Toronto council to vote today on proposed bylaw that limits protests outside places of worship

City council will vote today on a proposed bylaw that would limit protests outside places of worship and other 'vulnerable institutions.'
Councillors are debating the proposal at city hall on Thursday which would establish a 20-metre radius around places likes churches, hospitals, schools, daycares and libraries if requested by the owners of those facilities.
The bylaw, which was released last week by the city manager, requires those owners to attest that a protest, which 'impeded' access to the property, had occurred in the previous three months. Successful applications would result in an 'access area' or what's known as a 'bubble zone' being established for 180 days, which could then be renewed.
Protests in the city have increased in the wake of the Israel-Hamas war and Toronto police said earlier this year that they responded to 2,000 'unplanned events' in 2024. It's unclear how many of those protests took place outside of the institutions described in the bylaw.
The city said it would need to spend $1.6 million for 12 bylaw officers to enforce the rules. Another $200,000 would go towards public education. Those who break the bylaw could face a fine of up to $5,000.
If approved, the bylaw would go into effect on July 2.
The city manager was asked to craft the bylaw, in consultation with the city solicitor, in Dec. 2024. Since then, a number of public consultations were held to gather input and found that 63 per cent of respondents were either strongly unsupportive or somewhat unsupportive of the law.
Speaking before council on Wednesday, Chow acknowledged that the city has to balance competing priorities.
'On one hand, there are community concerns around attending places of worship and a lot of fear for their safety. On the other hand, we have to protect the Charter rights to freely assemble and expression,' she said.
Coun. James Pasternak put forward two motions Wednesday to increase the size of the 'bubble zone' from 20 metres to 50 or 100 metres and underscored that he believes the law would not impact freedom of speech.
'It doesn't take any rights away. It doesn't take away the right to protest, the right to picket, or the right to free speech. And all it's doing is extending rights to those who want to walk into vulnerable institutions,' he said Wednesday.
Coun. Chris Moise put forward his own motion to defer a vote on the proposed bylaw to wait until Ottawa introduces a federal law related to accessing places of worship, something Prime Minister Mark Carney said he would table in the run up to last month's election. The motion was defeated.
Similar bylaws have been passed in Vaughan and Brampton, after large-scale, and in some cases violent, protests broke out near synagogues and temples, respectively, last year. Those bylaws limit protests to 100 metres from a place of worship and owners of those institutions do not need to apply for an access area to be established.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CBC

