Basavaraju: B Tech degree holder who ‘engineered' major Naxal attacks on security forces

Nambala Keshav Rao alias Basavaraju, the powerful general secretary of CPI (Maoist) killed in an encounter along with 26 others on Wednesday, had masterminded several major attacks on security forces in Chhattisgarh and his death is a big blow to the armed movement, said officials. Advertisement
Hailing from Andhra Pradesh, Basavaraju, who carried a reward of Rs 1 crore on his head in Chhattisgarh, had been associated with the banned movement since 1970s and was elevated to the top post in CPI (Maoist) seven years ago, they said.
He was among the 27 dreaded Naxals killed by security forces in Chhattisgarh's Bastar region. The encounter took place in dense forests of Abhujmad on the tri-junction of Narayanpur-Bijapur-Dantewada districts.
The killing of long-hunted Maoist leader, who masterminded several major Naxalite attacks, marks the most significant achievement in efforts by the government and security forces to eliminate Left-wing extremism (LWE) from the country, the officials asserted.
Basavaraju, considered an expert in guerrilla warfare, took over as general secretary of the proscribed CPI (Maoist) in 2018, replacing Muppala Lakshmana Rao alias Ganpathy, then aged 71, who stepped down from the position due to his deteriorating health condition and age-related issues.
Ganpathy was holding the position since 2004 when the Communist Party of India (Maoist) was formed with the merger of the CPI (Marxist-Leninist) (People's War) and the Maoist Communist Centre (MCC) to lead the armed movement.
Since 2018, Maoists had executed several deadly attacks in Bastar, including in Tekalgudem (Bijapur) where 22 security personnel were killed in 2021, the 2020 Minpa ambush (Sukma) wherein 17 security personnel lost their lives and Shyamgiri attack (Dantewada) in April 2019 in which BJP MLA Bhima Mandavi and four security personnel were killed.
A resident of Jiyannapeta village in Srikakulam district of Andhra Pradesh, Basavaraju holds a B Tech degree from the Regional Engineering College, Warangal, and was seen as an enigmatic leader of the outlawed Naxal outfit.
Known by the aliases of Prakash, Krishna, Vijay, Umesh and Kamlu, he joined the armed movement in the 1970s as a ground-level organiser, a police official told PTI.
In 1992, he was elected a member of the central committee of the erstwhile Communist Party of India Marxist-Leninist People's War, when Ganapathy became its general secretary, he said.
Before being elevated as general secretary, he headed the Central Military Commission (CMC) of Maoists for several years, police said.
Considered an expert in imparting military training and handling explosives and landmines, cadres of Basavaraju's team were equipped with sophisticated weapons. A three-layered ring of armed cadres he kept around him in forests had so far made him untraceable by security forces, they said.
Basavaraju's age and looks is still a matter of speculation with security agencies suggesting he was around 71 years of age. They just have a bundle of old photos of him of his young age.
For the last few years, security forces have been consistently carrying out intelligence-based operations in interiors of Bijapur and Sukma to target Central Committee and Polit Bureau members of Maoists and they finally succeeded in eliminating Basavaraju in dense jungles and tough terrain, which had kept him and his team safe so far, a police officer said on condition of anonymity.
Polit Bureau is the topmost decision-making body of CPI (Maoist) and Basavaraju was a member of it. Wednesday's encounter was part of an operation launched three days ago to corner Central Committee and Polit Bureau members of the banned outfit, the officer said.
The encounter took place following 70-hour-long combing by security forces in dense forests of Abhujmad.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

USA Today

3 hours ago

• USA Today

Trump says we have 'too many non-working holidays.' He's right: Rest is for LOSERS!

