Ultra-processed foods could be linked to thousands of UK deaths a year
Thousands of UK deaths each year could be linked to the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs), analysis suggests.
Experts believe there is a relationship between people eating UPFs - such as processed meats, ice cream and crisps - and an increased risk of early death.
UPFs often contain high levels of saturated fat, salt, sugar and additives, which researchers said leaves less room in people's diets for more nutritious foods.
The analysis suggested that in 2018-19, some 17,781 premature deaths in the UK could have been linked to UPFs.
Such foods also tend to include ingredients that are not normally used when people cook from scratch - including preservatives, emulsifiers and artificial colours and flavours.
Other examples of UPFs include mass-produced bread, some breakfast cereals, biscuits, ready meals and fizzy drinks.
UPFs have previously been linked to an increased risk of early death and , including obesity, heart disease, cancer and diabetes.
However, some experts say it is not clear why UPFs are linked to poor and more studies will be needed "to establish the mechanisms involved".
The latest study, published in the American Journal Of Preventive Medicine, calls on governments to issue dietary recommendations aimed at cutting consumption of UPFs.
In analysing data from eight countries, it was found UPFs made up 53% of people's energy intake in the UK - the second highest after 55% in the US.
In Colombia, which has a lower consumption of UPFs, premature deaths attributable to these types of foods was 4%.
But premature deaths from UPFs jumped to 14% for the UK and the US, according to the research.
Read more from Sky News:
Lead researcher Eduardo Nilson, from the scientific body the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation in Brazil, said the study found "each 10% increase in the participation of UPFs in the diet increases the risk of death from all causes by 3%".
Nerys Astbury, associate professor from the University Of Oxford, said it is known that consuming diets higher in calories, fat and sugar can have detrimental effects on health, including premature mortality.
"More research is needed to ascertain a causal link between UPF and disease and to establish the mechanisms involved," she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Amber heat health alert issued for all of England with 'rise in deaths likely'
An amber heat health alert has been issued for all of England, which means there could be "a rise in deaths". A yellow heat health alert was initially issued on Tuesday (June 17) for most of the country by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), but this has been upgraded. According to the Met Office's latest forecasts, much of the south of England will see temperatures between 31C and 32C by Thursday afternoon (June 19). It would make for the hottest day of the year so far, beating the 29.4C recorded in Suffolk on Friday, June 13, Sky News reports. Just how high will temperatures get? 🌡️ Here's a look at when the peak temperatures may occur where you are over the next few days 📈 — Met Office (@metoffice) June 18, 2025 By this weekend, temperatures are forecast to hit highs of 33C and the amber alert is currently in place until 9am on Monday, June 23. The Heat-health Alert Service forewarns of periods of high temperatures, which may affect the health of the public. According to the Met Office, it is aimed at health and social care professionals and any person with a role in reducing the harm extended periods of hot weather can have on health. This service is provided by the UKHSA in partnership with the Met Office between June and September, and has been in operation since 2004. According to Sky News, an amber alert indicates that "significant impacts are likely" across health and social care services. It adds that there could be "a rise in deaths" among people with pre-existing health conditions and those aged over 65. The Met Office adds: "An amber alert would represent a situation in which the expected impacts are likely to be felt across the whole health service, with potential for the whole population to be at risk and where other sectors apart from health may also start to observe impacts, indicating that a coordinated response is required." The NHS suggests staying out of the heat if possible, adding that it is best to stay shaded, particularly between 11am and 3pm. Recommended reading: Heatwave to hit UK as parts of the country set to be hotter than Barcelona What is a Met Office and UKHSA heat health alert? What is SPF and what does the number mean? This is when you should reapply It also recommends using sunscreen, wearing a hat and light clothes, and avoiding exercise or activity that makes you hotter. To cool yourself down, have cold food and drinks and have a cool shower or put cool water on your skin or clothes. It is also vital to keep your living space cool, closing windows during the day and opening them at night when it is cooler.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Endangered rays, sharks and native oysters 'could thrive' despite climate change, report claims
