logo
El Pasoans Fighting Hunger Food Bank bracing for impact amid USDA program cuts

El Pasoans Fighting Hunger Food Bank bracing for impact amid USDA program cuts

Yahoo14-03-2025

EL PASO, Texas (KTSM) — The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) canceled two federal programs that provided about $1 billion in federal funds to schools and food banks to buy food directly from local farms.
One of the programs being cut is called the Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA). The program allowed local food banks like El Pasoans Fighting Hunger to buy fresh produce.
'It's been a great program over time. The food bank here in El Paso has been awarded about $2.2 million to purchase food from small farmers. The next round was supposed to take effect this summer,' said Susan Goodell, CEO of El Pasoans Fighting Hunger.
Goodell adds that the recent cuts will impact the food bank like others across the country.
'The vast majority, over 99 percent of the food that we get here in this community is donated. We cannot depend on local food supplies because we're a desert. And so, there's very little food production here in El Paso. So, we are reliant on programs like LFPA and like getting food from other parts of the country,' Goodell said.
Goodell said that in addition to the program cuts, another concern for the food bank is the potential tariffs on goods coming from Canada and Mexico.
'Over 40 percent of our food supply is fresh produce, and a very large percentage of that comes from Mexico. There's just so much to try to navigate right now. And I don't have answers, but we are doing our very best to handle all of the things coming at us,' she said.
Officials add that donations are especially important right now, and every dollar donated is quickly converted into seven meals for someone in need.
To donate, visit https://elpasoansfightinghunger.org/donate.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Amber waves of grain' recede in America's heartland as wheat farmers struggle
'Amber waves of grain' recede in America's heartland as wheat farmers struggle

