How international pressure fast-tracked policy changes that prioritise foreign profits over local ownership

President Cyril Ramaphosa suggests Starlink as a solution, which raises questions about the underlying motives, says the writer.
Image: Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto/AFP
On May 21, we witnessed an embarrassing scene of the presidential delegation in the Oval Office. Patrick Gaspard, a former American ambassador in South Africa under the Barack Obama administration, explained that Trump had turned the meeting with Ramaphosa into a "shameful spectacle" and "savaged him with some phoney snuff film and brutal rhetoric" (Gaspard, 2025).
This was purportedly done to remedy the very high already present tensions between the US and South Africa that have escalated since the Trump administration took office.
Interestingly, just 48 hours later, Communications Minister Solly Malatsi gazetted a new direction of policy to ICASA, permitting Starlink and other foreign investors to "harmonise" current ICT sector requirements (Department of Communications & Digital Technologies, 2025). The regulations previously demanded that at least 30% of shares be held by historically disadvantaged individuals. Current ICT Sector Rules
Due to the expansive and strategic nature of the telecoms sector – controlling how South Africans communicate, access information, and participate in the digital economy – the previous requirement for foreign telecommunications licensees to sell 30% of their local subsidiaries to historically disadvantaged groups ensured that black South Africans didn't just use these services, but owned and profited from the infrastructure serving their communities (Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, 2003).
ICASA's Role
ICASA is the regulator of South Africa's telecommunications sector, essentially the gatekeeper that licenses all companies wanting to provide internet, phone, or TV services (Independent Communications Authority of South Africa Act, 2000). Because they enforce the ownership requirements, they're the ones who need to ease these regulations to make room for Starlink and other prospective foreign investors. As the Department of Communications & Digital Technologies noted, this wouldn't just benefit one company but would apply to all ICT companies, including those from China and the Middle East (Department of Communications & Digital Technologies, 2025). Equity Equivalent and Ownership 'Workaround'
The 'sidestep' or 'harmonising' commonly referred to speaks to Equity Equivalent programmes – this is when companies are permitted to avoid giving up ownership but instead can contribute through community projects worth the same value as what that 30% ownership would have been. This usually takes the form of skills and training development, job creation, and supporting black-owned suppliers (Department of Trade, Industry and Competition, 2019).
In 2019, the South African government piloted this approach through the automotive industry, where BMW, Ford, and Toyota did not have to give up ownership but instead committed to ploughing back through skills development and funding for black-owned suppliers (Automotive Industry Development Centre, 2019). Essentially, companies keep their investments, shareholding, and decision-making power, but offer communities the equivalent value of what they would have given up in ownership.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Aphelele Mtwecu, a proud member of the Activate Change Drivers Network and a2016 Activator. She is a content writer, activist
Image: Supplied
Contentions of Timelines and Due Processes
So, how exactly does a presidential delegation meeting occur on Wednesday and have a new policy gazetted by Friday? The credibility of how this gazette played out is questionable. According to reports, the delegation included three other officials who were familiar with what Starlink would bring to the South African economy, granted this wasn't a spontaneous engagement.
However, here is the problem: South Africa, with all its flaws, values and upholds consultative processes. A major economic policy shift such as this one would normally require public hearings or parliamentary reviews to protect the Republic from exactly these kinds of overnight decisions (Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, 2000). In this matter of harmonising BEE laws, regardless of existing contentions, this is an important historical policy that would impact our state of affairs deeply.
It is further alarming how these kinds of events occur under the supposed sensitivity of the GNU government, where consensus-building across coalition parties should be central to major decisions. Unless it is the citizens who are blindfolded, and we simply do not know there was a prior agreement between parties to fast-track this change.
Pseudo Altruism
According to Statistics South Africa's latest general household survey, only 1.7% of rural households had an Internet connection at home in 2023 (Statistics South Africa, 2024). This devastating statistic has become the most compelling reason for the urgency of Starlink's operations in South Africa.
As we understand it, Starlink has been piloted in some South African rural communities and has indeed yielded positive results for farmers as well as the education sector. The need is undeniable – rural communities lack the same coverage and access compared to urban areas. This digital divide is real and valid. Currently, technology optimisation is everything, especially in education, and for children to have access to connectivity is critical.
But here's my question: out of all telecommunications services globally, can we prove that Starlink is the crème de la crème of satellite coverage? Have other avenues been exhausted before we convinced ourselves we had no choice?
And if Starlink had indeed piloted programs in rural areas and seen the benefits, why wouldn't they yield further to South Africa's legislative and broader economic equity by accepting a BEE partner under ICT BEE laws? If rural connectivity was so important to them, why was this condition such a deal breaker?
In these cases, material interests and profit margins trump everything else. And that makes me question their philanthropic intent "to save rural communities" entirely.
Digital Inclusion* (*Economic Participation Sold Separately)
The Department of Communications highlighted a significant issue, emphasising that the policy is not just about Starlink but is intended to address the growing digital divide. However, I do not agree with the methodology. We must ensure that our approach to digital inclusion does not compromise future sustainability.
We have identified the need, but here's the broader question: how can you give a society tablets when they cannot even harvest food to sustain themselves and their families? How is this different from any other interventions that have squandered the hopes of our people, only to leave them hanging with false hope and shattered dreams?
What's the point of digital inclusion without economic participation? We're essentially saying to rural youth: 'Here's access to the internet, but the profits from connecting you will flow to foreign shareholders.' This is the bread vs. bandwidth dilemma – we're trading long-term ownership for short-term access, creating dependency rather than empowerment.
Communications Minister Solly Malatsi gazetted a new direction of policy to ICASA, permitting Starlink and other foreign investors to "harmonise" current ICT sector requirements (Department of Communications & Digital Technologies, 2025).
Image: X / IOLGraphics
Racial Capitalism in Real Time
We are not oblivious to the sequence of events unfolding in the terrain we find ourselves in. The actions of certain global leaders have influenced policies that affect digital inclusion and economic participation.
After our ambassador was dismissed, claims emerged about land confiscation in South Africa, which were used to support allegations of land grabs and genocide. He curtain-calls this performance to the globe, summons 'Cupcake' to the Oval Office, and at the brink of our president making pleas for him to stop, the Trump-Musk axis asks: 'What will you give us in return?'
Our president suggests Starlink as a solution, which raises questions about the underlying motives.
But these dynamics of power and racial manipulation speak deeply to what Cedric Robinson identified as racial capitalism, where racism isn't incidental to capitalism, but fundamental to its operation (Robinson, 2000). As Robin D.G. Kelley reflects on Robinson's work, this system not only exploits black labour but also uses black societies as laboratories for testing how far capital can push without resistance (Kelley, 2017). Du Bois saw this clearly: the colour line isn't just about prejudice, it's about who gets to own, who gets to profit, and who gets relegated to being grateful for scraps (Du Bois, 1903).
We need to critically examine these issues, as seen in 2019 when BMW, Ford, and Toyota used 'equity equivalent' programs to avoid ownership responsibilities. But where's the evidence that this worked? Are there measurably more black-owned automotive companies today? Now they want us to accept the same promise in telecoms, dressed up as digital inclusion.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The South African

