MK Party warns of deeper economic crisis amid VAT suspension

Slamming the GNU's economic agenda, the MK Party accuses the ANC and DA of deepening inequality and looting, while calling for people-centered policies and the resignation of Finance Minister Godongwana.
Image: Timothy Bernard / Independent Newspapers
The uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MK Party) has welcomed the Western Cape High Court's decision to suspend the Democratic Alliance (DA)- led government's planned increase in Value Added Tax (VAT), but warns that the ruling is merely a temporary fix in the face of what it describes as a deeper economic and governance crisis.
MK Party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela says the VAT suspension, while necessary, "addresses only a symptom of a deeper crisis" and accuses the so-called Government of National Unity (GNU) of pursuing a brutal program of austerity, privatisation, and anti-poor policies.
At the centre of MK's critique is President Cyril Ramaphosa's Economic Reconstruction and Recovery Plan (ERRP), which the party calls a 'brutal blueprint for mass impoverishment.' Ndhlela said: 'Cloaked in technocratic language, the ERRP is a war against the poor, built on savage austerity, anti-worker reforms and suffocating monetary policy that has destroyed any prospect of meaningful recovery.'
The MK Party dismissed perceived policy differences between the ANC and DA as 'pure theatre,' calling them 'ideological twins committed to deepening inequality and looting the country.'
It also took aim at the South African Reserve Bank, accusing it of exacerbating the crisis through aggressive interest rate hikes that have ballooned the state's debt burden and further eroded fiscal space.
Criticising the government's priorities, the party condemned ongoing plans to privatise key state assets, including Eskom, Transnet, and water boards, arguing these moves will deny millions of South Africans access to essential services and dismantle the developmental role of the state.
Ndhlela warned that South Africa is 'on the brink of governance collapse,' citing the GNU's failure to lawfully adopt a budget for 2025/2026, which he said has plunged the economy into instability and tax chaos.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

IOL News

an hour ago

• IOL News

How international pressure fast-tracked policy changes that prioritise foreign profits over local ownership

