&w=3840&q=100)
2 Chinese scientists to remain in jail for bringing illegal material to US
Two Chinese scientists accused of smuggling or shipping biological material into the United States for use at the University of Michigan will remain in custody after waiving their right to a hearing Friday in federal court.
Yunqing Jian and Chengxuan Han said in separate court appearances in Detroit that they would not challenge the government's request to keep them locked up while their cases move forward.
This is a constantly evolving situation involving a large number of factors, Han's attorney, Sara Garber, told a judge. She didn't elaborate and later declined to comment.
Han was arrested Sunday at Detroit Metropolitan Airport after arriving on a flight from China, where she is pursuing an advanced degree at Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan.
She planned to spend a year completing a project at the University of Michigan lab, and is accused of shipping biological material months ago to laboratory staff.
It was intercepted by authorities. The FBI, in a court filing, said the material is related to worms and lacked a government permit. Experts told The Associated Press it didn't appear to be dangerous.
Jian's case is different. She is charged with conspiring with her boyfriend, another scientist from China, to bring a toxic fungus into the US Fusarium graminearum can attack wheat, barley, maize and rice.
The boyfriend, Zunyong Liu, was turned away at the Detroit airport last July and sent back to China after authorities found red plant material in his backpack.
Jian, who worked at the university lab, was arrested June 2. Messages between Jian and Liu in 2024 suggest that Jian was already tending to Fusarium graminearum at the lab before Liu was caught at the airport, the FBI said.
Jian's attorneys declined to comment Friday.
Federal authorities so far have not alleged that the scientists had a plan to unleash the fungus somewhere. Fusarium graminearum is already prevalent in the US particularly in the east and Upper Midwest and scientists have been studying it for decades.
Nicknamed vomitoxin because it's most known for causing livestock to throw up, it can also cause diarrhea, abdominal pain, headache and fever in animals and people.
Researchers often bring foreign plants, animals and even strains of fungi to the US to study them, but they must file certain permits before moving anything across state or national borders.
The university has not been accused of misconduct. It said it has received no money from the Chinese government related to the work of the three scientists.
In a statement, it said it strongly condemns any actions that seek to cause harm, threaten national security or undermine the university's critical public mission.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Inside the Texas Children's Hospital trans care whistleblower case: One year of fallout and unanswered questions
Credit: X/Vanessa Sivadge It's been exactly one year since nurse Vanessa Sivadge ignited a political and legal firestorm by accusing Texas Children's Hospital—America's largest pediatric care center—of secretly continuing gender transition treatments for minors in violation of state law. What began as a whistleblower interview has since spiraled into FBI visits, criminal indictments, legislative inquiries, and the quiet departure of a once-revered CEO. Here's how the case unfolded and what has happened since the revelations came to light. June 2024: Vanessa Sivadge goes public On June 23, 2024, the New York Post published an interview with Vanessa Sivadge, 31, a former nurse at Texas Children's Hospital (TCH). In the interview, Sivadge alleged that doctors at TCH continued to perform gender-affirming care on minors despite state law and public assurances that the program had been shut down. 'These doctors are driven by a political agenda, like an ideological agenda,' she told the Post. 'And I truly believe that they think that they're doing the right thing.' She further alleged that doctors manipulated parents into consenting to medical transition by invoking suicide threats. 'Parents were manipulated by doctors with an ideological agenda to go down this path of medical transition for their child,' she said. 'And I do think that doctors would use manipulative language to suggest that if they didn't do this their child would commit suicide or they would harm themselves.' According to Sivadge, doctors bypassed Texas' Medicaid restrictions by misdiagnosing minors with hormone deficiencies so that puberty blockers and hormone therapies would be covered. 'There was just no discussion of what are the risks, what are the long-term effects,' she said. 'Many of [the patients] had previous ER visits for attempted suicide, many of them are autistic, many of them are depressed and anxious, and that's really devastating because it's really clear there's something else going on.' The FBI shows up Following her public disclosures, Sivadge said she was visited by two FBI agents. Video footage shared by Christopher Rufo on X (formerly Twitter) shows two plainclothes agents at her door. One agent can be heard saying: 'I'm sure you're aware of some of the things that have been going on at your work lately.' Sivadge told Rufo, 'They threatened me. They promised they would make life difficult for me if I was trying to protect the leaker. They said I was not safe at work and claimed that someone at my workplace had given my name to the FBI.' Sivadge's revelations came a year after Dr. Eithan Haim, a surgeon at the hospital, released documents in May 2023 showing that Texas Children's continued providing gender-affirming care after claiming it had ceased operations in March 2022. Haim was later indicted by the Department of Justice on four federal charges—three of them for HIPAA violations. Haim denied any wrongdoing. 