24 minutes ago

• The South African

SARS makes LATE auto-assessment change for tax season 2025

In a move set to simplify tax filing for millions of South Africans, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) has announced the rollout of a new 'Express Access' feature on its eFiling platform ahead of the 2025 tax season. The new functionality is aimed at providing faster, easier, and more intuitive navigation for individual taxpayers – especially those eligible for SARS' growing auto-assessment system. Launching with the 2025 filing season, the 'Express' tab will appear directly on the taxpayer's eFiling landing page. It will serve as a one-stop hub for: Viewing auto-assessments for 2025 Submitting current or previous years' tax returns Updating personal and banking information quickly SARS said the move aligns with its broader goals of modernising tax administration, improving voluntary compliance, and creating clarity and certainty for taxpayers. With auto-assessments continuing to expand, SARS is gearing up to process a record number of automated returns this year. Starting on Monday, 7 July, taxpayers with straightforward tax profiles will receive pre-populated returns based on third-party data from banks, employers, and financial institutions. If the information is accurate, all the taxpayer needs to do is accept the assessment. A refund – if applicable – will then be paid within 72 hours. If SARS is owed money, the platform will provide seamless payment options through eFiling or the MobiApp. Should the taxpayer dispute any part of the auto-assessment, they can reject it and file a manual return. Taxpayer type Opens Closes Auto-assessments 7 July 2025 20 July 2025 Individuals 21 July 2025 20 October 2025 Provisional 21 July 2025 19 January 2026 Trusts 21 July 2025 19 January 2026 SARS has also urged all taxpayers to verify and update their banking and contact details, highlighting that incorrect information could result in delayed refunds or failed communications. 'Without correct contact details, taxpayers may miss critical messages, such as audit notifications, payment reminders, or penalty notices,' the agency warned. Missing these could lead to penalties, legal action, or loss of tax compliance status. In a statement, SARS said that 'Express Access' is part of its larger digital transformation strategy. 'Our aim is to provide effortless digital engagement and ensure taxpayers can fulfil their obligations quickly and securely,' the agency noted. The tax authority has also committed to continued investment in automated systems, secure messaging, and real-time verifications to further reduce errors, delays, and compliance risks. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