President Cyril Ramaphosa suggests Starlink as a solution, which raises questions about the underlying motives, says the writer. Image: Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto/AFP On May 21, we witnessed an embarrassing scene of the presidential delegation in the Oval Office. Patrick Gaspard, a former American ambassador in South Africa under the Barack Obama administration, explained that Trump had turned the meeting with Ramaphosa into a "shameful spectacle" and "savaged him with some phoney snuff film and brutal rhetoric" (Gaspard, 2025). This was purportedly done to remedy the very high already present tensions between the US and South Africa that have escalated since the Trump administration took office. Interestingly, just 48 hours later, Communications Minister Solly Malatsi gazetted a new direction of policy to ICASA, permitting Starlink and other foreign investors to "harmonise" current ICT sector requirements (Department of Communications & Digital Technologies, 2025). The regulations previously demanded that at least 30% of shares be held by historically disadvantaged individuals. Current ICT Sector Rules Due to the expansive and strategic nature of the telecoms sector – controlling how South Africans communicate, access information, and participate in the digital economy – the previous requirement for foreign telecommunications licensees to sell 30% of their local subsidiaries to historically disadvantaged groups ensured that black South Africans didn't just use these services, but owned and profited from the infrastructure serving their communities (Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, 2003). ICASA's Role ICASA is the regulator of South Africa's telecommunications sector, essentially the gatekeeper that licenses all companies wanting to provide internet, phone, or TV services (Independent Communications Authority of South Africa Act, 2000). Because they enforce the ownership requirements, they're the ones who need to ease these regulations to make room for Starlink and other prospective foreign investors. As the Department of Communications & Digital Technologies noted, this wouldn't just benefit one company but would apply to all ICT companies, including those from China and the Middle East (Department of Communications & Digital Technologies, 2025). Equity Equivalent and Ownership 'Workaround' The 'sidestep' or 'harmonising' commonly referred to speaks to Equity Equivalent programmes – this is when companies are permitted to avoid giving up ownership but instead can contribute through community projects worth the same value as what that 30% ownership would have been. This usually takes the form of skills and training development, job creation, and supporting black-owned suppliers (Department of Trade, Industry and Competition, 2019). In 2019, the South African government piloted this approach through the automotive industry, where BMW, Ford, and Toyota did not have to give up ownership but instead committed to ploughing back through skills development and funding for black-owned suppliers (Automotive Industry Development Centre, 2019). Essentially, companies keep their investments, shareholding, and decision-making power, but offer communities the equivalent value of what they would have given up in ownership. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Aphelele Mtwecu, a proud member of the Activate Change Drivers Network and a2016 Activator. She is a content writer, activist Image: Supplied Contentions of Timelines and Due Processes So, how exactly does a presidential delegation meeting occur on Wednesday and have a new policy gazetted by Friday? The credibility of how this gazette played out is questionable. According to reports, the delegation included three other officials who were familiar with what Starlink would bring to the South African economy, granted this wasn't a spontaneous engagement. However, here is the problem: South Africa, with all its flaws, values and upholds consultative processes. A major economic policy shift such as this one would normally require public hearings or parliamentary reviews to protect the Republic from exactly these kinds of overnight decisions (Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, 2000). In this matter of harmonising BEE laws, regardless of existing contentions, this is an important historical policy that would impact our state of affairs deeply. It is further alarming how these kinds of events occur under the supposed sensitivity of the GNU government, where consensus-building across coalition parties should be central to major decisions. Unless it is the citizens who are blindfolded, and we simply do not know there was a prior agreement between parties to fast-track this change. Pseudo Altruism According to Statistics South Africa's latest general household survey, only 1.7% of rural households had an Internet connection at home in 2023 (Statistics South Africa, 2024). This devastating statistic has become the most compelling reason for the urgency of Starlink's operations in South Africa. As we understand it, Starlink has been piloted in some South African rural communities and has indeed yielded positive results for farmers as well as the education sector. The need is undeniable – rural communities lack the same coverage and access compared to urban areas. This digital divide is real and valid. Currently, technology optimisation is everything, especially in education, and for children to have access to connectivity is critical. But here's my question: out of all telecommunications services globally, can we prove that Starlink is the crème de la crème of satellite coverage? Have other avenues been exhausted before we convinced ourselves we had no choice? And if Starlink had indeed piloted programs in rural areas and seen the benefits, why wouldn't they yield further to South Africa's legislative and broader economic equity by accepting a BEE partner under ICT BEE laws? If rural connectivity was so important to them, why was this condition such a deal breaker? In these cases, material interests and profit margins trump everything else. And that makes me question their philanthropic intent "to save rural communities" entirely. Digital Inclusion* (*Economic Participation Sold Separately) The Department of Communications highlighted a significant issue, emphasising that the policy is not just about Starlink but is intended to address the growing digital divide. However, I do not agree with the methodology. We must ensure that our approach to digital inclusion does not compromise future sustainability. We have identified the need, but here's the broader question: how can you give a society tablets when they cannot even harvest food to sustain themselves and their families? How is this different from any other interventions that have squandered the hopes of our people, only to leave them hanging with false hope and shattered dreams? What's the point of digital inclusion without economic participation? We're essentially saying to rural youth: 'Here's access to the internet, but the profits from connecting you will flow to foreign shareholders.' This is the bread vs. bandwidth dilemma – we're trading long-term ownership for short-term access, creating dependency rather than empowerment. Communications Minister Solly Malatsi gazetted a new direction of policy to ICASA, permitting Starlink and other foreign investors to "harmonise" current ICT sector requirements (Department of Communications & Digital Technologies, 2025). Image: X / IOLGraphics Racial Capitalism in Real Time We are not oblivious to the sequence of events unfolding in the terrain we find ourselves in. The actions of certain global leaders have influenced policies that affect digital inclusion and economic participation. After our ambassador was dismissed, claims emerged about land confiscation in South Africa, which were used to support allegations of land grabs and genocide. He curtain-calls this performance to the globe, summons 'Cupcake' to the Oval Office, and at the brink of our president making pleas for him to stop, the Trump-Musk axis asks: 'What will you give us in return?' Our president suggests Starlink as a solution, which raises questions about the underlying motives. But these dynamics of power and racial manipulation speak deeply to what Cedric Robinson identified as racial capitalism, where racism isn't incidental to capitalism, but fundamental to its operation (Robinson, 2000). As Robin D.G. Kelley reflects on Robinson's work, this system not only exploits black labour but also uses black societies as laboratories for testing how far capital can push without resistance (Kelley, 2017). Du Bois saw this clearly: the colour line isn't just about prejudice, it's about who gets to own, who gets to profit, and who gets relegated to being grateful for scraps (Du Bois, 1903). We need to critically examine these issues, as seen in 2019 when BMW, Ford, and Toyota used 'equity equivalent' programs to avoid ownership responsibilities. But where's the evidence that this worked? Are there measurably more black-owned automotive companies today? Now they want us to accept the same promise in telecoms, dressed up as digital inclusion.

