March 2025's Global Undervalued Small Caps With Insider Buying
As global markets grapple with declining consumer confidence and persistent inflation, small-cap stocks have faced increased volatility, with indices like the Russell 2000 experiencing notable downturns. Despite these challenges, opportunities may arise for discerning investors who focus on companies exhibiting strong fundamentals and strategic insider buying, which can signal potential value amidst broader market uncertainties.
Name
PE
PS
Discount to Fair Value
Value Rating
Bytes Technology Group
19.3x
4.9x
24.14%
★★★★★★
Security Bank
4.7x
1.1x
32.30%
★★★★★☆
Puregold Price Club
9.1x
0.4x
26.01%
★★★★★☆
Speedy Hire
NA
0.2x
27.18%
★★★★★☆
Hong Leong Asia
8.6x
0.2x
47.32%
★★★★☆☆
Gamma Communications
22.2x
2.3x
36.44%
★★★★☆☆
ABG Sundal Collier Holding
11.7x
1.9x
23.13%
★★★★☆☆
Franchise Brands
38.0x
2.0x
27.08%
★★★★☆☆
Optima Health
NA
1.5x
45.05%
★★★★☆☆
Yixin Group
8.8x
0.8x
-264.41%
★★★☆☆☆
Click here to see the full list of 116 stocks from our Undervalued Global Small Caps With Insider Buying screener.
Let's review some notable picks from our screened stocks.
Simply Wall St Value Rating: ★★★★★☆
Overview: Abacus Group is a diversified property investment and management company focusing on commercial, retail, and industrial assets with a market cap of A$2.5 billion.
Operations: Abacus Group generates revenue primarily through its operations, with a notable gross profit margin reaching as high as 81.56% in recent periods. The company's cost structure includes significant operating expenses, which have fluctuated but recently stood at A$36.49 million. Non-operating expenses have also been substantial, impacting overall profitability with figures reaching up to A$369.83 million in certain quarters. Despite these costs, the company has experienced variations in net income margin over time, reflecting changes in both revenue and expense dynamics.
PE: -9.9x
Abacus Group, despite reporting a net loss of A$5.72 million for the half-year ending December 2024, shows promising growth potential with earnings projected to rise by 82% annually. Insider confidence is evident through recent share purchases. The company's reliance on external borrowing poses some risk; however, its strategic participation in events like the Mobile World Congress highlights an active pursuit of growth opportunities. With a dividend payout targeting up to 95% of FFO, Abacus maintains shareholder engagement amidst financial challenges.
Click here to discover the nuances of Abacus Group with our detailed analytical valuation report.
Explore historical data to track Abacus Group's performance over time in our Past section.
Simply Wall St Value Rating: ★★★★★☆
Overview: Security Bank is a financial institution in the Philippines offering a range of services including retail, commercial, and corporate banking, with a market capitalization of approximately ₱102.06 billion.
Operations: Security Bank generates its revenue primarily through interest income, with operating expenses accounting for a significant portion of its costs. The net income margin has shown variability over time, reaching 23.28% in the latest period. Operating expenses are consistently driven by general and administrative costs, which have been increasing over recent periods.
PE: 4.7x
Security Bank's recent earnings report shows a net income increase to PHP 11.24 billion from PHP 9.11 billion the previous year, with basic earnings per share rising to PHP 14.91 from PHP 12.08. Insider confidence is evident as John David G. Yap acquired over 55,000 shares valued at approximately PHP 4 million, suggesting potential optimism about future performance despite a high bad loans ratio of 3.4% and low allowance for bad loans at 83%.
Navigate through the intricacies of Security Bank with our comprehensive valuation report here.
Examine Security Bank's past performance report to understand how it has performed in the past.
Simply Wall St Value Rating: ★★★☆☆☆
Overview: HBM Holdings focuses on the development of innovative therapies in tumor immunology and immune diseases, with a market cap of HK$1.65 billion.
