Three unknowns for America and the world after Trump's strike on Iran
President Donald Trump has claimed a "spectacular military success" in destroying three sites in Iran; we'll see if that's true. What is clear is that he has pushed America into a war with Iran that he acknowledges may escalate.
Beyond doubts about the legal basis for bombing Iran, I see risks for America and the world ahead revolving around three fundamental unknowns.
The first uncertainty is how Iran will strike back at the United States. Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, previously promised, "The harm the U.S. will suffer will definitely be irreparable if they enter this conflict militarily."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
New mobile air conditioner requires no installation (search now)
Air Condition | Search Ads
Search Now
Undo
Iran has many options, including attacks on U.S. bases in Iraq, Bahrain and elsewhere in the region. It could also mount cyberattacks, strike U.S. embassies or support terrorist attacks.
Another option would be to seek to close the Strait of Hormuz, fully or partly, by attacking shipping or by laying mines. That could be a blow to the world economy, for one-quarter of the world's oil passes through the strait. Experts have told me that they believe the United States could, over time, reopen the strait, but there might be economic and other costs. When Iran mined the strait in 1988, a mine crippled a U.S. Navy frigate, the Samuel B. Roberts.
Live Events
When the United States assassinated Qassem Soleimani, a top Iranian general, in 2020, Iran launched a missile barrage at American bases in Iraq. A Ukrainian passenger jet was hit by accident, killing all 176 people aboard.
My guess is that Iran may want to strike back harder this time, partly to try to reestablish deterrence, but its capacity to do so may be more limited. Israeli strikes might have impaired its ability to mine the strait, for example, and doing so would also impede Iran's oil shipments to China, annoying its friends in Beijing.
But it's worth remembering something James Mattis, a defense secretary in Trump's first term, once said: "No war is over until the enemy says it's over. We may think it over, but in fact, the enemy gets a vote."
The second uncertainty is whether the Israeli and American strikes have ended Iran's nuclear efforts or perhaps even accelerated them. That depends, in part, on whether the bombing of Fordo and other sites was as successful as Trump claimed, and that may take time to figure out.
It was not clear beforehand that even 30,000-pound American bunker busters would be sufficient to destroy the Fordo enrichment site, which is buried deep in a rock mountain. We also don't know if Iran has other centrifuges in another, unknown site.
There's broad agreement that a nuclear-armed Iran would be a disaster and would lead other countries in the region to develop their own weapon programs. But Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, publicly said this spring that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon; he was dismissive of that.
The risk is that Israeli and American attacks on Iran lead that country to decide it does need nuclear weapons. After all, if it had nuclear weapons, Israel would have been far less likely to bomb it.
Iran has already enriched enough fissile material to a high level for as many as 10 nuclear weapons, according to experts; that material was believed to be in the city of Isfahan. Trump said the U.S. struck Isfahan, but it's not clear whether the site was destroyed.
The third and final question is the largest: Is this the end of the conflict or the beginning?
Optimists such as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel seem to believe that he and the United States can end both Iran's nuclear program and the Iranian regime. Then again, Netanyahu was a strong supporter of the Iraq War and thought that would bring change to Iran as well; instead, the Iraq War benefited Iran.
Even if Iran's enrichment capacity is gone, the expertise to enrich uranium is probably not possible to extinguish. So if the regime remains, this may be more of a setback than an end to the nuclear program.
As for the idea that bombing will destroy the regime, there's not much sign of that. Iranian dissidents, like Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi, decried the bombing last week and called on Trump to stop the bombing, not join it.
In my travels in Iran, I've seen how unpopular the regime is. Iran -- at the popular level -- has always struck me as one of the most pro-American countries in the region, precisely because the government is so resented for corruption, hypocrisy and economic incompetence.
That pro-Americanism seemed to bode well for the future, after the death of the supreme leader. But a pro-American government seems less likely if we have waged war on Iran. Indeed, regime change might look more like a hard-line coup than anything else. Once again, the range of possibilities is immense, with some quite alarming.
Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., framed the risks this way: "While we all agree that Iran must not have a nuclear weapon, Trump abandoned diplomatic efforts to achieve that goal and instead chose to unnecessarily endanger American lives, further threaten our armed forces in the region and risk pulling America into another long conflict in the Middle East. The U.S. intelligence community has repeatedly assessed that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon. There was more time for diplomacy to work."
