China floats battle barges in Taiwan invasion plans
Vast new Chinese barges spotted off the country's south coast could be used to land heavy equipment and thousands of personnel in a possible invasion of Taiwan, defence experts say.
Beijing this week launched what it called "punishing" drills around Taiwan, sending jets and warships in a rehearsal for a blockade and assault on the self-ruled island.
And a memo from US Naval War College has revealed another potential weapon in Beijing's arsenal -- barges that can connect via extendable ramps to form an 820-metre-long (half-mile-long) pier from deep waters to land.
With retractable legs that can push into the sea floor, the Naval War College said they could create a platform for personnel and "hundreds of vehicles" an hour to land on Taiwan, which China claims as its own territory.
"These barges are clearly meant to facilitate amphibious invasion against Taiwan," Wen-Ti Sung, a nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council's Global China Hub, told AFP.
Wargaming of a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan long assumed that Beijing's People's Liberation Army (PLA) would have been forced to rely on small amphibious landing vessels to get ashore.
Only a handful of Taiwan's beaches are suitable for large-scale amphibious landings -- giving Taipei a critical edge in the defence of the island.
"These barges may enable Chinese forces to make landings even on the more challenging terrains of the Taiwanese coastline," Sung said.
This, he added, "gives the Chinese military a greater selection of potential landing spots, and spreads Taiwanese defences thin".
Satellite images from Planet Labs PBC obtained by AFP show the system deployed in the waters off Zhanjiang city of Guangdong, southern China, at the end of March.
In a programme on state TV last month discussing the barges, military commentator Wei Dongxu touted their ability to transport large numbers of heavy equipment onto an island "while keeping their feet dry".
"Once the naval and air forces effectively control the air and sea, then this... barge will appear," he said.
"It can be said that it is a sign of victory."
And another three barges, dubbed Shuiqiao ("water bridge" in Chinese) by analysts, are under construction in southern China, the US Naval War College said.
- 'Any means possible' -
"They embody the seriousness with which China under President Xi Jinping is pursuing absorption of Taiwan by any means possible," Andrew Erickson, professor at the US Naval War College's China Maritime Studies Institute, told AFP.
"China... would not waste resources on such a specialized, dedicated system if it were not bore-sighted on taking Taiwan by threat, or use, of force."
China could harness its world-leading shipbuilding industry to rapidly build many more barges at affordable cost, Erickson said.
Beijing has ramped up military pressure on Taiwan in recent years and held multiple large-scale exercises around the island that are often described as rehearsals for a blockade and seizure of the territory.
US officials say President Xi has ordered his military to be ready for an invasion of Taiwan by 2027.
And during this week's drills, Taiwan's defence ministry said it had detected 21 warships, 71 aircraft and four coast guard vessels around the island on Tuesday.
China's Shandong aircraft carrier also took part.
The drills, held less than a month after Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te called China a "foreign hostile force", saw Beijing practice striking "key energy sites" and ports, Beijing's military said.
- 'Hard to hide, hard to defend'-
But despite the bravado from Beijing, defeating well-prepared Taiwanese defenders and performing a successful invasion of the island still poses major challenges to China's modernising military.
And the barges are still no panacea for the logistical woes that will plague any future invasion.
The barges "appear vulnerable to attacks from land, air, and sea", the US Naval War College said.
"There are reasons why these capabilities aren't commonly touted as particularly viable," said Rorry Daniels, managing director of the Asia Society Policy Institute.
"They're... hard to hide, hard to defend, slow to move."
"You need air superiority for them to work and it's not clear to me that Beijing could establish air superiority over Taiwan."
US Naval War College's Erickson said they "cannot hope to survive in isolation".
Though still appearing to be in a trial phase of their deployment, the barges could be aimed at sending a message to Taiwan's leaders.
Beijing is saying "'We are actively problem-solving the issues that we see with a full-scale invasion of Taiwan,'" said Daniels.
"'And you should be worried about that.'"
