Sacramento's Cosumnes River Preserve could be impacted by U.S. sale of federal land for housing
U.S. considers selling more than 16 million acres of federal land in California for housing
U.S. considers selling more than 16 million acres of federal land in California for housing
U.S. considers selling more than 16 million acres of federal land in California for housing
SACRAMENTO — The U.S. Senate is considering selling over 16 million acres of federal land in California to turn into housing, including in Sacramento.
The plan is part of President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," or budget reconciliation bill, which proposed putting over 250 million acres of public land in western states for sale, including land governed by the Bureau of Land Management U.S. Forest Service.
The spot in Sacramento that could be impacted is the Consumnes River Preserve.
"We were out there for about three hours this morning and it's a prize. It's really something worth saving," said Josh Schermerhorn, who was enjoying the Consumnes River Preserve with his wife Kathy on Tuesday.
Senators who support this bill said selling federal land will generate upward of $10 billion for the government.
"The thought of the sale of public lands is pretty un-American," said Katie Hawkins, California program director of the Outdoor Alliance.
Hawkins said they are suspicious of the proposal because there are no safeguards in the plan that would prevent pretty much anyone from buying it.
"Whether it's extraction, timber sales or if it's development for wealthy developers or even foreign interest," said Hawkins.
Her other concern is whether the land is really meant to be built on. Historically, the area has seen flooding with waters spreading across nearby wetlands and rice fields.
"I think flooding is natural," said kayaker Kather Schermerhorn. "This is an area that's not hurting anybody and to let it be natural."
Mike Lee, a Republican Senator from Utah, has been pushing for the federal land to be sold, but not everyone in his party is on board.
"It is so important that the acquisition or disposition of any of these lands be made only after significant and meaningful local input," said Republican California Rep. Kevin Kiley.
Kiley openly opposed the idea on the House floor several weeks ago. The House voted against it, but the proposal is still alive on the Senate side.
"We have other places where housing could be built and it doesn't have to be on a pristine, precious preserve," said Kathy.
A staff member from one of the 10 organizations within the Consumnes River Preserve Partnership told CBS13 that the land is not meant to be built on and thinks solving the housing crisis should not cost Americans losing natural gems.
Other California land that could be impacted includes parts of Lake Tahoe, Yosemite and Joshua Tree.
Democratic U.S. Senator Alex Padilla sent CBS13 this statement about the proposal:
"Make no mistake, this latest Republican proposal is riddled with anti-environment provisions meant to create the largest public land sell off in recent memory to subsidize their tax cuts for billionaires. If Republicans have their way, we will never get our public lands back once they are privatized. Our public lands and natural spaces are some of our nation's greatest gifts and I will do everything I can do to protect them."
The Senate has until July 4 to decide on this bill.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Packaging Corporation of America Underperforming the Nasdaq?
Valued at $16.8 billion by market cap, Packaging Corporation of America (PKG), based in Lake Forest, Illinois, operates as a leading U.S. producer of containerboard and corrugated packaging. Operating through its Packaging and Paper segments, PKG provides essential products like shipping containers and protective packaging to industries such as food, beverages, and industrial goods. Companies worth $10 billion or more are generally described as "large-cap stocks." PKG fits right into that category, with its market cap exceeding the threshold, reflecting its substantial size and influence in the competitive industry of packaging & containers. 2 Outstanding Stocks Under $50 to Buy and Hold Now Nvidia's Bringing Sovereign AI to Germany. Should You Buy NVDA Stock Here? A $1 Billion Reason to Buy MicroStrategy Stock Here Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now! PKG currently trades 25.8% below its all-time high of $250.82 recorded on Nov. 25, 2024. PKG's stock has declined 5.8% over the past three months, notably underperforming the Nasdaq Composite's ($NASX) 11.7% uptick during the same time frame. In the long term, PKG stock has declined 17.3% on a YTD basis, underperforming the Nasdaq's 1.2% increase. Moreover, shares of PKG grew marginally over the past 52 weeks, also underperforming NASX's 9.4% returns over the same period. To confirm its recent downturn, PKG has been trading below its 200-day moving average