logo
Dear Disney: don't cave to Trump. We need you to shape dreams for kids everywhere

Dear Disney: don't cave to Trump. We need you to shape dreams for kids everywhere

The Guardian03-04-2025

I remember the moment I truly recognized the power Disney has to move young hearts and minds.
It was when I attended a sneak preview of Disney's adaptation of the Chinese legend of Mulan, about a young woman who disguises herself as a man and takes up her wounded father's sword to defend her nation.
I enjoyed the movie, with its combination of swashbuckling, slapstick and show tunes. But as I filed out of the theater, what I saw hit me like a fire-dragon rocket: two blond, apple-cheeked siblings, probably under the age of eight, leaping and sparring and loudly arguing over the right to pretend to be the movie's main character, Mulan. A boy and a girl, neither of them Asian, both so enthralled by the film's Chinese protagonist that they each aspired to be her.
It reminded me that Disney doesn't just tell stories; it shapes dreams, creating heroes iconic enough to inspire young kids to imagine and be more, and providing empowering figures that enable people from different backgrounds to see themselves – and one another.
It's still staggering for me to think that Mulan, a story from China with a gender-blurred title role, was greenlit, made and released in 1998 and is now broadly accepted alongside Bambi as a timeless animated classic – especially now that Maga has announced it's coming after the House of Mouse, with the apparent objective to make sure that nothing like it is ever made again.
On 27 March, the Trump-appointed Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chair, Brendan Carr – a dead ringer for Who Framed Roger Rabbit's mirthless toon-terrorizer Judge Doom – sent a letter to Disney's CEO, Bob Iger, informing him that he had directed the agency's enforcement bureau to begin an investigation into Disney's diversity, equity and inclusion policies.
Carr stated that he wanted to ensure that Disney had not been 'promoting invidious forms of DEI discrimination', calling out as examples the company's employee affinity groups, its 'Reimagine Tomorrow' multicultural showcase and especially the company's 'inclusion standards', a set of goals that aim to increase the number of characters from underrepresented groups to half of the regular and recurring roles on its TV network, ABC.
It's hard to explain why any of these are 'discriminatory' or 'invidious'; voluntary employee-led clubs – which have no restrictions or requirements for membership – are discriminatory? A website featuring remixes of Disney songs sung by artists of color and explanations of how to sign 'Mickey Mouse' in ASL is invidious? Even the 'inclusion standards' are just broadly aspirational objectives, which could be met in any number of ways: Disney's definition of 'underrepresented groups' includes women, people of color, LGBTQ+ people, disabled persons and military veterans.
But the mere threat of the investigation hastriggered Disney to begin a cautious reframing of some of these initiatives. The Reimagine Tomorrow site is gone, and now points to a generic inclusion page headed by the message: 'At Disney, we want everyone to belong and thrive.' The company's business employee resource groups have been redubbed 'belonging' employee resource groups.
Carr's letter makes it clear that mere semantic shifts won't be enough, demanding that Disney's policies be 'changed in a fundamental manner'. And while Carr cites 'equal opportunity rules' and the need to ensure 'fair and equal treatment under the law', it's obvious that he won't be satisfied until Disney changes the one thing that the FCC is restricted from regulating by the US constitution: its content.
Of course, the first amendment prevents the government from infringing on freedom of expression, except in very narrowly delimited ways. Where the FCC is concerned, the only way it can impose its will on a creative company's storytelling choices is if they are obscene, indecent or profane or contain dangerous disinformation. So the agency can't just demand that Disney stop making shows about Asian princesses or Black superheroes or Latina anthropomorphic automobiles.
