Battle to define ‘America First' intensifies as Israel strikes Iran
The Movement is a weekly newsletter tracking the influence and debates steering politics on the right. or in the box below.
The ideological battle over what 'America First' means in the Trump era is intensifying in wake of Israel's strikes on Iran, splitting the MAGA right and testing its relationships with the president.
On one side, noninterventionist doves insist the Trumpian tagline means the president must avoid U.S. troops, resources or dollars going toward the conflict, for fear of getting dragged into an endless war.
'Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA,' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) posted Sunday on the social platform X.
But on the other end, foreign policy hawks and supporters of Israel are appealing to President Trump's position that Iran should not have a nuclear weapon, and encouraging him to leave all options — including direct military intervention — on the table.
'How is it not AMERICA FIRST to congratulate those who just made sure Islamists who chant 'DEATH TO AMERICA' and who openly plotted to assassinate President @realDonaldTrump never have an opportunity to have a nuke?' right-wing provocateur Laura Loomer posted on X over the weekend.
In a Saturday phone interview with Trump responded to criticism from former Fox News host Tucker Carlson — who said in a newsletter that 'politicians purporting to be America First can't now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with' the strikes — by saying he is the one that will ultimately write the definition.
'Well, considering that I'm the one that developed 'America First,' and considering that the term wasn't used until I came along, I think I'm the one that decides that,' Trump said.
And Monday, Trump offered one part of his definition: 'AMERICA FIRST means many GREAT things, including the fact that, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!' he posted on Truth Social.
Trump beat back the dove side somewhat in another post calling Carlson 'kooky' — prompting Greene, who almost never criticizes the president, to make the stunning move to come to Carlson's defense.
'Foreign wars/intervention/regime change put America last, kill innocent people, are making us broke, and will ultimately lead to our destruction. That's not kooky. That's what millions of Americans voted for,' Greene said.
Despite Trump claiming ownership of the tagline, different wings of Trump supporters spent much of the last few days warring about the 'America First' response to the conflict.
Conservative radio host Mark Levin, who is on the hawkish side of the debate, made a lengthy post Monday about 'Real MAGA and Fake MAGA,' saying 'Real MAGA is not isolationist or antisemitic. In another post, Levin took aim at Greene, calling her 'a little known politician from Georgia.'
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also weighed in on the 'America First' debate in a Monday interview with ABC News.
'Today, it's Tel Aviv. Tomorrow, it's New York. Look, I understand 'America First'. I don't understand 'America Dead,'' Netanyahu said. 'That's what these people want.'
As Trump takes responsibility for defining the America First response, he is being vague and open enough to give both the hawks and the doves reason to believe they are right about their own versions of America First.
The initial response from the administration to the strikes, in the form of a statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, notably distanced the U.S. from the attacks — saying 'Israel took unilateral action against Iran' and that the U.S. was 'not involved in strikes against Iran.'
But the U.S. did assist in intercepting missiles that Iran shot into Israel in response — and NBC News reported the U.S. had been 'quietly moving some pieces into place to prepare for the Israeli attack.'
Trump slammed Iran for failing to make a deal after 60 days of negotiation on its nuclear program — referencing his warnings that there would be bombing if it did not do so. But even as the recent conflict derailed a round of peace talks that were supposed to take place Sunday with Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff — in part because Iranians with whom the U.S. was dealing are now dead, as Trump said — the president has not taken negotiation off the table.
'They should talk, and they should talk immediately, before it's too late,' Trump said Monday at the G7 Summit in Canada.
The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that Iran is seeking negotiations in order to end the hostilities — a development cheered by noninterventionists such as Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).
'Iran's move to reenter negotiations isn't a coincidence. It's the result of a foreign policy that rejects endless wars and puts American priorities first,' Paul said.
But Trump has declined to wholly rule out using U.S. force in Iran. Asked Monday in Canada what it would take for the U.S. to get involved in the conflict, Trump demurred: 'I don't want to talk about that.'
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) is among those urging Trump to use U.S. military might to help Israel in Iran if talks are not possible.
'If diplomacy fails, Mr. President, President Trump, you've been great, help Israel finish the job. Give them bombs. Fly with them if necessary,' Graham said Sunday on CBS's 'Face the Nation.', a weekly newsletter looking at the influences and debates on the right in Washington. I'm , House leadership reporter at The Hill. Tell me what's on your radar: ebrooks@thehill.com.
Not already on the list?
President Trump is pumping the brakes, shifting gears, and speeding up on the kind of migrants he is targeting as he aims to fulfill his promise of mass deportations.
The president is clearly sensitive about negatively impacting key industries that rely on migrants who entered the country without permission for labor — but seems to have reversed himself on pausing enforcement on such industries.
