logo
Disney's VERY pricey mistake: How firing a man who made the film studio billions 'cost them even more' after he became their biggest rival

Disney's VERY pricey mistake: How firing a man who made the film studio billions 'cost them even more' after he became their biggest rival

Daily Mail​20 hours ago

In the mid 90s, the Walt Disney Company sacked Jeffrey Katzenberg, the executive widely credited with reviving the studio's flagging fortunes and ushering in a golden age of animation.
In doing so, they may have made one of the most costly errors in corporate Hollywood history.
Not only did Jeffrey, now 74, go on to co-found DreamWorks SKG alongside Steven Spielberg and David Geffen but, under his leadership, the new studio soon became Disney's most formidable competitor in animation.
It was a twist few in the industry could have predicted, but Jeffrey's journey from Disney's inner circle to rival mogul reshaped the landscape of modern entertainment.
Jeffrey's film career began in 1974 when he joined Paramount Pictures as an assistant to the chairman, Barry Diller.
His work ethic and ambition quickly became apparent and after a short time, he was promoted to work directly under head of production Michael Eisner, according to the LA Times.
He became a trusted lieutenant and was soon overseeing major hits such as Saturday Night Fever, Grease and Beverly Hills Cop.
And when Eisner left Paramount in 1984 to become CEO of Disney, Jeffrey followed him, appointed to chair Walt Disney Studios during a time of significant decline.
At the time, Disney's animation division was near collapse. Jeffrey immediately began reshaping the unit, scrapping underperforming projects and helping complete a handful of decently successful films.
But his real impact came with The Little Mermaid, the first film over which he had full creative control.
It became a massive box office hit and signalled the start of what is now known as the Disney Renaissance.
Under Jeffrey's leadership, Disney produced a string of hits including Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin and The Lion King.
These films grossed billions of dollars, revitalised the company's reputation and re-established animation as a dominant force in global cinema.
But Jeffrey's influence extended beyond animation. He oversaw all of the studio's filmed content, from motion pictures and television to home video distribution.
He also played a major role in launching Disney's Touchstone Pictures and producing a string of adult-oriented comedies such as Good Morning, Vietnam, Dead Poets Society and Pretty Woman.
Under his influence, Disney rose from the bottom of the box office rankings to become the most successful studio in Hollywood by the late 1980s.
He co-launched Hollywood Pictures, oversaw the acquisition of Miramax and greenlit the historic partnership with Pixar, resulting in the production of Toy Story.
But even with these achievements, Jeffrey's relationship with the company began to deteriorate.
He had always been a highly ambitious executive and, in 1993, he even sought promotion to company president.
But after the untimely death of then-president Frank Wells in a helicopter crash the following year, CEO Michael Eisner decided not to promote Jeffrey to the vacant role.
According to Jeffrey, Eisner had previously assured him the position would be his if it became available, he told The Hollywood Reporter.
Instead, Eisner stepped into the role himself, reportedly under pressure from Roy E. Disney, who had become uncomfortable with Jeffrey's aggressive style and growing influence, the LA Times reported.
Jeffrey left the company in October, 1994, his contract completed but his departure laced with acrimony.
And shortly afterward, he filed a lawsuit against Disney, claiming he was owed bonuses and back pay. The case was ultimately settled out of court in 1999 for a reported $250million.
That same year, Jeffrey embarked on a new chapter in his career that would alter the animation industry once again.
With the encouragement of Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey co-founded DreamWorks SKG just two months after leaving Disney.
He was given primary responsibility for the studio's animation division and began building it from scratch.
Initially, the studio experimented with both traditional and stop-motion animation, producing titles like The Prince of Egypt, Chicken Run and The Road to El Dorado.
But the major breakthrough came in 2001 with Shrek, a computer-animated satire of the traditional fairytale narratives Disney had popularised.
Shrek was not only a commercial hit but also a critical success, winning the first-ever Academy Award for Best Animated Feature.
Its humour appealed to both children and adults, establishing a groundbreaking new tone in family entertainment.
It also spawned a billion-dollar franchise, complete with sequels, merchandise and spin-offs that have endured for more than two decades, with the next Shrek film coming to cinemas at the end of 2026.
Ahead of his time, Jeffrey recognised early on that the future of animation lay in computer-generated imagery.
After the commercial failure of the traditionally animated Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas in 2003, which lost the company over $100million, he shifted DreamWorks entirely to CG animation.
This transition led to a series of hits including Madagascar, Kung Fu Panda and How to Train Your Dragon.
By the mid-2000s, DreamWorks had become Disney's most serious competition in the animation market, both in terms of box office performance and cultural influence.
In 2016, Jeffrey sold DreamWorks Animation to NBCUniversal for a staggering $3.8billion, AWN reported.
He personally received an estimated $500million from the deal, bringing a lucrative end to a chapter that had begun with his being fired from Disney more than two decades earlier.
It appears Disney's decision to remove him in 1994 was rooted in internal politics and personal rivalries.
Yet in doing so, the company created a competitor that would challenge its dominance for years.
In the story of Hollywood's modern animation era, Jeffrey is a central figure not just for what he built, but for what he built after seemingly being told he was no longer needed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘I find it sad and difficult to listen to the Smiths': Ana Matronic's honest playlist
‘I find it sad and difficult to listen to the Smiths': Ana Matronic's honest playlist