Yet that's just what Carr is doing – using the back door of equal employment opportunity to claim that by casting people who aren't straight or white or male in its movies and TV programs, Disney is unfairly withholding employment from straight white males. And unless Disney is ready to announce Timothée Chalamet as the new Black Panther, which, thank God, it isn't, targeting the studio's ability to hire diverse talent is a deliberate attempt to force it away from making diverse stories.
That would spell business disaster for Disney.
Yes, the studio has had its share of flops, which the Maga mob has blamed on multicultural casting – including, most recently, its unfairly pilloried live-action remake of the 1937 animated masterpiece Snow White, starring Rachel Zegler, whose mother is Colombian. The film, made on a $240m budget, has so far earned just $142m at the box office, its prospects poisoned by controversy over Zegler's advocacy on behalf of Palestine and racist backlash over her Latina heritage from online creeps.
But similar attacks were also levied against Disney's The Little Mermaid remake, starring the African American actor Halle Bailey as Ariel, and that film was a box-office success and global streaming blockbuster. It also made the storyline relevant in new ways to young women – which makes sense, given that Disney's goal with its remakes isn't simply to photocopy the past, but to extend and refresh it, reaching untapped audiences of the present and emerging markets of the future.
If that means they sometimes swing and miss in the short term, in the long run it all evens out, because Disney doesn't actually plan their business by quarter or year – they blueprint it by age bracket. Their franchises are designed to be evergreen and intentionally aligned to 'graduate' kids up a ladder of content: girls go from Muppets to Disney Fairies to Disney princesses to Disney's Descendants. Boys go from Cars to Pirates to Star Wars to Marvel superheroes. The ultimate goal is to ensure that there's something for every stage of growing up until young adulthood arrives and their fans become parents themselves, allowing Disney to earn money across the consumer life cycle, generation after generation.
And every generation of Americans is more diverse. Baby boomers were 29% people of color. Gen X, 41%. Millennials, 46%, gen Z, 50%. The youngest rising cohort – those born after 2012, and currently squarely in Disney's prime target demo – is officially the first to be 'majority minority', with kids of color making up a full 52% of gen Alpha.
Whatever Trump's mandate may be, Disney's demographic mandate should be stronger. The company defiantly and successfully resisted attempts by Ron DeSantis to strong-arm it into ending its diversity practices in Florida. While Trump's flying assault is coming from a higher top rope, the Mouse should still be mighty enough to fend it off and roar back.
Disney's incentive will be what it always has been: making money. But for diverse communities, the positive manifestation of Disney's profit motive has been that kids growing up today know what it feels like to be mirrored in the media they consume, with all of the psychological and emotional benefits that confers.
I've seen this first-hand, as someone who grew up in an era nearly devoid of Asian representation in Hollywood, and who went through the bizarre experience of having my elder son, Hudson Yang, star in the first hit TV series focused on an Asian American family. To this day, Hudson still receives surprise hugs from people who grew up tuning into Fresh Off the Boat once a week, and wide-eyed stares from kids who have discovered it years later through TikTok clips and streaming reruns.
The network that aired the show for six seasons, beginning in 2014? Disney's ABC, a decade before inclusion standards existed and before Maga was around to protest them. And that gives me optimism that Disney will keep doing what it has done so well for generations, regardless: give children from a wide array of backgrounds an answer – 'now and here' – to the question in Mulan's signature ballad: 'When will my reflection show who I am inside?'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We bought an abandoned Italian mansion for half of the asking price, it looks like a palace but there's a major downside
We bought an abandoned Italian mansion for half of the asking price, it looks like a palace but there's a major downside

