Officials lock in nearly 7,000 acres of land for future generations: 'Adds a vital new link in the state's network of preserved natural spaces'
Chron, a division of the Houston Chronicle, reported that Texas is adding 6,900 acres of protected land to the state's network of preserved natural spaces.
The establishment of this protected area "presents an opportunity for the conservation and management of an ecologically unique and important habitat," said Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) executive director David Yoskowitz.
The TPWD announced that the newly-protected area is called the Trinity River Wildlife Management Area, and it is the first time in nearly 20 years that the state has added a significant mass of land to its protected area. These public lands, overseen by TPWD, have a goal to protect native wildlife and habitats and create outdoor recreation opportunities for visitors.
The protected status was secured through a combination of public and private funding.
In total, Texas has over 50 Wildlife Management Areas (WMA) of over 700,000 acres that cover different ecological regions.
Having protected land is important because these areas are critical to preserving natural habitats and biodiversity. Wildlife can thrive in their natural environments, which helps the species become better-established and can revive endangered populations.
Protected lands also help communities by maintaining natural landscapes that become areas of recreation and cultural significance, ensuring the lands are conserved for future generations.
Chron reports that the new WMA borders more than 11 miles of the Trinity River, bringing together a conservation corridor connecting more than 21,000 acres of protected land, including bottomland hardwood forests and wetlands. The protected area will help naturally absorb and slow floodwater, reducing erosion and improving water quality downstream, having a positive impact on human health.
The land is also providing a natural, protected habitat for migratory birds, pollinators that are vital to the health of the region, and other wildlife.
TPWD is set to begin restoration efforts of this newly protected area and plans to revitalize the wetlands, bottomland hardwood forests, and upland prairie. In addition to providing a secure habitat for wildlife, the plan is to provide Texans and visitors from other areas more opportunities to connect with nature.
The area, according to the article, "adds a vital new link in the state's network of preserved natural spaces."
Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty?
Definitely
Only in some areas
No way
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
LevelJump Announces 2024 Financial Results
Toronto, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - June 20, 2025) - LevelJump Healthcare Corp. (TSXV: JUMP) ("LevelJump" or the "Company"), is pleased to announce its financial results for the year ended December 31, 2024. Financial and Operational Highlights Revenues were $17.7 million in 2024 compared to $12.6 million in revenues for 2023, a year over year revenue increase of 41%. Canadian Teleradiology Services, Inc., the Company's 100% owned subsidiary had EBITDA for 2024 of $3.35 million. 2024 Financial Results for fourth quarter and year Revenues of $4.8 million in Q4 2024 and $17.7 million for the year 2024 with a net profit of $1.95 million for Q4 2024 and a net profit of $1.2 million for the year 2024. EBITDA of $395,936 for Q4 2024 and $1,545,298 for the year 2024. Subsequent Events Subsequent to the year end, the Company entered an agreement to acquire two additional diagnostic imaging outpatient clinic locations in Calgary, Alberta. The transaction is expected to close towards the end of July 2025. See the Company's news release dated June 13, 2025. Management Comments "2024 was a transformative year for our Company, marked by significant growth, particularly within our clinic operations," said Mitch Geisler, CEO. "Our year-over-year revenue increased by more than 40%, and we achieved strong EBITDA performance. We are now interpreting imaging scans for approximately 200,000 patients annually across all operations. Our focus remains on driving organic growth and advancing our long-term vision for continued expansion." Non-IFRS Financial Measures This news release contains financial terms (such as adjusted EBITDA) that are not considered in IFRS. Such financial measures, together with measures prepared in accordance with IFRS, provide useful information to investors and shareholders, as management uses them to evaluate the operating performance of the Company. The Company's determination of these non-IFRS measures may differ from other reporting issuers and therefore are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Further, these non-IFRS measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance or cash flows prepared in accordance with IFRS. These financial measures are included because management uses this information to analyze operating performance and liquidity. For further details on the results, please refer to LevelJump's Management, Discussion and Analysis and Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, which are available on the Company's website ( and under the Company's profile on SEDAR+ ( About LevelJump Healthcare LevelJump Healthcare Corp., (TSXV: JUMP) provides telehealth solutions to client hospitals and imaging centers through its Teleradiology division, as well as in person radiology services through its Diagnostic Centres. JUMP focuses primarily on critical care for urgent and emergency patients, establishing integral relationships in the communities we serve. ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFLEVELJUMP HEALTHCARE CORP. Mitchell GeislerChief Executive Officerinfo@ CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION This news release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws relating to the Company's business plans and the outlook of the Company's industry. Although the Company believes, in light of the experience of its officers and directors, current conditions and expected future developments and other factors that have been considered appropriate, that the expectations reflected in this forward-looking information are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on them because the Company can give no assurance that they will prove to be correct. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by these statements. The statements in this press release are made as of the date of this release and the Company assumes no responsibility to update them or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances other than as required by applicable securities laws. The Company undertakes no obligation to comment on analyses, expectations or statements made by third-parties in respect of the Company, Canadian Teleradiology Services, Inc., their securities, or their respective financial or operating results (as applicable). Neither the Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. The securities being offered have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "U.S. Securities Act") or any U.S. state securities laws, and may not be offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, United States persons absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable U.S. state securities laws. This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities in the United States, nor in any other jurisdiction. To view the source version of this press release, please visit Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
After Plummeting 40%, Where Will UnitedHealth Group Stock Be in 1 Year? Here Is What History Suggests.
