China's nuclear arsenal growing fastest globally, may hit 1,500 by 2035

China's nuclear arsenal is growing faster than that of any other country, adding roughly 100 new warheads per year since 2023, according to estimates by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri). In its annual report on armaments, disarmament, and international security released on Monday, the institute said China is now estimated to hold at least 600 nuclear warheads.
ICBM silos and long-term nuclear ambitions
By January 2025, China had either completed or was nearing completion of around 350 new intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) silos. These silos span three major desert sites in the north and three mountainous regions in the east of the country.
If China maintains its current trajectory, it could possess a number of ICBMs comparable to those of Russia or the United States by 2030. Still, even if China reaches the upper estimate of 1,500 nuclear warheads by 2035, this would amount to only about one-third of the current arsenals of the US or Russia.
Sipri Director Dan Smith raised concerns about the weakening of nuclear arms control frameworks and the risk of a renewed arms race. 'China is increasing its nuclear force steadily,' Smith warned, adding that the country could potentially reach 1,000 warheads within the next seven to eight years.
Israel, India and Pakistan also expanding capabilities
Israel—while officially maintaining strategic ambiguity regarding its nuclear weapons—is believed to be upgrading its arsenal. In 2024, it tested a missile propulsion system, potentially linked to its Jericho series of nuclear-capable ballistic missiles. Israel also appears to be enhancing its plutonium production reactor at the Dimona facility.
India, meanwhile, expanded its nuclear stockpile in 2024 and continued developing new types of delivery systems, including 'canisterised' missiles. Once fully developed, these systems could enable India to store missiles with warheads already mounted and may allow for multiple warheads per missile.
Pakistan also advanced its nuclear programme in 2024, developing new delivery systems and increasing its fissile material stock. Sipri analysts say this indicates a likely expansion of Pakistan's arsenal in the coming years.
India-Pakistan tensions nearly spark nuclear crisis
Earlier in 2025, military tensions between India and Pakistan escalated into a brief armed conflict. According to Sipri, this episode included strikes on nuclear-related military infrastructure and saw a surge in third-party disinformation campaigns.
'The combination of strikes on nuclear-related military infrastructure and third-party disinformation risked turning a conventional conflict into a nuclear crisis,' said Matt Korda, Associate Senior Researcher at Sipri's Weapons of Mass Destruction Programme and Associate Director at the Nuclear Information Project at FAS. 'This should act as a stark warning for states seeking to increase their reliance on nuclear weapons.
Global nuclear stockpile in 2025
As of January 2025, the global nuclear stockpile was estimated at 12,241 warheads. Of these, about 9,614 were in military stockpiles and available for potential use. Around 3,912 warheads were deployed on missiles or aircraft, with the rest held in central storage.
Approximately 2,100 of these deployed warheads were kept on high operational alert and mounted on ballistic missiles—nearly all of them belonging to either Russia or the United States. However, Sipri now suggests that China may also be maintaining some of its warheads in a launch-ready state during peacetime.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Indian Express

28 minutes ago

• Indian Express

Delhi must underline for Washington the grave dangers of Asim Munir's vision of Pakistan

In 2018, in his first term, US President Donald Trump had spelt out, in his typically blunt style, the sense that Rawalpindi and Islamabad had taken advantage of Washington: 'The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools… they give safe haven to terrorists'. This week, he said: 'I love Pakistan'. It would be simplistic to view the unprecedented lunch meeting at the White House between Trump and General Asim Munir — the first time a military leader who is not head of state in Pakistan has been accorded the honour — as a major u-turn. Indeed, India-US ties have been steadily deepening over the last three decades, based on a convergence of economic and strategic interests and shared values, even as the US-Pakistan relationship has grown more volatile. That said, the current moment in international relations is one of flux and Delhi must tread carefully. The Pahalgam attack underscored the grave national security threat that Pakistan-sponsored terrorism continues to present for India. With Operation Sindoor, Delhi has made it clear to both Rawalpindi and the world that it will pierce the shield of 'proxies' and not give in to Pakistan's nuclear blackmail. India has raised the costs of terror in order to ensure that such attacks on its soil are not carried out with impunity. Communicating the new normal it has etched with Pakistan after Pahalgam to its friends abroad is Delhi's challenge. To be sure, Delhi cannot control who Trump chooses to engage, and for what reasons. Pakistan's geography — it shares a 900-km border with Iran — may make it an attractive tactical partner for the US in the current Israel-Iran war. There is speculation that Pakistan's rolling out the red carpet for the privately-owned US cryptocurrency firm, World Liberty Financial (WLF), may have helped ingratiate Munir to the White House — Donald Trump Jr has close ties with WLF. A White House spokesperson has claimed that Munir has proposed Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his self-proclaimed role — firmly denied by India — in the post Op Sindoor cessation of hostilities. For India, though, the question is less why the Munir-Trump meeting, and more about how to ensure that the red lines it has laid down are respected, including by the US. Just a fortnight before terrorists killed 26 people in Pahalgam after confirming their religion, Munir had reiterated some of the nastiest tropes of the two-nation theory. He called Kashmir Pakistan's 'jugular vein', and reduced the complex and layered identities of the Subcontinent's people to their religion. It is now for Delhi — diplomatically, through the appropriate channels — to remind Washington that Pakistan's Field Marshal is a fundamentalist with an army at his disposal. Delhi has done well so far in standing its ground and making it clear that it will not compromise on its national interest: Even if belatedly, it issued a clear denial of President Trump's claims about mediating the ceasefire. Now, it must underline for Washington the danger that Munir's vision of Pakistan poses for stability in the region and for global order — and why Delhi has drawn some hard red lines.

