Amid support from doctors group, bill to clarify Texas' abortion ban does little to save lives, critics say
A bipartisan bill to clarify exceptions to the state's near-total abortion ban garnered widespread support Thursday from health care professionals and abortion opponents who said the bill would remove any hesitation doctors might have to save a pregnant woman's life.
Critics, meanwhile, told lawmakers that Senate Bill 31 doesn't go far enough to protect women facing pregnancy-related medical emergencies and even quietly resurrects 160-year-old laws that could be used to criminalize those who have undergone an abortion or have helped those who receive an out-of-state abortion.
At a state Senate committee hearing Thursday, SB 31's author Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola, said Texas law already creates a medical exception to the state's abortion ban, allowing doctors to intervene when the life of a pregnant patient is at risk. The proposed legislation, Hughes said, simply reiterates that exception and 'removes any question and hesitation' among doctors and hospitals about when they can provide medical care to pregnant patients.
'There's a mom and there's a baby, and we want to love and respect and protect them both,' Hughes said during the Senate Committee on State Affairs hearing. 'That's what this is really about.'
At least three women have died and dozens more have shared stories of medical care delayed or denied since Texas banned nearly all abortions after the overturn of Roe v. Wade in 2022. The law as currently written allows a doctor to perform an abortion to save the life of a pregnant patient, but with stiff penalties for violations — life in prison, hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines and the loss of their medical license — doctors have been unsure of when they can safely intervene.
SB 31, called the Life of the Mother Act, would not expand access to abortion or modify the existing near-total bans. Instead, it purports to better explain when doctors can intervene to perform a medically necessary abortion.
The bill would more clearly explain that doctors can remove an ectopic pregnancy or the remains of a fetus after a miscarriage, and aligns the definition of a medical emergency with existing state law. It also clarifies that doctors and lawyers can talk with a patient about a medically necessary abortion without running afoul of the law.
The bill also states that doctors are not required to delay, alter or withhold life-saving medical treatment to try to preserve the life of the fetus, and brings into state law previous guidance from the Texas Supreme Court, which ruled that nothing in the law required the medical emergency to be imminent or irreversible before a doctor could intervene. It also proposes continuing education requirements for lawyers and doctors to better educate them on interpreting and applying these laws.
The bill has garnered bipartisan support from Democratic lawmakers, anti-abortion groups, medical associations, doctors and other health care providers.
Medical practitioners and pro-life advocates worked together on the language of the bill, according to Lisa Kaufman, executive director and general counsel for the Texas Civil Justice League, one of the organizations that helped draft the bill. Kaufman said SB 31 would provide doctors with the confidence they need to act in a timely manner.
'There has been a breakdown of the implementation of pro-life law and we want to address that here with Senate Bill 31,' said John Seago, president of Texas Right to Life and one of a handful of individuals invited to testify for the proposed legislation.
The bill would also help recruit and retain the OB-GYN workforce, said Julie Ayala, an East Texas doctor who testified on behalf of herself and the Texas Medical Association.
One in five Texas OB-GYNs have considered leaving Texas and 13% are planning to retire early because of the state's abortion laws, according to a Manatt Health survey published in October 2024.
While the bill has the support of some doctors, some Texas mothers and University of Texas at Austin law students voiced opposition to the bill on Thursday, saying it does little to protect women and could dissuade young people from starting families in Texas.
Amanda Zurawski, who sued Texas over its abortion laws after doctors refused to end her nonviable pregnancy, questioned whether SB 31 would have allowed for a different outcome in her situation. Zurawski was 18 weeks pregnant when she experienced preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, a condition that is fatal to the fetus and poses significant risks to the pregnant patient. Zurawski went into sepsis and spent three days in the intensive care unit.
'It is unclear whether Senate Bill 31 would have prevented my trauma and preserved my fertility had it existed in 2022,' Zurawski said, pointing out that the bill does not include specific language about fetal anomalies. 'I do believe the bill comes from a place of concern, but I believe the bill is flawed and should be improved.'
