Northwest Side hospital owes construction firms millions of dollars
CHICAGO (WGN) — For months, the bills have gone unpaid. Local construction firms helped build an on-site behavioral treatment center at Community First Medical Center in Chicago's Belmont-Cragin neighborhood.
But they claim they're still waiting on their money, even though the center has received state funding.
The allegations come as small hospitals nationwide struggle to stay afloat, amid the rising cost of care and issues with Medicaid reimbursements.
'Safety net hospitals, almost by definition because they are taking care of [the] Medicaid population, have always had a tougher time making ends meet,' said Dr. Ngozi Ezike, CEO of Sinai Chicago.
WGN Investigates: Investigating public corruption, crime & fraud
Dr. Ezike isn't affiliated with Community First or aware of any issues at the center. But she does know the challenges that small hospital face.
'When the reimbursement doesn't cover the cost of care – you're losing more,' she said.
In a statement, the CEO of Community First said he hopes to have a resolution soon, adding that 'many of the safety net hospitals in Illinois are dealing with rising costs, slower payments from the managed care organizations, and the possibility of decreased funding.'
Meanwhile, the construction firms said they're owed a total of more than $3 million. Frustrated and fearful of going out of business, they contacted WGN Investigates for help.
'I don't know if I'm ever going to get paid,' said Louis Ochoa, of Ochoa Mechanical,
State records obtained by WGN Investigates indicate show Community First received $6.9 million from the state of Illinois in October. How those dollars were used remains unclear.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
2 hours ago
- Time Business News
Boost Revenue with Emergency Medical Services Billing: Top Solutions for EMS Providers in 2025
Emergency medical services (EMS) are a lifeline, literally. EMS providers face unique, high-pressure challenges daily, from saving lives in the field to managing time-sensitive transports. Yet, beyond the flashing lights and rapid response is a lesser-known but equally critical challenge: billing. In 2025, maximizing revenue through proper emergency medical services billing is more essential than ever. While the demand for emergency care rises, so does the complexity of billing. Regulations evolve, coding gets stricter, and reimbursement protocols are increasingly demanding. That's why EMS providers from rural squads to large urban fleets, must reimagine how they handle billing if they want to keep their operations financially viable and future-ready. Let's unpack the key strategies and solutions that EMS providers should prioritize to stay ahead. Understanding Emergency Medical Services Billing in 2025 EMS billing isn't just about sending an invoice; it's a specialized process requiring intimate knowledge of medical coding, insurance structures, compliance standards, and state-specific regulations. It is imperative that every service, regardless of whether it is an advanced life support (ALS) transport call or a basic life support (BLS) call, be coded accurately and submitted for timely reimbursement. Key components of effective emergency medical services billing include: Accurate documentation by EMS personnel Proper coding (HCPCS Level II and CPT codes) Payer-specific guidelines Compliance with Medicare/Medicaid regulations Timely submission and resubmission of claims Failure in any of these areas leads to claim denials, revenue leakage, and increased administrative strain. H2: Why Billing for EMS is So Challenging? Unlike clinic or hospital billing, billing for EMS comes with its own set of complications: On-the-go documentation: EMS crews must document services in the field, sometimes in chaotic or rushed environments. Multiple payers involved: Medicaid, Medicare, private insurers, and sometimes patients themselves. Complex service classification: ALS vs. BLS, emergency vs. non-emergency, mileage calculations, and supply charges. Variable compliance rules: Federal, state, and even municipal codes may influence how services are billed. In short, EMS billing requires both speed and precision, something many in-house teams struggle to maintain. H2: The True Cost of Poor EMS Billing Practices A mishandling of billing can result in the EMS agency losing more than just financial resources: Delayed cash flow impacting payroll and operations Reduced reimbursement rates from repeated errors Increased audits and compliance fines Decreased morale from overworked administrative teams It's for that reason that you should develop a strong relationship with a team that specializes in billing services for emergency response teams in order to achieve the best results. H2: How Emergency Medical Services Billing Solutions Are Growing As we move deeper into 2025, EMS billing has embraced a tech-first, compliance-driven approach. The best solutions combine automation, expert oversight, and real-time analytics to maximize collections and minimize denials. Here's what modern EMS billing looks like: Cloud-based claim systems with secure access Auto-flagging of errors before submission Detailed reporting dashboards for transparency Mobile-friendly documentation platforms for field EMTs Real-time eligibility checks for better billing accuracy Billing services for EMS that adopt these tools aren't just staying compliant, they're also getting paid faster and more consistently. H2: Must-Have Features in EMS Billing Services If you're considering outsourcing or upgrading your emergency medical services billing, make sure the solution includes: Dedicated EMS billing specialists trained in field-specific codes Credentialing support for providers Denial management and appeals handling Compliance monitoring aligned with federal/state law Revenue cycle analytics to help forecast and improve cash flow The services may