26 minutes ago

• CBC

B.C. minister defends progress on building more schools in Surrey

B.C.'s infrastructure minister has defended her government's progress on building more schools in Surrey, even as two more schools in the city will shift to a staggered schedule to deal with overcrowding. Fraser Heights and Sullivan Heights secondary schools will shift to having class times adjusted to start earlier, and end later, in order to squeeze a fifth block of classes into the daily schedule. That means eight schools in B.C.'s largest school district will have staggered schedules in total, as the Surrey School District's long-running overcrowding problems continue to lead to parent frustration. District officials have defended the practice of extending days and say staff have been able to manage the workload, while the minister responsible for building more infrastructure has said around $1 billion has been spent on new schools and school additions in Surrey since 2017. WATCH | Parents outraged over staggered school days: Staggered school times at Surrey, B.C., schools terrible for staff, parents say 3 days ago Duration 10:33 Fraser Heights and Sullivan Heights secondary schools in Surrey are expected to stagger start times so that school space is available for them in the fall. Cindy Dalglish says the staggered schedule at her child's school, Salish Secondary, is very disruptive for working parents. Sally Huang, who is the PAC president at Fraser Heights, called the changes terrible and horrifying. Parents, however, say that officials aren't moving fast enough to deal with a problem that has festered for years, and students' futures are getting caught in the crossfire. "The inconsistency is completely disruptive and the inequity, and lack of awareness of the inequity, is astounding," said Cindy Dalglish, whose daughter studies at Salish Secondary School, which was on staggered start times last year. "These decisions are not student centred at all." Dalglish said the inconsistency in school starting times means that parents have to juggle work responsibilities to get their kids to school and extracurriculars and study schedules are thrown in flux daily. "We already have, you know, a high level of curriculum coming into them," the parent said. "She is one of those go-getter kids that has really hard, hard classes .... they're cramming more into these [classes] this time." Sally Huang, the president of the Fraser Heights Secondary parent advisory committee, said that the staggered start times were also hard on staff, even as she acknowledged staggered start times were preferable to online learning. "The Surrey students' population growth is not new news," she said. "It has been steadily growing [over] the years, especially since COVID and a lot of young families, we heard, moved here looking for affordable housing. "So why hasn't the government kept up with that reality? Why hasn't there been a timely capital investment in new schools and classrooms?" Year-round schooling being considered Terry Allen, the vice-chair of the Surrey Board of Education, defended the staggered start times, and commended staff for dealing with the added workload. Allen said the feedback the school board has received has been positive, and he was disappointed to learn that parents weren't satisfied with their kids' learning experience. "The reality is, though, that there's really no other choice," Allen said of the extended school days. "We don't have enough schools in Surrey, and if we don't find some way of creating more space in the schools we have, it can only get worse and certainly not better." WATCH | Terry Allen defends staggered start times: 2 more Surrey, B.C., schools to have staggered start times 4 days ago Duration 9:01 Amid a funding crunch in B.C.'s biggest school district, Fraser Heights and Sullivan Heights secondary schools in Surrey are expected to stagger start times so that school space is available for them. Terry Allen, vice-chair of the Surrey Board of Education, said the issue of school space will only get worse if the province doesn't step up with more funding. Allen said that year-round schooling was being given serious thought at the Surrey school board, and that if they failed to receive new schools, everything was on the table. "Parents will have a problem with it, and I don't blame them," he said. "Simply because the provincial government is not providing new schools, and new expansions to existing schools." Minister says billions being spent B.C. Infrastructure Minister Bowinn Ma said she sympathized with parents in Surrey, and that the school board was being creative in dealing with the overcrowding people. She said the provincial NDP government has invested $6 billion, including $1 billion in Surrey, into new schools and additions since 2017. "Recognizing that the situation that Surrey is dealing with is not ideal, there is hope on the horizon because investments are underway to bring literally thousands of new seats into the Surrey School District," she said. In response to questions about why the government had not moved faster to deal with the overcrowding issue — given the NDP has been in power since 2017 — Ma said the previous Liberal government had not built a single school in the four preceding years. She categorized the money being spent now as a "massive increase in investment" since then, and said that if population growth had stayed consistent, Surrey would actually be seeing an excess of student seats. "But the population also went through this massive increase," the minister said. "So student population increased by 11,500 in that time. This is an unprecedented population increase, we have not seen these kinds of rates of increase in B.C. before." Ma said that a recently-passed infrastructure bill will help the government streamline projects and get them built faster.

CTV News

43 minutes ago

• CTV News

On National Indigenous Peoples Day, Tsuut'ina Minor Chief Steven Crowchild expands on conversation with U.S. President Donald Trump at G7

Saturday, Tsuut'ina Minor Chief Steven Crowchild expanded upon his conversation with U.S. President Donald Trump that took place last Sunday on the tarmac at Calgary International Airport. Crowchild welcomed the American president to Treaty 7 territory wearing a feathered headdress while Trump wore a white baseball cap with 'Make America Great Again' on it. In a preamble to his explanation of his conversation with Trump, Crowchild emphasized the inter-connectedness between water and peace. 'Where water is polluted or privatized, conflict brews,' he said. 'Where peace is broken, water systems collapse. 'If we truly want peace, we must protect water,' he said. 'If we truly want security, we must act on climate change and environmental justice now. Steven Crowchild U.S. President Donald Trump arrives on Air Force One at Calgary International Airport, greeting Indigenous leader Steven Crowchild, Sunday, June 15, 2025, in Calgary, Canada, ahead of the G7 Summit. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert) Crowchild said he was calling on all world governments including Canada and the United States 'to put the protection, dignity, respect and love for all our children and future generations at the centre of decision-making -- and recognize access to clean water as a universal human right. 'And protect it in all national and international policies,' he added. 'Uphold Indigenous sovereignty and support Indigenous-led water protection and climate solutions. Fund global efforts to restore rivers, wetlands, and natural water systems as part climate adaptation and peace building. 'And ban the use of water as a weapon in conflict zones,' he said, 'and hold violators accountable under international law -- and above all, prioritize diplomacy and peaceful resolution over military escalation and arms spending.' As for his Sunday night meet-and-greet on the tarmac with the American president, Crowchild said it was brief. "It was a simple conversation," he said about the encounter, which received global attention when Crowchild described himself as 'filled with rage' while speaking with Trump. Steven Crowchild Tsuut'ina Minor Chief Steven Crowchild wearing the medal he showed President Trump at the G7 welcoming last Sunday night at Calgary International Airport (Tyler Barrow, CTV Calgary) 'After sitting with my quote unquote rage and praying, I was reminded that my rage came from a place of grief and love – love for my people, all humanity, and love for this beautiful planet that we share," he said. 'And grief for those in the world suffering from the actions, words and inactions of a certain individual,' he said, 'and many others who have the ability to bring peace to the world. 'Our conversation was short,' he said, continuing. 'I introduced myself in my language and said 'this is native land'. '(Then) I introduced myself in English and my nation,' he said. 'I showed him this treaty medal here and told him that it's older than Canada itself. Canada Trump G7 Summit Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney walks with President Donald Trump after a group photo at the G7 Summit, Monday, June 16, 2025, in Kananaskis, Canada. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein) 'I said welcome to treaty, native land – and I wish you safe travels home. 'I told him that I speak for my babies, elders and future generations and to be a good leader and protect water for future generations.' 'All he said in response was something along the lines of 'Yeah. Yeah. We can do that.'' 'And then, that was the end of our interaction,' said Crowchild, who met the press on National Indigenous Peoples Day. 'So hopefully they can do that,' he said. 'Because our collective survival depends on it.' With files from CTV's Tyler Barrow