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

‘I find it sad and difficult to listen to the Smiths': Ana Matronic's honest playlist

The first song I fell in love with I was obsessed as a child with the Muppets and Sesame Street. My grandmother made me a puppet of the Count to help practise my counting. I loved The Pinball Number Count with the Pointer Sisters counting up 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 / 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 / 11/ 12 which is prophetic because I still consider the Pointer Sisters one of my all-time favourite bands. The first record I bought I was playing Delirious by Prince for my mother in 1982, and she said: 'He sounds like Little Richard.' I said: 'Who is Little Richard?' and she said: 'Get in the car, young lady,' and we went and bought a Little Richard greatest hits set. It was the start of a long conversation about music with my mom. The song I do at karaoke Psycho Killer by Talking Heads, Should I Stay Or Should I Go by the Clash, or – in the right mood – Pulp's Common People. The song I inexplicably know every lyric to You're speaking to someone who used to be a drag queen and is involved still in nightlife on Fire Island. I explicably know the words to lots of songs, especially if they are well known in the LGBTQ+ community. I've never owned Believe by Cher, but I can sing every word. The best song to get the party started I play so many kinds of parties: house music, disco, 80s, alternative. The one song they all agree is that Pull Up to the Bumper by Grace Jones is an absolute party starter. The song I can no longer listen to I find it sad and difficult to listen to the Smiths, but I still listen by pure virtue of Johnny Marr's guitar brilliance. How Soon Is Now was on such constant rotation when my father passed away, I'm sure my mom hates it now. The song I secretly like I don't believe in guilty pleasures. I think all pleasures should be enjoyed. I absolutely love – and can murder on karaoke – [US heavy metal band] Danzig. You'll often find me, late at night, headbanging. The song that changed my life I already loved Duran Duran and was a bit of a new romantic. But when my older sister brought home The Head on the Door by the Cure and I heard Inbetween Days, I went straight to the record store to talk to the guy behind the counter about my next purchase. The song that gets me up in the morning Straight Shooter by the Mamas and the Papas. Sign up to Inside Saturday The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend. after newsletter promotion The best song to have sex to Side one of Led Zeppelin IV. Preferably in a van. The song that makes me cry My friend Amber Martin does an incredible show, where she recreates Bette Midler's Bathhouse performances from the 1970s and you have to check your clothes and wear a towel, so it's just like going to the Continental Baths in 1972. When she does I Shall Be Released by Bob Dylan, it always makes me cry. The song I'd like played at my funeral Lavender Coffin by Lionel Hampton. I could get a lavender coffin, that'd be great. I could just rent it. I don't have to be inside. Maybe the Count from Sesame Street could be inside, and come out and sing. That's what I want. Ana Matronic's Good Time Sallies podcast is out now.