since early March and below its 50-day moving average since mid-June, with some fluctuation in recent months. Despite reporting better-than-expected financials, PKG stock prices observed a marginal dip in the trading session after the release of its Q1 results on Apr. 22. The company's packaging sales experienced a solid boost during the quarter, leading to its net sales growing 8.2% year-over-year to $2.1 billion, surpassing the Street's expectations by a thin margin. Meanwhile, driven by a favorable pricing mix, its margins observed a significant expansion. This led to its adjusted EPS soaring 34.3% year-over-year to $2.31, exceeding the consensus estimates by 4.5%. Following the initial dip, PKG stock prices rose 2.2% in the subsequent trading session. Its rival, Ball Corporation (BALL), has declined 10.3% over the past year, underperforming PKG. Among the nine analysts covering the PKG stock, the consensus rating is a 'Moderate Buy.' Its mean price target of $210.22 suggests a 12.9% upside potential from current price levels. On the date of publication, Aditya Sarawgi did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Medicare go-broke date pushed up three years in latest trustees report
This story was originally published on Healthcare Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Healthcare Dive newsletter. A key trust fund underpinning Medicare's hospital benefit will go broke three years earlier than previously expected absent congressional action, threatening benefits for seniors, according to the Medicare trustees' annual report released Wednesday. The Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund will be depleted in 2033, instead of 2036, as Medicare spending continues to outpace the program's income, the trustees — a group comprised of the HHS, Treasury and Labor secretaries, along with the Social Security commissioner — warned. The bleaker outlook is due to higher-than-expected spending for hospital care, hospice services and physician-administered drugs. The trustees called on Congress to act quickly to stabilize Medicare, though near-term action is unlikely as the Republican majority focuses on advancing their reconciliation megabill. Medicare has been teetering on the edge of insolvency for a while. But the latest report from Medicare's trustees is more dire than last year's, which projected Medicare would become insolvent in more than a decade. Now, Medicare's hospital trust fund will start running out of money in eight years — when today's 57-year-olds first become eligible for the program. The looming go-broke date is a result of the fund's substantial shortfall as Medicare costs continue to grow rapidly, trustees said in the report. Medicare costs are expected to increase from 3.8% of the gross domestic product in 2024 to 6.2% in 2050 before reaching 6.7% in 2099, the report projects. Costs to another fund that pays Parts B and D, called the Supplemental Medical Insurance trust fund, are also climbing, increasing pressure on beneficiary budgets and the federal budget. (Though, the Supplemental Medical Insurance trust fund is largely funded by premiums and general revenue that resets each year and doesn't face the same solvency concerns.) This year's estimates, which are based on current payment rates, could be conservative, trustees said. Under an alternate scenario, in which provider payments grow at a rate more consistent with underlying medical costs — a change aggressively lobbied for by physician associations — Medicare spending will rise to 8.8% of the GDP in 2099 rather than 6.7%, according to the report. The precarious footing of the federal insurance program, which covers almost 69 million people in the U.S., is due to the country's underlying demographic shifts, according to experts. More and more Americans are aging into Medicare, while at the same time the number of workers paying into its trust fund is dropping. More seniors are also selecting privatized Medicare Advantage plans, which are more expensive than traditional Medicare coverage. If and when the U.S. hits Medicare's go-broke date, the hospital trust fund, which pays hospitals and providers of post-acute services and also covers some of the cost of private Medicare Advantage plans, will have inadequate income to fund those benefits. Medicare payments would immediately be cut by 11%, according to the report. Those cuts would grow over time, likely disrupting services for seniors and reimbursement for providers. It's worth nothing that there's a significant degree of uncertainty in trustees' projections, which vary based on macroeconomic forces in a given year. For example, in 2020, in the early throes of COVID-19, the board predicted the hospital trust fund would run out by 2026. That deadline was pushed back to 2028 and then 2031 in subsequent years' reports, amid a broader economic rebound and more care shifting to cheaper outpatient settings. Still, the fund hasn't met the trustees' test for short-range financial adequacy since 2003, and has triggered funding warnings since 2018. To date, Congress has not allowed Medicare to go under. But legislators' lack of action despite years of warnings is a source of heartburn for budget hawks, Medicare advocates and physician lobbies. Experts say lawmakers need to act soon given many reforms to stabilize Medicare could take a few years to go into effect. 