even include patient communication tools as well as bilingual support, enhancing the patient's post-care experience as well as reducing the chances of missed payments. H2: Benefits of Outsourcing Emergency Medical Services Billing Instead of burdening your internal team with an increasingly technical and time-consuming task, outsourcing to a specialized EMS billing provider can deliver serious benefits: Faster reimbursement turnaround Higher clean-claim rates Reduced staffing pressure Full compliance assurance Access to industry insights and analytics One such company providing comprehensive billing support is Med Tek. Known for helping EMS teams streamline operations and increase collections, Med Tek has enabled providers to shift their focus back to emergency care, where it truly belongs. H2: Real-World Impact: A Look at the Numbers Agencies that implement efficient billing services for EMS have reported the following results: Up to 35% faster claim processing Over 90% clean claim rate on first submissions A 25-40% increase in overall collections within the first year These results don't happen by chance, they're a product of process optimization, smart tools, and real EMS expertise. H2: How to Choose the Right Billing Partner for Your EMS Agency? If you are looking for a new billing partner, ask these questions before making a commitment: Do they specialize in EMS billing or just general medical services? Can they show proven success in billing for EMS agencies of your size? Are they offering tech-enabled solutions with compliance monitoring? Will they provide performance metrics and regular reporting? Do they assist with credentialing and payer enrollment? Choosing the right partner is about more than price; it's about reliability, transparency, and long-term results. H2: The Future of EMS Billing: What to Expect Looking ahead, EMS billing will become even more data-driven. Artificial intelligence will play a greater role in claim scrubbing, predictive analytics will guide revenue strategies, and real-time tracking will be standard. EMS providers that invest in these advancements now will gain a head start on financial health, operational clarity, and regulatory readiness. Whether you're a municipal EMS department or a private ambulance service, having a proactive billing partner could be the most impactful decision you make in 2025. H2: Final Thoughts Financial clarity is just as important as operational readiness when it comes to today's high-stakes emergency medical environment. Emergency medical service providers can not only sustain their mission, but also expand it by focusing on better billing practices for emergency medical services. A strong strategy can help unlock growth and peace of mind, whether you need help navigating compliance, increasing collections, or managing billing services for emergency response units. Don't let outdated billing hold you back. Make 2025 the year you upgrade how your agency handles reimbursement and starts flourishing, not just surviving. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. Please consult with a certified EMS billing consultant for personalized recommendations. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Miami Herald
9 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Fed study blasts few healthcare options in top U.S. tourism states
Romantic getaways. Family memories. Great escapes. We Americans love a good vacation. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter You might be one of the millions lured this – and every – summer by a bold oceanfront, a lakeside fire pit or leafy mountain paths found in these popular tourism states. Related: Major health care company files for bankruptcy to sell assets Or maybe other seasonal adventures like world-class skiing, lush spring gardens or the simply fabulous foliage each autumn draw you and yours to these renowned venues any time of year. 'Cause there's also a ton of history, culture and sports to explore plus delicious local chow for the foodies. But beyond the cheery facades that welcome visitors are sad and scary realities that full-time residents face regarding year-round healthcare access in their rural communities. A new study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston spells out the first-hand accounts of mothers, children, elders and others challenged by distance, income, resources and other economic problems to receive healthcare that so many fellow Americans take for granted. The solutions don't seem to be short-term, straining hopes and accelerating chronic, life-threatening medical crises."Yep. It's a great place to visit but you wouldn't want to live here." Visitors to these states have heard this refrain from locals for decades, all the way back to the last century. Proximity to health care is an increasing concern in rural communities across America. As a result, patient care suffers. So do patients. Greater distances from primary care providers, community hospitals and trauma centers are linked to higher rates of fatal accidents, fatal heart attacks and infant mortality, according to Federal Reserve Bank of Boston senior policy analyst Riley Sullivan. Rural healthcare facilities are finding it more difficult to attract the skilled workforce to fill jobs at every level of skill. Reasons include lack of affordable or available housing and high costs of living magnified by the many, many miles from larger towns and bigger cities. Plus healthcare providers across America maintain that inadequate insurance, Medicaid or Medicare reimbursement rates are leading to major losses at private, public and not-for-profit facilities. Related: Major bankrupt healthcare provider closes distressed hospitals Overall, U.S. hospitals are finding that they have no choice but to cut services due to these acute financial challenges. Some even close because all options have simply run out, leaving their communities in medical deserts