Miss World organisers accused of being ‘vindictive and bitter' towards ex-contestant
Their mantra is 'beauty with a purpose'. But the organisers of the Miss World pageant have been accused of something altogether uglier: being 'vindictive and very bitter' towards a contestant who left over claims she had been used as window dressing.
The reigning Miss England, Milla Magee, said she agreed to take part in the 2025 Miss World pageant because she believed it would be a platform to promote her campaign to have CPR included in the school curriculum. But she said the reality was very different.
She left before the grand final in India on Saturday, saying she felt she was being exploited and claiming she and the other women felt they had been provided as entertainment for investors as a 'thank you'.
Miss World organisers responded with a statement in which they referred to 'false and defamatory statements' that they said were 'completely unfounded and inconsistent with the reality of her time with us'.
The organisation's chief executive, Julia Morley, went further in an interview with the Hindu newspaper, in which she accused Magee of leaving because she 'believed she didn't stand a chance in the competition'.
On Saturday, Magee said: 'What Julia said was vindictive and very bitter. And it was a ridiculous statement. I did not leave because I thought I was not going to win. I left because I wanted to stand for what I believe in and it didn't align with my values. And I would hate for another young girl to go into this system after watching me this past year and have to experience the same.'
Magee said there were a 'lot of tears behind the smiles' at the Miss World event in Hyderabad and she was unwilling to 'promote a lie'. She said that while the pageant purported to be about 'beauty with purpose', she found it to be about 'wearing different ballgowns every day and what you look like'.
She said: 'I felt like I've been fed a false narrative of this system that promotes 'beauty with a purpose', that's supposed to be about advocacy and what you champion for. And I thought, right, this is a real good opportunity for me on a global stage to be able to talk about [my campaign] Go Far with CPR. This isn't about me standing on the stage, this isn't about what I wear. It's not about what I look like.'
Instead, Magee claimed she found she and the other contestants were there more to look pretty and to entertain guests, with only limited opportunity given to promote their causes. In one instance, she alleged, a man she could not identify walked up to her and said: 'Next time I'm in London or England, hook me up,' leaving her feeling uncomfortable.
Magee also said she felt Miss World had exposed her to anger from its backers by posting its statement on social media for them to comment on – failing, she said, in its duty of care to her.
Nevertheless, she said, she had been 'inundated' with messages from women who had taken part in pageants 'saying how they felt the exact same'.
She called on the organisation to modernise, saying: 'They have a big responsibility to acknowledge what I've said, acknowledge and listen to the reasons of why I left, to not just so quickly and irresponsibly put out a statement to say it's because I didn't think I was going to win.'
Miss World has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
US issues latest India travel advisory with warnings about solo women travellers, conflict and crime
The US has issued a new travel advisory for India, maintaining guidance for solo female travellers and significantly escalating the severity of its warnings in light of ongoing ethnic violence in Manipur, recent terror attacks in Jammu and Kashmir and issues at the borders with Pakistan and Nepal. The update, issued by the State Department, includes a greater emphasis on the risks of violent crime, sexual violence, regional unrest, and immigration issues at land borders, particularly for solo women travellers and those entering India from neighbouring countries like Nepal. The State Department considers India as a whole a 'Level 2' country for travellers, where 1 is the riskiest and 4 means Americans are urged 'do not travel'. While its categorisation of India has not changed, the language of the updated 2025 advisory includes sharper warnings in several key areas. Among the most prominent changes are new warnings about immigration enforcement and land border crossings. It specifically advises US travellers not to enter India via the India-Nepal border. 'US citizens are advised not to cross the India-Nepal border by land due to the risk for immigration-related detention and fines,' the advisory states. The Indian government does not accept electronic visas at land border checkpoints, and even those carrying physical visas have reportedly encountered legal issues, it added. Regional travel restrictions have also been tightened. The advisory now has an expanded section with a clear 'do not travel' directive for the state of Manipur, citing ongoing ethnic violence and instability. 