The shorter man's search for love: ‘One woman cried when I told her how tall I am'
Height is often seen as a dealbreaker when it comes to romance, particularly within heterosexual relationships. But when Tinder recently said that it was trialling a feature that allows some premium users to filter potential matches by height, it quickly proved controversial. 'Oh God. They added a height filter,' lamented one Reddit thread, while an X user claimed: 'It's over for short men.'
'I've experimented with not putting my height on my dating profile, or lying about it just to see, and the number of likes I get shoots up massively,' says Stuart, who is in his 50s and from the Midlands. 'I know I get screened out by the majority of women from the off.' At 5ft 7in (170cm), Stuart is just two inches below the UK and US male average height of 5ft 9in, but a height filter would probably prevent him from receiving as many matches.
Since height is such a sticking point, it's no surprise that some apps, including Bumble and Hinge, already allow users to filter by this metric. A recent YouGov poll found that most Britons think being able to filter by height is acceptable; it was least popular with under-30s, of whom 36% were not in favour of height filters, compared with 26% of the wider public. (A common counter-argument is that, if users can filter by height, they should also be able to filter by weight – something that the same survey found 51% of men supported, compared with 36% of women.)
Tinder has been quick to point out that height is a paid preference feature being trialled in select markets, not including the UK. It is also not a hard filter; profiles that don't match the selected height criteria will not be blocked outright. A spokesperson said: 'This is part of a broader effort to help people connect more intentionally on Tinder.' The app has gained a reputation for initiating hook-ups, rather than relationships.
'I've not used Tinder, but I have paid once to filter for height on Hinge,' says one Guardian reader who wishes to remain anonymous. 'I am a tall woman – 6ft without shoes – and dating is a challenge, because I am only attracted to men who are taller than me. This is not a question of vanity, or of wanting to be seen with a man who is more alpha or impressive … holding hands with and hugging a shorter man feels like I'm being affectionate with a child. It makes me feel enormous, even though I have a slim figure and am confident in my appearance.'
Like many of those who cite height as a prerequisite, she has faced pressure from family and friends to loosen her requirements – someone shorter, they tell her, may be better able to meet her needs. 'But attraction is a need – and it seems it is only possible for me with men who are over 6ft.'
Jo, 33, who is 5ft 10in and from Northern Ireland, is also 'most comfortable' with partners who are 6ft and above. 'While I've had a deeply meaningful relationship with someone shorter than me, I realised over time that I didn't enjoy the physical dynamic of feeling like I was towering over my partner,' she says. 'It affected how I felt in my own body, particularly around feeling 'large', which in turn affected my confidence.'
In 2022, a former product manager at Bumble claimed that most women on the platform set a 6ft minimum for men – a statistic Bumble said was inaccurate – which would limit their dating pool to about 15% of the population. According to the dating app Badoo, the top keyword for men to get matches was '6ft' (perhaps surprisingly, for women, it was 'love').
Of course, as with much of the information provided in dating profiles, there is no guarantee the height given will be accurate. In 2010, OkCupid said its research showed that most men inflated their height by two inches. In 2019, Tinder made an April Fools' joke about the launch of a 'height verification' feature, to try to prevent such exaggerations.
'Height and strength are generally associated with dominance and power,' says Sandhya Bhattacharya, a relationship therapist. 'Having both predicates a greater disposition towards endurance and survival.' Research has confirmed the idea that taller men are seen as having an advantage when it comes to social status, access to resources and heritable fitness. In Bhattacharya's experience, this holds across most cultures, although genetic predisposition to attributes such as height and strength can vary globally. 'Unconsciously perhaps, we are re-enacting biological preferences.'
Anna Machin, an anthropologist and the author of Why We Love: The Definitive Guide to Our Most Fundamental Need, agrees that the search for a taller man is partly down to an 'evolutionary drive'. But, she says, studies on non-western populations have found variable outcomes. Within the Tsimané people of the Bolivian Amazon, for example, 'while men prefer the male to be taller, the women are not bothered'. This implies that there is 'a major cultural element to our western preference for men to be taller', says Machin.
In 2022, 'short king spring' trended on TikTok, although the moment was short-lived. While some Guardian readers apportion blame to 'TV, films and (especially) romantic novels' for the notion that a man must be tall to be attractive, a number of mixed-height celebrity relationships subvert preconceptions about height: Zendaya (5ft 10in) and Tom Holland (5 ft 8in); Sophie Dahl (about 6ft) and Jamie Cullum (reportedly 5ft 4in); and, until recently, Sophie Turner (5ft 9in) and Joe Jonas (5ft 7in), among others.
