Experts warn of hidden health risks of alcohol-free beverages
Many people who don't want to spend Sunday with a hangover choose alcohol-free beverages as they believe them to be the healthier choice.
Many of us like to frequent a beer garden when the sun is in the sky and have a good old catch up with friends and family we haven't seen in a while. While some of us might choose to have a cheeky cocktail or pint in the warm weather, others choose to go with an alcohol-free alternative.
While these drinks won't cause you to have a hangover the next day, many people choose to buy the beverage as they believe it to be the healthier choice. However, this may not be entirely true, especially if they are consumed without moderation.
While sales of the booze-free alternatives are soaring, health experts are worried that many people are unaware of the harm these drinks can cause to our health.
New research has uncovered that regularly drinking alcohol-free beer, especially those that are wheat-based or the 'mixed' varieties that are flavoured with fruit soda, could actually cause a significant increase to the risk of developing heart problems and type 2 diabetes, reports the Mirror.
UK pubs in 2023 alone sold 120million pints of booze-free beer, which was a 14 per cent hike from the year before. In comparison to sales in 2019, this is a staggering 77.8 per cent increase.
Scientists are wary of the alcohol-free beverages as, if drunk regularly, the sugar and calorie content can be damaging to your health.
In a recent study, 44 healthy men were asked to consume either two bottles or water or alcohol-free beer each day for four weeks. Each of the men received blood tests throughout the trial to track any changes in their metabolic health.
The results showed that those who drank the booze-free beer showed an increase in the levels of insulin in their blood, which can be linked to type 2 diabetes. Blood sugar levels were also seen to rise, as well as levels of triglycerides, which is a type of fat associated with cardiovascular disease.
According to the group of international researchers - from the University of California, San Diego, Germany's Knappschaft Kliniken and the University of the Basque Country - the negative effects were seen to be largely driven by excess sugar and calories in some alcohol-beer beers.
Reported in the Nutrients journal, the team said: "Non-alcoholic beers are gaining popularity as alternatives to alcoholic beverages, yet their metabolic and health effects compared to no consumption of these drinks remain unclear."
The problem seems to come from the way that alcohol-free drinks are made. As removing the alcohol can take away the flavour, brewers will often add sugar and flavourings to improve the taste. However, in some cases these can contain more sugar than their boozy alternative.
For example, a 330ml bottle of Erdinger Alkoholfrei contains nearly 12g of sugar, which is more than seven times the 1.65g in the brand's standard Weissbier.
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
Drinkaware is advising consumers to check the labels of their drinks carefully. They said: "It's important to understand the calories in any drink don't just come from alcohol, so you only 'save' calories if the substitute drink is a 'low-calorie' one."
However, Dr Richard Piper, chief executive of Alcohol Change, had stressed that not all of the booze-free drinks on the market are as bad, with many low-alcohol beers and wines containing less sugar than soft drinks.
Speaking to The Times, he said: "The latest study compared the metabolic effects of low/no beers with water, but orange juice typically contains 13.8g and cola about 11g of sugar per 100ml, more than many no-alcohol beverages.
"If you choose wisely you can have a low-alcohol drink with 135 times less sugar than the same volume of fruit juice."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Cannabis users more likely to die of heart disease, study reveals
Marijuana users are up to twice as likely to have a stroke, heart attack, or die from heart disease, research has revealed. University of California scientists found there was a 29 per cent higher risk of conditions like heart attack, a 20 per cent higher risk for stroke and double the risk of dying from heart disease among cannabis users. The study, published in Heart, reviewed 24 studies involving 200 million people to investigate the relationship between the drug and the diseases. The researchers warned that the study 'raises serious questions about the assumption that cannabis imposes little cardiovascular risk'. The reviewed studies, which ranged from 2016 to 2023, included people aged between 19 and 59 years old. The research did not specify if the marijuana exposure was from smoking the drug or other forms of consumption. In 2023, the American College of Cardiology revealed that people who smoke marijuana or eat weed-laced edibles daily are a third more likely to develop coronary artery disease (CAD). CAD is the most common form of heart disease – cholesterol narrows the arteries supplying blood to the organ, causing chest pain, shortness of breath and fatigue. The significant link remained regardless of whether users smoked tobacco, drank alcohol, had major cardiovascular risk factors, and no matter their age or sex. Whether users took cannabis by smoking the drug, eating edibles, or other methods also made no difference. The American College of Cardiology researchers said people should let their doctors know if they use the drug, so clinicians can start monitoring heart health. Dr Ishan Paranjpe, resident physician at Stanford University and the study's lead author, said: 'We found that cannabis use is linked to CAD, and there seems to be a dose-response relationship in that more frequent cannabis use is associated with a higher risk of CAD. 'In terms of the public health message, it shows that there are probably certain harms of cannabis use that weren't recognised before, and people should take that into account. 'From a scientific standpoint, these findings are exciting because they suggest there might be new drug targets and mechanisms we can explore to take control of this pathway going forward.'