UnitedHealth is facing some reputational damage following a series of missteps by the company's management. Its recent share price action is similar to what happened with CrowdStrike last year following a faulty software update in the cybersecurity platform. Historical trends show a clear indication of where beaten-down stocks of quality businesses tend to move over time. 10 stocks we like better than UnitedHealth Group › UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH) has been one of the more interesting case studies in the stock market this year. Many stocks that have witnessed plummeting share prices can point to President Donald Trump's new tariff policies as the culprit. UnitedHealth's 40% decline can be traced to a number of different hiccups, but perhaps ironically, tariff rhetoric hasn't made a direct impact on the company. Let's explore what's going on at UnitedHealth right now and dig into the details on what's driving investors to run for the hills. From there, I'll draw some parallels from other businesses that remind me of UnitedHealth's current situation to help asses where the stock could be one year from now. Over the last month, UnitedHealth investors have received a lot of not-so-great information. For starters, management surprised investors when the company reduced earnings guidance during the first-quarter financial report. Not only is lowering guidance usually met with some level of panic, but the underlying reasons for the decelerating earnings likely caused some investors to seriously question the company's leadership. Essentially, management admitted that forecasts for utilization rates in its Medicare Advantage business as well as reimbursements from its pharmacy benefit management unit weren't anywhere close to reality. The cherry on top of this news was that UnitedHealth CEO Andrew Witty abruptly stepped down and was replaced with its prior chief executive, Stephen Hemsley. I know the details above make it sound like UnitedHealth Group is in a messy situation with no light at the end of the tunnel. But I can't help but draw some parallels between UnitedHealth's situation and that of another market leader, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike stock plummeted last July following the discovery of a bug in its software during an update. The ripple effect was that many of CrowdStrike's users experienced widespread outages -- impacting their own operations and customers. At the time, this was a reputational nightmare for CrowdStrike. However, as the chart above shows, CrowdStrike stock is now 113% higher than where it bottomed last July (about one year ago). To be fair, the CrowdStrike example detailed above isn't entirely an apples-to-apples comparison to UnitedHealth. Both companies operate in entirely different end markets. But at a high level, I'd argue both CrowdStrike and UnitedHealth are in the business of selling mission-critical products that are always in demand: cybersecurity and insurance. Taking my analysis one step further, notice what UnitedHealth Group stock shares with the broader price movement of the S&P 500. Over a long time horizon, both the S&P 500 index and UnitedHealth stock increased in value. These trends underscore the idea that even though businesses experience headwinds from time to time, prices continue to rise for quality businesses despite these challenges. Between the CrowdStrike example explored above and the broader movements across the S&P 500, I think that history suggests UnitedHealth Group will move higher in the long run. With that said, I am cautiously optimistic that shares will be much higher in just one year and rebound in a similar fashion to that of CrowdStrike. As the chart above illustrates, UnitedHealth stock is now trading near five-year lows. Similar to what happened with CrowdStrike, I think this price action suggests that expectations around the company's performance are exceedingly low. While 2025 won't be the best year for UnitedHealth from a growth perspective, management anticipates overcoming operational hurdles currently plaguing the company and achieving renewed growth by next year. When you combine the encouraging outlook with the flurry of insiders buying UnitedHealth stock right now, it could be argued that the bad news is already priced in. In my view, if UnitedHealth begins to show any hint of a turnaround, investors could begin pouring back into the stock. As patient investors experienced with CrowdStrike, investing in UnitedHealth stock at its current levels could pay off big time. For these reasons, I think now is a compelling opportunity to buy the dip in UnitedHealth stock and prepare to hold on as the company works through its challenges. Before you buy stock in UnitedHealth Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and UnitedHealth Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,821!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $886,880!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 791% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Adam Spatacco has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends CrowdStrike. The Motley Fool recommends UnitedHealth Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. After Plummeting 40%, Where Will UnitedHealth Group Stock Be in 1 Year? Here Is What History Suggests. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Chicago Tribune
2 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
David Wright Faladé: Black Texans were not ignorant of their freedom before June 19, 1865