sam/oho/je/sco
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Iran questions US ‘trust' in nuclear talks as negotiations remain stalled amid Islamic Republic's conflict with Israel
Iran is questioning its 'trust' in the US to engage in nuclear talks as Tehran has refused to restart negotiations until Israel halts its attacks. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi accused the Trump administration of using nuclear negotiations as a cover for Israel's airstrikes on the country's nuclear program, claiming the attacks came just two days before a new round of talks between US and Iranian officials were set to start. 'So they had perhaps this plan in their mind, and they just needed negotiations perhaps to cover it up,' Araqchi said Friday in an interview with NBC News. Advertisement 4 Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi accused the Trump administration of using nuclear negotiations as a cover for Israel's airstrikes on the country's nuclear program. NBC News 'We don't know how we can trust them anymore. What they did was, in fact, a betrayal of diplomacy.' He vowed that negotiations would cease as long as Israel's 'aggression continues,' flatly rejecting Trump's demands to scrap its uranium enrichment and balking at his 'two week' deadline to reach a deal. Advertisement 4 Satellite image of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant in Iran. © 2025 PLANET LABS PBC/AFP via Getty Images 'I told him several times zero enrichment is impossible,' Araqui said of his meetings with special envoy Steve Witkoff, who he accused of contributing to a 'lack of confidence' between the two nations. He later called Tehran's nuclear program a scientific 'achievement' and a source of 'pride and dignity,' insisting that even if it were bombed and destroyed, Iran would rebuild it using the knowledge and technology it has amassed over the years. But Araqchi said US officials could resolve the issue with a single phone call to Tel Aviv to halt the attacks. Advertisement 4 Iranian foreign minister expressing distrust of the U.S. following Israeli attacks. NBC News 'They can stop this process very quickly, and then we will consider diplomacy again,' he told reporter Andrea Mitchell during the sit-down. 'They have asked us to negotiate, but we negotiate only when it is negotiation and not dictation.' Israel began its attack on Iran last Friday by taking out its top nuclear scientists and military officials responsible for the country's nuclear enrichment program. Advertisement 4 President Trump gave Iran a two-week deadline to restart negotiations to reach a deal. Ron Sachs/CNP / President Trump earlier this week spent days behind closed doors vacillating between negotiating a deal with Iran to limit its uranium enrichment and potentially joining Israel in bombing Tehran's nuclear facilities. The president said Thursday he'd make a final decision within the 'next two weeks' as he still holds out hope for renewed negotiations over Tehran's nuclear program. Araqchi warned that if the US joins Israel in launching an attack on Iran, the country will strike back. 'When there is a war, both sides attack each other. That's quite understandable. And self-defense is a legitimate right of every country,' he said. 'If the US joins Israel in these attacks, we will do the same.'
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
A ‘big, beautiful deal', America's aerospace ‘revolution' and other commentary
Iran-Israel war: A 'Big, Beautiful Deal' 'Proponents of an American strike believe that we have no realistic choice other than to help Israel do as thorough a job as possible in setting back Iran's nuclear ambitions,' contends The New York Times' Bret Stephens. True, after Trump drops bunker busters on the Fordow nuclear site, the question is 'what comes afterward.' But the president can follow that up with 'a diplomatic bunker buster on Tehran': lifting economic sanctions and forcing the Israelis to stop the bombings. 'Nobody, perhaps even President Trump himself, knows for sure whether the United States will wind up joining Israel in launching military strikes on Iran.' But 'there's a big, beautiful deal to be struck here. For all sides.' Tech watch: America's Aerospace 'Revolution' Advertisement 'From LAX to coastal San Diego,' dozens of new firms are 'embracing the country's emerging 'hard tech' revolution,' cheers Joel Kotkin at UnHerd. Including around 40 spinoffs of SpaceX, they make everything — largely for aerospace — 'from drones to engines, drilling systems to satellites.' Together, they can 'restore' America's 'blue-collar prosperity.' Given the 'military implications' of these products, these firms embrace a 'Right-wing patriotism' and so threaten to change corporate culture. Yet 'the biggest pool of money' is not from the Defense Department but the 'burgeoning space industry.' And the 'technology looks set to dominate our century. For if those robots and satellites are all impressive enough in theory, they could yet be used as a geopolitical battering ram' — with US innovators as 'riposte to Chinese central planning.' Libertarian: Czechs to the Rescue in Ukraine 'Through online fundraisers organized by community platforms like 'Gift for Putin,' 'Team for Ukraine,' or 'Just Retribution,' Czech citizens have donated millions of dollars toward' arms for Ukraine, marvels Miroslav Hanušniak at Reason. These include much-needed rifle magazines, howitzer shells, a Black Hawk helicopter and 'more than $11.5 million toward the direct purchase of First Person View drones.' Czechs 'show no signs of slowing down. New initiatives continue to emerge, finding creative ways to support the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.' In neighboring Slovakia, citizens defied their Russian-leaning 'government's stance and joined the fundraising efforts, contributing millions.' It's a reminder that 'real power and meaningful change do not always come from parliaments.' Advertisement Defense beat: Space — Aukus' Final Frontier 'It's time for Aukus,' the Australia, US and UK alliance, 'to grow,' argues Scott Morrison at The Wall Street Journal, and Trump 'is the right person for the job.' Aukus 'enables Australia's acquisition of its first nuclear-powered sub fleet' and 'facilitates cooperation on advanced military capabilities,' notes the former Australian prime minister. But 'if our nations are serious about deterrence, then we must prepare for new theaters of geopolitical competition' — particularly space. Aukus should be expanded to consolidate 'cooperation across launch systems, satellite architecture, cybersecurity, data integration and industrial innovation.' It must ensure that space 'is secured by free nations, not our enemies. American and Australia have stood shoulder to shoulder on land, at sea and in the skies. Now we must do the same in orbit.' Hispanic pastor: Riots Hurt Protesters' Cause Advertisement 'Once more, the streets of Los Angeles are filled with chaos' because of 'modern-day anarchists,' blasts Samuel Rodriguez for The Hill. Blame it on Team Biden's border 'failure,' which 'permitted millions to enter our country without any real verification process.' Now 'the majority of these riots are being led, organized, and amplified by Antifa factions and ultra-left progressive groups whose mission is not reform but total revolution.' These thugs are 'protesting the deportation of individuals who are violent criminals, rapists, murderers, or pedophiles.' 'There is a legitimate space for expressing concern over the deportation of longstanding immigrants who have lived here peacefully,' but 'these riots hurt and did not help their cause. This lawlessness is antithetical to everything the immigrant rights movement hopes to achieve.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