Indian Express

3 hours ago

• Indian Express

Labelling ASEAN countries as China's ‘B-team' unwarranted, insulting: Congress

The Congress on Friday hit out at Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal for his remarks against the India-ASEAN trade agreements, signed under the UPA government, saying labelling these countries as 'B team of China' is 'irresponsible and insulting'. Speaking at the India Global Forum (IGF) session in London, Goyal said, 'There was a point of time 15 years ago when we were more focused on doing FTAs with countries who were our competitors. So if I am doing an ASEAN agreement, it really is silly because (that is) opening up my market to my competitors, many of whom have now become the B team of China.' 'So effectively and indirectly, I have opened up my market for goods that find their way from China into India,' Goyal had said. Sharma, a former Union Commerce Minister, Friday said in a statement, 'Piyush Goyal's statement terming the Trade agreement with ASEAN as silly and labelling these countries as B team of China is irresponsible and insulting.' He said India and ASEAN countries 'have been engaged in a multifaceted relationship for over three decades' which is 'mutually rewarding and important'. 'This is an integral part of the Look East policy to deepen and diversify India's relations with a region economically vibrant and of enormous geostrategic importance…' 'The Commerce Minister should be prioritising strengthening trade relations with partner countries and not insulting them while bending backwards to negotiate a suboptimal trade agreement with US on its terms,' he added.

Time of India

5 hours ago

• Time of India

Pakistan army chief Asim Munir courts US opinion makers amid bid to reset strategic ties

ISLAMABAD: In a bid to recalibrate Pakistan's global narrative and bolster ties with Washington, Field Marshal Syed concluded a series of high-level engagements in the United States, meeting senior American scholars, strategic experts, and international media representatives during an official visit to Washington DC, the Pakistani military said on Friday. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In a carefully choreographed diplomatic offensive, Munir interacted with leading think tanks and policy institutions, offering what officials described as 'Pakistan's principled perspectives' on evolving regional and global dynamics. His engagements underscored Islamabad's renewed focus on international outreach amid a shifting geopolitical landscape in South Asia. The army chief reiterated Pakistan's commitment to regional stability, counterterrorism, and a rules-based global order, pitching the country as a responsible actor in an increasingly multipolar world. Munir spoke at length about Pakistan's counter-terrorism strategy, highlighting military operations such as Maarka-e-Haqa and Operation Bunyanum Marsoos. He reminded his audience of Pakistan's role as a frontline state in the global war on terror, citing the 'immense sacrifices' borne by its security forces and civilians. Without naming India, Munir warned against 'regional actors using terrorism as an instrument of hybrid warfare' – a familiar refrain in Pakistan's diplomatic lexicon referring to its neighbour. While not new, the accusation resurfacing in the US capital, signalling Pakistan's intent to shape the security discourse in South Asia. Munir also showcased Pakistan's economic aspirations. He pitched the country's untapped potential in IT, agriculture, and mineral wealth, calling on global stakeholders to invest in these 'engines of shared prosperity'. From foreign policy to economic diplomacy, Munir portrayed Pakistan as a country pursuing dialogue, diplomacy, and international law — an image Islamabad has been keen to project as it seeks to distance itself from past reputational baggage. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Discussing Pakistan-US relations, Munir called for transforming the historical security-centric engagement into a multidimensional partnership grounded in strategic convergence and mutual respect. He acknowledged past cooperation on counterterrorism and economic development but pushed for a broader framework of engagement. According to Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the army's media affairs wing, participants appreciated the candid nature of the discussions and acknowledged Pakistan's efforts to maintain regional stability. The meetings were seen as a trust-building exercise amid evolving US priorities in the Indo-Pacific region and growing scepticism over Islamabad's commitments. The visit comes at a time when Pakistan is striving to reset ties with major powers, especially after its recent economic crises and shifting regional alignments. With India drawing closer to the US and Afghanistan remaining volatile, Islamabad is attempting to reposition itself as an indispensable — if complicated — regional player.