Like most Americans, I cannot stand work holidays. I want to be in the office, making America great again by working tirelessly for a corporation that squeezes maximum profit out of me. If there's one thing hardworking Americans who support President Donald Trump can agree on, it's that we're not working hard enough and desperately need to eradicate radical Marxist concepts like 'days off' and 'holidays.' That's why I was so proud to read the MAGA president's social media post – which was totally coincidentally sent on Juneteenth, a federal holiday that celebrates the end of slavery – calling for a sharp reduction in rest: 'Too many non-working holidays in America. It is costing our Country $BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to keep all of these businesses closed. The workers don't want it either! Soon we'll end up having a holiday for every once working day of the year. It must change if we are going to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Exactly. Like most Americans, I cannot stand work holidays. I want to be in the office, making America great again by working tirelessly for a corporation that squeezes maximum profit out of me as I slowly drift apart from my family. IT'S IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS, PEOPLE! Trump treated Juneteenth like a 'DEI program' he wants to cut Now some libs out there will suggest Trump intentionally posted about getting rid of holidays on Juneteenth because he's doing everything in his power to strip the federal government of anything that suggests non-White people exist and thinks acknowledging the end of slavery is leftist DEI thinking. And some will note that Trump recently issued presidential proclamations honoring Flag Day, National Flag Week and Father's Day while completing ignoring Juneteenth and making it a regular work day at the White House. How dare liberals connect numerous dots that form a straight line and logically conclude that President Trump's actions reflect how he feels. It sounds like they have too much time on their hands, which is why we desperately need to eliminate work holidays and give people less time to think. Opinion: From massive protests to a puny parade, America really let Donald Trump down Trump knows Americans just want to work. And work and work and work. America proudly has the second-lowest number of paid vacation days and the fewest paid leave days of any nation on the planet, and I can't think of a single patriot who would welcome more time off. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. As Trump said in his post, 'The workers don't want it either!' Damn straight. If there's one person qualified to know what workers want, it's a billionaire who spends huge amounts of time selflessly golfing so that golf club employees and the people who protect him can work more. Opinion: Trump's parade didn't make him feel tough. Maybe a war with Iran will? Trump must immediately do away with ALL federal holidays Because I know President Trump doesn't have a prejudiced bone in his body, and to demonstrate that he wasn't singling out Juneteenth as an unworthy holiday, I'm sure he'll take quick action to eliminate all paid federal holidays, including the Fourth of July, Columbus Day, Christmas and Presidents Day. Because, as Trump wrote, 'It is costing our Country $BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to keep all of these businesses closed.' We MAGA Americans want to work, work, work, and not be burdened by the socialist concept of paid days off. So I'm sure we can all get behind this new slogan, soon to be available on red hats everywhere: 'MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN – WORK UNTIL DEATH!' Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.

USA Today

a day ago

• USA Today

Trump says we have too many non-working holidays. He's right: Rest is for LOSERS!

Like most Americans, I cannot stand work holidays. I want to be in the office, making America great again by working tirelessly for a corporation that squeezes maximum profit out of me. If there's one thing hardworking Americans who support President Donald Trump can agree on, it's that we're not working hard enough and desperately need to eradicate radical Marxist concepts like 'days off' and 'holidays.' That's why I was so proud to read the MAGA president's social-media post – which was totally coincidentally sent on Juneteenth, a day that celebrates the end of slavery – calling for a sharp reduction in rest: 'Too many non-working holidays in America. It is costing our Country $BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to keep all of these businesses closed. The workers don't want it either! Soon we'll end up having a holiday for every once working day of the year. It must change if we are going to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Exactly. Like most Americans, I cannot stand work holidays. I want to be in the office, making America great again by working tirelessly for a corporation that squeezes maximum profit out of me as I slowly drift apart from my family. IT'S IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS, PEOPLE! Trump treated Juneteenth like a 'DEI program' he wants to cut Now some libs out there will suggest Trump intentionally posted about getting rid of holidays on Juneteenth because he's doing everything in his power to strip the federal government of anything that suggests non-white people exist and thinks acknowledging the end of slavery is leftist DEI thinking. And some will note that Trump recently issued presidential proclamations honoring Flag Day, National Flag Week and Father's Day while completing ignoring Juneteenth and making it a regular work day at the White House. How dare liberals connect numerous dots that form a straight line and logically conclude that President Trump's actions reflect how he feels. It sounds like they have too much time on their hands, which is why we desperately need to eliminate work holidays and give people less time to think. Opinion: From massive protests to a puny parade, America really let Donald Trump down Trump knows Americans just want to work. And work and work and work. America proudly has the second-lowest number of paid vacation days and the fewest paid leave days of any nation on the planet, and I can't think of a single patriot who would welcome more time off. As Trump said in his post, 'The workers don't want it either!' Damn straight. If there's one person qualified to know what workers want, it's a billionaire who spends huge amounts of time selflessly golfing so that golf-club employees and the people who protect him can work more. Opinion: Trump's parade didn't make him feel tough. Maybe a war with Iran will? Trump must immediately do away with ALL federal holidays Because I know President Trump doesn't have a prejudiced bone in his body, and to demonstrate that he wasn't singling out Juneteenth as an unworthy holiday, I'm sure he'll take quick action to eliminate all paid federal holidays, including the Fourth of July, Columbus Day, Christmas and Washington's Birthday. Because, as Trump wrote, 'It is costing our Country $BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to keep all of these businesses closed.' We MAGA Americans want to work, work, work, and not be burdened by the socialist concept of paid days off. So I'm sure we can all get behind this new slogan, soon to be available on red hats everywhere: 'MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN – WORK UNTIL DEATH!' Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at

