Supreme Court declines to hear GOP request to review Pa. provisional ballot ruling
A GOP challenge to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's ruling on provisional ballots is dead after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case.
The high court's rejection June 6 means county boards of elections must count provisional ballots cast by voters who find out their mail-in ballots have been rejected under the state Supreme Court's decision in October.
The case at issue, Faith Genser et al vs. the Butler County Board of Elections, stemmed from a lawsuit filed after the 2024 primary election by two Butler County voters. They claimed they were disenfranchised when the board refused to count provisional ballots the voters cast on Election Day, after learning their mail ballots were disqualified for missing dates.
Pa. politics: Erie County Democrats have slimmest voter registration edge in decades
The board of elections reasoned the Pennsylvania Election Code says provisional ballots from voters whose mail-in ballots are 'timely received' can't be counted, even if the voters' mail-in ballots are rejected.
In its 4-3 decision, the state Supreme Court found the Elections Code requires county elections officials to count provisional ballots if no other ballot is attributable to the voter, and as long as there are no other issues that would disqualify their provisional ballot.
The U.S. Supreme Court did not explain its decision not to hear the appeal. Attorneys for the RNC and Republican Party of Pennsylvania did not respond to an email requesting comment.
'Republicans don't think every rightful vote should count. We disagree, and now, the Supreme Court has sided with us. Pennsylvanians deserve to have their say in every election ― full stop,' Democratic National Committee Chairperson Ken Martin said in a statement.
The case is one of many involving 'paperwork errors' on vote-by-mail-ballots, since absentee voting without an excuse became an option in 2019 with the passage of Act 77.
'Every election, thousands of Pennsylvania mail ballots are voided due to common technical mistakes made by voters,' Rich Ting, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Pennsylvania, said. 'Thanks to Faith Genser and Frank Matis fighting for their right to vote, all Pennsylvania voters who make those mistakes are guaranteed the right to vote by provisional ballot as a failsafe.'
The ACLU of Pennsylvania and the Public Interest Law Center with pro-bono counsel from Dechert LLP represented Genser and Matis in their lawsuit.
'The Supreme Court's determination not to hear this case means that Pennsylvanians who make a technical mistake with their mail-in ballots will have a way to fix the mistake instead of losing the opportunity to vote,' Ben Geffen, senior attorney at the Public Interest Law Center, said.
In its petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, the GOP argued the state Supreme Court usurped the Pennsylvania Legislature's authority to set the 'times, places and manner' for congressional elections, leaning on a premise known as the 'independent state legislature theory.' That theory asserts that the U.S. Constitution reserves the authority to set the times, places and manner of elections exclusively for state legislatures.
In opposition, the DNC and Pennsylvania Democratic Party asserted that the U.S. Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction, because the case falls outside the limited circumstances in which it can review the judgment of a state's highest court. Such appeals are allowed only when a federal law is in question, a state law is claimed to conflict with federal law or 'where any title, right, privilege, or immunity is specially set up or claimed under the Constitution.'
The June 6 decision is the second time the U.S. Supreme Court has passed on reviewing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision. In November it refused to place a stay on enforcement of the ruling days before the presidential election.
The Pennsylvania General Assembly has taken steps to pass amendments to clarify the vote-by-mail law in recent weeks.
House Bill 1396, sponsored by Speaker Joanna McClinton, D-Philadelphia, would give election workers up to a week before Election Day to prepare to count mail-in ballots, a process that has been a bottleneck for election results in parts of the state, and has provided fodder for election deniers. The measure would remedy other ambiguities in Act 77, such as making clear that county election officials must notify voters if their mail ballots are rejected. It passed the House with a 102-101 vote along party lines May 13.
Peter Hall has been a journalist in Pennsylvania and New Jersey for more than 20 years, most recently covering criminal justice and legal affairs for The Morning Call in Allentown. Pennsylvania Capital-Star is part of States Newsroom, the nation's largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.