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Nuclear troops given unnecessary x-rays in Britain's first atomic bomb test
A hidden document has revealed that troops were given unnecessary x-rays on their way to take part in Britain's first atomic bomb test in the 1950s Troops were given potentially harmful x-rays in a secret biological monitoring programme as part of Cold War weapons tests. Hundreds of Royal Engineers were ordered to submit to the medical examinations without any clinical reason or benefit. The evidence has emerged from a medical officer's journal, hidden for decades at the Atomic Weapons Establishment behind top secret security classifications. Thousands of servicemen were subject to similar orders as Britain developed its nuclear arsenal over the decade that followed. Pam Hill, whose dad Jim Stephenson took part in Operation Hurricane in 1952, said: 'He was sent to do his duty and he did it. Afterwards he had serious gut problems, and 40 years of a severe lung disease which eventually killed him. Seven months are missing from his medical records. It was always on his mind that the whole lung thing was caused by being out at Montebello. If he had chest x-rays at the time, it might have answered all our questions.' Jim's lung condition, bronchiectasis, can be caused by radiation. His children have also suffered unexplained illness, with miscarriages, coeliac disease, and spinal issues. His teenaged grandson has almost no adult teeth. While the cancer risk of an x-ray is small, it increases if done repeatedly. It can be justified only if there is a therapeutic benefit - and for healthy troops already examined and found to be A1-fit, there was none. The Mirror 's three-year investigation of the Nuked Blood Scandal has already uncovered thousands of blood and urine tests given to troops, with the results withheld from their medical records. Now we can reveal there was a third and potentially-harmful form of monitoring, using x-rays. If men had damage as a result of inhaling radioactive particles, it could show up as dark shadows on their lungs. What happened to healthy people living amid fallout was unknown, but since 1947 human experiments have needed informed consent, full communication of the risks involved, and the right to withdraw. A consultant radiologist told the Mirror: 'There was a clear understanding at the time that radiation caused tumours. From a military standpoint you'd probably get ethical approval because it's an unknown and there were civil defence concerns. You would want to know what proportion later developed a problem, what the damage was, whether it rectified itself or led to longer term damage. There would always be a duty of care to the patients. 'To not keep those records long-term would be considered a massive breach of research protocol. There would be redress, and punitive fines. Perhaps more importantly for the veterans, someone would have looked at all these x-rays and made an assessment, written a report on the outcomes. Where is that now?' READ MORE: Video emerges of Defence Secretary saying nuke veterans scandal "shames us as a country" The medical journal covers the weeks shortly before Operation Hurricane in 1952, Britain's first nuclear bomb test, which detonated in the hull of an old warship off the Montebello Islands in Australia. Just over 200 Royal Engineers were ordered to join the fleet, to build jetties, camps and laboratories near Ground Zero. The journal states: 'They came aboard only a few hours before we sailed, and I did not discover until after that it is not a routine in the army to have the chest x-rayed at yearly intervals. Accordingly I had them all done at Royal Naval Hospital Malta.' The log was discovered on a top secret database at the Atomic Weapons Establishment, locked on the grounds of national security risks. Labour ministers have ordered the entire archive to be published, but have not commented on why it was a state secret, or why it is not one any more. The Ministry of Defence has spent decades denying it experimented on troops. Few survive from that first operation, and government studies have found they have increased risks of bladder, skin, stomach and 'unspecified' cancers. They also have elevated rates of suicide. Jim's former comrade, Dixie Kidd, 92, said: 'At one point after the bomb we were ordered on to shore to collect things the scientists had left behind, tins of food, raw vegetables. Others were picking up dead sea birds. After we left, I was in a contingent ordered to take readings from the things we had found, two hours on, two hours off. The numbers were to establish the radioactive half-life. 'On the way home, our pay books were taken off us and they put into each one we had been exposed to 5 rads of radiation. All of us the same. I wondered how that was possible, and why I never got ill when so many of my mates did.' Documents seen by the Mirror state that anyone with a dose over 5 rads could no longer be employed on the operation. A higher recorded dose may also have led to war pensions. Another ex-sapper, Eric Waterfield, from 71 Field Squadron, has seen his daughters suffer reproductive issues. He said: 'Three years after Hurricane, a surgeon found a growth in my lung. He said it was better in the bucket than in my chest, so he had it out, and that was the last I heard of it. If there were chest x-rays, it might explain things.' The bogus classification of information about the experiments is now the subject of a criminal complaint to the Met Police, which is considering further action. The missing medical records are being sought in a civil suit estimated to cost the MoD up to £5bn in aggravated damages. Campaign group LABRATS has asked the Prime Minister for a meeting to find a cheaper, quicker route to truth and justice, but has received no reply. Founder Alan Owen said: 'This biological monitoring was done to see what would happen to the British civilian population if attacked. Troops were the only people who could be ordered into fallout and told to stay there, under threat of a court martial. 'We have found veteran after veteran has medical records that are missing this vital data. Without it, medical diagnosis and treatment are harder and war pensions next to impossible. 'All we want is for the most mistreated veterans in British history to get a fair deal - to be heard, to get justice, and to get an apology.' A spokesman for the MoD said: 'The Minister for Veterans and People has commissioned officials to look into unresolved questions regarding medical records as a priority, and this is now underway. This work will enable us to better understand what information the department holds regarding medical testing of service personnel.'