Yet heightism remains so entrenched when it comes to dating that some men have taken to wearing heel lifts – shoe inserts that boost height by as much as six inches – or elevator shoes; Tom Cruise (reportedly 5ft 7in) and Ron DeSantis, who says he is 5ft 11in, are both thought to be fans. But while heterosexual women may place the greatest importance on their partner's height, filters could benefit men too. Research has shown that most men prefer to be a little taller than their female partners and that satisfaction with their partner's height can lead men to feel greater satisfaction with their own height – more so than with women.
'I've made peace with the fact that, statistically, I'm very unlikely to find someone shorter than me,' says Michael, 31, who is 5ft 2in and from Hampshire. He thinks it's reasonable for women to want to date someone taller, but believes that being able to filter by height when using a dating app is a bad idea. 'Even the most generous, inclusive person is unlikely to select the whole range that's offered, even if they don't care about it or would be willing to look past it for the right person,' he says. 'It excludes anyone at the extremes by default.'
He has had mixed dating experiences in relation to his height. 'About half of the women either weren't bothered by it or were willing to look past it,' he says. 'Most of the other half ghosted me as soon as they learned about it. One woman, whom I'd gotten to know quite well, said my height was shocking when I told her on a phone call, then cried for half an hour. She turned out to be 5ft 8in.'
Height may not play such a pivotal role in attraction when it comes to gay relationships. A 2014 study of queer men found that most preferred a partner slightly taller than themselves, although these preferences were modulated by sexual role. Elsewhere, other studies have found that, on average, gay men and women preferred partners with body heights that were equal to their own.
'For most of high school and college, I felt ugly and unwanted, in large part because of comments I heard from straight women about short men being undesirable,' says Charles, 26, who is 5ft 6in and from San Francisco, California. 'In my senior year of college, I came out as bisexual and started dating men. I was shocked by how attractive queer men found me. Even those who had a preference for height were generally less strict about it than the women I'd been around. So I date in queer spaces, where I feel more valued.'
Height has become such a bone of contention on dating apps that some users have taken to addressing it outright. Taller-than-average women can often be found to quip that they are 'probably taller than you' within their profile bios, while so many men list their height followed by the phrase 'because apparently that matters' that it has become a cliche.
Away from the apps, the 6ft fixation seems to be less of a hard‑and-fast boundary when meeting by chance. 'I've worked with couples where there is a significant height difference and it makes no difference to their physical, emotional or sexual compatibility,' says Bhattacharya. 'Ultimately, the couple 'fit' well because they choose to be respectful, engaged and invested in the relationship.'
Machin says 'anything that focuses people down so closely on one attribute is detrimental'. A list of checkpoints, she says, is not the best way to choose a partner. 'Ultimately, in long-term relationships, it is who someone is at their core – their beliefs, values, personality, creativity, ambitions – that we fall in love with and is the best predictor of compatibility.'
Jenny, 40, who is 5ft 10in and from Sacramento, California, believes that prioritising height is a 'remnant of caveman days when you had to rely on someone larger than yourself to protect you and your offspring'. Her husband, whom she met at work, is 5ft 7in – but height, she says, is just a number. 'I'd prefer someone shorter who protects me emotionally and provides psychological safety,' she says. 'I say kill your filters, online and in person – let life surprise you in the best way.'