Mary Rolfson Taylor, a law student at the University of Texas at Austin, told lawmakers about her experience with an ectopic pregnancy that ultimately led her to undergo an emergency surgery to remove part of her fallopian tube. SB 31 includes a requirement that physicians document the gestational age and location of the fetus to diagnose an ectopic pregnancy before providing an abortion-inducing drug, a provision that Taylor said could force doctors to delay providing life-saving care.
'I, to this day, don't know my fetus' gestational age and did not know the location of the fetus until after the surgery,' Taylor said.
SB 31 states that physicians can perform an abortion on a patient who faces 'a serious risk of substantial impairment to a major bodily function,' but does not clarify what exactly that means, said Karly Bruder, a law student at the University of Texas at Austin who also testified against the bill.
Bruder and others told lawmakers that Texas' abortion ban has led people to leave the state out of fear of what kind of care they can expect if they become pregnant.
'Doctors and health care professionals are leaving the state in droves because they are afraid,' said another University of Texas at Austin law student, Gwynn Marotta. 'There is a maternal health care crisis taking place and pregnant people will continue to die… the blood is on your hands because of these bans and because of these bills.'
Bruder was one of several at the hearing who also raised concerns that the bill would breathe new life into an unresolved legal question about the status of Texas' pre-Roe abortion laws.
Texas' current abortion laws prohibit criminalizing or otherwise going after the person who undergoes the abortion. But, the pre-Roe statutes leave the door open to criminalizing the person who terminated their pregnancy, and criminalizes anyone who 'furnishes the means' for an illegal abortion. Texas' abortion funds — nonprofit groups that help pay for out-of-state abortions — have argued in court that this clause could be used to pursue criminal charges against them.
These laws, originally written in the 1800s, were put on ice by the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Roe v. Wade. They remained on the books but unenforced for almost 50 years. In 2004, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the laws were 'repealed by implication,' a ruling that a federal district judge reiterated in 2023.
But Attorney General Ken Paxton, conservative lawmakers and anti-abortion attorneys argue these pre-Roe statutes went back into effect as soon as Roe was overturned. There was a lawsuit challenging this question in court immediately after the decision, but it was never fully resolved.
SB 31's clarifying language would apply to the pre-Roe statutes, as well as the more recent bans, raising concerns from some reproductive rights advocates that it's a backdoor attempt to more fully revive these laws.
Elizabeth Sepper, a law professor at the University of Texas at Austin, said she's skeptical that Republican lawmakers see that as a necessary step, since they believe these laws are fully in effect.
'If they didn't include language about the pre-Roe statute, then I think we would have tons of resistance from people who are concerned about reassuring doctors, because then they're still going to worry that they could face enforcement under the pre-Roe law,' she said. 'I don't see this as a meaningful step to change the status of that law.'
A companion bill, House Bill 44, has not yet been scheduled for a committee hearing. The committee also heard clashing testimony on two other bills cracking down on abortion pills, out-of-state travel and other ways Texans are evading the abortion ban.
Disclosure: Texas Civil Justice League, Texas Medical Association and University of Texas at Austin have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
We can't wait to welcome you to the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Step inside the conversations shaping the future of education, the economy, health care, energy, technology, public safety, culture, the arts and so much more.
