Texas Gov. Greg Abbott vetoes SB 3, cites proposed state THC ban conflicting with federal law
In the 11th hour until the deadline, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has struck down the proposed THC ban from state lawmakers, giving Texans his reason why.
Senate Bill 3, authored by Lubbock Republican Sen. Charles Perry, was set to severely restrict the $8 billion hemp industry in Texas.
Others are reading: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signs historic $20 billion water investment bill, talks state impact
Perry, along with Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, on their media press tour around Texas earlier in the month, defended the proposed law, saying it would have closed a loophole in state law that allowed "bad actors" to make synthetic cannabis that is "more powerful and more potent than anything we've ever seen before."
In a statement on social media, Patrick criticised Abbott's decision to veto SB 3.
"Throughout the legislative session, (Gov. Abbott) remained totally silent on Senate Bill 3, the bill that would have banned dangerous THC products in Texas," Patrick stated. "His late-night veto, on an issue supported by 105 of 108 Republicans in the legislature, strongly backed by law enforcement, many in the medical and education communities, and the families who have seen their loved ones' lives destroyed by these very dangerous drugs, leaves them feeling abandoned."
Patrick further stated he would hold a press conference to discuss the bill's failure, but it must be noted that this statement was issued before Abbott announced a special session for lawmakers to address SB 3.
Document: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's Veto Proclamation on SB 3
Abbott also released a four-page proclamation as to why he vetoed the bill, stating that the bill was "well-intentioned" but "would never go into effect because of valid constitutional challenges."
Abbott further cited a similar bill in 2023 in Arkansas, which was challenged in the courts and has been left in limbo on whether it can be enforced or not.
"If I were to allow Senate Bill 3 to become law, its enforcement would be enjoined for years, leaving existing abuses unaddressed. Texas cannot afford to wait," read Abbott's proclamation.
Abbott, a former Texas Supreme Court justice and attorney general, said it would create a showdown between federal and state law with legal ramifications for farmers and pharmacists.
The governor also said SB 3 could also take private property unconstitutionally — even if the bill is aimed at so-called "bad actors" exploiting a loophole.
"But there are also many Texans conducting business responsibly, who invested millions of dollars planting fields or opening up retail stores in reliance on laws making hemp a lawful product," read Abbott's justification. "While States may restrict the use of dangerous contraband, it is a different thing entirely to change the rules in the middle of the game."
Others are reading: What's the difference between marijuana, cannabis? 4/20 terms to know.
But the reality of the issue does not go unnoticed by the governor, who gave lawmakers the task of creating a law that protects public safety, aligns with federal law, has a "fully funded enforcement structure," and can go into effect without delay.
"Passing a law is not the same thing as actually solving a problem," read Abbott's message. "Texas needs a bill that is enforceable and will make our communities safer today, rather than years from now."
After the governor's veto, hemp industry leaders released statements praising the governor for his decision but also warning that the issues at hand still need to be addressed more meaningfully.
"We respect Governor Abbott's decision and understand his concerns about unintended consequences. That said, the rapid proliferation of high‑potency hemp products in Texas has highlighted a regulatory gap that simply can't be ignored. I hope this signals a renewed commitment to crafting thoughtful legislation that effectively addresses public health and youth protection, without undermining safety," said Jason Vedadi, CEO of Story Cannabis.
Others are reading: Delta what? Here's how to understand the difference between Delta 8, 9 and 10
"While the bill's failure to move forward keeps the status quo in place, it should not be mistaken for a long-term solution. There is growing concern around unregulated psychoactive hemp products being marketed without proper safeguards or age restrictions. Lawmakers will need to revisit this issue soon to ensure Texas has a cannabis framework that prioritizes transparency, accountability, and public health. Consumers deserve better than loophole-driven policies," said Sara Gullickson, CEO of Cannabis Business Advisors.
"We applaud Governor Abbott's decision regarding Senate Bill 3, which recognizes that sensible regulation is superior to outright prohibition. This outcome preserves thousands of Texas jobs and billions in economic activity while maintaining the state's ability to implement appropriate safeguards. The hemp industry has consistently supported responsible regulation, including strict age verification, product testing, and transparent labeling," said Reid Stewart, CEO of Frozen Fields.
As stated above by the governor, lawmakers will be able to address the shortcomings — rather the overreach of SB 3 in a special session in July.
The special session is set to convene in Austin on July 21, 2025 and will last 30 days.
