stock weights and investor flows.
The fund is suitable for investors seeking long-term capital appreciation through exposure to equity and equity-related instruments that form part of the Nifty 500 Low Volatility 50 Index.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Madhubala biopic put on hold; Makers rework budget plans - Here's what we know
The much-anticipated biopic on legendary actress Madhubala has hit a temporary roadblock. Directed by Jasmeet K Reen, who earned acclaim with her 2022 film Darlings, the film's production has been put on hold due to budgetary constraints, even though the script is reportedly complete. High Budget Causes a Pause Initially envisioned as a lavish period drama, the film was set to portray the grandeur of Madhubala's life and era, with a projected budget of Rs 80 to Rs 100 crore. However, as per News 18 reports, the production team — comprising Sony Pictures International Productions, Brewing Thoughts Pvt. Ltd., and Madhubala Pictures — found that the high costs related to period detailing, elaborate sets, and costumes could make it difficult to recover the investment. Reportedly the recovery math didn't add up and the budget had to be re-evaluated. Searching for a Middle Ground Reportedly, the team is now working hard to redesign the financial plan without compromising on the essence of the story. 'The goal is to honour Madhubala's legacy while keeping the project financially viable. The budget is now being slashed to almost half,' said a source. As a result, casting discussions with top female actors — previously underway — have been temporarily paused until the revised plan is finalised. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo Despite the financial pause, the spirit behind the project remains strong. Reportedly, the team is hopeful about taking the film on floors by the second quarter of this year, once the numbers make sense. The biopic aims to highlight her iconic performances and stardom and also to shed light on her personal struggles and challenges as a woman in a male-dominated industry. Madhubala 87th birth anniversary: Here's a look at some lesser-known facts about the timeless actress
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ticketing blunder: Spicejet slapped with Rs 30,000 penalty over rerouting error; senior citizen compensated for ‘mental harassment'
Representative image A consumer commission in Mumbai has ordered budget airline SpiceJet to pay Rs 25,000 as compensation and Rs 5,000 towards litigation costs to a senior citizen who suffered mental agony and financial loss after being issued an incorrect ticket during a rerouted journey in December 2020, reported news agency PTI. The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (Suburban), in its June 17 order, held SpiceJet guilty of 'deficient service and negligent behaviour' that caused 'mental harassment' to the passenger, even though the original flight cancellation was due to bad weather and beyond the airline's control. The complainant, a senior citizen from Ghatkopar, had booked round-trip tickets from Mumbai to Darbhanga. While the outbound journey was completed, the return flight was cancelled. SpiceJet arranged alternate travel via Patna and Kolkata, but the ticket was issued incorrectly, causing a missed connection. Upon reaching Patna, the complainant was informed that his connecting flight from Kolkata to Mumbai was scheduled to depart before his arrival in Kolkata. This led to him booking another flight at his own expense and missing an important PhD online examination in Mumbai. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo He approached the consumer panel seeking a refund of Rs 14,577, Rs 2 lakh for mental agony, and Rs 25,000 towards litigation expenses. While the commission acknowledged the airline's efforts to reroute the journey and later reimburse the complainant, it ruled, 'The opposite party is guilty of deficient service and negligent behaviour by issuing an incorrect ticket, which threw the complainant in an unwarranted mental harassment.' It also noted that the complainant had a role in the error. 'Had the complainant checked the ticket when it was issued, the mistake could have been rectified on the spot,' the panel stated. Despite this, the commission concluded that the passenger deserved compensation for the ordeal and directed the airline to pay a total of Rs 30,000. The ruling comes at a time when SpiceJet is recovering financially. The airline reported a standalone profit after tax of Rs 324.87 crore in the March 2025 quarter, nearly three times its profit in the same period last year. This marked its second consecutive profitable quarter and its first full-year profit in seven years. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Three unknowns for America and the world after Trump's strike on Iran