Hear from our CEO, Sonal Shah, on TribFest 2025.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
31 minutes ago
What to know about debate over protesters and ICE agents wearing masks amid immigration crackdowns
CHICAGO -- President Donald Trump and his allies have repeatedly called for mask-wearing at protests to be banned and for protesters whose faces are covered to be arrested, with the most recent push following demonstrations in Los Angeles over immigration raids. Legal experts told The Associated Press there are a variety of reasons people may want to cover their faces while protesting, including to protect their health, for religious reasons, to avoid government retaliation, to prevent surveillance and doxing, or to protect themselves from tear gas. With legislative action happening across the U.S., they say it's only a matter of time before the issue returns to the courts. Protesters, meanwhile, have voiced anger over footage of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents covering their faces at immigration raids and masked officers at the Los Angeles protests, calling it a double standard. Here are some things to know about the debate over face masks: At least 18 states and Washington, D.C., have laws that restrict masks and other face coverings in some way, said Elly Page, senior legal adviser with the International Center for Not-For-Profit Law. Since October 2023, at least 16 bills have been introduced in eight states and Congress to restrict masks at protests, according to the center. Many of these laws date back to the 1940s and '50s when many states passed anti-mask laws as a response to the Ku Klux Klan, whose members hid their identities while terrorizing victims. Amid protests against the war in Gaza and the Republican president's immigration policies, Page said there have been attempts to revive these rarely used laws to target protesters, sometimes inconsistently. Trump's calls to arrest protesters for wearing masks came as federal agents were seen donning masks while conducting raids in Los Angeles and other U.S. cities. Democratic lawmakers in California have introduced legislation aiming to stop federal agents and local police officers from wearing face masks amid concerns that ICE agents were attempting to hide their identities and avoid accountability for potential misconduct during high-profile immigration raids. The issue also came up at a congressional hearing on June 12, when Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat, criticized ICE agents wearing masks during raids, saying: 'Don't wear masks. Identify who you are.' Republican federal officials have maintained that masks protect agents from doxing. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin called the California bill 'despicable." Geoffrey Stone, a University of Chicago law professor, said the U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that the right to free speech includes the right to speak out anonymously. But he said how it should apply to protesters wearing masks remains 'an unresolved First Amendment question.' For Stone, that raises a key question: Why should protesters and ICE agents be subject to different rules? 'The government doesn't want them to be targeted because they engaged in their responsibilities as ICE agents,' Stone said. 'But that's the same thing as the argument as to why you want demonstrators to wear masks. They want to wear masks so they can do their 'jobs' of engaging in free speech properly. The same rationale for the officers wearing masks should apply to the protesters.'
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Senate parliamentarian rejects GOP attempt to authorize states to conduct immigration enforcement
The Senate parliamentarian has rejected several more provisions in the Republican megabill to enact President Trump's agenda, including language authorizing states to conduct border security and immigration enforcement, which traditionally have been duties of the federal government. Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough also ruled against language in the bill that would increase the Federal Employees Retirement Systems (FERS) contribution rate for new civil servants if they do not agree to give up civil-service protections to become at-will employees. Additionally, the parliamentarian advised against a section of the bill that would allow the executive branch to reorganize federal government agencies — or eliminate whole agencies — without congressional oversight. The parliamentarian ruled these provisions violate the Byrd Rule and are not eligible to pass the Senate with a simple-majority vote on the procedural fast track known as budget reconciliation. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, hailed the parliamentarian's rulings. 'There is no better way to define this Big Beautiful Betrayal of a bill than families lose, and billionaires win. Democrats are on the side of families and workers and are scrutinizing this bill piece by piece to ensure Republicans can't use the reconciliation process to force their anti-worker policies on the American people,' Merkley said in a statement. 'The Byrd Rule is enshrined in law for a reason, and Democrats are making sure it is enforced,' he said. The parliamentarian additionally rejected a provision granting authority to agencies to unilaterally rescind funds appropriated by Congress by establishing an incentive program for federal employees to identify 'unnecessary expenditures' and transfer savings back to the Treasury Department. And she ruled against language in the bill mandating the sale of all U.S. Postal Service electric vehicles and charging infrastructure.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
‘Hollywood' may challenge Preckwinkle
Happy Monday, Illinois. We're back at it, wretched heat be damned. TOP TALKER EXCLUSIVE: Rickey Hendon, the former Illinois state senator and Chicago alderman, has started an exploratory committee for a possible run against Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle in the 2026 Democratic primary. 'It may be time for a change, so yeah, I'm looking at it seriously. I've talked to some people and they're trying to get me to get back in,' Hendon told your Playbook host. 'I have the apparatus to get signatures overnight, and I feel pretty good about my chances if I decide to pull the trigger.' They call him 'Hollywood': Hendon, who's known for his outgoing style, served as a Chicago alderman and in the state Senate — he once famously got in a shoving match with then-Sen. Barack Obama on the Senate floor. Most recently, Hendon has been battling behind the scenes as a campaign consultant. He's also a businessman involved in the cannabis industry. At the plate: Hendon, who led the state legislative softball team in his day, still plays the game five days a week. It's proof, says the 71-year-old, that he's ready to play ball on the Cook County Board. Hendon says he'll make his decision on running before the July 17-18 slating by Cook County Democrats. That's when candidates introduce themselves to get the endorsement of the powerful party organization (which, by the way, is led by Preckwinkle). Preckwinkle, who is 78, is running for her fifth term and so far has no challengers, though Ald. Brendan Reilly also confirmed he's still 'very seriously considering' jumping into the race. The political take: A three-way race could make the contest difficult for Preckwinkle. THE BUZZ BEYOND THE BLAST: President Donald Trump's decision to bomb nuclear sites in Iran over the weekend has divided Illinois elected officials along party lines. Republican U.S. Reps. Mike Bost, Darin LaHood and Mary Miller all praised the airstrikes, with Miller echoing Trump's words: 'peace through strength.' Democrats in the Illinois congressional delegation were critical, with Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Iraq War veteran, calling the bombings 'illegal' and Sen. Dick Durbin blaming Trump for Iran developing dangerous weapons when he 'killed the Iran nuclear deal, which required mandatory inspections.' Congresswoman Robin Kelly, who's running for Senate, said Trump's decision to strike Iran 'will not lead to peace but rather cause more violence, destruction and conflict in the Middle East.' And Congressman Mike Quigley, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said 'diplomacy' not attacks 'is critical to global security.' Watch for Congress to take up the issue of Trump authorizing the bombings without having constitutional approval. The debate comes as lawmakers are still trying to nail down a budget reconciliation bill. The ripple effect: In Illinois, Gov. JB Pritzker said in a post that he has requested the Illinois State Police and federal and local law enforcement officials to update him 'on any potential physical and cyber threats to the homeland that could affect Illinois' as a result of the attacks. RELATED Trump floats regime change in Iran, muddying the administration's message, by POLITICO's Felicia Schwartz and Amy Mackinnon Oil prices jump as market awaits Iran response to attacks, by POLITICO's Ben Lefebvre If you are Mike Bost, Playbook would like to hear from you! Email: skapos@ WHERE'S JB No official public events WHERE's BRANDON At 5405 West Madison Avenue at 9:45 a.m. to attend the One Fair Wage celebration — At 317 North Clark at 5:55 p.m. for the Black Business Roundtable Lakeside Chat Where's Toni No official public events Have a tip, suggestion, birthday, new job or a (gasp!) complaint? Email skapos@ BUSINESS OF POLITICS — Rahm Emanuel confronts 'awkward' prospect of facing a home-state rival in the 2028 presidential race: 'Look, JB and I are friends,' Emanuel said. The two recently had dinner, he noted. They text. 