Some people featured in this article responded to a community callout. You can contribute to open callouts here
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Lime bikes dumped in canals and rivers 'posing pollution risk'
Hundreds of Lime e-bikes have been dumped in rivers and canals since hire schemes were introduced across England - raising concerns about pollution and Canal and River Trust said it was a national problem and was having to spend thousands of pounds retrieving the bikes from waterways. The charity said Nottingham was a particular hotspot, with eight or nine Lime bikes pulled from the canal each the US company that runs the hire scheme in Nottingham and other cities, told the BBC it is working with various authorities to tackle the problem. According to the Environment Agency, electric bikes pose a pollution risk because the batteries contain substances that can enter a watercourse if they remain submerged in Canal and River Trust said the number of Lime bikes being dumped nationally "could be into the thousands"."Whilst the quantities are a concern, and this is a drain on our resources, it's worth remembering one bike alone can easily cause thousands of pounds worth of damage to a boat, tens of thousands of pounds of damage to canal infrastructure, and an incalculable value of damage to wildlife," said Dick Vincent, the charity's national towpath charity has asked Lime to cover the cost of retrieving the bikes, but an agreement has not been reached."If I'm being honest, I would like them to answer their emails and get back to us," said Mr Vincent."They seem to be ignoring this as a problem, and that's a real shame." Toni Robinson, founder of the Little Litter Pickers of Nottingham, said her group had retrieved 23 Lime bikes from just a short stretch of the River Leen, in the Bulwell area of the said she had written to Lime but the company had not responded to her."I would like them to stop them ending up in the river," said Ms Robinson."We're trying to keep the river clean from pollution and then we've got these bikes that are polluting the river more than probably any rubbish we've ever found was."Ms Robinson is particularly concerned because e-bikes are powered by lithium-ion batteries, and she is worried about substances entering the believes Lime should have docking bays to keep the bikes locked up unless people pay to ride them."I think young people get bored and think 'I'll throw it in the river'," said Ms Robinson."It's just been ongoing. We pick one out and there's another one in there." Ethan Radford, deputy leader of Nottingham City Council, is so concerned he has been putting on waders and entering the River Leen himself to retrieve the Lime said it started happening after the Lime scheme was introduced two years ago, in spring 2023."On one particular occasion I think we pulled out about five bikes in one day," said Radford, who has been helping Ms Robinson's group."There's obviously the environmental concerns. These things don't belong in the river. It's a natural habitat." The Environment Agency said it was in the process of setting up a meeting with Lime following "repeated attempts" to do so."The disposal of electric bikes or other waste into rivers can cause environmental damage, affect water quality, and harm aquatic life," a spokesperson said."Whilst we have pollution concerns, we primarily remove the Lime bikes from the River Leen in Nottinghamshire and other watercourses in the area such as Nethergate Brook and Ouse Dyke, to prevent blockages and reduce flood risk to local communities." Who is dumping the bikes? The consensus is Lime bikes are being dumped in water by people who steal them, rather than paying bikes do not need to be physically locked in place at parking locations, which makes it easier to steal bikes do have a pedal-locking mechanism, but this can be "hacked" so that people can ride them without Robinson said she had witnessed this herself."I know people can ride round with them with the alarm going off, so they can still use the bike without inputting any details," she said."There are often kids going past me on the street and it's going 'beep beep', and they're riding past as normal."In a statement, the city council's transport team said: "Evidence shows that it is exclusively non-customers who are causing issues, including abandoning bikes or dumping bikes in rivers and canals."Radford agreed. "It's not the people who are using the scheme that are causing the problem," he said."It's people who come along after that, see a row of bikes, take advantage and do something stupid." Can anything be done to prevent thefts? Radford believes the problem could be resolved if Lime required customers to lock the bikes in bays, as some hire bike operators do."There's nothing stopping you from pushing it around, putting it on the floor, putting it in the road, taking it over to the river, for example, if it's not locked into place," he Robinson added: "It would stop them being stolen and polluting our rivers."The BBC put this suggestion to Lime, and asked why it does not require customers to lock bikes up.A spokesperson said: "Lime has operated a mandatory parking scheme in Nottingham since the launch of our e-bike service here two years ago."This is enforced by accurate on-vehicle GPS technology and our new mandatory end trip photo process. Users that leave bikes outside of designated parking locations are warned and fined, with repeat offenders banned." How widespread are these problems? The Canal and River Trust, which manages waterways in England and Wales, said it was a problem wherever Lime had hire of the Lime bikes are concentrated around London, but there are also schemes in Greater Manchester, Nottingham and Milton previously ran a hire bike scheme in Derby, but pulled out due to what it described as "persistent issues with vandalism and antisocial behaviour".This included bikes being thrown into the River Environment Agency, which is responsible for managing large rivers in England, said it "regularly" pulled bikes out and took them to designated drop-off points. What has Lime said in response? Lime says it is "the largest provider of shared electric vehicles in the world", and it claims to provide a "sustainable" mode of transport by replacing car working with the agency and Canal and River Trust, Lime said: "We have engaged in ongoing conversations with the Environment Agency and Canal and River Trust and are eager to finalise a collaborative plan to address these issues."Lime says anyone who sees a submerged bike can report the location, and it will "recover it as soon as possible". "We always aim to promptly collect obstructive or misparked bikes reported to us via the 'report bad parking' function in our app within a matter of hours," a Lime spokesperson said."To improve our response time, we have significantly increased our on-street team by more than double in Nottingham."On pollution and environmental concerns, Lime said the deliberate dumping of bikes was "totally unacceptable"."It harms the environment and undermines our mission to create sustainable urban transport," the spokesperson added."We are committed to working with the local community, Environment Agency, and the Canal and River Trust to stop this behaviour."