Scottish Sun

time8 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

We bought an abandoned Italian mansion for half of the asking price, it looks like a palace but there's a major downside

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A COUPLE shared a glimpse into the abandoned Italian mansion they purchased for less than half the asking price. And while the stunning property was definitely a steal, they revealed one major downside to their plans. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 TikTok user Jordan Kamelleri showed his followers the Italian mansion he purchased with his partner Credit: Tiktok/@jordankamelleri TikTok user Jordan Kamelleri (@jordankamelleri) and his partner Emmanuele are no strangers to rennovating old buildings and transforming them into high-end properties. Their latest purchase is an "abandoned Italian palace" which hasn't been inhabited in 40 years. The couple have been documenting their rennovation work on the 14-bedroom space, amassing eight million views on one of their clips. "When I was younger, I would have dreamed of a place like this," Jordan told his followers, revealing that features such as the property's armoury immediately sold him. Now, the pair plan to convert the 16th-century Italian palace into a private residence, reports People. They have been working to renovate various properties together since 2018, eventually leading them to their most restoration yet. Their new estate was built sometime in the 1500s and has over 21,500 square feet of living space. With years of experience navigating Italy's real estate market, the couple were able to negotiate the purchase price down to roughly half the original listing. They revealed that they ultimately paid the equivalent of £557,000 for the property, plus additional fees and taxes. The pair are now focused on clearing out the vast spaces and salvaging what they can. Inside Ireland's 'magical' Disney castle with fairytale tower on sale for €7.5MILLION and it's minutes from the beach However, the long-abandoned property comes with one major drawback. They revealed that they have had to deal with "decades of decay" in their efforts to do up the space. But there are significantly more pros than cons with this property, as well as being a steal with magnificent views of the Italian countryside, it remarkably also has functional plumbing. While the current plan is to convert the space into a private property, the couple are remaining flexible and allowing for the possibility of opening one wing to guests as a vacation rental. They added that they are also considering opening parts of the palace for events such as weddings. 5 Tips to Get on The Property Ladder Saving for your first property is tough, but it is possible. Here are a few steps for first-time buyers. 1. Cut back on luxuries and start saving Consistent monthly saving is the best way to accumulate enough money to get on the ladder, for a deposit and purchase fees. To do this, you need to take a look at your monthly outgoings and think about what can be cut out - holidays, new clothes, weekly takeaway. Using a savings calculator can help you to establish how long you will need to save for a deposit. Based on your income, you can figure out a realistic amount to save each month. 2. Have a realistic property search Set a budget for the property price you would like to buy, and think realistically about the location and size of your property. While we all may want that house with a view or extra bedroom, can you afford it? 3. Research Help To Buy and Shared Ownership schemes The government has introduced a few ways to help first-time-buyers get on the property ladder and they're great for those on lower incomes or to buy a property in more expensive areas like London. 4. Consider buying with another person Investing with somebody else you know is a sure way to get onto the property ladder. You only need to save half the amount you would otherwise, so you can work towards getting your property sooner. You can invest with a friend, family or partner. Naturally, it is a big step and a huge commitment so be open and honest about what you expect from living together — if you haven't already. 5. Talk to a mortgage broker and get your documents in order A mortgage broker can tell you exactly how much you can borrow for a mortgage, what you will need to pay monthly and in upfront costs. The vast property has an array of indoor-outdoor spaces, a favourite feature for the couple. These include several verandas, loggias, and panoramic atriums offering exposure to the Italian sun throughout the day. TikTok users shared their thoughts on the stunning property in the comments section. "This has SO MUCH potential as not only a home but also a wedding venue," wrote one viewer. "I've never been so jealous in my entire life," said another impressed follower. "People are really out there living my dream," commented a third person.

Where are the cast of Lost now - 15 years after the show ended
Where are the cast of Lost now - 15 years after the show ended