This article originally appeared on Erie Times-News: Supreme Court won't hear GOP challenge to PA provisional ballot ruling
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he is open to regime change in Iran after strikes on Tehran's nuclear facilities
US President Donald Trump on Sunday hinted at the possibility of regime change in Iran, questioning the future of Iran's ruling theocracy. Trump's social media jab at the regime in Iran came after he ordered a surprise attack on three of the country's nuclear sites, raising the risk of a wider war in the Middle East amid warnings from his MAGA base and allies and foes from abroad. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' Trump posted on social media. 'MIGA!!!' His comments seemingly contradicted an earlier call to Iran for negotiations and de-escalation in the Israel-Iran conflict. Trump's words also marked something of a reversal from his Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference that detailed the aerial bombing. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth said. Speaking on Fox News on Sunday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that any retaliation against the US or a rush toward building a nuclear weapon would 'put the Iranian regime at risk.' Rubio explained that what the US administration has made clear is that it wants Iran to stop any development of nuclear weapons. But beyond that, the world is awash in uncertainty at a fragile moment that could decide whether parts of the globe tip into war or find a way to salvage a relative peace. Vice President JD Vance also spoke at news outlets. 'We're not at war with Iran,' Vance said on NBC. 'We're at war with Iran's nuclear program.' According to him, the strike offers a chance to restart stalled talks on reducing Iran's nuclear program. Despite the efforts of Trump's senior aides to clarify the situation and put out a coordinated message and strategy on the US involvement or plan, Trump himself has made a series of intimidating statements, even as he has simultaneously called to restart negotiations. Analysts believe the messaging makes it hard to get a complete read on whether the US president is simply taunting an adversary or using inflammatory words that could further widen the war between Israel and Iran that began earlier this month. Related US operation against Iran in detail: Bombs, planes and missiles used Can Iran attack the US now and how (and where) can it do it? Before Trump's post on Sunday afternoon, the coordinated messaging from Trump's secretary of state, top military adviser, vice president, and head of the Pentagon indicated a belief that any fallout would be controlled. The Israel-Iran conflict began on 13 June when Israel attacked Iran's military infrastructure, killing the country's intelligence chief, Mohammad Kazemi, and his deputy, Hassan Mohaqiq. Ten nuclear scientists were also killed. Iran responded with ballistic missiles and drone attacks on Israel, but Iran's military capabilities are believed to have been severely decimated after Israel's aerial campaign that took out much of Tehran's air defences and missile launchers. At least 950 people have been killed by Israel's strikes on Iran, according to figures from a Washington-based group, Human Rights Activists, and 27 people have died from Iran's retaliatory strikes on Israel.
CBS News
27 minutes ago
- CBS News
Oakland group pushing to get new charter amendment on 2026 ballot
A group in Oakland is working to change the way the city government operates. The Oakland Charter Reform Project is in the process of trying to get a charter amendment on the ballot in 2026. Steven Falk is one of the leaders of the project. He's lived in Oakland throughout his adult life and plans to call the city home for the foreseeable future. "This is my city," exclaimed Falk. "I love Oakland." But he knows it's not perfect. He's worked for Oakland as a city manager, as well as five other cities over the past nearly 40 years. "My experience was Oakland is more dysfunctional than the other cities I had worked for," Falk explained. "And I tried to figure out why. If it wasn't the people, what was it? I concluded it was the system. It's the organization chart. It's the way the city is organized that holds it back." A charter is the constitution of the city, outlining how it functions. In Oakland, the charter dictates that the mayor does not attend city council meetings, they have no voting power on the council, and they do not supervise department heads. "That is not the case in 97% of California's cities, but Oakland is built differently and that needs to change," Falk said. Newly elected Mayor Barbara Lee agrees. It's in her first 100-day plan. She lists 10 things she wants to accomplish, number five says, "appoint a taskforce of League of Women Voters, ethics, and good government experts to modernize Oakland's Charter and strengthen government accountability." Falk is ready to help with that. "We're working with her and hope to have this task force up and running by mid-August in order to meet her self-imposed deadline," Falk said. A charter amendment would need to be voted on during a general election. The next one is one year away, in June of 2026. That means they need to have their ballot measure written for review by the city attorney by January, February at the latest. Falk is out talking with Oaklanders about what they want to see. "We're hearing that they want better government, in the most recent poll by the Oakland Chamber of Commerce, 75% of Oaklanders say they feel the city is on the wrong track," Falk said. "That number is too high; that has to change and we don't think it can change until the charter is changed." So far, he's talked with hundreds of people. He said many want faster, more centralized decision-making and a council and mayor that have real authority over city staff. Falk believes a new charter could be a game-changer for Oakland. "Oakland has the arts, the culture, the history; it should be the center of the Bay Area," said Falk. "It should be the crown jewel of the Bay Area, but I think most people recognize that it's not. I'm passionate about helping Oakland reach its potential and be as good as it can be."
Washington Post
30 minutes ago
- Washington Post
GOP tax bill would ease regulations on gun silencers and some rifles and shotguns
WASHINGTON — The massive tax and spending cuts package that President Donald Trump wants on his desk by July 4 would loosen regulations on gun silencers and certain types of rifles and shotguns, advancing a longtime priority of the gun industry as Republican leaders in the House and Senate try to win enough votes to pass the bill.