Globe and Mail

2 hours ago

• Globe and Mail

What if Elon Musk Is Right About U.S. National Debt? 3 Stocks to Buy if He Is.

The highly public spat between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump over the One, Big, Beautiful Bill highlights an ongoing, decades-long debate over national debt. The focus of this article is to explore a potential scenario and suggest a way to invest in protection against it. That path is via life and retirement insurance companies like Prudential Financial (NYSE: PRU), MetLife (NYSE: MET), and Corebridge Financial (NYSE: CRBG). Here's why. Rising debt, rising debt servicing payments This chart gets to the heart of the matter. As shown below, the U.S. national debt has increased substantially, and so has the level of debt in relation to the country's gross domestic product (GDP). The shaded areas show recessionary periods, including the financial crisis of 2008-2009 and the pandemic, whereby GDP contracted and spending soared, so naturally, the debt-to-GDP ratio did, too. Still, the response in both cases was the same: more spending and more debt. US Public Debt Outstanding data by YCharts. Musk's view is that the national debt issue needs to be addressed as it's out of control and has the potential to saddle Americans with an unsustainable debt burden, which the bill will exacerbate. To be fair, the Trump administration's aim is not to increase the deficit as officials believe it will lower the deficit, through implementation of mandatory savings and promoting GDP growth. Again, this is not the place to debate that matter. However, what if Musk is right and the U.S. continues down the path of rising debt? Higher interest rates could be around the corner Rising debt levels and debt servicing payments imply more debt issuance. Simple economics argues that, unless demand improves, the rising supply of debt will lead to a rise in the price of debt. In other words, long-term interest rates will rise, and could be higher than the market is expecting. The chart below indicates that the market is comfortable with the matter and isn't attaching a significant premium (beyond the usual premium to reflect the increased risk of holding longer-dated debt) to long-term interest rates over medium-term rates. 10 Year Treasury Rate data by YCharts. But the market could be wrong. And while Musk's primary concern appears to be the difficulty of cutting rates caused by rising debt, it's only a short step away to argue that rising debt could lead to higher long-term interest rates. Stocks to buy in a rising rate environment The situation might not be catastrophic, but interest rates could be higher than anticipated. It's not an ideal scenario for stocks overall, as it makes them relatively expensive compared to bonds. However, there is one sector that could do well, namely life and retirement insurers such as Prudential Financial, MetLife, and Corebridge. These insurance companies pick up premiums from policyholders. The policies create long-term liabilities for insurers that they need to balance against their assets. As such, they tend to invest in relatively low-risk assets, such as government debt. While rising interest rates will reduce the value of the existing debt holdings, they will also increase the discount rate used to calculate the net present value of their liabilities. Consequently, as rates rise, insurers will be able to buy corporate bonds, mortgage loans, and government debt at higher rates. Here's a breakdown of all three insurers and the assets they hold in their general accounts, which are used to match their liabilities. Data sources: Company presentations. As indicated above, the assets in their general accounts are fixed income and relatively safe investments, giving all three companies good exposure to the theme of higher long-term rates. Stocks to buy? It's important not to be too alarmist here. The debt problem is undoubtedly an issue, but it's very hard to predict where interest rates, or total interest payable, will be. That said, if you are a young person worried about the public debt burden and the possibility of higher rates over your lifetime, then it makes sense to buy stocks in this sector as a form of (I'm avoiding the obvious word) matching your assets to your potential future liabilities from rising public debt servicing costs. Should you invest $1,000 in Prudential Financial right now? Before you buy stock in Prudential Financial, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Prudential Financial wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025