Operations: HBM Holdings generates its revenue primarily from the development of innovative therapies in tumor immunology and immune diseases, with a recent quarterly revenue of $72.21 million. The company has seen fluctuations in its net income margin, moving from negative to positive figures over time, reaching 0.29% as of the latest data point. Operating expenses are significant, with research and development being a major component at $29.80 million in the most recent period.
PE: 26.3x
HBM Holdings, a company with a strong foundation in antibody discovery, has recently engaged in strategic collaborations and licensing agreements to bolster its innovative therapeutic offerings. The partnership with Insilico Medicine aims to leverage AI for next-gen antibody applications, while the co-development of HBM9378/SKB378 targets COPD treatment. Insider confidence is evident as Jingsong Wang acquired 400,000 shares for approximately RMB 1.4 million between late 2024 and early 2025. Despite volatile share prices recently, these developments highlight potential growth avenues amidst high operational efficiency.
Get an in-depth perspective on HBM Holdings' performance by reading our valuation report here.
Review our historical performance report to gain insights into HBM Holdings''s past performance.
Explore the 116 names from our Undervalued Global Small Caps With Insider Buying screener here.
Have a stake in these businesses? Integrate your holdings into Simply Wall St's portfolio for notifications and detailed stock reports.
Elevate your portfolio with Simply Wall St, the ultimate app for investors seeking global market coverage.
Explore high-performing small cap companies that haven't yet garnered significant analyst attention.
Fuel your portfolio with companies showing strong growth potential, backed by optimistic outlooks both from analysts and management.
Find companies with promising cash flow potential yet trading below their fair value.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include ASX:ABG PSE:SECB and SEHK:2142.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
a day ago
- CNBC
How activist Barington Capital can collaborate with Victoria's Secret to improve shareholder value
Business: Victoria's Secret & Co. is a specialty retailer of women's apparel and beauty products marketed under the Victoria's Secret, Pink and Adore Me brand names. Victoria's Secret brand offers intimate apparel, casual sleepwear, swim, lounge and sport, as well as fragrances and body care. Pink is a lifestyle brand for young women providing variety of collections and heritage pieces, including intimate apparel, loungewear, activewear, accessories, beauty and more. Adore Me is a direct-to-consumer lingerie and apparel brand that is focused on serving women of all sizes and budgets. Stock Market Value: $1.5B ($18.83 per share) Ownership: > 1% Average Cost: n/a Activist Commentary: Barington was founded in 1992 by James A. Mitarotonda as a boutique, full-service investment bank to serve the needs of emerging growth and smaller capitalization companies. The success of the firm and its investments led to the wind-down of the investment bank and the launch of an activist hedge fund in 2000. In its history, Barington has taken material action at 38 other companies and has averaged a 38.18% return on these investments versus 14.74% for the Russell 2000 over the same period. Barington is advocating for Victoria's Secret to (i) replace at least a majority, if not all, of the board with directors who have proven experience in brand revitalization, operational execution, international expansion and shareholder value creation (six of the nine current directors have been on the board since its public listing); (ii) have the reconstituted board consider whether CEO Hillary Super has the experience and strategic clarity necessary to engineer a turnaround; (iii) dedicate additional focus to its core brand; (iv) accelerate growth in digital and international markets; and (v) streamline the operating model eliminating underperforming and distracting initiatives. Victoria's Secret & Co. ("VSCO") is a specialty retailer of lingerie, clothing and beauty products through its flagship Victoria's Secret brand, Pink and Adore Me. The company began trading on the New York Stock Exchange in summer 2021 following a spin-off from L Brands (which is now Bath & Body Works). The company's nearly four-year stint in the public markets has been marked by difficulties. Trading at an all-time high of roughly $76 per share not long after its debut, shares have fallen more than 75% to around $18 per share. Investor BBRC International PTE Limited converted from a 13G to a 13D in February 2024 and built its position to nearly 13% as VSCO shares continued to tumble. Earlier this month, BBRC sent a letter to Victoria's Secret Chair Donna James in which it lambasted the board for its history of value destruction. BBRC's letter is short on support and detail and long on allegation, negativity and second guessing with the benefit of hindsight. The only suggestion the investor makes states