'Ongoing ethnic-based conflict has resulted in reports of extensive violence and community displacement. Attacks against Indian government targets occur on a regular basis,' the advisory said, adding that US government employees working in India need prior approval before they visit the state. The warning stems from the two years of sustained ethnic violence between the Meitei majority and Kuki-Zo tribal communities that began in May 2023. Clashes have killed over 250 people, displaced more than 60,000, destroyed thousands of homes and religious structures, and there continue to be shootings and deadly crossfire incidents involving civilians and security forces. Similarly, the northeastern states of Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Assam, Mizoram, Nagaland, Meghalaya and Tripura, which were previously grouped under a level 3 'reconsider travel' guidance, now also have a more detailed section on the risks associated. Warnings about the Jammu and Kashmir region remain in effect, excluding Leh and eastern Ladakh. The advisory reiterates that foreigners are prohibited by Indian law from visiting areas near the Line of Control – the de facto border between India and Pakistan in the contested Himalayan region – and that terrorism and civil unrest continue to pose threats in Srinagar, Gulmarg, and Pahalgam. These cautions have been in place for several years and remain unchanged in the June 2025 update. The advisory does, however, reflect the aftermath of the 22 April terrorist attack in Pahalgam, where gunmen opened fire on tourists in the Baisaran Valley, killing 26. It was the deadliest attack on tourists in the region in over three decades. Other recurring elements of the advisory have been retained, including warnings about restrictions on carrying satellite phones or GPS devices into India. These are still prohibited by Indian law and violators may face severe penalties, including large fines of up to $200,000 (about £150,000) and jail time. The advisory also continued to highlight the risks of travelling to regions affected by Maoist insurgency in eastern Maharashtra, Telangana, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Bihar, Jharkhand, and West Bengal. Travel to these areas by US government personnel remains subject to special approval. The advisory retained language stating that 'rape is one of the fastest growing crimes in India' and warned that women are particularly vulnerable, especially at tourist destinations. It urged US citizens, 'especially women,' not to travel alone. It also identified certain public venues where the risk of violent crime or terrorist attacks is perceived to be high. The updated language named tourist locations, transportation hubs, markets or shopping malls, and government facilities as sites where a terrorist attack could take place without warning.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Ministry of Lesbian Affairs review – exuberant musical drama wriggles its way into your heart
A group of women convene around a piano in a nondescript room for weekly singing practice. It could be any amateur choir in any town hall, but this motley group first meet to be among fellow lesbians and then embark on a quest to perform on the main stage of the Pride festival in a national competition. For a while, Iman Qureshi's comic musical drama follows an 'against-all-odds' trajectory, in the mould of a good, old-fashioned underdog endeavour warmly reminiscent of The Full Monty or Calendar Girls. It is exuberant and uplifting, accomplishing the extraordinary feat of being broad and universal in its appeal, yet speaking to and about the lesbian and queer community. Directed by Hannah Hauer-King, characters are comic but run clear of cliche; everyone is flawed but lovable, more and more as they reveal who they are. Shuna Snow infuses her part as conductor and Older Wiser Lesbian (OWL) with adorable physical comedy; Leah Harvey is excellent as Lori who is only half out of the closet; Georgie Henley's performance, as Lori's partner, Ana, grows from strength to strength. The frisson between Fi (Liz Carr) and Bridget (Mariah Louca) feels delicious until it turns into ideological schism, while Fanta Barrie is charming as the group's lothario. Serena Manteghi is charming as Dina too, although her storyline (a woman in a controlling heterosexual relationship) is the only one which feels under-written. Zak Ghazi-Torbati, acting all marginal male parts, brings great comic froth. The interpersonal gripes and tensions are not huge in the first hour of the drama but, like paper cuts, surprisingly painful for something so small. There is sentiment but it is never sugary or manipulative. The serious brushes closely alongside the comic and vice versa. Connie, as the OWL is sent up for her old-school language, but so is Ana for the tyranny of her political correctness while there are passing, playful, digs at pronouns. To add to the mood-transforming magic are the songs, which are by turns funny (especially in a Bizet, Charli xcx and Lady Gaga mashup), full of feeling, and heart-stoppingly lovely in a cappella. There is a sharp left turn after the interval when the play re-orients its tone and purpose, so it seems, to turn audaciously into something different. Its arc is no longer that of the uplifting endeavour. Now it talks more directly about issues around these women's identities and sexualities, from the attenuation of public spaces for lesbians to everyday homophobia. At the centre is a crisis-point over trans identity that hits this choir. But drama is never sacrificed on the altar of sincerity. Story takes primacy and like best 'heart warming' narratives, it wriggles its way in your heart to take residency there, weaving its delicate balance between the silly, sweet and serious. Having had a first run at Soho theatre in 2022, this is a second incarnation. Let's hope for a third. Genuinely heart warming, and utterly winning with it. At Kiln theatre, London, until 12 July