'We're going to continue to be friends, but if we're running for the same position, it will be awkward,' he told NBC News' Natasha Korecki. — In IL-09: Howard Rosenblum, a civil rights attorney, announced this morning that he's running as a Democrat for Congress for the seat now held by retiring U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky. 'I know how important equality under the law and full opportunity through civil rights is. My legal experience fighting back is exactly what we need in Washington right now,' said Rosenblum, who served on the U.S. Access Board during the Obama administration and was appointed to the Illinois Human Rights Commission by Gov. JB Pritzker. — REMATCH: Maria Peterson, a Democrat, is launching her campaign for state representative in the 52nd District, which is represented by Republican state Rep. Martin McLaughlin. In 2024, McLaughlin defeated Peterson by 47 votes. 'Since the last election, I have committed countless hours to electing Democrats locally. ... I am ready to take this and years of fighting for our community to Springfield,' Peterson said in a statement. Among her endorsers: former Gov. Pat Quinn. The full list is here. — State Rep. Charlie Meier, a conservative Republican from southern Illinois, has announced his re-election bid. The 109th District lawmaker who's served since 2013 says he wants to address 'higher taxes, threats to our freedoms [and] radical policies coming out of Chicago are making life harder and more expensive for the rest of us.' — County contest: Ted Mason says he's been endorsed by the National Democratic County Officials in his campaign for Cook County commissioner, 15th District. The NDCO is the campaign arm of the Democratic Party. ILLINOIS' POPE — Pope Leo XIV warns of the dangers of AI on youth, by POLITICO's Nicole Markus THE STATEWIDES — Medicaid helps keep this toddler alive and at home. Federal cuts could put it all at risk: Little Marely 'requires 24/7 care after receiving a heart transplant covered by Medicaid. The U.S. Senate is considering slashing the program,' by WBEZ's Kristen Schorsch. — ICE took her mother. Now, a 6-year-old is left without a guardian or legal path back to reunite in Honduras, by the Tribune's Laura Rodríguez Presa and Nell Salzman — No surprise: Despite moves by Indiana lawmakers, Illinois' borders unlikely to change, by the Tribune's Dan Petrella — Alexi Giannoulias, the Illinois secretary of state, headlined on the national MeidasTouch podcast. The subject: The Trump administration sweeps by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Los Angeles and Chicago. Watch here — The richest men in Illinois and the billion-dollar sports betting grudge: 'Neil Bluhm's grudge against FanDuel and DraftKings has lasted for at least a decade, driven millions of dollars in political donations, and found validation from another of Illinois' wealthiest men: the governor,' by Legal Sports Report's Eric Ramsey. Why Illinois Republicans are suing Democrats over 'gut-and-replace maneuver' in the General Assembly: Republicans want to prevent Senate Bill 328 (which Republicans say is anti-business) from being signed into law because it passed after midnight on the last day of session with a maneuver 'that allowed the majority party to avoid proper due process such as committee hearings and public input,' via the State Journal-Register's Tom Ackerman. — DAY IN COURT: State Sen. Emil Jones III to face retrial on bribery charges in 2026 — when he'll also be up for reelection, by the Tribune's Jason Meisner — A vehicle miles traveled tax may be what's needed to fix roads in Illinois — and across the country, by Andrew Leahey for Forbes — SOUNDS FAMILIAR: In 1894 Pullman strike, Illinois' governor fought president's decision to send in troops, by Robert Loerzel for the Tribune CHICAGO — Mayor Brandon Johnson's transportation chief departing City Hall: 'Tom Carney's departure follows several other high-profile exits in the Johnson administration this year,' by the Tribune's Alice Yin. — Embattled Kenwood shelter housing migrants and homeless Chicagoans to close in coming months, by the Tribune's Nell Salzman and Caroline Kubzansky — New Chicago clinic provides 'all-trimester' abortions up to roughly 34 weeks in pregnancy, by the Tribune's Angie Leventis Lourgos — City won't say why Beat Kitchen was booted from the Riverwalk, by the Block Club's Melody Mercado — An endangered Washington Park building inspired by Frank Lloyd Wright is in need