What if Elon Musk Is Right About U.S. National Debt? 3 Stocks to Buy if He Is.
The highly public spat between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump over the One, Big, Beautiful Bill highlights an ongoing, decades-long debate over national debt. The focus of this article is to explore a potential scenario and suggest a way to invest in protection against it.
That path is via life and retirement insurance companies like Prudential Financial (NYSE: PRU), MetLife (NYSE: MET), and Corebridge Financial (NYSE: CRBG). Here's why.
Rising debt, rising debt servicing payments
This chart gets to the heart of the matter. As shown below, the U.S. national debt has increased substantially, and so has the level of debt in relation to the country's gross domestic product (GDP). The shaded areas show recessionary periods, including the financial crisis of 2008-2009 and the pandemic, whereby GDP contracted and spending soared, so naturally, the debt-to-GDP ratio did, too.
Still, the response in both cases was the same: more spending and more debt.
US Public Debt Outstanding data by YCharts.
Musk's view is that the national debt issue needs to be addressed as it's out of control and has the potential to saddle Americans with an unsustainable debt burden, which the bill will exacerbate. To be fair, the Trump administration's aim is not to increase the deficit as officials believe it will lower the deficit, through implementation of mandatory savings and promoting GDP growth.
Again, this is not the place to debate that matter. However, what if Musk is right and the U.S. continues down the path of rising debt?
Higher interest rates could be around the corner
Rising debt levels and debt servicing payments imply more debt issuance. Simple economics argues that, unless demand improves, the rising supply of debt will lead to a rise in the price of debt. In other words, long-term interest rates will rise, and could be higher than the market is expecting.
The chart below indicates that the market is comfortable with the matter and isn't attaching a significant premium (beyond the usual premium to reflect the increased risk of holding longer-dated debt) to long-term interest rates over medium-term rates.
10 Year Treasury Rate data by YCharts.
But the market could be wrong. And while Musk's primary concern appears to be the difficulty of cutting rates caused by rising debt, it's only a short step away to argue that rising debt could lead to higher long-term interest rates.
Stocks to buy in a rising rate environment
The situation might not be catastrophic, but interest rates could be higher than anticipated. It's not an ideal scenario for stocks overall, as it makes them relatively expensive compared to bonds. However, there is one sector that could do well, namely life and retirement insurers such as Prudential Financial, MetLife, and Corebridge.
These insurance companies pick up premiums from policyholders. The policies create long-term liabilities for insurers that they need to balance against their assets. As such, they tend to invest in relatively low-risk assets, such as government debt. While rising interest rates will reduce the value of the existing debt holdings, they will also increase the discount rate used to calculate the net present value of their liabilities.
Consequently, as rates rise, insurers will be able to buy corporate bonds, mortgage loans, and government debt at higher rates. Here's a breakdown of all three insurers and the assets they hold in their general accounts, which are used to match their liabilities.
Data sources: Company presentations.
As indicated above, the assets in their general accounts are fixed income and relatively safe investments, giving all three companies good exposure to the theme of higher long-term rates.
Stocks to buy?
It's important not to be too alarmist here. The debt problem is undoubtedly an issue, but it's very hard to predict where interest rates, or total interest payable, will be. That said, if you are a young person worried about the public debt burden and the possibility of higher rates over your lifetime, then it makes sense to buy stocks in this sector as a form of (I'm avoiding the obvious word) matching your assets to your potential future liabilities from rising public debt servicing costs.
Should you invest $1,000 in Prudential Financial right now?
Before you buy stock in Prudential Financial, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Prudential Financial wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
38 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Does Meta Platforms' Massive $14.3 Billion Artificial Intelligence (AI) Bet Make the Stock a Buy Now?