LeBron James speaks out on when he will retire from the NBA
LeBron James speaks out on when he will retire from the NBA

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

LeBron James speaks out on when he will retire from the NBA

LeBron James admitted his days in the NBA are running out as the 40-year-old addressed possible retirement on Saturday. The Lakers legend appeared on stage alongside Tom Brady and Victor Wembanyama at Fanatics Fest in New York City. When asked how much longer he had in the league, James chuckled and pointed at Brady. 'He played until he was 58! 'I don't know, man... I can't play that much further.' LeBron then gestured to Wembanyama and suggested the 7ft 3ins Frenchman might push him into retirement. 'The more and more time I play as long as he keeps smacking my f***ing shots into the stands, it's going to make me retire,' he said. The NBA legend was egged on by former quarterback Brady, who shouted: 'You're still young!' Brady, who played in the NFL until he was 45, told James: 'You look so good out there!' WARNING - EXPLICIT CONTENT LeBron James says he won't play 'that much further' and jokes that Wemby might push him into retirement — Ryan Garcia (@RyanGarciaESM) June 21, 2025 The NBA legend will turn 41 in December and he is already teammates with his son, Bronny (L) LeBron's future has been the subject of renewed speculation since the Lakers were beaten in the first round of the playoffs by the Minnesota Timberwolves. James is a four-time NBA champion and the league's all-time leading points scorer. But he will turn 41 in December and is already teammates with his son, Bronny. The 40-year-old is under contract with the Lakers through the end of the 2026 season, when he would become an unrestricted free agent. Earlier this week, the NBA legend hinted he could move into acting after the end of his basketball career. James has previously hosted ' Saturday Night Live ' and was the star in the movie 'Space Jam: A New Legacy'. 'If the scripts start to roll in and there's an opportunity for me to do some acting and I have the time... I don't mind looking at it and seeing if I can make it happen,' James said to the Hollywood Reporter.

I'm no Ed Sheeran fan, but he's right: when it comes to musical plagiarism, guilt is in the ear of the listener
I'm no Ed Sheeran fan, but he's right: when it comes to musical plagiarism, guilt is in the ear of the listener

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

I'm no Ed Sheeran fan, but he's right: when it comes to musical plagiarism, guilt is in the ear of the listener

