Bipartisan proposal would make looting a felony during disasters
A new bipartisan bill aims to crack down on looting during natural disasters by making theft a felony in areas under federal disaster declaration.
The Law On Offender Transgressions during Emergencies and Recovery (LOOTER) Act — drafted by Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-Calif.) — would make petty larceny during a natural disaster punishable by up to one year in prison, while grand larceny would be punishable by up to five years.
The bill, details of which were shared first with The Hill, seeks to 'safeguard residents from criminal exploitation,' which has become increasingly common in the aftermaths of disasters across the country, according to Panetta's office.
'As a former prosecutor, I've seen firsthand how looting during emergencies only deepens the suffering of disaster victims,' Panetta said in a statement, noting his district has experienced devastation related to wildfires and floods.
'The LOOTER Act would ensure that those who prey on communities during times of crisis face serious consequences under federal law.'
'Our bipartisan legislation is critical to better protecting disaster-stricken communities, supporting our local law enforcement partners, and sending a clear message that if you loot during a disaster, you will be held accountable,' he added.
Panetta is leading the effort with Reps. Aaron Bean (R-Fla.), Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.) and Troy Nehls (R-Texas).
Nehls, a former county sheriff, said in a statement that his district is 'prone to natural disasters' and has seen its fair share of devastation.
'When Hurricane Harvey hit, I served as Sheriff of Fort Bend County, Texas, and know all too well how natural disasters leave people and their property vulnerable, especially to crime,' Nehls said.
'This bill ensures accountability for those who take advantage of disaster and ensures justice for those who might fall victim to these low-life crimes,' he added.
The bill's introduction comes ahead of what federal forecasters recently predicted will be an unusually heavy hurricane season. Atlantic hurricane season officially runs from June 1 to Nov. 30, and forecasters expect 3-5 major hurricanes this season.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Where US troops in Mideast are most at risk of Iran strike
The Big Story Tens of thousands of U.S. troops are within Iran's striking distance should President Trump decide to wade into Israel's conflict with Tehran and directly attack the country. © Alex Brandon, Associated Press More than 40,000 American service members and civilians — as well as billions of dollars in military equipment — are in the Middle East, spread out across bases in Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. Those working in countries closest to Iran, including Iraq and Kuwait, would conceivably have only minutes to prepare for an incoming Iranian strike, a likely outcome should Trump order the U.S. military to join Israel's bombing campaign, experts say. 'If [Iran] had the ballistic missiles ready to go, those strikes could happen in under 15 minutes. Launched to target,' retired Col. Seth Krummrich, vice president at security consultancy firm Global Guardian, told The Hill. 'They move very quickly.' Israel last week unleashed a barrage of airstrikes on Iran that set off the largest conflict ever between the two regional adversaries, with Tehran responding with its own attacks. The war has threatened to pull in the U.S., which says it supports Israel's right to defend itself but has not directly involved itself in the bombing. Trump has not yet decided on possible American military action against Iran, telling reporters through his top spokesperson that he would make his decision within two weeks. But Iran has already threatened to directly attack U.S. forces should they enter Israel's war campaign, with the country's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warning Wednesday that 'Americans should know that any U.S. military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage.' Tehran's threats aren't idle, as the country has retaliated against Washington in the past, most notably in January 2020, when Trump in his first term ordered an airstrike that killed Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, the head of Iran's elite Quds Force. The strike, which happened as Soleimani traveled to Baghdad, prompted a swift response from Iran, which days later hammered Al-Asad Air Base in Iraq and another U.S. base in Erbil with 13 ballistic missiles. While no Americans were killed in the largest ballistic missile attack ever against U.S. forces abroad, more than 100 were later diagnosed and treated for traumatic brain injuries. Now, with Trump reportedly considering using the GBU-57 — known as the Massive Ordnance Penetrator or so-called bunker buster bomb — to damage Iran's Fordow nuclear enrichment facility, a similar attack from Tehran could soon be at hand. Read the full report at Welcome to The Hill's Defense & National Security newsletter, I'm Ellen Mitchell — your guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect defense and national security now and inthe future: Trump: 'Hard' for Israel to stop strikes now President Trump said Friday it would be difficult for Israel to stop strikes on Iran at this point, a week into the intense conflict between the two nations and two weeks out from the president's decision on U.S. involvement. 'I think it's very hard to make that request right now,' he said when pressed about the Iranian foreign minister saying that the U.S. would call on Israel to stop airstrikes if Trump is serious about … Democrat: Trump 2-week Iran deadline 'not a bad thing' Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) tepidly praised President Trump on his handling of the ongoing military conflict between Israel and Iran, after the president said he would wait two weeks to decide whether to take direct action against Iran. 