The Citizen

2 hours ago

• The Citizen

How to miss a miracle: Just don't try

The National Development Plan was visionary, but today its only value is as a mirror. The plan was the government's flagship strategy to create a more equal society and an environment of accelerated economic growth … Picture: Shutterstock I found a dusty copy of the original National Development Plan (NDP) published in August 2012 while moving offices last week. Paging through the 500-page glossy book, I was again reminded that it was an excellent document – well ahead of its time. But the irony is stark, as it now represents one of the biggest pipedreams in South Africa's democratic history. The plan was the government's flagship strategy to create a more equal society, with all proposals centralised to establish an enabling environment where businesses could grow and flourish to accelerate economic growth. The goal was average economic growth of over 5.4% between 2011 and 2030. Unemployment was targeted to drop to 14% by 2020 and to 6% by 2030. The government adopted the plan amid dancing girls and fireworks, proudly labelling it the magic blueprint for a prosperous future in South Africa. Read more SA expresses sadness, offers condolences to India after Air India crash [VIDEO] Well, that didn't quite happen. But it isn't a surprise. I also remember the ANC's elective conference in Mangaung a few months later, in December 2012, where Jacob Zuma was re-elected as ANC president. During his victory speech in a packed and boisterous venue, he feverishly brandished the plan in the air and shouted above the noise: 'This is the plan that will take South Africa forward.' The crowd noise tapered off and turned to discontented mumbling. A Cosatu official I had been speaking to bent down and muttered: 'It's a DA plan. It will never happen. Over my dead body.' That was nearly 13 years ago. It might as well have been the blueprint for the tallest building in the world, where the only execution was the theft of the building materials. ALSO READ: What is the National Development Plan, and will its hopes become a reality? No execution, but reviews continue … The National Planning Commission still exists, and it regularly publishes reviews of the original plan's failures. The cynic in me says it could be one commission Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana can cut as part of his austerity plan. The NDP still sports a beautiful cover, with crisp, glossy pages and an expertly crafted layout – a really professional document. Yet, despite its elegance, it has become a prime example of how a visionary and audacious plan, without execution, is ultimately not worth the paper it's printed on. It's a waste of money. Today, South Africa has no clear blueprint for its future. The government of national unity (GNU) is positive, but the leadership is currently focused on stabilising coalitions and tackling short-term crises. Beyond the immediacy, there is a vacuum of long-term strategic thinking. A positive development, however, is the GNU's stated focus on growth and job creation – core goals that echo the original intent of the NDP. ALSO READ: SA's expanding safety net: Millions more to receive social grants by 2030 Worth another (good) look Perhaps the plan's lasting value lies in its function as a mirror. If politicians and policymakers were to reread it today – really read it – they might come to a sobering realisation: the country's current economic policies are not working. This will require an aggressive reassessment of key policies: revisiting empowerment policies and frameworks, policies not to nationalise plundered and dysfunctional state-owned enterprises but to re-establish powerful, independent institutions like the Scorpions to combat corruption, and fundamentally rethinking how South Africa fights crime to restore the rule of law. We don't need another glossy plan. We need brave decisions, practical policy shifts, and the political will to act. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.

The Citizen

3 hours ago

• The Citizen

ConCourt's 'humanistic jurisprudence' source of pride, Ramaphosa

The Constitutional Court marked its 30th anniversary on Friday. As the country marked the 30th anniversary of the Constitutional Court, President Cyril Ramaphosa has called for continued recognition of the apex court's role in upholding democracy, saying its 'humanistic jurisprudence is a source of pride.' The Constitutional Court marked its 30th anniversary on Friday. Human rights Writing in his weekly newsletter, Ramaphosa discussed the threat to human rights across many parts of the world, with constitutionalism increasingly being tested. Ramaphosa stated that in March this year, the UN Human Rights Council said the 'world is facing a moment of profound instability' – characterised by conflict, democratic backsliding, declining respect for the rule of law, right-wing populism, attacks on civil society and judicial independence being undermined. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa defends transformation: 'We must dispel the false notion' Freedoms He said the council stressed the need for countries to strengthen democratic institutions charged with safeguarding fundamental rights and freedoms. 'As South Africans, we can be proud that we continue to strive to live up to this obligation. Even as we face numerous challenges, our democratic order is in good health, anchored in a progressive constitution and a Constitutional Court that continues to safeguard the rights of all'. 'Key facet' Ramaphosa said the imperative for the establishment of a specialised constitutional court was a 'key facet' of the multiparty negotiations that preceded the democratic transition. 'Whilst some believed that existing structures such as the Supreme Court could perform this task, the ANC advocated for a new court that was untainted by the past. 'Just as drafters of the constitution itself drew heavily on the experiences of other countries, when considering the model of the court, we looked to other jurisdictions for inspiration,' Ramaphosa said. 'Uniquely South Africa' Ramaphosa said while the ConCourt draws on the wisdom and support of international partners, it remains uniquely South African in its outlook, orientation, and values. The president said the court's first case in 1995, on the constitutionality of the death penalty, set the tone for a humanistic jurisprudence grounded in human dignity that endures to this day. 'In his judgment, one of South Africa's finest legal minds, South Africa's first black Chief Justice Ismail Mohamed, immortalised the vision of the new court,' Ramaphosa said. 'The South African Constitution is different,' Justice Mohamed writes. 'It retains from the past only what is defensible and represents a decisive break from, and a ringing rejection of that part of the past which is disgracefully racist, authoritarian, insular and repressive, and a vigorous identification of and commitment to a democratic, universalistic, caring and aspirationally egalitarian ethos.' Ramaphosa said throughout its 'proud history', the ConCourt has carried out its work without 'fear or favour, not hesitating to hold even the most powerful in society to account.' ALSO READ: Ramaphosa calls for dialogue to end Israel-Iran conflict