Let's review.
Thursday morning: Trump posted recognition of concerns from those in the agricultural and hotel industries about his 'very aggressive policy on immigration' taking away workers who are 'almost impossible to replace' — promising that 'changes are coming.'
It was a notable shift in tone from the kind of hard-line stances and messaging from the immigration hard-liners in Trump's administration such as Stephen Miller — particularly in wake of anti-Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) protests in Los Angeles that prompted Trump to activate the National Guard.
Thursday afternoon: Trump made another post appealing to the immigration hard-line side. 'I campaigned on, and received a Historic Mandate for, the largest Mass Deportation Program in American History,' he said, adding that migrants in the U.S. illegally should self-deport 'or, ICE will find you and remove you.'
But directives to soften enforcement on certain industries as the president had first espoused still came. ICE was directed to 'largely pause raids and arrests on American farms and in hotels and restaurants,' NewsNation reported, citing Department of Homeland Security sources.
Sunday: Trump made another long social media post giving further guidance on deportation targets: Democratic-run cities. 'ICE Officers are herewith ordered, by notice of this TRUTH,' Trump said, to expand detention and deportation efforts in the nation's largest cities that 'are the core of the Democrat Power Center.'
Monday: 'Officials from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, including its Homeland Security Investigations division, told leaders at the agency in a call Monday that agents must continue conducting workforce site immigration raids on agricultural businesses, hotels and restaurants, according to two people familiar with the call,' The Washington Post reported.
The whiplash is exposing some divisions within the Trump administration.
The New York Times reported over the weekend that the initial post about agriculture workers came after Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins had told the president about worries about the effect of the immigration raids on the agricultural industry.
Rollins appeared to respond to the reporting in a post on X saying to 'ignore the noise from the fake news media.'
'The President and I have consistently advanced a 'Farmers First' approach, recognizing that American households depend upon a stable and LEGAL agricultural workforce. Severe disruptions to our food supply would harm Americans. It took us decades to get into this mess and we are prioritizing deportations in a way that will get us out,' Rollins said.The shocking shootings of Minnesota Democratic lawmakers in the early hours of Saturday morning — killing Minnesota House Democratic Leader Melissa Hortman and her husband — set off an ugly ideological blame game on social media.
Right-wing posters did not want to believe the now-detained suspect in the shootings, Vance Boelter, was on their 'side.' And despite evidence piling up that Boelter shared right-wing beliefs, some still don't want to believe it.
The first misdirection came after a number of accounts posted videos of Hortman earlier in the week getting emotional while talking her vote in favor of a bill vote that cut access to health care for immigrants in the country illegally — insinuating her assassination was a result of progressive left anger about that vote. She was the only House Democrat to vote for the bill, averting a potential government shutdown.
Other emerging details fueled the belief the shootings were left-on-left violence. Law enforcement confirmed Boelter had flyers in his car that said, 'No Kings,' an apparent reference to the anti-Trump protests that occurred across the country Saturday. And Boelter was in 2019 appointed by Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) to a workforce development board.
But Boelter's friend and roommate told CBS News that the suspect was very conservative, listened to the right-wing conspiracy theorist Alex Jones's 'Infowars,' and had voted for Trump.
Reporting in the Minnesota Star Tribune said Boelter did not know Walz; that the 60-member member board includes people appointed by the governor who do not agree with his political views; and that he voted in the 2024 primary election, but not in the Democratic primary.
That has not stopped the narrative from taking hold, though. Donald Trump Jr. had this to say on right-wing influencer Benny Johnson's YouTube show Monday: 'They're sitting there, 'Oh, please be a MAGA guy.' Oh, it happens to be a Tim Walz appointee in his own state. He happened to go after a Democrat legislator, but it seems like he went after a Democratic legislator because she voted against Democrat Party policy, which was the unabashed, unlimited health care funding for illegal immigrants.'
Among those who pushed the left-on-left violence narrative: Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who posted a photo of the masked suspect Sunday with the commentary: 'This is what happens When Marxists don't get their way.' Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) confronted Lee about the post in the Senate Monday night, my colleague Al Weaver reports. Lee refused to answer questions from reporters about the encounter.
Minnesota state Sen. Julia Coleman (R) posted on X on Saturday that she found the race to figure out of Boelter was a Republican or Democrat 'absolutely shameful.'
'The state needs unity. Not blame. Now more than ever we should come together and put partisan politics aside,' Coleman said.Tuesday, June 17: Unleash Prosperity hosts a policy forum on 'The Impact of Immigration on the 21st Century American Workforce' at the Conservative Partnership Institute, 12:30 p.m. EDT. Livestream here.