the obvious: "constructing a confidence-inspiring Board and generating positive financial returns to drive value creation." Thankfully for Victoria's Secret and its shareholders, a more constructive and experienced activist showed up: Barington Capital. On June 16, Barington sent a letter to the board of VSCO notifying the company of its more than 1% position. Then in its very next paragraph, Barington uses words like "constructively," "collaboratively" and "helpful." The firm does not just claim to have industry experience, but cites its engagement with L Brands, the former parent company of VSCO, which led to an increase in the stock price by 221.5% during its tenure as an advisor to the board of directors. Like BBRC, Barington criticizes the company's dismal underperformance, trailing its peers by 47.4 percentage points since its IPO. But while BBRC was content with just being critical, Barington specifically identifies several reasons for the underperformance such as declining revenue, shrinking gross margins, growing inventory, high senior management turnover, a lack of marketing and merchandising focus and an apparent failure to articulate or execute a compelling brand vision. Had Barington just left it there, the firm would have been more helpful than BBRC. However, as a responsible and experienced shareholder activist, Barington takes it to the next integral step – suggestions on a path forward. Specifically, Barington recommended that Victoria's Secret: (i) replace at least a majority, if not all, of the board with directors who have proven experience in brand revitalization, operational execution, international expansion and shareholder value creation (six of the nine current directors have been on the board since its public listing); (ii) have the reconstituted board consider whether CEO Hillary Super has the experience and strategic clarity necessary to engineer a turnaround; (iii) dedicate additional focus to its core brand; (iv) accelerate growth in digital and international markets; and (v) streamline the operating model eliminating underperforming and distracting initiatives. Barington is no stranger to VSCO. In fact, the firm was a vocal proponent of the spin in a previous 2019 campaign at L Brands. At the time, Barington recommended that the company take swift action to improve the performance of VSCO by correcting merchandising mistakes and launching a strategic review to unlock value through a separation of VSCO from Bath & Body Works. The two parties eventually entered into an agreement pursuant to which L Brands appointed Barington as a special advisor to the company, and Barington agreed to withdraw its proposed nominees to the board. Ultimately, VSCO was spun and Barington generated a return of over 221.5% during its tenure as an advisor to the board. Barington may not be a household name in the investor world like many activists, but it has as much experience as any activist today. The firm's activism dates back to 2000, and much of it was focused on the retail sector, targeting companies like Hanesbrands, Chico's FAS and Dillard's. Of its 46 campaigns, 19 have been at consumer discretionary companies, at which the firm has had an average return of 13.86% versus 8.56% for the Russell 2000 over the same period. Barington does not like spending what it takes to win a proxy fight, preferring to gain representation through settlements. Its recent proxy fight and loss at Matthews International was evidence of this, but also showed that Barington is still willing to take a proxy fight to the distance. Barington is not likely to go through that again so soon, but given its experience in this industry and at Victoria's Secret (two of the current directors, including Chair Donna James, were directors when Barington successfully collaboratively engaged in 2019), we would expect that the firm would have a good opportunity to work constructively and amicably with the board to create shareholder value.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
NCC Group Reports First Half 2025 Earnings
Net income: UK£16.0m (up by UK£16.0m from 1H 2024). EPS: UK£0.052. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 2.3% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 7.9% growth forecast for the IT industry in the United Kingdom. Performance of the British IT industry. The company's shares are down 11% from a week ago. We should say that we've discovered 1 warning sign for NCC Group that you should be aware of before investing here. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Johan Holdings Berhad Third Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS: RM0.007 (vs RM0.008 loss in 3Q 2024)
Net income: RM8.15m (up from RM8.78m loss in 3Q 2024). EPS: RM0.007 (up from RM0.008 loss in 3Q 2024). We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Johan Holdings Berhad shares are up 20% from a week ago. You should always think about risks. Case in point, we've spotted 3 warning signs for Johan Holdings Berhad you should be aware of, and 2 of them are concerning. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