New York Post
6 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump refining ‘very likely' Iran strike plan if no diplomatic deal struck within two weeks: sources
WASHINGTON — President Trump is hoping for a peace deal with Iran in the next two weeks — but in the meantime is refining war plans to have the most effective airstrikes possible 'mapped out,' sources close to the White House told The Post, one of whom said the commander-in-chief is favoring the strikes. Four sources describe Trump as personally reviewing details of the plans with his military commanders, including Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine and CENTCOM Commander Gen. Michael Kurilla. 'Very likely there will be strikes,' one source said. 'But [Trump] wants a very mapped out and deliberate plan on what happens next. [He] doesn't want to just figure it out step by step.' 4 President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on April 7, 2025. AFP via Getty Images Another source close to the administration said Trump 'is more engaged than just about any president in a pre-strike scenario like this with his top commanders. President Trump is talking very intensively with both [Caine and Kurilla], more than most presidents would.' 'He's talking to them directly and so it's not like they're coming up with new plans, but they are refining plans that are already on the table and tweaking them based on circumstances there now,' the second source said. Trump said Thursday he will be making a decision 'within the next two weeks' on whether to join Israel in bombing Iran to halt its nuclear program. On Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi countered that Tehran would never hold nuclear talks with the US 'until Israeli aggression stops.' 'Americans want to negotiate and have sent messages several times, but we clearly said that as long as this aggression doesn't stop, there's no place for talk of dialogue,' Araqchi said in an address on Iran's state television. But retired four-star Gen. Jack Keane also warned on 'Fox & Friends' Friday that Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, won't agree to placing limits on his nation's uranium enrichment. 'The reason why he has never made a deal is because he had built an enterprise to survive an attack — and he believes they can absorb the attack, survive it, recover it, and then rebuild,' Keane said. 'That is where this guy is. And I don't see him, in the near term, making the deal here whatsoever.' The messaging from the West Wing has been that Trump is getting briefed daily by his national security team in the situation room and seeks a diplomatic solution if possible — but hasn't ruled out joining the fray with targeted military strikes. 'It's a little bit hard to someone to stop,' the president told reporters Friday evening after landing in New Jersey for a Republican fundraiser at his Bedminster golf club. 'We're going to see what that period of time is, but I'm giving them a period of time, and I would say two weeks would be the maximum.' The question of US involvement centers on Israel's possible inability to destroy the Fordow nuclear enrichment site located beneath a mountain. Israel has been dropping 2,000-pound US-made bombs, but lacks the aircraft required to drop a 30,000-pound US-made 'bunker buster.' 4 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during a press conference in Jerusalem, May 21, 2025. AP 4 Israeli security personnel and first responders inspect an area hit by an Iranian missile strike on central Tel Aviv. The 'within two weeks' window gives Trump time to leverage both the possibility of striking a deal if Iran wants, and more time for the national security team to fully monitor the situation and provide the best plans. A third source close to the administration said that in the end, only Trump knows what the final decision will be regarding striking Iran's below ground nuclear facilities, or taking out Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei, like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wants to. 'Only he knows. Him and Netanyahu being on different pages about killing Khamenei suggests Trump is buying time for peace,' the source said. 'But we won't know what this two weeks was actually for until there are strikes or [a] pause in tension.' The two-week period allows Trump to have 'better military plans' drawn up, the source added, 'while also giving a chance for Iran to throw in the towel in a way he can sell to the world as meaningful and divide Netanyahu's base of support.' 4 Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei delivers a televised speech in Tehran A fourth source, who is close to the Pentagon, described the current status of planning 'a natural progression' where 'you get more specific based off the broader operational plans,' though they note Trump still is hesitant to strike. 'I think the president has since 2019 had a very extreme aversion to getting directly involved in a war with Iran, however it does not mean the door is completely shut,' the source said. 'I think he has changed over the past week and a half and is more open to military action, but he is clearly still conflicted. … The Israelis have put the president in a corner.' Israel accomplished a similar but simpler mission in Iraq — destroying a nuclear reactor in 1981 — by dropping 16 of its 2,000-pound bombs and it's unclear whether some resolution could allow them to see similar success at Fordow after the Jewish state already established air supremacy over Iran. Trump previously ordered US attacks in March on Iran-backed Houthi fighters who control northern Yemen and forced the group into an Omani-brokered deal to halt their bombardment of international shipping in the Red Sea. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth played a leading role in deliberations about the Yemen strikes, providing a detailed but respectful message supporting the operation in a later-leaked Signal group chat when Vice President JD Vance expressed concern that 'we are making a mistake.' Hegseth has been at the White House daily since Israel began striking Iran last week and Pentagon and White House officials say he also is an active part of deliberations. 'The Secretary is speaking with the President multiple times a day each day and has been with the President in the Situation Room this week,' Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said.
