How to make health care affordable for more Rhode Islanders? Look for the union label.

Dozens of Lifespan employees gather for the announcement of the health system's name change to Brown university Health during a press conference in the lobby of Hasbro Children's Hospital on June 20, 2024. Rhode Island has nearly 15,000 unionized health care workers. (Photo by Alexander Castro/Rhode Island Current)
The Rhode Island health care system faces a number of significant threats to its viability. In Washington, D.C., Congressional Republicans are proposing significant cuts to Medicaid spending, while locally, for-profit hospital owners are filing for bankruptcy protection and state leaders grapple with the fallout. As labor leaders, we share the concerns of many Rhode Islanders about the condition of our health care system. In our small state of just over 1 million people, over 50% of us are insured through either Medicare or Medicaid. In our hospitals, over 70% of patients are covered by public health care plans. That leaves only 25% of hospital patients covered by commercial insurance, well below our neighboring states of Massachusetts (30%) and Connecticut (29%).
What most Rhode Islanders might not know: The next largest group of insured Rhode Islanders get their health care from a union-negotiated health insurance plan, whether they are a union member or not. Even though there are about 9,000 unionized state employees, approximately 33,000 people are insured through union plans. It's not only because of the dependents we cover, but also because our plan also covers non-union workers like managers and supervisors, as well as their families.
In the Ocean State, there are close to 15,000 unionized health care workers; so, not only are our members consumers of health care services, but we are also providers of health care. We have a vested interest in making sure our health care system is as strong as possible. That is why we believe all Rhode Islanders who are concerned about the state of our health care system should encourage more workers to join labor unions where they work. To us, increased unionization is a key component to a strategy ensuring every Rhode Islander has access to affordable health care services while simultaneously addressing a health care funding crisis that seems to get more precarious by the day.
As a recent poll commissioned by the Rhode Island AFL-CIO found, there is strong public support for unions in the Ocean State, with more than eight in 10 Rhode Islanders agreeing that unions 'are necessary to protect the working person.'
There are just over 500,000 Rhode Island based non-farm jobs in the state according to the Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training. About 80,000 of these jobs are protected by collective bargaining agreements. We know from sources like the U.S. Department of Treasury that not only do unions raise the wages of their members by 10 to 15%compared to similar non-union jobs, but that all workers in markets with a heavy union presence see economic improvements. On top of that, 96% of union members have employer- provided health insurance compared to just 69% of non-union workers.
We have a vested interest in making sure our health care system is as strong as possible. That is why we believe all Rhode Islanders who are concerned about the state of our health care system should encourage more workers to join labor unions where they work.
Now imagine there were 10,000 more union members in Rhode Island by the end of 2025. If the average wage paid to a Rhode Island worker averages $65,000 per year, and these workers, through collective bargaining, could increase their wages by 10%, that would mean the individual worker would see a salary increase of $6,500. In a state with just over 1 million people, that means an additional $65 million in economic activity, leading to increased tax revenues from income and sales taxes. It would also mean these 10,000 workers, and their dependents, would be much more likely to have commercial health insurance. This could equate to as many as 25,000 fewer people on Medicare, meaning our hospitals would receive adequate payments for the services they provide, instead of relying on low reimbursement rates from public health insurance plans.
Please don't misunderstand our point of view. As trade unionists, we believe that in a perfect world, there would be some form of national health care system where every American's health care would be provided for without concern for the cost to the patient and their family. But we don't live in a perfect world, and Rhode Island is confronting a crisis today.
According to Rhode Island General Laws § 28-7-2, '…it is declared to be the public policy of the state to encourage the practice and procedure of collective bargaining.' This section of law refers not only to the public sector workers, but to those in the private sector as well. It is why the AFL-CIO refers to Rhode Island as a 'labor state' and why, we think, we can use the power of organized labor to help address Rhode Island's health care crisis. That is why we are calling on the collective leadership of the state — elected officials, business, community, and other civic leaders — to join with us during the next few months as the General Assembly debates next year's state budget and encourage as many Rhode Islanders as possible to join with their coworkers and negotiate for better wages and benefits. The entire state of Rhode Island would be better off if more of our proudly working-class state were part of organized labor.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Forbes