Leave Ed Sheeran alone. Four words I never expected to write, but we live in very strange times. Cards on the table: I'm no fan of his music, but that's neither here nor there when it comes to making sense of the recently concluded epic battle over alleged copyright infringement. To catch you up to speed: on 20 June 2014, Sheeran released his second studio album X, a worldwide chart-topper. On 24 September 2014, he released the third single from it, Thinking Out Loud, a standard love song about vowing eternal devotion, which was another worldwide chart-topper. In between, that July, BBC Radio 1Xtra announced its Power List of the most important figures in black and urban music, which, to much derision, placed the very white Sheeran at the top. This was nothing new: Sheeran had already received four nominations for a Mobo Award. And, at least according to the owners of Marvin Gaye's 1973 bedroom ballad Let's Get It On, Thinking Out Loud was indeed music of black origin. The family of Ed Townsend, Gaye's co-writer, launched a copyright infringement case in 2016, seeking $100m in damages. In 2023, a New York jury ruled in Sheeran's favour. However, a company called Structured Asset Sales, which owns a stake in Townsend's songwriting, launched a separate case in 2018. This week, that case, too, was rejected by the US supremecourt. This comes as a particular relief to Amy Wadge, Sheeran's co-writer. Wadge is a true Welsh success story (she grew up in Somerset but cut her teeth on the grassroots Cardiff scene), and deserved better than a decade-long shadow over her first major hit. There is the very vaguest similarity in the way Thinking Out Loud's syncopation drags its heels, the trick that gives Let's Get It On its sexiness. If anything, at the risk of precipitating another legal case, Thinking Out Loud reminds me more of Tracy Chapman's Baby Can I Hold You, and I'm not alone. (A YouTuber has created a mashup called Baby Can I Think Out Loud Tonight, and the two songs are also paired together on the SoundsJustLike website.) This was not the first time a Marvin Gaye song has sparked a copyright case. In 2015, the Gaye estate successfully won a case against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams regarding their hit, Blurred Lines, not on the basis of melody or lyrics but, controversially, a similarity to the vibe and feel of Gaye's 1977 single Got To Give It Up. Nor is it the only time Sheeran has been the target of such a claim. His 2017 mega-hit Shape of You was targeted, unsuccessfully, by grime artist Sami Switch in 2022. Anyone immersed in pop history can rattle off dozens of previous cases, fruitful or failed. Most famously of all, George Harrison paid out £587,000 due to his 1971 hit My Sweet Lord's strong resemblance to the Chiffons' He's So Fine. Sugar Hill Gang's epochal Rapper's Delight eventually gave a co-credit to Nile Rodgers and Bernard Edwards of Chic, whose Good Times bassline it interpolates. Radiohead ceded a small percentage of the royalties for Creep to the composers of the Hollies' Air That I Breathe. When Jonathan King launched a media campaign accusing Pet Shop Boys of plagiarising Cat Stevens' Wild World, even recording a cover of Stevens' song in a PSB style, Neil Tennant and Chris Lowe turned the tables by successfully suing King, donating the proceeds to charity. (And that's before we even touch upon the countless samples-based cases.) Whether or not a case has merit is a question for musicologists and lawyers to consider (and, in the case of Sheeran's Thinking Out Loud, they've answered it conclusively). But in the court of public opinion, guilt or innocence is in the ear of the listener. We all enjoy spotting examples. Searching through my own social media, there are countless times I've observed: 'You never see (Song A) and (Song B) in the same room.' But we don't always enjoy having them pointed out to us. I remember being annoyed when my dad told me the Jam's Start! made generous use of the bassline from the Beatles' Taxman. And it isn't as if the Beatles were innocent of such things (look up Bobby Parker). Ultimately, we are all hypocrites. How we react to alleged rip-offs depends on how fond we are of the alleged ripper-offer. If the Manics do it to Goldfrapp (Europa Geht Durch Mich), or Pulp to Laura Branigan (Disco 2000), or Suede to Judy Garland via Bowie (The Drowners), I might hail it as evidence of their taste, their cleverness and their adeptness at intertexual referentiality, or 'dialogic composition'. If Oasis do it to T Rex (Cigarettes and Alcohol), I cite it as proof of their oafish derivativeness. Sometimes, the originator takes a magnanimous view. In 2013, it was alleged that One Direction's Best Song Ever bore a close resemblance to the Who's Baba O'Riley. Pete Townshend quickly distanced himself from the furore. 'The chords I used and the chords they used,' he wrote in a statement, 'are the same three chords we've all been using in basic pop music since Buddy Holly, Eddie Cochran and Chuck Berry.' In 2021, Olivia Rodrigo was accused of lifting the riff of her single Brutal from Elvis Costello & the Attractions' 1978 classic Pump It Up. Costello was fine with the steal. 'It's how rock & roll works,' he tweeted. 'You take the broken pieces of another thrill and make a brand new toy. That's what I did.' In 2014, Sam Smith scored a major hit with Stay With Me, whose chorus was melodically similar to I Won't Back Down by Tom Petty. The latter and co-writer Jeff Lynne reached a 12.5% settlement with Smith and their team, and Petty bore no grudge. 'All my years of songwriting have shown me these things can happen,' he said. 'Most times, you catch it before it gets out the studio door, but in this case, it got by.' This feels like the most enlightened approach. That's how the chain of influence functions, from generation to generation. The caveat being that there's sometimes a power dynamic at play, and it's often black artists who get shafted (it still leaves a sour taste that Led Zeppelin only gave co-writing credits to bluesmen such as Willie Dixon decades too late). As the saying goes, where there's a hit there's a writ. 'I feel like claims like this are way too common now,' said Ed Sheeran after the Sami Switch case, adding: 'Coincidence is bound to happen if 60,000 songs are being released every day on Spotify. That's 22m songs a year, and there's only 12 notes that are available.' Referring to the Gaye case, he said: 'I am not and will never allow myself to be a piggy bank for anyone to shake.' Sheeran has a point. Claims of plagiarism too often stifle pop, and only result in lawyers getting richer. The message to plaintiffs, especially if they're faceless corporations, is simple: be less petty, and be more Petty. Simon Price is a music journalist and author

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store