That seems right to me. Trump's speech was triumphant, but it's much too early to be celebrating, and far too much uncertainty remains.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
2 F-5 jets downed, key military sites hit: Israel gives 24-hour recap; shares video of strikes on Iran
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) on Sunday said it had destroyed two Iranian fighter jets and eight ballistic missile launchers in a sweeping overnight operation that targeted dozens of military installations across Iran. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The strikes, carried out by 20 Israeli fighter jets, reportedly hit key sites including Dezful and Isfahan airports. According to the IDF, the Israeli Air Force bombed two Iranian F-5 fighter jets at Dezful Airport, while missile launchers prepared for imminent strikes on Israel were also neutralised. 'This morning, the IAF struck missile launchers ready to launch toward Israeli territory, soldiers in the Iranian Armed Forces, and swiftly neutralised the launchers that launched missiles toward Israel,' the IDF said in a statement. Additional targets included explosive production sites, weapons storage and air defence systems. Military infrastructure at Isfahan Airport was also hit to prevent the Iranian Air Force from using the facility. The escalation came just hours after the United States entered the fray, striking three nuclear sites in Iran — Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz — in a coordinated effort with Israel. President Donald Trump declared that Iran's nuclear programme had been 'completely and fully obliterated,' although no independent damage assessment has yet been released. Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation confirmed the attacks but said its programme would continue. The UN nuclear watchdog reported no signs of radioactive leakage but confirmed it would continue monitoring. Following the US strikes, Iran launched a retaliatory barrage of 40 missiles targeting Israeli cities, including Haifa and Tel Aviv. Over 80 people were reportedly injured. Israel said it had 'swiftly neutralised' the launchers responsible and began a new wave of strikes on western Iran. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Trump described the joint offensive as a historic moment. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three nuclear sites in Iran… All planes are safely on their way home,' he posted online. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised the US President's bold move, calling it a decision that 'will change history.' Meanwhile, Iran's foreign ministry condemned the attacks, warning that the US had 'launched a dangerous war' and reserved the right to respond 'with full force.' The situation has sparked growing international concern, with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres calling the strikes a 'dangerous escalation' and warning of 'catastrophic consequences.'
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Weekly Horoscope (June 23 – June 29): Predictions for Snake Chinese Zodiac
The Snake is wise, calm and observant. This week, your choices must come from peace, not fear. Anxiety may try to confuse you, but when you act from your deeper truth, success will follow. Do not rush. The stars suggest that when you move with quiet intention, even big problems become small. Trust your inner knowing. When decisions feel light, they are right. Let your calm mind guide the way forward. Weekly Career Horoscope for Snake Chinese Zodiac For career, Snakes will benefit by choosing quality over speed. You may feel pressure to match others' pace, but that can lead to anxiety. Pick tasks and roles that align with your real values. Professions involving strategy, counselling, writing or research will suit you. If you feel overworked, slow down and realign. Saying 'no' is also a wise act. Look for work that respects your thinking style and gives you space to shine quietly. Weekly Love Horoscope for Snake Chinese Zodiac In love, Snakes should listen to the feeling under the surface. You often hide your emotions, but this week asks for clear connection. Make decisions based on peace, not worry. If in a relationship, speak about what really matters. Your love life will grow when you feel secure in yourself. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo True love will not cause anxiety. Let calm hearts meet. Weekly Money Horoscope for Snake Chinese Zodiac Money will be more stable if you plan slowly. The Snake should not invest from fear or copy others' actions. Instead, make choices that fit your situation calmly. This week is not for gambling or guessing. If your work is aligned with your values, money will come naturally. Do not spend to escape emotions—use your money mindfully. Small steps bring stable success. Weekly Education Horoscope for Snake Chinese Zodiac In education, Snake students need a peaceful space to focus. Too much noise or pressure can disturb your inner clarity. Choose subjects that interest you truly, not just those that sound impressive. Your memory is strong, but anxiety can block understanding. Study at your own pace. Use breaks to stretch or listen to soft music. Make a schedule that includes calm time. You will shine when you study with balance, not stress. Weekly Health Horoscope for Snake Chinese Zodiac For health, Snakes should take care of nerves, digestion and skin. Worry can show up in your stomach or as restlessness. Eat simple and warm meals. Avoid too much coffee or cold drinks. Skin may become dry—use coconut oil or natural creams. Gentle yoga, tai chi or walking in the morning will refresh you. Talk out your thoughts to someone close. Inner calm is your medicine this week. Move from anxiety to alignment. Discover everything about astrology at the Times of India , including daily horoscopes for Aries , Taurus , Gemini , Cancer , Leo , Virgo , Libra , Scorpio , Sagittarius , Capricorn , Aquarius , and Pisces .
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
What are the nuclear contamination risks from attacks on Iran?