'They wanted to intimidate me into silence using every technique the federal leviathan had at their disposal. But they failed,' Haim said. 'The only way to lose is to submit to corruption. It's time to fight back harder than ever!' Haim claimed the leaked files did not contain personal health information. And like Haim, Sivadge also had to pay the price for bringing the truth out in the open. Sivadge in a tweet revealed she had been fired in August 2024, just two months after coming forward. 'I had low expectations when I went public, doubtful and uncertain if anyone would notice or care,' she wrote. 'Imagine my shock when people I had never met overwhelmed my Legal Defense Fund with financial support.' She added: 'After I was fired in August 2024, these early contributions by generous supporters enabled us to retain [@BurkeLawTweets] as our legal counsel. They are the most qualified, tenacious group of attorneys I have ever had the privilege of working with.' However, Sivadge points out that the two journalists she accused,- David Pauls and Dr Richard O Roberts- have since vanished from the scene. Jonathan Choe, a reporter known for investigating gender medicine practices, visited the physicians' listed residences. Despite attempts to make contact, neither doctor was found at home, and no public statement has been issued by them regarding the allegations to date. Amidst the controversy, the CEO of the Texas hospital, Mark A. Wallace, stepped down after 35 years at the helm. The announcement was delivered without fanfare and did not reference the whistleblower case or ongoing investigations. Credit: X/Vanessa Sivadge However, internal memos obtained by reporters showed that Wallace had previously circulated communications stating that the hospital's gender program had been fully shut down following the February 2022 directive from Attorney General Ken Paxton, which categorized gender-affirming care for minors as potential child abuse under Texas law. Contrary to those assurances, whistleblower claims and leaked documents showed that the program had continued operations in various capacities well into 2023, with medical records indicating the ongoing prescription of puberty blockers and hormones. The disconnect between internal messaging and actual medical practice is now a focal point in both legal and legislative reviews of the hospital's conduct. June 2025: One year later, still no closure The Texas Attorney General's Office, under Ken Paxton, is actively investigating the allegations involving Medicaid fraud and misrepresentation of gender-related diagnoses for billing purposes. State Rep. Brian Harrison and Sen. Mayes Middleton submitted a joint letter urging Texas Health and Human Services to conduct a full audit of Medicaid/CHIP funds used by Texas Children's Hospital from 2021 onward. Credit: X/Vanessa Sivadge In their statement, they wrote: 'There is perhaps no more important responsibility we all share than to be good stewards with tax dollars... If true, not only do the actors involved know they are perpetrating a fraud, but they are doing it to engage in child abuse.' Meanwhile, federal prosecutors continue their case against Dr. Eithan Haim. He faces four charges—three for alleged HIPAA violations and one for unauthorized access of medical files. Haim maintains that no protected health information was leaked and that his actions were protected whistleblowing under federal law. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has since launched an official investigation into the hospital's use of Medicaid funds and the allegations of child abuse. State Rep. Brian Harrison has called for emergency hearings. Meanwhile, Dr. Eithan Haim's legal case continues, as does fundraising for both whistleblowers' legal defenses. For her part, Vanessa Sivadge remains defiant and resolute. 'They tried to silence me,' she said. 'But if telling the truth costs me everything, I can live with that.' One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Nature's red alert: 5 species that went extinct while we watched
The last few years were quite ominous for conservationists and wildlife lovers everywhere. Climate change, deforestation, and pollution have long been known as causes of extinction, but 2019 to 2024 saw a rapid increase in species going extinct. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The official announcement of extinction is not to be taken lightly and takes years, and very often decades, of intensive surveys and ecological information. The following are five species that were officially confirmed as extinct between 2019 and 2024, using official sources such as the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and national environmental departments. Chinese Paddlefish (Psephurus gladius) Credit: Wikipedia Confirmed extinct: July 2022 (IUCN) Last spotted: Early 2000s Habitat: Yangtze River, China One of the world's largest freshwater fish, the Chinese paddlefish, was officially declared extinct in 2022. Reaching more than 7 meters in length, it was a top predator in the Yangtze River for millions of years. But dam building (particularly the Gezhouba Dam), overfishing, and habitat fragmentation put an end to its life. No one has been seen despite exhaustive search campaigns since 2003. The paddlefish was considered "functionally extinct" in 2019 before it was delisted from the IUCN Red List in 2022. Mountain Mist Frog (Litoria nyakalensis) Announced extinct: October 2020 (IUCN) Last recorded: 1990 Distribution: Queensland, Australia This rare frog had previously inhabited the rainforests of uplands in northeastern Australia. It started declining in the latter half of the 20th century due to the transmission of chytrid fungus, a highly lethal pathogen on amphibians globally. By 1990, the species was completely extinct. It was officially declared extinct by the IUCN in 2020, after intense surveys had failed to provide any indication of its continuation. Poʻouli (Melamprosops phaeosoma) Credit: Wikipedia Declared extinct: 2021 (U.S. Fish & Wildlife), 2024 (IUCN) Last seen: 2004 Habitat: Maui, Hawaii The Poʻouli, a honeycreeper native to Hawaii, was a bird that inhabited forests with exceptional feeding habits and a distinctive look. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It was first discovered in 1973, and its population quickly dwindled because of habitat loss, introduced predators such as rats and cats, and disease transmitted by mosquitoes. The last recorded specimen died in captivity in 2004. In 2021, the U.S. formally recommended its delisting as an endangered species because it had gone extinct. IUCN also verified the status of extinction in 2024. Campo Grande Tree Frog (Boana cymbalum) Declared extinct: 2023 (IUCN) Last spotted: Only once in 1968 Habitat: São Paulo, Brazil Recorded from a single locality and observation in 1968, this Brazilian tree frog has not been seen since targeted searching. Urbanization at speed, pollution, and deforestation of forested habitats led to its suspected extinction. In 2023, the IUCN officially declared the Campo Grande tree frog to be extinct, another case of how biodiversity can be lost before a species can even be scientifically examined. Cheongpung Blind-Beetle (Coreoblemus parvicollis) Declared extinct: 2023 (IUCN) Last observed: Unknown Habitat: Cheongpung, South Korea A subsurface cave beetle restricted to a limited region of South Korea, the beetle went unnoticed when it silently became extinct after environmental alterations due to dam construction and flooding in the area. Its extinction was authenticated by the IUCN in 2023. Lacking its unknown nature, very little information is available, which is usually true with underground or micro-endemic organisms. Is this nature warning us against a bigger threat? These five species are among the hundreds that could be lost this decade. Every extinction carries a greater message: the Earth's biodiversity is in trouble. Over 47,000 species are threatened with extinction, and many will likely go silently into oblivion without ever being globally noticed, states the IUCN Red List. Whereas extinction is irreversible, activist conservation, restoration of habitats, and international cooperation can reverse this trend. The question remains: Will we do so before the next one is erased from the list.


Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
What is China really doing in space? Mysterious satellite maneuver stuns experts
China's activities in space have recently taken a quiet but significant turn, which might be a sign of a major evolution in how we think about satellite operations. In today's world, technology, sustainability, and national security are intertwined with one another. Such missions seem to explore the possibilities far above Earth. Recent movements by China in geostationary orbit are being closely watched by the space community, which has posted the observations on its official X handle. On January 6, 2025, a Long March 3B rocket launched from Xichang carried Shijian‑25 into geostationary transfer orbit. Built by Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology (SAST), it's officially tasked with 'satellite fuel replenishment and life extension service technology verification,' reported Shijian-21 was launched in October 2021 on a Long March 3B rocket. Its mission was to dock with an old, no longer working satellite called Beidou-2 G2 and move it to a safe, out-of-the-way orbit above the regular geostationary satellites. This 'graveyard orbit' helps keep space clear and prevents collisions with active satellites. Both these Chinese satellites made a close approach in June Ground‑based tracking by S2A Systems detected Shijian‑21 and ‑25 converging in GEO during mid‑June. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 4BHK+Family Lounge+Utility room at 4.49Cr (All Incl)* ATS Triumph, Gurgaon Book Now Undo On June 14, they were 'virtually unresolvable from the other,' indicating a close rendezvous, which is likely expected to be a docking test, as reported by Observations also noted earlier manoeuvres on June 13 and 14, and an expected rendezvous around June 11 based on their orbital trajectories. How can this test be useful? Refuelling and servicing satellites in GEO could drastically extend their service life, reduce space debris, and lower launch demands. Shijian‑25 was intended to rendezvous with Shijian‑21 because they are in a phased orbit, which means sharing orbital elements but staggered in longitude, which can result in lowering the fuel needed for proximity operations. Although this mission is described as a civilian technology test, the close movements of the satellites have raised some concerns. According to COMSPOC OPS on social media, two US satellites, called USA 270 and USA 271, are nearby, probably keeping an eye on the Chinese satellites. COMSPOC explained, 'USA 270 and 271 now flank SJ-21 and SJ-25 from the east and west—potentially enabling favorable sun angles depending on the timing of closest approach. ' According to COMSPOC, the ongoing activity between China's Shijian-21 and Shijian-25 satellites is unfolding in a particularly busy and sensitive area of geostationary orbit (GEO). COMSPOC also stated clearly, 'While these U.S. assets aren't directly involved, their proximity adds complexity to the local SSA picture — and raises strategic awareness concerns.' In other words, even if there's no direct interaction, just being close in such a critical orbital region makes the dynamics more complicated and potentially riskier.