The Hill

2 days ago

• The Hill

Powell's decision not to cut rates is baffling for many reasons

People forget that Jay Powell is not an economist. The Federal Reserve chair was trained as a lawyer, receiving his JD from Georgetown University in 1979. He then went on to work as an investment banker. Maybe that's why Powell keeps getting it wrong. He's not an economist; has he instead become a politician? That's the view of President Trump, who is pushing Powell to lower interest rates, to no avail. For the fourth straight month, the Federal Open Market Committee held rates steady, even though many think the time has come to give borrowers a break. Even though the Fed itself is projecting slowing growth and rising unemployment. Their excuse? A jump in inflation, visible so far only to those with an anti-tariff agenda. In the lead-up to yesterday's Fed meeting, Trump joked that he himself could do a better job than 'stupid' Powell, whom he has threatened to fire. Why the animus? Check the record, and consider Powell's latest decision to keep interest rates steady. Remember that the Fed has a dual mandate; it aims to keep inflation around 2 percent as measured by the Personal Consumption Index, and to maintain low unemployment. Last fall, about six weeks before the presidential election, the Fed cut interest rates by 50 basis points, just in time to juice the economy and boost Kamala Harris' chances of becoming president. Real GDP growth in the second quarter of last year surprised economists by jumping to 2.8 percent, well ahead of the anemic 1.4 percent expansion recorded in the first quarter. Job growth remained robust for most of the year, averaging 186,000 job additions per month. Employment growth slowed some in the summer, but the economy added 142,000 jobs in August, which was reported before the Fed met in September. Unemployment was steady at 4.2 percent; there was no employment emergency. Meanwhile, inflation for August 2024, as measured by the CPI, the most recent month reported to the Fed before they slashed rates, was 2.5 percent. Yes, the rate of inflation had been dropping, but it was still far above the Fed's target. And, in fact, the month-to-month rate had actually accelerated in July from the prior two months, and held steady in August. In other words, while certainly inflation had moderated, it was still an issue. So why did the Fed choose to cut rates? Good question. And in fact, inflation turned higher again after that rate cut. In September it rose to 2.6 percent, and by January, just as President Trump took office, it had bounced back up to 3 percent. Real GDP growth, meanwhile, came in at a robust 2.4 percent in the fourth quarter. In retrospect, a rate cut — and especially a jumbo cut of 50 basis points — was not necessary, unless you were Kamala Harris and wanted to head into the election touting a strong economy. Fast forward to today, when Powell has assumed the role of soothsayer. He claims to be guided by 'the data', but the data today shows inflation much lower, actually hitting the Fed's 2 percent inflation target. Meanwhile, economic growth is slowing and the labor market showing some weakness. It would seem a perfect time to reduce interest rates — to give the economy a boost. But Powell has just chosen not to do that. Inflation has recently dropped to the lowest level in four years. The core PCE number, closely watched by the Fed, was up 0.1 percent in April month-to-month, and 2.5 percent above the year prior. Last September, when Powell cut rates, it was running at 2.7 percent. The job market has shown some cracks. The latest month showed a gain of 139,000, slightly better than expected, but below the prior month's 147,000 addition. Also, the Household employment level, reported in another survey, fell by almost 700,000. Unemployment was steady at 4.2 percent, but other indicators showed the jobs market softening. The most recent JOLTS report shows job openings at about 7 million — gradually declining, but down sharply from the 12 million level recorded in 2022. More concerning is the latest job report from the National Federation of Independent Businesses, where small companies' plans to hire 'remain in weak territory.' The Fed itself, in its latest beige book report, noted: 'All Districts described lower labor demand, citing declining hours worked and overtime, hiring pauses, and staff reduction plans.' That's presumably why they bumped up their 2025 forecast of inflation from 4.4 percent (recorded in March) to 4.5 percent. Given slowing inflation and a weakening jobs picture, and since the Fed expects two rate cuts later this year, why not take action now? In his press conference after the rates announcement, Powell said, 'Inflation has eased significantly from its highs in mid-2022 but remains somewhat elevated relative to our 2 percent longer-run goal.' Yes, and that was true last September, too, when the Fed slashed rates. Powell's ultimate excuse: 'increases in tariffs this year are likely to push up prices and weigh on economic activity.' Fair enough, but so far that hasn't happened. Does it matter? Yes, especially to young people starting out who want to buy a home. High interest rates are depressing the housing market. People fortunate to have long-term low-interest rate mortgages on their homes are reluctant to move, not wanting to take on new borrowings at nearly 7 percent, where mortgages are today. That means the supply of houses for sale is low. Although high mortgage rates (the 30-year is now close to 7 percent) should theoretically mean lower prices, helping buyers, that largely isn't happening. The median sales price of existing homes in April 2025 was $414,000, an all-time high for the month of April and the 22nd consecutive month of year-over-year price increases, according to Bankrate. New home prices have slipped slightly, but not enough to encourage a rebound. The homeownership rate dropped to 65.1 percent last quarter, the lowest level since the beginning of 2020. Just before COVID hit, that rate was 67.9 percent. Buying a home is how millions of Americans have traditionally begun their financial journey; it is an investment that over time not only provides shelter but also encourages saving and historically has created wealth. Liz Peek is a former partner of major bracket Wall Street firm Wertheim and Company.