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) is shaking up its artificial intelligence (AI) efforts and the industry as a whole. Earlier this month, it invested a total of $14.3 billion in Scale AI to take a 49% non-voting stake in the company and bring key personnel into Meta's laboratories. Despite the significant changes this brings to Meta and the industry, it's not what makes the stock a buy today. Artificial intelligence is extremely important to the future of Meta Platforms, and the potential impact of the technology still seems to be underappreciated by the market. Meta's stock price is attractive, and it would be a buy whether it made the move to invest in Scale AI or not. What does Scale AI bring to the table for Meta? Scale AI provides curated and labeled data sets to frontier model developers for AI training. It can also provide evaluation and help improve reasoning models with the help of human experts. It works with many of the biggest names in artificial intelligence, providing key services to ensure they can put out the best products. Meta's investment includes a commercial agreement to spend $450 million per year on Scale's platform. Meta will likely gain access to proprietary data sets in an industry where good data has become incredibly important. More importantly, though, it brings Scale's founder and CEO Alexandr Wang onto Meta's payroll, where he'll head up a new AI "superintelligence" lab. Meta has struggled to attract top talent to its AI labs, and the disappointing results of its latest Llama AI model release have made the talent gap more clear. It reportedly offered huge incentive packages to poach OpenAI employees in an effort to win over talent to catch back up with the competition, but most rejected it. With its investment in Scale, Meta is hoping it can correct that issue. Building a leading-edge model is important for Meta, even though it provides its Llama models to the open-source community, albeit with restrictions for commercial use. CEO Mark Zuckerberg is more interested in the potential the most advanced AI systems could bring to Meta's existing products instead of making a product out of the AI model itself. But to build the best model with the most capabilities, it needs wide adoption from the developer community, and that won't happen if its performance is subpar. So, adding Wang to the AI team is a great start, but Meta would've likely found a way to attract talent one way or another. The potential value of AI to the company is just too high for it to remain a barrier forever. Is Meta stock a buy now? Meta is already working on a service that could be the start of a long runway of AI growth. On Meta's most recent earnings call, Zuckerberg described an AI agent that could take a marketing objective and a budget and take care of creating and running an entire ad campaign by itself. It would design the creative, figure out who to target, and optimize images, videos, copy, and targeting to meet those objectives. It could potentially create individualized ads for Facebook and Instagram users to help marketers meet their objectives with minimal costs. That's not some far-off dream, either. The company aims to offer the service by the end of next year, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal. Such a service would not only lead to marketers' willingness to pay for ads increasing (since they won't have to spend time or money on developing ad creatives), but it would expand the number of advertisers. Lowering the barrier to entry should lead more businesses to advertise on Meta's platform, which should support higher pricing for its ads due to higher demand. On top of that, Meta's ability to generate paid content for its users with artificial intelligence would also mean it can generate highly personalized and engaging entertainment content as well. That could lead to higher engagement rates and more time spent on the platform, increasing the number of ads shown and their value. Few companies are in as good of a position to capitalize on the potential of AI compared to Meta. Not only does it have a massive platform to deploy its AI capabilities, but it has the capital to invest in the future of AI. Its investment in Scale and move to bring Wang and other personnel in-house is the company using its competitive advantage to its benefit, which is what makes it a great investment. And with the stock trading for roughly 27 times forward earnings, it could prove a bargain at the current price. Should you invest $1,000 in Meta Platforms right now? Before you buy stock in Meta Platforms, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Meta Platforms wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
This Ultra-High Dividend Yield Stock Is Crushing the Market in 2025: But Is It a Buy Today?
In times of turmoil and uncertainty, investors often flock to consumer staples. That has occurred yet again in 2025. Altria Group (NYSE: MO) has posted a total return of 17% year to date, compared to a measly 2% return for the S&P 500 index. With domestic rights to the tobacco brand Marlboro, among other assets, the company has long been a reliable dividend stock, and it boasts a sky-high dividend yield of 6.8% as of this writing. Should you buy shares of Altria Group to ride out market volatility? Here are the positives and negatives of owning the tobacco stock right now. Declining cigarette volumes The largest selling point against Altria Group and its cigarette business is the rapidly declining usage of cigarettes in the United States. While good for society, it is a headwind to Altria's bottom line, with gradually declining demand for the company's core product. And this trend may be accelerating as Marlboro volumes fell 13% year over year last quarter, one of the worst volume performances in the company's history. Altria has been able to counteract volume declines with price increases. Smokeable net revenue after excise taxes only dipped 4.1% last quarter with operating income up 1.2% to $2.47 billion. Altria has long been able to prop up its bottom line despite the shrinking pool of smokers in the United States. It reported $11.62 billion of consolidated operating income over the past 12 months, a figure that has held relatively steady over the last five years. Trying to move beyond cigarettes Just because cigarette usage in the U.S. is declining, however, does not mean nicotine usage is down. New forms of nicotine consumption have popped up in recent years, such as electronic vapor and tobacco-free nicotine pouches. Altria has made numerous investments into these product categories. It now owns the NJOY vaping brand, which is growing market share in the U.S. (6.6% as of last quarter). Revenue and earnings from NJOY are not disclosed today, but it is a growing brand for Altria that can help make up for lost cigarette customers. Altria also owns the On! pouch brand, which grew shipment volumes 18% last quarter to 39.3 million. One problem remains, though: It's well behind other tobacco giants in building these new nicotine businesses. For example, On! competitor Zyn, owned by Philip Morris International, is growing faster and has much larger market share. Zyn shipment volume in the United States was 202 million last quarter, up from 132 million a year ago. That means Zyn added more than the entire quarterly On! shipment volume in just one year. Altria is behind its peers in non-tobacco nicotine, and that's not a great place for the business to be in. Data by YCharts. Should you buy Altria Group stock at a dividend yield of 6.8%? Altria's dividend currently yields 6.8%, enough to generate a substantial amount of annual income. For example, if you own $10,000 of Altria stock, you would receive about $680 in dividend income for the year (before taxes). That amount will likely grow over time as well. But how sustainable is this dividend with the company facing weakening demand for its biggest product? Altria pays an annualized dividend per share of $4.04, while its free cash flow per share is $4.97, or 23% larger than the payout. Free cash flow is the core metric here since it represents the company's operating cash flow, less capital expenditures (money reinvested into the business). The cushion between Altria's dividend payments and free cash flow leaves it with some flexibility to maintain and grow its annual payout. At the same time, management is repurchasing stock, which reduces its outstanding share count and the total amount paid out in dividends each quarter. So, in the short run, Altria Group should have no trouble maintaining its dividend, but it's the long run that concerns me. Record cigarette volume declines will catch up with the company eventually, and anyone looking to hold the stock for years of steady, passive income is facing this major risk. That's why I suggest avoiding Altria Group stock, even with its market-beating yield. Should you invest $1,000 in Altria Group right now? Before you buy stock in Altria Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Altria Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Should I Retire Early at 49 With $1.3 Million in Investments and $150K Passive Income?