Tuesday, June 17: The Federalist Society's DC Young Lawyers Chapter hosts a reception with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), America's Square at 5:45 p.m. EDT. Details here.
Tuesday, June 24: Heritage Foundation Launch of 'American Founders' & Presentation of America's 250th Anniversary Innovation Prizes, with keynote by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), 4 p.m. EDT. Details here.
Riley Gaines, a prominent activist against transgender athletes in women's sports, announced at Turning Point USA's Young Women Leadership Summit over the weekend that she is pregnant with her first child. She did so while taking a jab at Olympic gold medal-winning gymnast Simone Biles, who had gotten into an online tiff with Gaines over transgender athletes and told Gaines to 'Bully someone your own size, who would ironically be a male.' Gaines, revealing her baby bump, said: 'How many men do you know who have this?'
The Trump Organization commemorated the 10th anniversary of the now-president gliding down the escalator to announce his presidential campaign by announcing it is starting a mobile phone service company. Trump Mobile will not only provide service but plans to manufacture phones in America and will have its customer service call centers based in America, executives said at the announcement. The plan will also come with telemedicine and roadside assistance features. Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump helped roll out the announcement.
Big Beautiful Bill update: The Senate Finance Committee released its portion of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities bill Monday, making some changes to the version passed in the House that will be controversial. It reverts the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction cap to $10,000, after blue-state lawmakers had pushed to raise the cap to $40,000. It lowers health care provider taxes — a mechanism states use to extract more federal Medicaid provider taxes — to 3.5 percent, stricter than the House version. But it significantly slows down the repeal of some green energy incentives compared to the House version.
Jewish Insider's Gabby Deutch and Emily Jacobs: DNI Tulsi Gabbard draws friendly fire from Republicans for video warning of nuclear war
Politico's Rachael Bade and Felicia Schwartz: Inside the MAGA vs. hawk battle to sway Trump on bombing Iran
The New York Times's Tyler Pager, Miriam Jordan, Hamed Aleaziz, and Zolan Kanno-Youngs: Inside Trump's Extraordinary Turnaround on Immigration Raids
Thanks for reading. Check out more newsletters from The Hill here. See you next time!
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
11 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
What's Next After the Initial Fallout from US Strikes on Iran
What's next? The unprecedented US airstrikes on Iran have set traders and governments worldwide on edge, as the Islamic Republic warns of retaliation and Israel shows no sign of letting up in its assault. Asian currencies and stocks fell, European stock futures declined while oil advanced, then erased gains, after Washington struck Iran's nuclear sites over the weekend. China and Pakistan were quick to condemn — even though China hasn't yet offered substantial assistance to Tehran besides rhetorical support and Pakistan is at the same time taking steps to build stronger ties with the White House. The US State Department issued a ' Worldwide Caution ' alert for Americans. More critically, President Donald Trump's decision to deploy bunker-busting bombs — in Washington's first direct military action against Iran after decades of hostility — has pushed the Middle East into uncharted territory. Did the end justify the means? While the US attacks have set back Iran's nuclear ambitions and dealt its clerical regime a humiliating blow, the program hasn't been completely destroyed. The move may ultimately lead Tehran to end international monitoring of its nuclear program and consider going ahead to develop a bomb. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei hasn't been seen in public in 11 days but remains in control. Even as diplomatic allies Russia and China have stayed on the sidelines and its network of armed proxies in the region remains weakened, Tehran still has ways to inflict pain on the US as it plans its retaliation. Two supertankers, each capable of hauling about 2 million barrels of crude, U-turned in the Strait of Hormuz after the US airstrikes on Iran raised the risk of a response that would ensnare commercial shipping in the region, according to vessel tracking data compiled by Bloomberg. The two empty freighters then sailed south, away from the mouth of the Persian Gulf. The turning oil carriers offer the first signs of re-routing, something that oil traders will scrutinize. Any disruption to traffic through the strait, a major artery for global crude and natural gas, raises the specter of a spike in energy prices. That's bad news for Asia, which buys more than four-fifths of all the crude produced in the Middle East, 90% of which goes through the Strait of Hormuz.