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Rolling pins for hammers and grouting with a credit card: How under-40s who don't have a toolbox tackle DIY jobs in their homes
If you want something done right, do it yourself, as the saying goes. But when it comes to maintenance around the home a significant number of us are botching DIY jobs by using the wrong tools – including swapping hammers for rolling pins. A survey found four in ten people under the age of 40 do not own a toolbox, while three quarters (74 per cent) admit that they regularly attempt projects without the proper equipment – often costing them thousands of pounds in the process. A further 65 per cent have used an object from around the home to try to get the job done. Some 72 per cent of respondents have had at least five DIY disasters in the last year, with the average cost per disaster coming in at £1,555 – totalling a whopping £7,775 a year. And half (51 per cent) admitted to having to call out a professional tradesman to fix the problem as a result of their DIY bungles. The research found 71 per cent have used a kitchen knife as a screwdriver, while 63 per cent frequently use scissors to trim plants and hedges. Credit cards to spread grout (40 per cent), kitchen bowls to mix wallpaper paste (37 per cent) and Sellotape to fix leaking pipes (36 per cent) also emerged among the most commonly used wrong tools for jobs. Other appropriated household items include broomsticks to clear gutters (33 per cent), Tupperware dishes to mix filler (32 per cent), rolling pins as hammers (31 per cent) and spoons to dig out weeds (31 per cent). And two thirds (66 per cent) have even tried to guess if a shelf or picture is level using just their eye, rather than a proper spirit level, with 72 per cent adamant that it was straight despite missing the right tools. One in four (23 per cent) say they are 'rubbish' and 'terrible' at DIY, with 13 per cent admitting they end up watching internet tutorials when they want to learn how to do something. It is no surprise that as a result, three quarters (74 per cent) were put off from DIY altogether. Rebecca Leversidge from insurance company Premierline, which commissioned the research, said: 'While innovation and initiative in the home is admirable, DIY is often a risky substitute for calling in a professional who will have the right skills and tools for the job – especially when it comes at an average cost of £1,555 per fix.' According to the 500 tradesmen interviewed as part of the survey, 43 per cent have noticed a decline in DIY skills in recent years and 30 per cent felt there has been a significant drop. One in ten say they are being called out at least once a week to fix botched jobs, with poorly fitted shelves and cabinets (40 per cent), electrical wiring issues (37 per cent), burst pipes (35 per cent), damaged walls (31 per cent) and poor paintwork and wallpapering (26 per cent) being the main problems. But that does not stop us, despite 10 per cent worrying about doing a bad job and 7 per cent panicking about damaging their property. The professionals have come up with a list of must-haves for the home toolbox, including a tape measure, spirit level and power drill.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
How your hairdresser could convince you to go green: Experts call for roll out of 'eco-stylists' to encourage Brits into sustainable lifestyles
Once a trip to the hairdresser's involved nothing more challenging than a chat about your latest holiday. Now it seems a quick cut and blow dry could come with a conversation about your carbon footprint. Experts are calling for state-sponsored eco-stylists to nudge clients towards sustainable lifestyles. It comes after a pilot scheme found that what we chat about in the salon changes our everyday lives. A report revealed chatty stylists are the perfect influencers to subtly bring about behaviour change. Hairdressers have previously been trained to spot signs of domestic abuse. In the pilot scheme – called Mirror Talkers – stickers carrying green tips were stuck to salon mirrors to spark conversations, and 73 per cent of people subsequently pledged to make planet-friendly changes to their haircare habits. Now ministers are being urged to back schemes that could see subliminal lectures in unlikely places – including cafes, restaurants and farmers' markets. The latest study – led by Oxford University and the Government-funded Centre for Climate Change and Social Transformations – wants to tackle 'pluralistic ignorance relating to climate action'. It claims hairdressers have 'considerable untapped potential regarding the influence [they] could have on clients'. 'While researchers can equip people with the tools and knowledge to become better at public engagement, in fact, hairdressers are already experts,' it says. The authors, convened by Oxford's Dr Sam Hampton, envisage salon chats 'beginning with haircare as a point of connection, but expanding to broader conversations about energy, transport, food, investments, carbon literacy and intergenerational responsibility'. Calling for funding, they concluded: 'Yielding the power of everyday influencers to build public consensus is an under-utilised strategy which demands new approaches to climate policy.' The latest study also involved the Universities of Southampton and Utrecht in the Netherlands.