As always, The Motley Fool cannot and does not provide personalized investing or financial advice. This information is for informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Always seek the guidance of a qualified financial advisor for any questions regarding your personal financial situation. If you'd like to submit your question for feedback, you can do so here. Everyone has a different journey in terms of reaching retirement and saving enough to fund their daily expenses and potential aspirations later in life. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Some work their entire life and are unfortunately still living paycheck to paycheck, while others may hit it big early and be able to retire in their 20s and 30s. For many, saving enough to retire comfortably involves working for a good 30 to 40 years and making smart financial decisions. Today, I will take a look at one Reddit question that asks: Should I retire early at 49 with $1.3 million in investments and $150,000 in passive income? What professionals and public data tell us Here is the initial question from Reddit: Should I retire early? I'm 49, military + VA retired, two rental homes, $1.3M in investments, and $150K+ in passive income. What would you do? by u/Maleficent_Wrap_3635 in Fire First, we should applaud this savvy investor. Having a $1.3 million investment portfolio at the age of 49, as well as enough passive income from rentals to make $150,000 in annual income, shows this person has invested well and made smart financial decisions thus far. Now, whether to retire boils down to several factors, but first, we can look at professional investment advice and use publicly available data to see how this Reddit user is doing. According to Fidelity, which manages trillions of dollars worth of retirement assets, by the time one reaches the age of 50, they should have saved six times their salary. This is based on several assumptions, including a person saving 15% of their income annually starting at the age of 25, investing more than half of their savings in stocks over their lifetime, retiring at the age of 67, and planning to maintain the same lifestyle in retirement as they had before retirement. Assuming we go by this advice, if this person's annual earnings are $150,000, then they should have saved $900,000 by age 50, which this person has easily eclipsed. However, this Reddit user also said they teach. If we assume their annual income is closer to $225,000, this person, according to Fidelity, should have saved $1.35 million by this time, which is right around where they are. This is all mostly theoretical, of course. We can also look at how much people have actually saved for retirement by age 50. According to data compiled by Motley Fool, the average 401(k) balance of people in the 45-54 age bracket is $168,646, although the median number is $60,763. Should this person retire at 49? Based on Fidelity's advice, this Reddit user is right where they need to be, although Fidelity does assume in its guidance that people will work to 67. But when we look at actual data, the Reddit user looks to be well ahead of the average person in terms of savings. If I use a retirement calculator and assume this person starts with $1.3 million, invests for another 18 years (until 67), generates an 8% return annually, and invests a quarter of their $150,000 in annual passive income each year ($37,500), this person would be able to grow that $1.3 million to about $6.6 million. Fidelity recommends having 10 times your annual salary saved by age 67. Even if this person is making $250,000 per year, they would easily have enough savings to carry them through retirement. The Reddit user also mentioned being able to eventually get Social Security and income from their pension. Of course, this means the Reddit user probably can't splurge too much or dip into their savings early because they would still be investing a quarter of their passive income each year and keeping their initial $1.3 million invested in the market. It all comes down to what this person's plans in retirement are. They specifically wrote on Reddit that they want to "build that dream business, travel, and write more." If this is the case, I would tell this person that it's probably OK to give up their teaching gig if it is no longer rewarding and they would rather spend their time writing or traveling. However, I would keep the rentals up and running because that's valuable passive income they can live off of and invest. When compounded, they should be able to generate strong savings over the next 18 years, leading to even more financial freedom later on in life. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these strategies.
