Trump says he is open to regime change in Iran after strikes on Tehran's nuclear facilities

US President Donald Trump on Sunday hinted at the possibility of regime change in Iran, questioning the future of Iran's ruling theocracy.
Trump's social media jab at the regime in Iran came after he ordered a surprise attack on three of the country's nuclear sites, raising the risk of a wider war in the Middle East amid warnings from his MAGA base and allies and foes from abroad.
'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' Trump posted on social media. 'MIGA!!!'
His comments seemingly contradicted an earlier call to Iran for negotiations and de-escalation in the Israel-Iran conflict.
Trump's words also marked something of a reversal from his Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference that detailed the aerial bombing. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth said.
Speaking on Fox News on Sunday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that any retaliation against the US or a rush toward building a nuclear weapon would 'put the Iranian regime at risk.'
Rubio explained that what the US administration has made clear is that it wants Iran to stop any development of nuclear weapons. But beyond that, the world is awash in uncertainty at a fragile moment that could decide whether parts of the globe tip into war or find a way to salvage a relative peace.
Vice President JD Vance also spoke at news outlets. 'We're not at war with Iran,' Vance said on NBC. 'We're at war with Iran's nuclear program.'
According to him, the strike offers a chance to restart stalled talks on reducing Iran's nuclear program.
Despite the efforts of Trump's senior aides to clarify the situation and put out a coordinated message and strategy on the US involvement or plan, Trump himself has made a series of intimidating statements, even as he has simultaneously called to restart negotiations.
Analysts believe the messaging makes it hard to get a complete read on whether the US president is simply taunting an adversary or using inflammatory words that could further widen the war between Israel and Iran that began earlier this month.
Related
US operation against Iran in detail: Bombs, planes and missiles used
Can Iran attack the US now and how (and where) can it do it?
Before Trump's post on Sunday afternoon, the coordinated messaging from Trump's secretary of state, top military adviser, vice president, and head of the Pentagon indicated a belief that any fallout would be controlled.
The Israel-Iran conflict began on 13 June when Israel attacked Iran's military infrastructure, killing the country's intelligence chief, Mohammad Kazemi, and his deputy, Hassan Mohaqiq. Ten nuclear scientists were also killed.
Iran responded with ballistic missiles and drone attacks on Israel, but Iran's military capabilities are believed to have been severely decimated after Israel's aerial campaign that took out much of Tehran's air defences and missile launchers.
At least 950 people have been killed by Israel's strikes on Iran, according to figures from a Washington-based group, Human Rights Activists, and 27 people have died from Iran's retaliatory strikes on Israel.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

San Francisco Chronicle​

7 minutes ago

• San Francisco Chronicle​

The Latest: The White House defends its massive bombing campaign against Iran

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told ABC News on Monday morning that Iran was an 'imminent threat' and that President Donald Trump is the 'first president with the guts to actually do something about it.' She was definitive about the outcome of U.S. strikes, saying they 'took away Iran's ability to create a nuclear bomb.' Over the weekend, American stealth bombers, fighter jets and a submarine struck Iran with bombs and missiles - joining Israel's attempt to wipe out Iran's nuclear program. 'The president was just simply raising a question that I think many people around the world are asking,' she told reporters on Monday morning. She added, 'if they refuse to engage in diplomacy moving forward, why shouldn't the Iranian people rise up against this brutal terrorist regime?' Trump's bombardment of three sites in Iran quickly sparked debate in Congress over his authority to launch the strikes, with Republicans praising Trump for decisive action even as many Democrats warned he should have sought congressional approval. 'We did make bipartisan calls,' Leavitt told Fox News. She said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries 'couldn't be reached.' Traditionally, there are bipartisan briefings for congressional leaders, even for classified missions. Leavitt insisted the White House was 'not obligated to tell anybody' about the plans but 'we gave these calls as a courtesy.' Pakistan condemns Trump shortly after nominating him for Nobel Pakistan condemned U.S. President Donald Trump for bombing Iran, less than 24 hours after saying he deserved a Nobel Peace Prize for defusing a recent crisis with India. Relations between the two South Asian countries plummeted after a massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir in April. The nuclear-armed rivals stepped closer to war in the weeks that followed, attacking each other until intense diplomatic efforts, led by the U.S., resulted in a truce for which Trump took credit.

CNBC

9 minutes ago

• CNBC

Why market's aren't selling off, even after U.S. attack on Iran

This isn't the market reaction many expected. The U.S. this weekend entered the Iran-Israel war, directly attacking Iranian nuclear sites. President Donald Trump after the attack said there "will be either peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days." Investors trudged into Sunday's futures open expecting a sharp jump in oil prices and a steep decline in equities. That's not what happened. After an initial decline, stock futures were marginally higher on Monday morning, while crude oil futures at one point were lower after trading up a few percent overnight. "Investors aren't terribly panicked about an oil market calamity, an equanimous view that's appropriate at this point," wrote Adam Crisafulli of Vital Knowledge. "Geopolitical risks are undoubtably elevated in the Middle East right now, but our view remains that the extreme asymmetry of the conflict (with Iran's military capabilities, and those of its proxy partners, significantly degraded), coupled with Tehran's relative isolation (with few, if any, allies willing to come to its assistance) and ample global oil supplies, will help keep the fallout contained." @SP.1 5D mountain S & P 500 futures 5-day chart Indeed, while Iran has warned it will retaliate against the U.S. for its attacks, many see few options for the Islamic Republic. One of those is closing the Strait of Hormuz , a major shipping route for roughly 20% of the world's oil. However, that could alienate Tehran's allies. Secretary of State Marco Rubio also urged China — the leading buyer of Iranian oil — to dissuade Iran from blocking the strait. Were Iran move to block the strait, "it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it," Rubio told Fox News on Sunday. "The next move is up to the Iranians," wrote Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research. "Our bet is that they will sue for peace. If that's the case, then the price of oil should fall and stock markets around the world should resume their ascents." U.S. crude oil briefly spiked to its highest level since January on Sunday night, but by Monday morning was only fractionally higher. "The key question is whether Iran now retaliates vs. U.S. interests in the region, triggering a massive U.S. response," Alpine Macro chief U.S. strategist David Abramson wrote. "Such a miscalculation by Tehran is possible – even likely. Either way, spikes in oil prices and risk-off market moves are possible, but are likely to fade quickly, given Iran is very ill-poised to win its conflict, especially if the U.S. intervenes again."

Washington Post

11 minutes ago

• Washington Post

The Latest: The White House defends its massive bombing campaign against Iran

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told ABC News on Monday morning that Iran was an 'imminent threat' and that President Donald Trump is the 'first president with the guts to actually do something about it.' She was definitive about the outcome of U.S. strikes, saying they 'took away Iran's ability to create a nuclear bomb.' Over the weekend, American stealth bombers, fighter jets and a submarine struck Iran with bombs and missiles - joining Israel's attempt to wipe out Iran's nuclear program.