'The fact that we're not reading about a U.S. attack on Iran right now actually gives me a little bit of comfort,' the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee told independent … Israel, Iran trade strikes as Trump weighs US military involvement Israel and Iran traded strikes on Friday as President Trump weighs the possibility of U.S. involvement and European officials seek to revive nuclear negotiations with Tehran. Israel said it hit 60 Iranian aircrafts early Friday morning along with the headquarters of the Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research, which carries out nuclear weapons research, according to the Associated Press. Iranian media said Israel's … On Our Radar Upcoming things we're watching on our beat: In Other News Branch out with a different read from The Hill: DHS places new limits on lawmakers visiting ICE facilities The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is placing new limitations on lawmakers seeking to visit detention facilities, releasing guidelines in the wake of visits from Democrats that have turned confrontational. Members of Congress have the legal right to make unannounced visits to U.S. Immigration … On Tap Monday Events in and around the defense world: What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets: Trending Today Two key stories on The Hill right now: Senate parliamentarian knocks pieces out of Trump's megabill Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has ruled that several key pieces of the massive bill to implement President Trump's agenda run afoul of … Read more Supreme Court rules against FDA, EPA 12:30 Report is The Hill's midday newsletter. Subscribe here or using the box below: Close Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters … Read more Opinions in The Hill Op-eds related to defense & national security submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you next week! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here
San Francisco Chronicle
6 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
June 2025 SAT scores are out. Here's how California students can check theirs
SAT scores from earlier this month are now available, marking a major milestone for thousands of California high school students preparing their college applications. The College Board, which oversees the SAT, confirmed that results began rolling out Friday. Students who tested on June 7 can now check their scores through their College Board account, the BigFuture School mobile app — if they provided a phone number on test day — or by contacting their school counselor. Historically, SAT results have become accessible in phases due to high online traffic. Some students reported receiving results as early as 6 a.m., though most will gain access by 8 p.m. 'The release date of your scores depends on when you took the test and when your test was submitted, not on your scores, grade or location,' according to the College Board. Students who took the SAT during in-school testing earlier in the spring should have already received their scores. Those who elected to send scores directly to colleges using the four free reports available during registration can expect those institutions to receive the results by June 30. To send scores to additional colleges, students must sign in to their College Board account, search for desired institutions, and select which test dates' scores to submit. Many colleges allow applicants to send only their best results, though some require all scores. A shifting role for the SAT in college admissions The SAT, once a near universal milestone for college-bound high schoolers, has seen its influence wane dramatically since the COVID-19 pandemic. With test-optional and test-blind policies now common, many students — especially in California — face a new dilemma: whether taking the test is even necessary. The University of California and California State University systems no longer consider SAT or ACT scores for undergraduate admissions. Most private colleges in the state remain test-optional, further complicating the decision for students and families. • Data tools: Acceptance rates by major | UC acceptance rates by high school | Cal State admissions rates 'College admissions has turned from somewhat unpredictable to chaotic in the last few years,' Irena Smith, a college admissions consultant and former Stanford admissions officer, told the Chronicle in March. As a result, test-taking has become far more selective. In 2019, nearly 70% of California high school graduates had taken the SAT. By 2023, that number had dropped to just 25%, and only about 9% of graduates submitted scores to colleges. Those who still take the SAT are typically aiming for highly selective universities such as Stanford or USC — schools where, while scores aren't required, they can still make a difference in competitive admissions. The average scores among those who do submit results have risen. From 2019 to 2023, the share of California students scoring above 1400 grew by 5 percentage points, reflecting a smaller pool of high-performing test-takers. For some students, especially those scoring in the mid-1300s, the decision whether to submit can feel like 'an excruciating guessing game,' Smith said. Others are grappling with limited access to testing sites. In the Bay Area, fully booked centers have forced students to travel hundreds of miles to cities like Fresno or Reno just to take the exam. What to expect on test day and beyond The digital SAT now runs 2 hours and 14 minutes and includes two sections: reading/writing and math. Students applying early decision or early action are encouraged to take advantage of the remaining 2025 test dates: Aug. 23, Sept. 13, Oct. 4, Nov. 8 and Dec. 6. For those still planning their college path, the College Board's BigFuture platform offers tools to explore schools, scholarships and careers based on individual test performance.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Defense attorney for suspect in Aliza Sherman's murder hints at strategy: I-Team
CLEVELAND (WJW) – The accused killer of Aliza Sherman was in court on Tuesday for his first pretrial and his attorney is now hinting on plans to fight the charges. Gregory Moore, 51, is accused of killing Sherman in 2013. Her murder went unsolved for 12 years. Moore was indicted on several charges, including aggravated murder, on May 2. His defense attorney, Jon Paul Rion, is questioning why prosecutors are filing the charges now. 'The delay in this case is of concern,' Rion said. 'It is not clear if there is any new evidence.' What is the Prenatal Equal Protection Act? New bill would effectively ban abortion in Ohio Prosecutors allege the murder happened because Moore was not prepared to take her case to trial. Prosecutors have also said there is technology available now that was not available more than a decade ago when the murder happened. 'You have a due process right to have a trial within a reasonable period of time, when all the witnesses and evidence are available for both sides,' Rion said. 'If there are material witnesses or other evidence no longer in existence that could adversely affect the defendant, in this case Greg Moore, the court has to look if it's even fair to have a trial.' Cleveland Clinic to extend hours for surgeries, specialty appointments at many NE Ohio locations Sherman's estranged husband died last year. Prosecutor's have said he was not a suspect in the case. Moore remains jailed on a $2 million bond but his attorney said he may file a motion asking for a bond reduction. Moore is due back in court next month. His trial date has been set for March 30. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