Daily Record
7 hours ago
- Daily Record
Experts warn of hidden health risks of alcohol-free beverages
Many people who don't want to spend Sunday with a hangover choose alcohol-free beverages as they believe them to be the healthier choice. Many of us like to frequent a beer garden when the sun is in the sky and have a good old catch up with friends and family we haven't seen in a while. While some of us might choose to have a cheeky cocktail or pint in the warm weather, others choose to go with an alcohol-free alternative. While these drinks won't cause you to have a hangover the next day, many people choose to buy the beverage as they believe it to be the healthier choice. However, this may not be entirely true, especially if they are consumed without moderation. While sales of the booze-free alternatives are soaring, health experts are worried that many people are unaware of the harm these drinks can cause to our health. New research has uncovered that regularly drinking alcohol-free beer, especially those that are wheat-based or the 'mixed' varieties that are flavoured with fruit soda, could actually cause a significant increase to the risk of developing heart problems and type 2 diabetes, reports the Mirror. UK pubs in 2023 alone sold 120million pints of booze-free beer, which was a 14 per cent hike from the year before. In comparison to sales in 2019, this is a staggering 77.8 per cent increase. Scientists are wary of the alcohol-free beverages as, if drunk regularly, the sugar and calorie content can be damaging to your health. In a recent study, 44 healthy men were asked to consume either two bottles or water or alcohol-free beer each day for four weeks. Each of the men received blood tests throughout the trial to track any changes in their metabolic health. The results showed that those who drank the booze-free beer showed an increase in the levels of insulin in their blood, which can be linked to type 2 diabetes. Blood sugar levels were also seen to rise, as well as levels of triglycerides, which is a type of fat associated with cardiovascular disease. According to the group of international researchers - from the University of California, San Diego, Germany's Knappschaft Kliniken and the University of the Basque Country - the negative effects were seen to be largely driven by excess sugar and calories in some alcohol-beer beers. Reported in the Nutrients journal, the team said: "Non-alcoholic beers are gaining popularity as alternatives to alcoholic beverages, yet their metabolic and health effects compared to no consumption of these drinks remain unclear." The problem seems to come from the way that alcohol-free drinks are made. As removing the alcohol can take away the flavour, brewers will often add sugar and flavourings to improve the taste. However, in some cases these can contain more sugar than their boozy alternative. For example, a 330ml bottle of Erdinger Alkoholfrei contains nearly 12g of sugar, which is more than seven times the 1.65g in the brand's standard Weissbier. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Drinkaware is advising consumers to check the labels of their drinks carefully. They said: "It's important to understand the calories in any drink don't just come from alcohol, so you only 'save' calories if the substitute drink is a 'low-calorie' one." However, Dr Richard Piper, chief executive of Alcohol Change, had stressed that not all of the booze-free drinks on the market are as bad, with many low-alcohol beers and wines containing less sugar than soft drinks. Speaking to The Times, he said: "The latest study compared the metabolic effects of low/no beers with water, but orange juice typically contains 13.8g and cola about 11g of sugar per 100ml, more than many no-alcohol beverages. "If you choose wisely you can have a low-alcohol drink with 135 times less sugar than the same volume of fruit juice."