President Donald Trump has claimed a "spectacular military success" in destroying three sites in Iran; we'll see if that's true. What is clear is that he has pushed America into a war with Iran that he acknowledges may escalate. Beyond doubts about the legal basis for bombing Iran, I see risks for America and the world ahead revolving around three fundamental unknowns. The first uncertainty is how Iran will strike back at the United States. Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, previously promised, "The harm the U.S. will suffer will definitely be irreparable if they enter this conflict militarily." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like New mobile air conditioner requires no installation (search now) Air Condition | Search Ads Search Now Undo Iran has many options, including attacks on U.S. bases in Iraq, Bahrain and elsewhere in the region. It could also mount cyberattacks, strike U.S. embassies or support terrorist attacks. Another option would be to seek to close the Strait of Hormuz, fully or partly, by attacking shipping or by laying mines. That could be a blow to the world economy, for one-quarter of the world's oil passes through the strait. Experts have told me that they believe the United States could, over time, reopen the strait, but there might be economic and other costs. When Iran mined the strait in 1988, a mine crippled a U.S. Navy frigate, the Samuel B. Roberts. Live Events When the United States assassinated Qassem Soleimani, a top Iranian general, in 2020, Iran launched a missile barrage at American bases in Iraq. A Ukrainian passenger jet was hit by accident, killing all 176 people aboard. My guess is that Iran may want to strike back harder this time, partly to try to reestablish deterrence, but its capacity to do so may be more limited. Israeli strikes might have impaired its ability to mine the strait, for example, and doing so would also impede Iran's oil shipments to China, annoying its friends in Beijing. But it's worth remembering something James Mattis, a defense secretary in Trump's first term, once said: "No war is over until the enemy says it's over. We may think it over, but in fact, the enemy gets a vote." The second uncertainty is whether the Israeli and American strikes have ended Iran's nuclear efforts or perhaps even accelerated them. That depends, in part, on whether the bombing of Fordo and other sites was as successful as Trump claimed, and that may take time to figure out. It was not clear beforehand that even 30,000-pound American bunker busters would be sufficient to destroy the Fordo enrichment site, which is buried deep in a rock mountain. We also don't know if Iran has other centrifuges in another, unknown site. There's broad agreement that a nuclear-armed Iran would be a disaster and would lead other countries in the region to develop their own weapon programs. But Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, publicly said this spring that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon; he was dismissive of that. The risk is that Israeli and American attacks on Iran lead that country to decide it does need nuclear weapons. After all, if it had nuclear weapons, Israel would have been far less likely to bomb it. Iran has already enriched enough fissile material to a high level for as many as 10 nuclear weapons, according to experts; that material was believed to be in the city of Isfahan. Trump said the U.S. struck Isfahan, but it's not clear whether the site was destroyed. The third and final question is the largest: Is this the end of the conflict or the beginning? Optimists such as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel seem to believe that he and the United States can end both Iran's nuclear program and the Iranian regime. Then again, Netanyahu was a strong supporter of the Iraq War and thought that would bring change to Iran as well; instead, the Iraq War benefited Iran. Even if Iran's enrichment capacity is gone, the expertise to enrich uranium is probably not possible to extinguish. So if the regime remains, this may be more of a setback than an end to the nuclear program. As for the idea that bombing will destroy the regime, there's not much sign of that. Iranian dissidents, like Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi, decried the bombing last week and called on Trump to stop the bombing, not join it. In my travels in Iran, I've seen how unpopular the regime is. Iran -- at the popular level -- has always struck me as one of the most pro-American countries in the region, precisely because the government is so resented for corruption, hypocrisy and economic incompetence. That pro-Americanism seemed to bode well for the future, after the death of the supreme leader. But a pro-American government seems less likely if we have waged war on Iran. Indeed, regime change might look more like a hard-line coup than anything else. Once again, the range of possibilities is immense, with some quite alarming. Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., framed the risks this way: "While we all agree that Iran must not have a nuclear weapon, Trump abandoned diplomatic efforts to achieve that goal and instead chose to unnecessarily endanger American lives, further threaten our armed forces in the region and risk pulling America into another long conflict in the Middle East. The U.S. intelligence community has repeatedly assessed that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon. There was more time for diplomacy to work." That seems right to me. Trump's speech was triumphant, but it's much too early to be celebrating, and far too much uncertainty remains.