President Trump announced U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, including Fordow, joining earlier Israeli attacks. Experts suggest limited contamination risks from strikes on uranium enrichment facilities, mainly chemical rather than radiological. Gulf states are especially concerned about potential contamination of desalinated water sources if the Bushehr reactor is hit, prompting high alert and emergency plans. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads WHICH IRANIAN NUCLEAR SITES HAVE BEEN HIT SO FAR? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads WHAT RISKS DO THESE STRIKES POSE? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads WHAT ABOUT NUCLEAR REACTORS? WHY ARE GULF STATES ESPECIALLY WORRIED? President Donald Trump said Iran's main nuclear sites had been "obliterated" in military strikes overnight, including on the deeply buried Fordow facility, as the U.S. joined attacks launched by Israel on June have said military strikes on Iran's uranium enrichment facilities pose limited risks of contamination, and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said on Sunday no increased off-site radiation levels had been reported following the U.S. U.S. military struck sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Trump said Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities had been "completely and totally obliterated". The attacks follow previously announced Israeli attacks on nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan, Arak and Tehran says it aims to stop Iran building a nuclear bomb and the U.S. says Tehran would not be allowed to get such weapons. Iran denies ever seeking nuclear international nuclear watchdog IAEA has previously reported damage to the uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, the nuclear complex at Isfahan that includes the Uranium Conversion Facility and to centrifuge production facilities in Karaj and has also attacked Arak, also known as Khondab. The IAEA said Israeli military strikes hit the Khondab Heavy Water Research Reactor, which was under construction and had not begun operating, and damaged the nearby plant that makes heavy IAEA said it was not operational and contained no nuclear material, so there were no radiological effects. Heavy-water reactors can be used to produce plutonium which, like enriched uranium, can be used to make an atom to Reuters before the U.S. strikes took place, experts said Israel's attacks had posed limited contamination risks so Dolzikova, a senior research fellow at London think-tank RUSI, said attacks on facilities at the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle - the stages where uranium is prepared for use in a reactor - pose primarily chemical, not radiological enrichment facilities, UF6, or uranium hexafluoride, is the concern."When UF6 interacts with water vapour in the air, it produces harmful chemicals," she said. "In low winds, much of the material can be expected to settle in the vicinity of the facility; in high winds, the material will travel farther, but is also likely to disperse more widely. The risk of harmful chemicals being dispersed is lower for underground facilities."Simon Bennett, who leads the civil safety and security unit at the University of Leicester in Britain, said risks to the environment were minimal when subterranean facilities are hit because you are "burying nuclear material in possibly thousands of tonnes of concrete, earth and rock".James Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said that before uranium goes into a nuclear reactor it is barely radioactive. "The chemical form uranium hexafluoride is toxic ... but it actually doesn't tend to travel large distances and it's barely radioactive," he on enrichment facilities were "unlikely to cause significant off-site consequences", he said, while stating his opposition to Israel's major concern would be a strike on Iran's nuclear reactor at Bushehr on the Gulf of catastrophe rippled through the Gulf on June 19 when the Israeli military said it had struck a site in Bushehr, only to say later that the announcement was a says it wants to avoid any nuclear Wakeford, honorary professor of epidemiology at the University of Manchester, said that while contamination from attacks on enrichment facilities would be "mainly a chemical problem" for the surrounding areas, extensive damage to large power reactors "is a different story".Radioactive elements would be released either through a plume of volatile materials or into the sea, he of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace said an attack on Bushehr "could cause an absolute radiological catastrophe".For Gulf states, the impact of any strike on Bushehr would be worsened by the potential contamination of Gulf waters, jeopardising a critical source of desalinated potable Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is on high alert to monitor for any possible environmental contamination after the attacks, said a source with knowledge of the matter. There have been no signs of radiological contamination so far, the source said, adding that the GCC had emergency plans in place in case of a threat to water and food security in the the United Arab Emirates, desalinated water accounts for more than 80% of drinking water, while Bahrain became fully reliant on desalinated water in 2016, with 100% of groundwater reserved for contingency plans, authorities is also 100% dependent on desalinated Saudi Arabia, a much larger nation with a greater reserve of natural groundwater, about 50% of the water supply came from desalinated water as of 2023, according to the General Authority for some Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia, Oman and the UAE have access to more than one sea to draw water from, Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait are crowded along the shoreline of the Gulf with no other coastline."If a natural disaster, oil spill, or even a targeted attack were to disrupt a desalination plant, hundreds of thousands could lose access to freshwater almost instantly," said Nidal Hilal, professor of engineering and director of New York University Abu Dhabi's Water Research Center."Coastal desalination plants are especially vulnerable to regional hazards like oil spills and potential nuclear contamination," he said.