of rescue, by the Sun-Times' Lee Bey COOK COUNTY AND COLLARS — Skokie budget restores 1 percent grocery tax, hikes water rates but freezes property tax: 'Water rate is still among lowest in area, spokesperson said,' by the Pioneer Press' Richard Requena. — Supreme Court rejects suburban toy company's push for a quick decision on Trump's tariffs, by The Associated Press — From the murders to manhunt: New book examines 'human elements' of Brown's Chicken killings, by the Daily Herald's Charles Keeshan and Susan Sarkauskas TAKING NAMES — Jerry Reinsdorf, chair of the White Sox, to give deposition in Rate Field shooting lawsuit: 'Two women were wounded in a shooting in the left-field bleachers on Aug. 25, 2023. Circumstances of the shooting remain mostly unknown,' by the Sun-Times' Kade Heather. — Lisa (Garza-Weichman) Harries has been named board chair of Planned Parenthood of Illinois. Harries has served on the board since 2022. She takes over for Arielle Rodriguez Maffei, who was just appointed to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America board. Reader Digest We asked what skills make a good lieutenant governor. Claude Walker, who served as spokesperson to then-Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn: 'Versatility, curiosity, patience.' Alexander Domanskis: 'Being deferential to the governor, while being a true second-in-charge. Jim Lyons: 'Being able to tell the governor when he or she is wrong.' Mark Michaels: 'A Democrat who can step in when Pritzker goes to Washington.' Kathy Posner: 'Being able to build consensus, manage initiatives (rural affairs, military economic development and justice/equity/opportunity) and represent the governor across the state.' Timothy Thomas: 'Trustworthiness and reliability, experience in government and policy, and public speaking skills.' NEXT QUESTION: Who's a non-political person who's still powerful in politics? THE NATIONAL TAKE — The New York mayor's race will resonate far beyond the Big Apple, writes POLITICO's Jonathan Martin — Andrew Cuomo's anger is legendary. And it's powering his comeback, by POLITICO's Calder McHugh and Nick Reisman — Senate GOP slashes megabill's tax costs with new accounting method, by POLITICO's Benjamin Guggenheim IN MEMORIAM — Chicago is mourning the death of Sister Rosemary Connelly, who was a political force advocating for the Misericordia community for people with developmental disabilities. Once in front of a crowd, Connelly criticized then-Mayor Rahm Emanuel about a plan to charge a water fee to schools, churches and other institutions. After her comments, a blushing Emanuel took the stage to say, 'Ladies and gentleman, my five-minute rebuttal. I thought Jewish mothers had the corner on the market for guilt.' From the Sun-Times: 'She saw our kids as people, not as disabilities,' by Neil Steinberg From the Block Club: Misericordia is a national leader in caring for people with disabilities, by Noah Asimow — Elk Grove Village Clerk Lorrie Murphy dies at 63, by the Daily Herald's Christopher Placek — Alexander Polikoff, public-interest lawyer behind landmark CHA segregation case, dies, by Bob Goldsborough for the Tribune EVENTS — Tonight: The Illinois Democratic County Chairs' Association is holding its annual Summer Brews Reception. It's always a scene. Details here — Tonight: Peggy Flanagan, the Minnesota lieutenant governor and U.S. Senate candidate, visits Chicago for a meet-and-greet and fundraiser. Flanagan was a co-chair of the 2024 Democratic National Convention and was a close friend of slain Minnesota Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman. Details here — Tonight: LGBTQ+ rights advocate and political strategist Richard Streetman discusses Pride month and issues facing the trans community on Patti Vasquez's WCPT show at 6:30 p.m. — Wednesday: State Sen. Ram Villivalam and state Rep. Eva-Dina Delgado headline a virtual discussion titled 'Chicagoland Transit in Crisis: What is the Fix?' DePaul University's Joe Schwieterman will moderate. Details here TRIVIA FRIDAY's ANSWER: The town of Alhambra was inspired by the writings of Washington Irving? TODAY's QUESTION: Why was Alice Palmer kicked off the ballot in her last bid for the state Senate? Email skapos@ HAPPY BIRTHDAY State Rep. Mike Kelly, Ald. Scott Waguespack, former Secretary of State Jesse White, former Congressman Bob Dold, JMD Public Strategies' Joe Duffy, Indiana, Illinois and Iowa Foundation for Fair Contracting Executive Director Marc Poulos, Climate Jobs Illinois Equity Director Chynna Hampton, retired Baxter exec Valery Gallagher, D1 Capital Partners' Jeremy Katz and journalist Dawn Reiss And belated greetings to political donor and GCM Grosvenor Chair and CEO Michael Sacks, who celebrated Sunday. -30-