'The projections in this report show that change is needed to address Medicare's financial challenges,' the Medicare trustees wrote in their report. 'The sooner solutions are enacted, the more flexible and gradual they can be.' According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, restoring Medicare solvency would require Congress to boost the payroll tax rate by 14% or reduce Medicare spending by 9% — both politically unappetizing proposals. Other reforms that could curb Medicare spending, like implementing site-neutral payments or reducing overpayments in MA, have more bipartisan support but aren't a policy priority on the Hill. Republicans are currently focused on hammering out legislation to extend tax cuts from President Donald Trump's first term, cut green energy programs, fund border control and curb Medicaid spending. 'We are running out of time to phase in changes gradually and avoid harsh cuts, sharp tax increases, or unacceptable borrowing. Demagoguing this issue may be politically expedient, but it will ultimately prove ruinous for the tens of millions of Americans that rely on the programs,' Maya MacGuineas, the president of the CRFB, said in a statement Wednesday. Recommended Reading Medicare go-broke date extended to 2036, but warning bells continue ringing
CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
Suspect in Minnesota lawmaker attacks was a ‘prepper' who had drafted a ‘bailout plan' for wife, according to court filing
The man charged in the killings of a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband one week ago was a 'prepper' and had at some point given his wife a 'bailout plan' in case of 'exigent circumstances,' according to an FBI agent investigating the case. The term 'prepper' refers generally to someone who stockpiles materials and makes plans to survive some future disaster or doomsday event. In a newly unsealed affidavit obtained by CNN affiliate WCCO, FBI agent Terry Getsch wrote that Boelter and his wife were preppers and that Boelter's established 'bailout plan' instructed his wife to go to her mother's home in Wisconsin. The affidavit does not imply that Boelter's wife knew about her husband's alleged plans to attack the lawmakers, and she has not been charged with any crime. After last Saturday's shootings, Boelter's wife was pulled over by law enforcement 'while traveling with her four children to visit friends northwest of the metro area,' Getsch wrote. She consented to a search of their car, in which investigators found two handguns, passports for Boelter's wife and their children and about $10,000 in cash. During an interview, Boelter's wife said that she received a group text message from Boelter in a thread with their kids. 'Dad went to war last night … I don't wanna say more because I don't wanna implicate anybody,' one text from Boelter to members of his family read, according to a federal complaint unsealed earlier this week. The affidavit also revealed that at roughly 9 a.m. on Saturday, Boelter visited a bank in Robbinsdale, Minnesota, and withdrew all $2,200 he had in a bank account in his name. A third party whose name is redacted in the affidavit drove Boelter from the bank. Boelter was driven to the bank by a person listed as 'Witness 1' in a previously unsealed court document, the same person who authorities say sold Boelter an electric bike and Buick sedan, which was found during the 43-hour manhunt last weekend. Authorities said earlier this week Boelter is believed to have carried out the attacks on lawmakers alone, but noted investigators would 'fully explore' to ensure that was the case. CNN reached out to the Brooklyn Park Police Department for an update on the investigation. Boelter, 57, faces both federal and state charges. Investigators found 'voluminous writings' in Boelter's home and car, but no clear manifesto has been uncovered, according to Acting US attorney Joseph Thompson. The notebooks contained the names of more than 45 Minnesota state and federal public officials, 'mostly or all Democrats,' according to the complaint. Some listed had ties to Planned Parenthood and the abortion rights movement. Boelter made his first appearance in federal court on Monday. He faces six federal charges, including murder, stalking and firearms offenses. He has not yet entered a plea and CNN has reached out to the federal public defender representing him for comment. Boelter is scheduled to appear in federal court in St. Paul, Minnesota, for a preliminary detention hearing on Friday.