2 hours ago

• Forbes

Price Controls On Doctors Are Costing Patients Dearly

Market Manipulation Just like the December 2024 continuing resolution, the current budget reconciliation bill fails to address the problem of Medicare reimbursing physicians at below market rates. Without a fix, the inevitable consequences will be worsening doctor shortages, declining healthcare quality, higher overall healthcare spending, and the accelerated loss of independent practices. Of course, how do we know that Medicare's payments to doctors are below their economic value? To start, Medicare's reimbursement rates have declined relative to both the cost of running a medical practice and inflation. Doctors consistently report that they lose money treating Medicare patients. A survey of doctors found that Medicare's low reimbursement rates (68%) are a primary threat to independent practices. As for inflation, it has grown 34.5% overall since January 2016 while the prices received by doctors have grown less than half as much - just 15.1%. This is not due to demand for healthcare declining – remember the huge number of aging Baby Boomers seeking health care – or a huge surge in the number of qualified doctors serving patients. In fact, the level of doctors serving patients today - 25.4 active physicians per 10,000 residents - is down from 2019 and has fallen back to 2009 levels. The problem is government setting prices at below market levels. And setting prices below market rates cause adverse consequences to our health, such as fewer doctors available to serve patients. This creates serious health risks for patients including longer wait times for appointments, less access to specialty care, shorter doctor visits, larger numbers of medical errors, and more misdiagnoses or missed diagnoses. These risks are more acute for people living in rural areas, who have a higher chance of living in areas deemed 'medical deserts' or regions that lack sufficient access to pharmacies, primary care providers, and hospitals. Medicare's uneconomical reimbursement system is also changing how patient care is delivered. For example, under the current reimbursement system, Medicare compensates hospitals more than independent physician offices for performing the same service. This incentivizes independent practices to merge with hospitals. Consolidating lower-cost physician practices into higher-cost hospital systems is driving up overall healthcare costs for patients and taxpayers and is reducing patient choice. Congress has acknowledged that there are serious consequences from government price controls, enacting legislation to raise provider payments by 2.9% for most of 2024. But these payments went back down on January 1, and the problem continues to plague the healthcare system. Fixing Medicare's flawed reimbursement policy should be a top priority for Congress. The more efficient reform comprehensively addresses Medicare's broader deficiencies by turning Medicare into a cash-based benefit system that funds health savings accounts (HSAs) for seniors. This direct payment option allows beneficiaries to receive their Medicare benefits in the same manner that they receive their Social Security benefits. At current spending levels, Medicare could give each beneficiary $15,150 annually to cover their insurance and healthcare costs. Under this system, patients and physicians, not bureaucrats, would take change and prices would reflect value. Providers would have to compete and would be incentivized to find new and better ways to expand value and reducing costs for patients. Fundamental reforms that establish well-functioning healthcare and health insurance markets will take time. Given this, Congress could act more immediately to index government payments to medical inflation and stop paying different reimbursement rates for the same services depending on where care is delivered. With more people aging, taxpayers will be spending more and more for Medicare and Medicaid. Unless Congress acts soon to stop Medicare's underpayment of physicians, it is patients who will ultimately pay the highest price with less access to doctors and specialists and longer wait times for life-saving care.

Yahoo

20 hours ago

• Yahoo

This Under-the-Radar Healthcare Stock Could Be a Solid Income Play

CVS Health Corporation (NYSE:CVS) is one of the best dividend stocks for a bear market. Even during economic downturns, people continue to rely on medications, essential consumer products, and affordable local healthcare. CVS Health Corporation (NYSE:CVS) serves as a convenient healthcare and retail destination within communities. A row of shelves in a retail pharmacy, demonstrating the variety of drugs and over-the-counter products. The company's overall business remains solid, thanks to its diversified operations and multiple sources of revenue. In recent years, it has expanded its presence in primary care and launched a subsidiary called Cordavis to focus on developing and marketing biosimilar drugs. Its broad reach across communities and wide range of services are key advantages. Lately, higher Medicare usage and increased post-pandemic healthcare costs have impacted the company's revenue and earnings growth. However, CVS Health Corporation (NYSE:CVS) remains profitable and maintains a solid cash position. In the most recent quarter, it reported $4.6 billion in operating cash flow. Looking ahead to 2025, the company has raised its full-year operating cash flow forecast from around $6.5 billion to approximately $7.0 billion. In addition, CVS Health Corporation (NYSE:CVS) appears to have significant room to grow its dividend. With a cash payout ratio of just 30%, even doubling that figure would still leave it within a sustainable range. Due to this strong cash generation, CVS Health Corporation (NYSE:CVS) has maintained its payouts since 1997. Currently, it offers a quarterly dividend of $0.665 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.96%, as of June 17. While we acknowledge the potential of CVS as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure. None.

Yahoo

21 hours ago

• Yahoo

Feds demand Oregon Health Plan data in crackdown against immigrant coverage

PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – Federal officials are seeking the personal data of the Medicaid-funded Oregon Health Plan as part of a crackdown on coverage for undocumented immigrants. The request, as first reported by , comes after the Department of Homeland Security provided immigration officials with similar data from California, Illinois, Washington state and Washington, D.C. 'Just wrong': Oregon advocates say SCOTUS decision targets transgender youth Oregon, like these states, has expanded medical coverage to undocumented residents through state-funded programs. On Monday, Gov. Tina Kotek said her office is reviewing the order. 'I think it's very important, to a degree that we can, that we do not share personal information,' Kotek said. 'Always comfortable with aggregated information, but when we start sharing personal medical information that could be misused, that's a challenge for me.' The state of Oregon has until the end of July 2025 to comply. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.