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

'Amber waves of grain' recede in America's heartland as wheat farmers struggle

By Emily Schmall COLBY, Kansas (Reuters) -On a foggy morning in May, Dennis Schoenhals drove a carload of crop scouts around the wheat fields of northern Oklahoma, part of an annual tour to evaluate the health of the crop. But on some fields, Schoenhals and other farmers had already abandoned plans to harvest the grain for sale because prices had sunk to five-year lows. Farmers cut their losses early this year across the U.S. wheat belt, stretching from Texas to Montana. They were choosing to bale the wheat into hay, plow their fields under or turn them over to animals to graze. In Nebraska, wheat acreage is less than half of what it was in 2005. For farmers with crop insurance, damaged or unprofitable wheat fields can still earn revenue. But many agree that chasing insurance payouts is not the best business model. The Great Plains have long been celebrated for the "amber waves of grain" in the popular hymn "America the Beautiful." The region's states produce most of the U.S.-grown crop of hard red winter wheat, favored by bakers for bread. But with prices hovering around $5 per bushel, U.S. wheat farmers have reached an inflection point, with many forced to either lose money, feed wheat to cattle or kill off the crop. Interviews with more than a dozen farmers and analysts across Kansas, Nebraska and Oklahoma, along with a review of U.S. Department of Agriculture data, revealed a vast disparity in profit for wheat compared to other crops. This has led farmers to abandon more fields before harvest. In parts of the region, prolonged drought has lowered yields in recent years. Farm revenue has also suffered in years with healthy rainfall, as abundant global supplies have weighed on prices. Many have pivoted to corn, soy or livestock, often after generations of their family growing wheat exclusively. "They can't sustain that," said Schoenhals, 68, who raises crops and cattle near Kremlin, Oklahoma, and is president of the state's wheat growers association. "Eventually you either change to other crops if you're able to, or you go out of business," he said. Two years ago, severe drought drove farmers to abandon about a third of the U.S. crop. This year, healthy green stalks shot through the cracked soil, and farmers had expected to harvest the most bushels per acre since 2016. But wheat prices hit a five-year low in May. Every year since 2020, farmers have abandoned between a fifth and a third of the winter wheat crop, U.S. Department of Agriculture data show. Nationwide, corn and soybeans dominate crop fields, with wheat a distant third in planted acreage. Hard red winter wheat exports hit historic lows in 2024 after drought and lower prices in other wheat-producing areas of the world squeezed the U.S. commodity's competitiveness. In Kansas, the leading U.S. producer of hard winter wheat, the disparity between acreage and value is particularly stark. About 1.3 million more farm acres in Kansas were planted with wheat than with corn in 2024, USDA data show, but corn's value of production was more than twice as high. Plentiful global supplies have kept benchmark U.S. prices stuck at lows that discourage farmers from growing wheat, producers and analysts told Reuters. Supplies are so ample that droughts in important grain-growing regions of China and Russia this year have barely budged prices. 'We're below profitable levels for these guys,' said Darin Fessler, an analyst with Lakefront Futures in Lincoln, Nebraska, who grew up on a row crop farm in nearby Sutton. The way things stand, he said, many farmers have "eaten a lot of their own money and burned up working capital. These bankers are going to say: 'show me some profits or we're going to have some farm sales.'" HERITAGE BUT NO PROFIT Ties to wheat farming run deep in the Plains. Historically, European settlers in Kansas struggled to find a foothold until Mennonites from Ukraine arrived with seeds of Turkey Red wheat, a variety that proved able to withstand the area's dry soil, harsh winters and extreme temperature swings. The seeds spread to neighboring Oklahoma and Nebraska, where pioneers established homesteads in the sandy, light earth in which wheat thrived but other crops struggled. Hard red winter wheat has remained the main variety of wheat sown in the U.S. Images of golden stalks adorn hotel lobbies and road signs, and towns include the word in their names. Pulitzer Prize-winning author Willa Cather, a daughter of Red Cloud, Nebraska, wrote a celebrated poem describing "the miles of fresh-plowed soil, heavy and black, full of strength and harshness." Now, U.S. wheat growing is on a steady decline, with farmers finding surer profits from corn, soybeans or cattle. On the wheat quality tour in May, weeks before Nebraska wheat is usually harvested, no wheat could be seen for miles around Red Cloud. When Royce Schaneman joined Nebraska's wheat board 19 years ago, wheat fields stretched for 2.2 million acres across the state. Since then, acreage has shrunk to less than a million acres, he said. In Cheyenne County in southern Nebraska, the state's most productive wheat-growing land, about one in five fields was abandoned this year. "The feeling out in the country is not good," he said. Generations of farmers grew wheat because the crop thrived on rainfall alone. In recent decades, farmers have invested in pricey irrigation systems, experimented with hardier varieties and used fertilizer to improve yields. Agronomists have helped farmers grow more bushels per acre even as climate change has brought more drought and pests. Producers in the southern Plains have experimented with other types of wheat such as durum, the kind used for pasta, and a gluten-free variety, pursuing customers willing to pay more. Profits remain elusive. 'It's heritage, but there's no profit," said Lon Frahm, the CEO of Frahm Farmland, a 40,000-acre operation in Colby, Kansas. Surrounding Thomas County is now dotted with wind farms. Farmers there once grew wheat exclusively, he said, but they have started to diversify due to more frequent drought and global competition depressing prices. Frahm himself now mainly plants corn. He irrigates, fertilizes and harvests the grain using multimillion-dollar machines, then stores it in gleaming, 80-foot steel grain bins. His 7,000 acres of wheat sometimes produce just 5 percent of his farm's total output. "There's certainly profit in corn," he said.

NFL Won't Replace Exec Brian Rolapp After His Departure for PGA Tour
NFL Won't Replace Exec Brian Rolapp After His Departure for PGA Tour