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Test Match Breakfast: Headingley has a new hero and how Shubman Gill broke the rules
Test Match Breakfast takes a look at some of the biggest issues around cricket during England's huge first Test against India at Headingley. England fought back with an Ollie Pope century, ending day two at 209-3, after India dominated day one. Ahead of day three, DAVID COVERDALE discusses Headingley's new hero, Rishabh Pant's stunning celebrations and why India captain Shubman Gill's attire sparked plenty of conversation Headingley's new hero After being given the backing of Ben Stokes and England, Ollie Pope has also now won over the hard-to-please folk of Yorkshire. It was notable that the Surrey star was serenaded by fans at Headingley on Saturday as he neared his century, even if his song of 'Ollie, Ollie Pope' lacked creativity. There was even the sighting of a group of blokes dressed in pope costumes in the Western Terrace. It appears Headingley has a new hero. Crowd-pleaser Rishabh Pant celebrates in style... again Rishabh Pant produced perhaps the most elaborate century celebration in Test match history when he performed a somersault in the middle. 'Rishabh's celebration is as entertaining as his batting!' wrote India icon Sachin Tendulkar on X. However, it is not the first time crowd-pleaser Pant has celebrated in such style. The India wicketkeeper also marked his 54-ball hundred for Lucknow Super Giants in the IPL last month with a front flip, a moment which went viral. It appears Pant's party trick is here to stay – and cricket is all the better for it. Shubman Gill breaks the rules... with his socks Shubman Gill's black socks provoked plenty of conversation on the first day of the Test. 'Very natty,' commented Mail Sport columnist David 'Bumble' Lloyd, while Mark Butcher called them 'village'. It now turns out, however, that the India captain actually broke ICC rules by wearing them. The global governing body's clothing regulations state that players are only permitted to wear white, cream or light grey socks in Test matches. Sanctions for breaching the rules include a formal warning or a deduction of up to 20 per cent of the player's match fee. Someone clearly had a word in Gill's ear on Friday night, as he resumed his innings on Saturday wearing white socks. Karun Nair's unhappy return A penny for the thoughts of Karun Nair. The India batsman – who hit an unbeaten 303 against England in 2016 - has had to wait seven years for another Test chance. Yet having watched three of his team-mates hit centuries in India's first innings, when Nair got his long-awaited opportunity at the crease, he was dismissed for a fourth-ball duck. Mark Wood on commentary duty Mark Wood is a man in demand here at Headingley. The injured England bowler will not be available to play against India until the final Test at best. However, Wood has been making the most of his time away from the middle by trying his hand at commentary. The 35-year-old was part of the BBC Test Match Special team on Friday. Then on Saturday, he switched from radio commentary to TV, calling an international match on Sky Sports for the first time. The charismatic Wood, who also hosts his own podcast, has long been one of the most media-friendly players in the England dressing room. And the Durham paceman is sure to have plenty of offers of work when he hangs up his bowling boots in the not-too-distant future. Harry Brook left in a heap Getting roughed up by the India bowlers is one thing. Taking a blow from your own team-mate is another. Harry Brook was minding his own business when Ben Duckett fielded Pant's edge off Shoaib Bashir. But when Duckett picked the ball up and rifled it towards the stumps, Brook was in the direct path of the throw and was struck flush on his back, leaving him in a heap. England players initially looked concerned, while India's stars winced up on the Headingley balcony. Fortunately, Brook was soon back on his feet and laughing about the incident, even if he did rush off the field for treatment. Ben Stokes eats rabbit pie For Josh Tongue, it was the feast after the famine. Having toiled away without success on Friday, the England quick picked up four quick wickets to mop up India's tail on Saturday. When Tongue clean bowled No11 Prasidh Krishna to end India's first innings, his captain Ben Stokes mimicked an eating motion, leaving commentators confused. It was left to Broad on Sky Sports to explain that Stokes' gesture meant 'eating rabbit pie', i.e. knocking over the lower order. Dickie Bird's golden anniversary Yorkshire legend Dickie Bird was given a huge ovation by the Headingley crowd when he was shown on the big screen during the second day's play. The iconic umpire's appearance here was not significant in itself - he always takes his seat in the pavilion during an England Test match. It was, though, a special day for Bird as July 21 marked the 50th anniversary of the first-ever Cricket World Cup final at Lord's, which he umpired