Daily Record

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Record

Where are the cast of Lost now - 15 years after the show ended

The hit supernatural drama Lost ended 15 years ago, but where are the cast now and what have they been up to since leaving the show... The early 2000's drama series Lost wrapped up 15 years ago in May 2010, with a series finale that remains one of TV's most emotional and captivating endings - with over 13.5 million fans tuning in. Now the series can be watched on major streaming platforms such as Netflix, Disney+ and Apple TV, and is even free to watch on ITVX, attracting new viewers while longtime fans return to enjoy it again. ‌ Created by Jeffrey Lieber, JJ Abrams and Damon Lindelof, Lost follows the survivors of a plane crash stranded on a mysterious island in the South Pacific. ‌ While the core story unfolds on the island, the show incorporates flashbacks and flash forwards to deepen character development and deepen the storylines. The supernatural series aired 121 episodes over six seasons and developed a devoted cult following, leaving many fans to wonder what happened to the cast once they left the show. So where is the cast of Lost now? Here's everything about the stars' careers and lives since the show ended nearly two decades ago. Matthew Fox ‌ Matthew Fox was one of the central characters in the show, playing Doctor Jack Shepard, who took on the role of group leader when the plane crashed leaving everyone stranded. Since the show finished, Matthew continued to act and went on to feature in the films World War Z and Alex Cross. Although after some personal setbacks, Matthew took a break from acting, returning to the small screen in 2020 in the TV series Last Light. Evangeline Lilly ‌ Evangeline Lilly, was another main character in the series for her role as Kate Austen. She received critical acclaim for her performance, earning a Golden Globe nomination and six Saturn Award nominations for Best Actress on Television. On the show, Evangeline's character Kate quickly became a fan favourite for her dramatic love triangle with Jack and Sawyer. Following her success in Lost, Evangeline went on to star in major blockbusters, including The Hobbit trilogy, Avengers, Ant-Man and the Wasp and voiced Savannah Mason in the video game Call of Duty: Black Ops 4. ‌ Josh Holloway Josh Holloway played the iconic role as James 'Sawyer' Ford, the loose cannon of the group lost on the Island. He had a strained relationship with Jack due to his romantic interest for Kate and eventually Juliet. ‌ Since leaving the show, Josh has appeared in Mission Impossible - Ghost Protocol and TV series Intelligence, Colony, Blackout and Yellowstone. Jorge Garcia Jorge Garcia, was known as the beloved Hugo 'Hurley' Reyes in Lost, and became a fan favourite for his bubbly and sweet personality. Since the, Jorge has continued to win over audiences with appearances in series such as How I Met Your Mother, Hawaii Five-0, and How to Be a Bookie. ‌ Although he then started to stay out of the public eye, before returning to our screens in 2022 as Cyclops on season seven of the American version of The Masked Singer. Terry O'Quinn Terry O'Quinn, who captivated audiences as the charismatic and philosophical John Locke on the show, maintained a steady presence in film and TV since the series ended. ‌ His roles span a variety of different things, from voice acting to zombie series - including Phineas and Ferb, FBI: Most Wanted, The Walking Dead: The Ones Who Live, Resident Alien, and Unsung Hero. Naveen Andrews Naveen Andrews earned multiple nominations for his role as Sayid Jarrah on Lost - Golden Globe Award and Primetime Emmy nominations. He has continued to expand his impressive career in TV and film, having stared in Diana, Once Upon a Time in Wonderland, The Cleaning Lady, Last King of the Cross and The Dropout. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.

Disney's VERY pricey mistake: How firing a man who made the film studio billions 'cost them even more' after he became their biggest rival
Disney's VERY pricey mistake: How firing a man who made the film studio billions 'cost them even more' after he became their biggest rival

Daily Mail​

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Disney's VERY pricey mistake: How firing a man who made the film studio billions 'cost them even more' after he became their biggest rival