Yahoo

time7 days ago

  • Yahoo

NFL Won't Replace Exec Brian Rolapp After His Departure for PGA Tour

The NFL will not replace longtime executive Brian Rolapp with one person, according to someone familiar with the league's plan. Rolapp's vast responsibilities will be divided among current NFL executives, per the source, who was granted anonymity because the details are private. Last week, Rolapp was named the first CEO of the PGA Tour. He spent more than 20 years at the NFL and had been its chief media and business officer since 2017. Rolapp spearheaded the league's media strategy, with its current agreements worth more than $120 billion over 11 years. He also oversaw the league's sponsorship business and its investment arm, 32 Equity, which has invested in DraftKings, Fanatics, Genius Sports and NoBull. Advertisement More from 'We have spent some time planning for this change and are confident we will successfully manage the responsibilities while we align our structure to meet our long-term strategic goals,' NFL commissioner Roger Goodell wrote in a memo to team presidents announcing Rolapp's departure. The NFL did not respond to a request to comment on its plans to replace Rolapp. Hans Schroeder is one executive who should absorb many of Rolapp's responsibilities on the media side. He joined the NFL in 2001 and was Rolapp's deputy as COO of NFL Media. Keeping the NFL's media partners happy is a critical role; they provide the bulk of the $400 million-plus check each team gets from the league office annually. Advertisement The NFL has an opt-out of its media deals in 2029, and the league recognizes its leverage as the undisputed leader in drawing viewers to live broadcasts. At the last Super Bowl, Goodell told reporters that the NFL's option to exit its current media rights contracts presents an 'incredibly valuable' opportunity for the league. Renie Anderson, who joined the league office in 2006, is another top lieutenant at the NFL who will take on more. She was named chief revenue officer in 2019 and oversees partnerships, sponsorships and consumer products. Anderson also handles media sales across NFL Network, NFL Digital Media and the league's legalized sports betting business. Other top executives who could shoulder greater duties include David Jurenka, who is a senior VO at NFL Media, and Dhruv Prasad, who heads 32 Equity. Rolapp was deemed a potential successor to Goodell, although the commissioner has two more years on his current contract and is likely to sign an extension. Advertisement 'I don't expect they will fill that [Rolapp] role with any one person, not from inside, not from outside,' Marc Ganis, longtime advisor to Goodell and NFL owners, said. 'The talent that is there is going to have more opportunity to spread their wings.' Best of Sign up for Sportico's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

CT towns granted over $180K for tree planting, invasive species removal. See if your town is on list
CT towns granted over $180K for tree planting, invasive species removal. See if your town is on list

Yahoo

time16-06-2025

  • Yahoo

CT towns granted over $180K for tree planting, invasive species removal. See if your town is on list

More than $180,000 in grant money has been awarded to support urban and community forestry projects in several Connecticut towns and cities, officials said. The state's Department of Energy and Environmental Protection announced the recipients of 2025 Urban and Community Forestry Planning and Urban Forested Natural Areas and Riparian Corridor Restoration grants. Over $184,000 will be granted to support 11 urban and community forestry projects in Bloomfield, Ellington, Mansfield, New London, North Stonington, Old Saybrook, Ridgefield, Stamford, and Stratford, according to officials. The grant money, distributed with federal funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Forest Service and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, will help fund projects that protect and enhance urban and community forests, such as tree inventories, forest management plans, invasive species removal and native tree plantings, officials said. 'Urban forests contribute to livable cities and provide numerous benefits, including heat and pollution mitigation, stormwater management and improved health outcomes for residents,' said DEEP commissioner Katie Dykes. 'Urban trees can boost local business and support workforce development and have been linked to reductions in crime. The grants offered through DEEP's Urban and Community Forestry Program help communities in Connecticut access these benefits while also working toward meeting our state's statutory goal to increase urban tree canopy cover by 2040.' The grants ranged from under $10,000 to $20,000 for some communities. Among the 11 projects awarded funds are $21,000 for Mansfield to help hire a certified forester to inventory and develop a management plan for approximately 1,061 acres of town-owned forest across five ecologically significant parcels, officials said. Other projects include a $20,000 grant for Killingly to help support and manage invasive species after a timber harvest to ensure that native tree species are able to regenerate, maintaining a healthy and resilient forest stand. DEEP officials said that the Trees for Communities Grant Program, a new grant offered by the agency, is now accepting applications from Connecticut governmental entities and non-profit organizations. A total of $1 million is available for grants up to $200,000 each to support urban forestry projects that increase tree cover and protect trees in low-canopy, high-need communities. Eligible projects include, but are not limited to, tree planting and maintenance, urban forest planning, workforce development, invasive species management and forest restoration. More information can be found on DEEP's Trees for Communities Grant Program webpage. A complete list of grant recipients, grant amounts, and project summaries are available on DEEP's Urban Forestry Grant Accomplishments webpage. Stephen Underwood can be reached at sunderwood@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store