At the end of the Civil War, Union Army Gen. Gordon Granger arrived in Galveston, Texas, to establish a base of operations for his occupying troops, and soon after, he read General Order No. 3 at a public meeting, proclaiming all enslaved people to be free. African Americans in the crowd responded with cheers and rejoicing. In the reporting at the time and in common retellings since, the event, known as Juneteenth, has been described as the day in 1865 the enslaved people of Texas finally 'learned' that they were free. Public figures and news outlets, then and now, have characterized it this way. I want to quibble with this depiction, as it suggests that enslaved Texans had been ignorant of the fact of their own freedom. This strikes me as improbable — impossible, even. By Southern law, enslaved people were property, like a plow horse or a prized settee, bought and sold or passed down from one family member to another. But they always knew themselves to be fully human, and they were everywhere present in the lives of those who owned them. They served drinks as their masters discussed the issues of the day with visiting guests and stood at hand during meals, overhearing conversations. They knew what their owners knew, oftentimes without the owners realizing. And they shared the information among each other — in the slave quarters and in those of nearby plantations, and also beyond, as enslaved people worked on docks and at rail depots. This became apparent during the war, when runaways fleeing into Union lines became sources of valuable intelligence to the invading army. So, the enslaved people of Texas had surely followed the progress of the war elsewhere in the South, including the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation, just as their owners did, and very likely just as quickly. The problem was that, acting on this knowledge was exceedingly difficult. As Union victories mounted in the east, die-hard secessionists fled to Texas, the westernmost state in the Confederacy, far from the fighting, with as many as 150,000 enslaved people in tow. Slavery continued fairly uninterrupted there throughout the entirety of the war, and even after. Violence was the means by which slaveholders were able to get fellow human beings to submit to servitude, and Texans were willing to use it liberally. The arrival of the Union Army in the summer of 1865 did little to change this. The first sentences of Granger's order, which proclaimed that 'all slaves are free' and that future engagement between 'former masters and slaves' should be as 'employer and hired labor,' are often cited when telling the story of Juneteenth. But later ones bear closer scrutiny, particularly given the blatant racism suggested in them. General Order No. 3 goes on: 'The freed are advised to remain at their present homes, and work for wages. They are informed that they will not be allowed to collect at military posts; and that they will not be supported in idleness either there or elsewhere.' Granger's evocation of a potential 'idleness' on the part of the formerly enslaved and his command to restrict their freedom of movement illustrate a widely held ambivalence toward Black freedom at the time, by Northern white people as much as Southern ones. His order was not the panacea that we, today, might construe it to have been. African Americans, who for some time had likely known themselves to be legally free, were hardly free, in point of fact. To the contrary, in order to prevent the feared chaos that too much disruption of the status quo might incite, General Order No. 3 insisted on restricting their movement and on maintaining a historically fraught overseer-laborer relationship between white and Black. And though Granger declared that wages should be paid, his soldiers provided little enforcement. Despite the constraints, though, Black Texans attempted to claim their freedom. In an example from T.J. Stiles' book 'Custer's Trials,' in which he describes George Armstrong Custer's experience as part of Granger's occupying army, Stiles recounts a story from October 1865, more than three months into the Union presence. A 9-year-old Black girl quit the plantation on which she had been kept in bondage before emancipation and made her way 23 miles to Hempstead, northwest of Houston, to rejoin her mother, from whom she had been separated during slavery. Upon learning of the girl's departure, the wife of the plantation's owner dispatched their teen son to bring her back. The boy tracked the girl down, at her mother's side, and when she refused to return with him, he 'tied her hands behind her and then tied a rope around her waist, pulled her out, and tied her to a ring in his saddle, mounted and put spurs to the horse,' according to a Union Army surgeon. The surgeon reported that, by the time they arrived, the girl was just 'a mass of broken flesh and bones.' The boy was arrested, but Custer, the officer in charge, chose not to prosecute and sent him home. Persisting subjugation was a real and present threat for the formerly enslaved, even after Juneteenth. Black people knew they were free. They were struggling to find a way to actually live freely — to enjoy the promise of America that they and their forbears had toiled to help construct. How we understand the legacy of Juneteenth reflects how we understand the indispensable, foundational role of African Americans in American history. Black folks were not passive players in the drama of slavery and freedom. They militated as best they could, against extraordinary odds and even greater resistance. To characterize Juneteenth as the moment African Americans only first 'learned' of their emancipation risks perpetuating the false idea, broadly believed during slavery and recently resuscitated through efforts to ban books and scrub curricula, that they were merely victims, benighted and lesser, incapable of significant action for themselves.