Endangered rays, sharks and native oysters could thrive in seas around the UK in the decades ahead amid changing conditions in the oceans - but other common species could become rare, according to a study. Researchers looked at 19 threatened marine species in UK seas and the impact they could face from climate change. The results suggested an "overall increase" in suitable habitat for the study's selected species, although said any projected change for many was "relatively small". Some species will "move or shift" to new areas in response to rising ocean temperatures and this will have an impact on how they are managed and protected, the study added. Many species are anticipated to lose habitat with climate change, researchers said. Maintaining or increasing the numbers of vulnerable animals around the UK might require additional management methods. Projecting habitat changes into the future has "a number of uncertainties" and species may find "favourable" new areas, but the conditions could then "move" to zones which are "not suitable" for species to survive. The report, published in the Marine Biology journal, said although rays, sharks and oysters could become less threatened - there were risks for other species. "Spurdog, thornback and undulate rays and native oyster showed the largest increases in suitable habitat this century, whereas decreases were seen in the slender sea pen, ocean quahog, sea fan and fan mussel," said the report. "The increases were concentrated in the central and northern North Sea and the decreases to the south and west of the UK, as well as in the southern North Sea." Some species may thrive in new areas not currently protected from human disturbance, scientists said. But some currently protected sites "may no longer remain viable in protecting their designated features in the future". "Some of these changes may become apparent relatively quickly, with substantial changes in suitable habitat evident from the 2030s and 2040s," researchers said. Read more from Sky News: The government is currently consulting on measures for fishing in Marine Protected Areas, which are designated parts of the ocean set up to protect habitats, species and ecosystems. Researchers at the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science compiled the report in consultation with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Natural England, and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
Yahoo
09-06-2025
- Yahoo
Around 1,000 doctors urge MPs to vote against ‘unsafe' assisted dying Bill
Around 1,000 doctors have written to MPs urging them to vote against the assisted dying Bill describing it as 'simply not safe'. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will return to the House of Commons for debate on Friday, with MPs expected to consider further amendments. But in a letter, published this week, doctors from across the NHS have urged lawmakers to listen to those 'who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill'. They warn the Bill 'poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'. In its current form the proposed legislation, which applies only to England and Wales, would mean terminally ill adults with only six months left to live could apply for assistance to end their lives, subject to the approval of two doctors and an expert panel. Last month, MPs approved a change in the Bill to ensure no medics would be obliged to take part in assisted dying. Doctors already had an opt-out but the new clause extends that to anyone, including pharmacists and social care workers. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. The letter to MPs said: 'As experienced medical professionals who regularly work with dying patients and who have reviewed the worldwide evidence on assisted dying, it is our opinion that this Bill poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce, and we urge you to vote against it. 'We are concerned that the private member's Bill process has not facilitated a balanced approach to the collection of evidence and input from key stakeholders including doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups. 'This Bill will widen inequalities, it provides inadequate safeguards and, in our collective view, is simply not safe. 'This is the most important piece of healthcare legislation for 60 years and we urge you to listen to the doctors who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill.' Sir Ed Davey welcomed the letter on Monday, telling Sky News he had 'real concerns'. 'I have voted against this assisted dying legislation, as I did on previous occasions,' the Liberal Democrat leader said. 'I have real concerns about the pressure on individuals, that they will put on themselves, if they think they are a burden on their family, so I welcome this letter.' He added: 'I hope, as time has gone on, as the arguments have been better exposed, that MPs will switch sides and join the side that I and many MPs are on.' But Sir Chris Bryant said he would be voting in favour. The technology minister told Sky News: 'The Government doesn't have a formal position at all and individual members are free to choose how they vote. 'I'm not going to hide my own personal preference. I abstained on the first time round, I decided I wasn't going to vote because I wanted to hear the debate. 'I have listened to a lot of the debate. Of course, I don't want anybody to feel that they are a burden on society and that should lead them towards taking their own life, but I also have heard the cries of people who are absolutely miserable, and that's why I will be voting for the Bill.' Some of the Bill's opponents have urged MPs to focus on improving end-of-life care rather than legislating for assisted dying. Ahead of last month's Commons debate on the Bill, two royal medical colleges raised concerns over the proposed legislation. The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) said it believes there are 'concerning deficiencies', while the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) said it has 'serious concerns' and cannot support the Bill. Opinions among members of the medical profession remain varied, with TV doctor Hilary Jones describing assisted dying for the terminally ill as 'kind and compassionate', adding that he would help a patient to end their life if the law was changed. The GP, often seen on ITV's Good Morning Britain and the Lorraine show, told the PA news agency he believes medicine will go 'back to the Dark Ages' if proposed legislation being considered at Westminster is voted down. While Friday is expected to see debate on further amendments to the Bill, it is thought a vote on the overall legislation might not take place until the following Friday, June 20.
