‘Coin flip': 50-50 chance Milky Way will be destroyed in collision with Andromeda galaxy
The Milky Way may not have a catastrophic collision with another huge galaxy as has been predicted, computer simulations revealed Monday, giving our home galaxy a coin-flip chance of avoiding destruction.
But don't worry either way: no galactic smash-up is expected for billions of years, long after our ageing Sun will have burnt away all life on Earth.
The Milky Way and the even-larger galaxy Andromeda are speeding towards each other at 100 kilometres (60 miles) a second, and scientists have long predicted they will collide in around 4.5 billion years.
That would be bad news for our neighbourhood.
Previous research has suggested that the Sun — and our Earth — could wind up in the centre of this newly merged 'Milkomeda' galaxy and get sucked into its supermassive black hole. Alternatively, the Sun could be shot out into the emptiness of intergalactic space.
However 'proclamations of the impending demise of our galaxy seem greatly exaggerated', according to a new study in the journal Nature Astronomy.
There is only a roughly 50 per cent chance the Milky Way and Andromeda will smash into each other in the next 10 billion years, the international team of astrophysicists determined.
'It's basically a coin flip,' lead study author Till Sawala of the University of Helsinki told AFP.
The researchers ran more than 100,000 computer simulations of our universe's future, using new observations from space telescopes.
A galaxy merger in the next five billion years is 'extremely unlikely', Sawala said.
Much more likely is that the galaxies will zoom relatively close to each other — say, a little under 500,000 light years away.
In only half of the simulations did dark matter then eventually drag the two galaxies together into a cataclysmic embrace.
But this would likely only occur in around eight billion years — long after our Sun has died, the researchers found.
'So it could be that our galaxy will end up destroyed,' Sawala said. 'But it's also possible that our galaxy and Andromeda will orbit one another for tens of billions of years — we just don't know.'
'The fate of our galaxy is still completely open,' the study summarised.
The researchers emphasised that their findings did not mean that previous calculations were incorrect, just that they had used newer observations and taken into account the effect of more satellite galaxies.
Future data releases from Europe's recently retired Gaia space telescope as well as Hubble could provide a definitive answer to this question within the next decade, Sawala predicted.
How much all this all matters to us is a matter of debate. The Sun is expected to make Earth inhospitable to life in around a billion years.
'We might have some emotional attachment' to what happens after we're gone, Sawala said.
'I might prefer the Milky Way not to collide with Andromeda, even though it has absolutely no relevance to my own life — or the lives of my children or great-great grandchildren.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
a day ago
- News.com.au
Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom reportedly had explosive fight about ‘ridiculous' space flight
He's gonna hear her roar. Orlando Bloom reportedly blasted Katy Perry's Blue Origin space flight in April as 'embarrassing' and 'cringe-worthy' in 'the middle of a fight.' The actor, 48, 'told her the whole thing looked ridiculous' during the explosive argument, a source told the Daily Mail on Friday. 'It hurt her feelings,' the insider noted. 'Of course she was hurt. Imagine going to space – motherf***ing space – and your partner isn't impressed.' The singer, 40, had reportedly 'hoped' her fiance would 'be more supportive.' She told Sirius XM's The Morning Mash Up listeners in March that Bloom was 'all about' her historic journey to space. In fact, he even was photographed on site, supporting Perry before and after the launch. Because of Bloom's reported comment, however, Perry is finding it 'difficult to accept' that her partner will be attending Lauren Sánchez and Jeff Bezos' Italy wedding this month without her as she tours. 'He complains about her going to space, and then wants to go to the wedding of the people who made it possible for her to do this in the first place,' the outlet added. 'They're already spiralling and now the wedding is another thing that they have to fight about.' TMZ was the first to report that Perry will not be present at the star-studded nuptials due to 'prior commitments' — her Lifetimes tour. While the Grammy nominee 'does have prior commitments,' Bloom's attendance 'feels like … a 'f**k you' to her from him,' according to the outlet. 'They're really her friends more than his, and yet he's the one going to the wedding,' the insider alleged. 'And he's insistent that he goes, which annoys her because he's not particular close to either of them.' Reps for Bloom and Perry have yet to respond to Page Six's requests for comment. The couple have been together since 2016, briefly splitting up the following year before getting engaged in 2019. The duo, who share a 4-year-old daughter named Daisy, put their 2020 wedding on hold amid the coronavirus pandemic. News broke earlier this month that their was 'tension' in the pair's relationship, with People reporting that Perry's 'devastating' album flop caused 'stress.' The outlet claimed, 'Katy was deeply frustrated following the reception of her new album, [ 143 ]. It made her very stressed. Orlando was understanding, but it did cause some tension.' Page Six subsequently heard that the romance is on the rocks. 'It's over,' a source told us. 'They are waiting 'til her tour is over before they split.' Perry's tour, notably, wraps on December 7.
ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
Wantok Program Fraide 20 June
18m ago 18 minutes ago Fri 20 Jun 2025 at 7:30am Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume. Play Duration: 29 minutes 59 seconds 29 m
News.com.au
2 days ago
- News.com.au
What your doctors are writing about you behind your back
Have you ever wondered what your doctor is really thinking about you when you're sitting in their office? The truth is, the world of medicine has long been home to its own secret language – shorthand acronyms and slang that doctors use to communicate about patients to other healthcare staff, often behind their backs. However, this is somewhat of a dying art, as today's medical slang now largely exists in whispered conversations or informal notes. These colloquialisms rarely make their way into a patient's official records, because they're often considered unethical and potentially offensive. Also, using them could result in legal trouble for doctors or hospitals if patients discovered them and decided to pursue legal action. Adam Fox, a collector of medical slang, once shared an example from one of his annual reports to the BBC. A practitioner had written 'TTFO', meaning 'told to f**k off', on a patient's chart. When asked about the entry in court, the practitioner had to pretend the initials stood for 'to take fluids orally'. Another reason for the decline in this sort of slang is that they may be confused with genuine medical terms, potentially leading to misunderstandings. Leading GP, Dr. Zac, tells that he remembers an incident where this happened. 'A patient ended up suing – and winning – after she overheard a clinician referring to 'the cow in the room',' he says. 'She assumed she was being insulted. But the reality was that the clinician had been venting about a COW: a 'Computer on Wheels' that was malfunctioning again (as they often do). 'The context was lost, and what followed was a legal headache no one needed, but it served as a wake-up call. Ever since then, there's been a push to remove any language that could be easily misconstrued, especially when emotions are already heightened in a hospital setting.' According to ex-TedxSydney founder, Remo Giuffre, who explored this phenomenon in his book series Remorandum, some of the codes include: ART: Ain't Right There (patient has an unusual demeanour or behaviour) BWCO: Baby Won't Come Out (needs Caesarian) CFL: Chronic Frustrated Lawyer (frustrated patient who threatens legal action frequently) CSTO/DSTO: Cat/Dog Smarter Than Owner (used by vets) CTD: Circling the Drain (a critically ill patient who is deteriorating) DBI: Dirt Bag Index (this multiplies the number of tattoos by the number of missing teeth to give an estimate of the number of days since the patient last bathed) DUB: Damn Ugly Baby EGO: Excessive Gas Output (patients with frequent flatulence complaints) FF: Frequent Flyer (patient who frequently visits the ER for non-emergency issues) FLK w/ GLM: Funny-Looking Kid with a Good Looking Mum FUBAR: F**ked Up Beyond All Recognition (extremely complex or difficult situation) FURB: Funny, Unusual, Rectal Blockage (people who use unusual objects in their anus) GOK: God Only Knows (patient with symptoms that are baffling or defy a clear diagnosis) GOMER: Get Out of My Emergency Room GPO: Good for Parts Only (patients whose injuries may mean they are unlikely to survive) GRAFOB: Grim Reaper At Foot Of Bed LOBNH: Lights On But Nobody Home (patients who are alert but mentally absent) LOFA: Lack of F**king Ability (patients who struggle with simple tasks or who seem helpless) LOLINAD: Little Old Lady In No Apparent Distress NQR: Not Quite Right (patient who doesn't have a clear diagnosis but isn't healthy either) PITA: Pain In The A** TEETH: Tried Everything Else, Try Homeopathy (chronic cases that resist standard treatment) TMB: Too Many Birthdays (elderly patients, often with multiple chronic issues due to age) TOBP: Tired of Being Pregnant (especially patient demanding Caesarian) TSTL: Too Stupid To Live (patients engaging in extremely risky or unhealthy behaviour) UBI: Unexplained Beer Injury (injuries of unknown origin associated with alcohol consumption) VIP Syndrome: A high-status patient who expects special treatment that disrupts standard care WADA: Weak And Dizzy All-over (patients with vague, non-specific symptoms) Dr Zac says that while most of these terms are on the way out, some acronyms still hold a strong clinical place and are routinely used in day-to-day care. These are the ones that serve a real purpose in communication and patient safety, not 'cheap laughs', he says. Here are a few that remain in standard use: FAST – Face, Arms, Speech, Time (stroke recognition tool) ABCDE – Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure (standard trauma and emergency assessment structure) SOAP – Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan (common structure for medical notes) PEARL – Pupils Equal And Reactive to Light (used in neurological exams) AVPU – Alert, Voice, Pain, Unresponsive (used to measure level of consciousness) 'So while the cheeky acronyms of old might still make the rounds on Reddit or late-night handover jokes, in practice, they've mostly been replaced with clearer, standardised terminology,' Dr Zac says. 'And maybe that's a good thing.'