TimesLIVE

35 minutes ago

• TimesLIVE

From fallen giants to giant-killers: Botafogo's remarkable revival

Once Brazilian football royalty, Botafogo had languished for decades as a debt-ridden sleeping giant before they toppled Paris St Germain at the Club World Cup to cap a resurrection tale three years in the making. When American entrepreneur John Textor acquired the club in 2022, fresh from their promotion back to Brazil's first division, he took on a training ground so decrepit that then-coach Luis Castro dismissed it as 'good for parking cars'. That was alongside crushing liabilities exceeding one billion reais (R3.3bn). Botafogo were a storied but shattered institution. The club that once nurtured Brazilian greats — Garrincha, Zagallo, Jairzinho and Nilton Santos, architects of three World Cup triumphs — was drowning in debt, having endured the humiliation of relegation three times in just over a decade. On Thursday, they outplayed European champions PSG to win 1-0 in the Club World Cup's most eye-catching upset, propelling themselves to the top of the tournament's 'group of death' and on the verge of the knockout stage. PSG did not see Igor Jesus coming 🫣 #FIFACWC #CWC2025 #SSFootball — SuperSport Football ⚽️ (@SSFootball) June 20, 2025 Their squad, assembled through shrewd bargain-hunting in football's forgotten corners, now faces Diego Simeone's Atletico Madrid in Los Angeles on Monday, sitting comfortably, knowing even a two-goal defeat would still secure their passage to the round of 16. The victory over PSG vindicated Textor's vision, outlined in a Reuters interview three years prior, of 'beating the system' through astute scouting in under-explored talent pools. The architects of Thursday's victory exemplified this approach. Match-winner Igor Jesus arrived as a free agent after three anonymous years in the UAE and was transformed into a Brazil international. Argentinian defender Alexander Barboza, who neutralised PSG's vaunted attack, was plucked from Paraguay's Club Libertad for nothing. Captain Marlon Freitas came from second-division Atletico Goianiense, while experienced European campaigners Alex Telles and Allan were revitalised after spells in Middle Eastern leagues. Gregore, Jefferson Savarino, John and Cuiabano were all signed for under 2m (R41.5m) each. 'The goal is to be sustainably competitive every year,' Botafogo CEO Thairo Arruda told Reuters. 'With a top six payroll, we produce like a top three.' The transformation extends far beyond the pitch. Revenues have soared from 140 million reais in 2022 to projected earnings exceeding 1.1 billion by 2025, while liabilities have been slashed by 40%. Textor's Eagle Football empire also encompasses stakes in Ligue 1's Olympique Lyonnais and Premier League Crystal Palace. Botafogo's Renaissance — crowned by last year's domestic and continental double — has breathed new life into a club motto once heavy with self-pity: 'There are things that only happen to Botafogo.' After outclassing Europe's elite, those words now carry an altogether sweeter resonance.

Eyewitness News

43 minutes ago

• Eyewitness News

Ramaphosa believes democratic order in SA still in 'good health' despite various challenges

Babalo Ndenze 23 June 2025 | 9:56 Cyril Ramaphosa Constitutional Court Democracy President Cyril Ramaphosa delivered the keynote address at the 30th anniversary of the establishment of the Constitutional Court on 20 June 2025. Picture: @OCJ_RSA/X CAPE TOWN - President Cyril Ramaphosa believes the democratic order is still in "good health" in the country despite various challenges being faced. Ramaphosa said this year marks a bold new chapter in the country's journey from apartheid to a democracy, as it's been 30 years since the Constitutional Court convened for the first time. READ: Ramaphosa: The Constitution is a guardian watching over SA's legal health He was writing in his weekly newsletter, where he said the apex court's "humanistic" approach to law over the last three decades should be a source of pride. Ramaphosa emphasised the importance of the establishment of a specialised Constitutional Court, describing it as a key facet of the multiparty negotiations which preceded the country's transition to a fully-fledged democracy. He said that whilst some believed that existing structures, such as the Supreme Court, could perform this task, the African National Congress (ANC) advocated for a new court that was "untainted by the past". In the letter, he wrote that in March 2025, the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Council reflected on how the world was facing "a moment of profound instability", characterised by "conflict, democratic backsliding, right-wing populism with judicial independence being undermined". The council stressed the need for countries to strengthen democratic institutions "charged with safeguarding fundamental rights and freedoms". Ramaphosa said South Africans can be proud that they continue to strive to live up to this obligation.