Mateo Rosiles is the Government & Public Policy reporter for the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal. Got a news tip for him? Email him: mrosiles@lubbockonline.com.
This article originally appeared on Lubbock Avalanche-Journal: Texas Gov. Abbott calls special session to address proposed THC ban
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
23 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Ford Escalates Battery Job Warnings as Congress Mulls EV Cuts
Ford Motor Co. intensified its campaign to preserve clean energy manufacturing subsidies Monday, warning jobs at its electric-vehicle battery plant in southwestern Michigan could be at risk if Republicans in Congress pare back tax credits in President Donald Trump's multi-trillion dollar economic package. The $3 billion plant in Marshall, about 100 miles west of Detroit, is slated to produce 20 gigawatt-hours of lithium iron phosphate, or LFP batteries, and employ 1,700 people after it starts production in 2026. The 2 million-square-foot site, which is still under construction, has drawn intense political scrutiny since it was announced in 2023 because Ford is licensing the technology to build the batteries from China's Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd, the world's largest battery manufacturer.
Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Top Trump health official slams Democrats for 'misleading' claims about Medicaid reform
FIRST ON FOX: A top Trump White House official is looking to undercut Senate Democrats' talking points on Medicaid, arguing that the GOP's plan to reform the healthcare program would benefit rural hospitals, not harm them. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz told Fox News Digital that "special interests are pushing misleading talking points to try and stop the most ambitious healthcare reforms ever." Oz's sentiment comes as Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and Senate Republicans sprint to finish their work on President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" ahead of a self-imposed July 4 deadline. Part of the bill from the Senate Finance Committee aims to make good on the GOP's promise to root out waste, fraud and abuse within the widely used healthcare program by including work requirements and booting illegal immigrants from benefit rolls, among other measures. Tweaks to the Medicaid provider tax rate have ruffled feathers on both sides of the aisle. Indeed, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. and Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., sent a letter to Trump and the top congressional Republicans last week warning that changes to the Medicaid provider tax rate would harm over 300 rural hospitals. And a cohort of Senate Republicans were furious with the change after the bill dropped last week. But Oz contended that "only 5%" of inpatient Medicaid spending happens in rural communities, and that the mammoth bill "instead targets abuses overwhelmingly utilized by large hospitals with well-connected lobbyists." "We are committed to preserving and improving access to care in rural communities with a transformative approach that bolsters advanced technology, invests in infrastructure, and supports workforce — rather than propping up a system that mostly benefits wealthier urban areas," Oz said. Schumer's letter included data from a study recently conducted by the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research at the University of North Carolina at his behest. He warned that if the bill is passed as is, millions of people would be kicked off of their healthcare coverage, and "rural hospitals will not get paid for the services they are required by law to provide to patients." Fox News Digital reached out to Schumer, Wyden and Merkley for comment. However, another report from the Trump-aligned Paragon Health Institute argued similarly to Oz that special interest groups and healthcare lobbyists were "flooding the airwaves with claims" that Republicans' changes to Medicaid would shutter rural hospitals. For example, they argued that a recent report from the Center for American Progress warned that over 200 rural hospitals would be at risk of closure, but that the findings were based on changes to the federal medical assistance percentage, or the amount of Medicaid costs paid for by the federal government. Changes to that percentage were mulled by congressional Republicans but were not included in the "big, beautiful bill." Still, the changes to the Medicaid provider tax rate, which were a stark departure from the House GOP's version of the bill, angered the Republicans who have warned not to make revisions to the healthcare program that could shut down rural hospitals and boot working Americans from their benefits. The Senate Finance Committee went further than the House's freeze of the provider tax rate, or the amount that state Medicaid programs pay to healthcare providers on behalf of Medicaid beneficiaries, for non-Affordable Care Act expansion states, and included a provision that lowers the rate in expansion states annually until it hits 3.5%. However, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, is working on a possible change to the bill that would create a provider relief fund that could sate her and other Republicans' concerns about the change to the provider tax rate.
Washington Post
27 minutes ago
- Washington Post
NATO is worth paying for. Trump is right that Europe needs to do more.
President Donald Trump will attend the first NATO summit of his second term Tuesday, at a time when the alliance's 21st-century relevance has never been clearer — but when its sustainability is also in question, with a NATO-skeptical American president back in the Oval Office. Given these realities, Europe needs to show it will contribute its share to ensure the alliance is stable and strong.