In the mid 90s, the Walt Disney Company sacked Jeffrey Katzenberg, the executive widely credited with reviving the studio's flagging fortunes and ushering in a golden age of animation. In doing so, they may have made one of the most costly errors in corporate Hollywood history. Not only did Jeffrey, now 74, go on to co-found DreamWorks SKG alongside Steven Spielberg and David Geffen but, under his leadership, the new studio soon became Disney's most formidable competitor in animation. It was a twist few in the industry could have predicted, but Jeffrey's journey from Disney's inner circle to rival mogul reshaped the landscape of modern entertainment. Jeffrey's film career began in 1974 when he joined Paramount Pictures as an assistant to the chairman, Barry Diller. His work ethic and ambition quickly became apparent and after a short time, he was promoted to work directly under head of production Michael Eisner, according to the LA Times. He became a trusted lieutenant and was soon overseeing major hits such as Saturday Night Fever, Grease and Beverly Hills Cop. And when Eisner left Paramount in 1984 to become CEO of Disney, Jeffrey followed him, appointed to chair Walt Disney Studios during a time of significant decline. At the time, Disney's animation division was near collapse. Jeffrey immediately began reshaping the unit, scrapping underperforming projects and helping complete a handful of decently successful films. But his real impact came with The Little Mermaid, the first film over which he had full creative control. It became a massive box office hit and signalled the start of what is now known as the Disney Renaissance. Under Jeffrey's leadership, Disney produced a string of hits including Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin and The Lion King. These films grossed billions of dollars, revitalised the company's reputation and re-established animation as a dominant force in global cinema. But Jeffrey's influence extended beyond animation. He oversaw all of the studio's filmed content, from motion pictures and television to home video distribution. He also played a major role in launching Disney's Touchstone Pictures and producing a string of adult-oriented comedies such as Good Morning, Vietnam, Dead Poets Society and Pretty Woman. Under his influence, Disney rose from the bottom of the box office rankings to become the most successful studio in Hollywood by the late 1980s. He co-launched Hollywood Pictures, oversaw the acquisition of Miramax and greenlit the historic partnership with Pixar, resulting in the production of Toy Story. But even with these achievements, Jeffrey's relationship with the company began to deteriorate. He had always been a highly ambitious executive and, in 1993, he even sought promotion to company president. But after the untimely death of then-president Frank Wells in a helicopter crash the following year, CEO Michael Eisner decided not to promote Jeffrey to the vacant role. According to Jeffrey, Eisner had previously assured him the position would be his if it became available, he told The Hollywood Reporter. Instead, Eisner stepped into the role himself, reportedly under pressure from Roy E. Disney, who had become uncomfortable with Jeffrey's aggressive style and growing influence, the LA Times reported. Jeffrey left the company in October, 1994, his contract completed but his departure laced with acrimony. And shortly afterward, he filed a lawsuit against Disney, claiming he was owed bonuses and back pay. The case was ultimately settled out of court in 1999 for a reported $250million. That same year, Jeffrey embarked on a new chapter in his career that would alter the animation industry once again. With the encouragement of Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey co-founded DreamWorks SKG just two months after leaving Disney. He was given primary responsibility for the studio's animation division and began building it from scratch. Initially, the studio experimented with both traditional and stop-motion animation, producing titles like The Prince of Egypt, Chicken Run and The Road to El Dorado. But the major breakthrough came in 2001 with Shrek, a computer-animated satire of the traditional fairytale narratives Disney had popularised. Shrek was not only a commercial hit but also a critical success, winning the first-ever Academy Award for Best Animated Feature. Its humour appealed to both children and adults, establishing a groundbreaking new tone in family entertainment. It also spawned a billion-dollar franchise, complete with sequels, merchandise and spin-offs that have endured for more than two decades, with the next Shrek film coming to cinemas at the end of 2026. Ahead of his time, Jeffrey recognised early on that the future of animation lay in computer-generated imagery. After the commercial failure of the traditionally animated Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas in 2003, which lost the company over $100million, he shifted DreamWorks entirely to CG animation. This transition led to a series of hits including Madagascar, Kung Fu Panda and How to Train Your Dragon. By the mid-2000s, DreamWorks had become Disney's most serious competition in the animation market, both in terms of box office performance and cultural influence. In 2016, Jeffrey sold DreamWorks Animation to NBCUniversal for a staggering $3.8billion, AWN reported. He personally received an estimated $500million from the deal, bringing a lucrative end to a chapter that had begun with his being fired from Disney more than two decades earlier. It appears Disney's decision to remove him in 1994 was rooted in internal politics and personal rivalries. Yet in doing so, the company created a competitor that would challenge its dominance for years. In the story of Hollywood's modern animation era, Jeffrey is a central figure not just for what he built, but for what he built after seemingly being told he was no longer needed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store