facing life-or-death choices 24-7. Boston Fed principal economist and policy advisor Mary Burke, who studies regional labor force participation rates, said all these issues add up to big strains on healthcare systems in Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont. Sullivan's study showed: Northern Light Health, Maine's second-largest health care system, lost a staggering $156 million in 2024. Northern Light Inland Hospital in Waterville (known for its ski resorts) closed earlier this year. In New Hampshire, Catholic Medical Center in Manchester reported monthly losses ranging from "$2 - $3 million," before it was sold in February Vermont, a state-mandated though disputed analysis found that its hospitals will need to find between $700 million and $2.4 billion to break even by 2028. "I think that when you look around the country in rural areas and you find thriving health care systems or hospitals, what you see are thriving communities, where economic development is strong," said Dr. Sunil Eappen, CEO of The University of Vermont Health Network. Economic development is the key to reversing these trends in Vermont and its two northern neighbors. Tourism dollars, though in the millions, just aren't enough. Eappen, also a member of the Boston Fed's Board of Directors, said potential catalysts – including improved infrastructure and more housing – would help stop the bleeding of healthcare access. But ultimately, it all comes down to one thing. "We need another 100-150,000 young people to move in who are working and paying into a commercial insurance population," Eappen said. "We need more people to move in." Related: Major hospital chain owner files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
How the Senate megabill could backfire on conservatives
A provision in a key Senate committee's version of the GOP megabill will backfire against Republicans by forcing red states to consider doing exactly what Republicans don't want them to: expand Medicaid, the CEO of the South Carolina Hospital Association told POLITICO. Republicans have sought to shelter the 10 conservative states that have declined to expand Medicaid to cover more low-income people, as Obamacare encourages with generous federal subsidies. But the Senate bill, in an effort to find the savings needed to extend President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts, would still blow a hole in the budgets of Palmetto state hospitals by reducing what insurers who contract with the state to provide Medicaid services can pay them. States and Washington share the insurance program's costs. 'It affects the viability of the whole system,' said Thornton Kirby, chief executive of the South Carolina Hospital Association, which estimates the Senate proposal will cost the state over $2.3 billion annually. 'If you take away this alternative way to balance the budget, you leave us with only one path…Medicaid expansion,' Kirby said. The Senate is rushing to complete its version of a bill that would enact Trump's agenda using a procedure that requires only a simple majority vote. Trump wants it done by July 4, but with the slim margins in both houses of Congress, the industries affected by the bill are hoping to peel off votes to save themselves from cuts. Republicans can lose no more than three votes in either chamber as long as Democrats remain united in opposition. To make the case that the restrictions on so-called state-directed payments need to go, the hospital association is leaning on three home state Republicans with clout: Sen. Tim Scott, who has a seat on the Finance Committee that has proposed the restrictions; Rep. Russell Fry, who's on the Energy and Commerce Committee that drafted the Medicaid provisions of the megabill the House passed last month; and Henry McMaster, the governor of South Carolina and, Kirby said, a personal friend. 'I don't want to put him in the hot seat,' Kirby said of McMaster. 'He doesn't want to see [Medicaid] upended.' Of Scott, Kirby said he's in touch at least every other day and that the senator and Trump ally 'has been a champion.' 'He understands…he doesn't want to go down that path' of Medicaid expansion, Kirby added. The three Republicans did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Expanding Medicaid could help replace the revenue the Senate provision would take away because it would make many more people — South Carolina now has one of the nation's higher uninsured rates at 9 percent — eligible for the program. Under Obamacare, the federal government picks up 90 percent of the cost for the new enrollees. Under the Finance Committee proposal, state-directed payments to hospitals serving Medicaid patients would fall by 10 percent each year until the total payment rate is only 100-110 percent of the Medicare payment rate. In South Carolina, the current payment rate is more than twice the rate paid by Medicare, the federal health insurance program for elderly people. Hospitals in states that have expanded Medicaid would take an additional hit under the Senate proposal. The Finance Committee would lower the provider tax rate that the 40 states that have expanded Medicaid can levy on hospitals from 6 percent to 3.5 percent. States have used the taxes to boost their federal matching funds, which they have then sent back to hospitals in higher reimbursements. The Senate would freeze the tax rates in states like South Carolina that haven't expanded Medicaid, but would not require them to lower them. The version of the megabill the House passed would freeze the rates for all states, a plan Kirby was willing to accept. On Friday, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) urged GOP leaders to strike the Finance Committee language on Medicaid, warning the crackdown won't clear the House. Republican senators hope to pass their version of the bill next week after which the House would need to pass it before Trump could sign it into law.