CNBC
17 minutes ago
- CNBC
Treasury yields inch higher after U.S. bombs Iran
U.S. Treasury yields inched higher on Monday after the U.S. bombing of Iran and as investors awaited a batch of key economic data this week. At 5:25 a.m. ET, the 10-year yield was more than 1 basis point higher at 4.387%, and the 30-year yield moved over 1 basis point higher to 4.903%. The 2-year yield also added 1 basis point to reach 3.918%. One basis point is equal to 0.01%, and yields and prices move in opposite directions. Investors are on high alert after the U.S. entered the war between Israel and Iran on Saturday by attacking Iranian nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. "There will be either peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days. Remember, there are many targets left," Trump said from the White House after the strikes. Investors, who were formerly expecting diplomacy, are now bracing for Iran's retaliation. That could include targeting U.S. personnel in nearby bases or closing the Strait of Hormuz, which would disrupt global oil flows. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on social media that the U.S. attacks would have "everlasting consequences," and that "every member of the United Nations must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behavior." Deutsche Bank analysts said in a note, "In terms of the economic impact, the US has turned into a net energy exporter in the last few years so any negative impact would be through deteriorating financial conditions or through higher for longer rates as the Fed have another reason to delay cuts." Investors will also await a series of economic data this week, including existing home sales data for May on Monday, gross domestic product growth rate on Thursday, and the personal consumption expenditures index on Friday.
Associated Press
17 minutes ago
- Associated Press
NATO leaders are set to agree a historic defense spending pledge, but the hike won't apply to all
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — NATO leaders are expected to agree this week that member countries should spend 5% of their gross domestic product on defense, except the new and much vaunted investment pledge will not apply to all of them. Spain has reached a deal with NATO to be excluded from the 5% of GDP spending target, while President Donald Trump said the figure shouldn't apply to the United States, only its allies. In announcing Spain's decision Sunday, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said the spending pledge language in NATO's final summit communique — a one-page text of perhaps half a dozen paragraphs — would no longer refer to 'all allies.' It raises questions about what demands could be insisted on from other members of the alliance like Belgium, Canada, France and Italy that also would struggle to hike security spending by billions of dollars. On Friday, Trump insisted the U.S. has carried its allies for years and now they must step up. 'I don't think we should, but I think they should,' he said. 'NATO is going to have to deal with Spain.' Trump also branded Canada 'a low payer.' NATO's new spending goals The 5% goal is made up of two parts. The allies would agree to hike pure defense spending to 3.5% of GDP, up from the current target of at least 2%, which 22 of the 32 countries have achieved. Money spent to arm Ukraine also would count. A further 1.5% would include upgrading roads, bridges, ports and airfields so armies can better deploy, establishing measures to counter cyber and hybrid attacks and preparing societies for future conflict. The second spending basket is easy for most nations, including Spain. Much can be included. But the 3.5% on core spending is a massive challenge. Last year, Spain spent 1.28% of GDP on its military budget, according to NATO estimates, making it the alliance's lowest spender. Sánchez said Spain would be able to respect its commitments to NATO by spending 2.1% of GDP on defense needs. Spain also is among Europe's smallest suppliers of arms and ammunition to Ukraine, according to the Kiel Institute, which tracks such support. It's estimated to have sent about 800,000 euros ($920,000) worth of military aid since Russia invaded in 2022. Beyond Spain's economic challenges, Sánchez has other problems. He relies on small parties to govern and corruption scandals have ensnared his inner circle and family members. He is under growing pressure to call an early election. Why the spending increase is needed There are solid reasons for ramping up spending. The Europeans believe Russia's war on Ukraine poses an existential threat to them. Moscow has been blamed for a major rise in sabotage, cyberattacks and GPS jamming incidents. European leaders are girding their citizens for the possibility of more. The alliance's plans for defending Europe and North America against a Russian attack require investments of at least 3%, NATO experts have said. All 32 allies have endorsed these. Each country has been assigned 'capability targets' to play its part. Spanish Foreign Minister José Albares said Monday that 'the debate must be not a raw percentage but around capabilities.' He said Spain 'can reach the capabilities that have been fixed by the organization with 2.1%.' Countries much closer to Russia, Belarus and Ukraine all have agreed to reach the target, as well as nearby Germany, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands, which is hosting the two-day summit starting Tuesday. The Netherlands estimates NATO's defense plans would force it to dedicate at least 3.5% to core defense spending. That means finding an additional 16 billion to 19 billion euros ($18 billion to $22 billion). Setting a deadline It's not enough to agree to spend more money. Many allies haven't yet hit an earlier 2% target that they agreed in 2014 after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. So an incentive is required. The date of 2032 has been floated as a deadline. That is far shorter than previous NATO targets, but military planners estimate Russian forces could be capable of launching an attack on an ally within five to 10 years. The U.S. insists it cannot be an open-ended pledge and a decade is too long. Still, Italy says it wants 10 years to hit the 5% target. The possibility of stretching that period to 2035 also has been on the table for debate among NATO envoys. An official review of progress could also be conducted in 2029, NATO diplomats have said. ___ Suman Naishadham in Madrid contributed to this report.
