Why Palantir Technologies is the Pentagon's favorite tech company — top facts revealed
Palantir Technologies
, once best known for data analytics, has now become a leader in the software and artificial intelligence (AI) sectors, most notably in defence technology, which has benefitted the company in the past two quarters, as per a report.
Defense Contracts Are Propelling Palantir's Growth
Palantir's expansion has been spurred by government contracts worth millions of dollars, including a $30 million software agreement with
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE), according to The Street. While, the firm also received good news from the Pentagon recently, as it revealed that it will substantially boost its funding for Palantir's
Maven Smart System
, as per the report. The Pentagon raised the project's funding to $1.3 billion over the four years, an increase of approximately $795 million, reported The Street.
What Is Project Maven?
Project Maven, started in 2017 by the US Department of Defence, applies AI and machine learning to analyse huge amounts of data, images from drones, satellites, and sensors, which will be used to track and detect potential threats, according to The Street report.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Ingin Tahu Tentang Diagnosis Limfoma? Dapatkan Info Selengkapnya
Limfoma
Baca
Undo
Demand for Palantir's AI Software Is Growing
Demand for Palantir's MSS has risen and an official from the department recently issued a statement, saying, 'Combatant commands, in particular, have increased their use of MSS to command and control dynamic operations and activities in their theaters. In response to this growing demand, the [Chief Digital and AI Office] and Army increased capacity to support emerging combatant command operations and other DOD component needs,' quoted The Street.
Already Embedded Across US Military Branches
According to The Street report, the additional funding will be used for US combatant commands that oversee military operations.
Live Events
While, Palantir Technologies already has contracts with the US Army, Air Force, Space Force, and Navy for its MSS software licences, reported The Street.
FAQs
Why is the Pentagon working so closely with Palantir?
Because Palantir's AI tools, like the Maven Smart System, help analyze data from drones and satellites to detect threats.
What does Palantir actually do now?
Palantir started in data analytics but now focuses heavily on AI-powered defence and military software.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
11 hours ago
- Mint
The six miles of water keeping global markets on edge
Oil traders see it as a worst-case scenario. Pentagon officials have long warned against it. Vice President JD Vance believes it would be suicidal. Yet Iranian lawmakers on Sunday reportedly threatened a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a strip of water connecting the energy rich Persian Gulf to global markets, after the U.S. joined Israeli strikes on Tehran's nuclear facilities. That rattled oil markets and sent U.S. stock futures lower on Sunday evening. Roughly 20% of the world's petroleum passes through the 20-mile-wide strait, where dozens of skyscraper-size tankers each day funnel into a pair of 2-mile-wide traffic lanes separated by a 2-mile-wide buffer. The transit includes a similarly huge share of the world's liquefied natural gas. Crucial for cars, chemical makers and power plants around the world, the supplies help fuel the oil-hungry Chinese economy and dictate prices paid by U.S. drivers and air travelers. Iran has often harassed foreign-flagged tankers in the area and occasionally threatened to disrupt that trade more broadly in times of stress, a move that could upend financial markets and send global energy costs soaring. On Sunday, after U.S. forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites, Iranian state media reported that Iran's parliament had approved a closure of the strait. But they added that ultimate power to do so lay with the regime's top security officials. Many oil traders and energy executives still view the scenario as a scorched-earth tactic and distant possibility. Tanker-tracking firms said Sunday that traffic through the strait was proceeding as usual. Smoke and fire rise from an oil refinery in Tehran after an Israeli strike this month. Even so, oil markets remain on edge. The cost of Brent crude futures, the international pricing benchmark, jumped 3.2% on Sunday, trading around $79.50 a barrel. Prices have now climbed about 15% since Israel unleashed its punishing air campaign earlier this month. U.S. stock futures edged lower, with contracts tied to the S&P 500 down about 0.5%. 'It's a bargaining chip," said Anthony Gurnee, a retired longtime tanker-company executive, referring to the strait. 'Once they use it, it's gone." Gurnee, who served in the 1980s as a U.S. Navy intelligence analyst focusing on threats to commercial shipping, said a full closure of the strait by Iran would prompt a swift military response by American warships that have recently moved into the region. But 'I don't think it's a three- or four-day operation," he said. 'It could take much longer." Any disruption to ship traffic could also slow Iranian energy exports, a lifeline to Iran's economy. Although Israeli strikes have hit Iran's domestic energy infrastructure in recent days, shipments from the country have continued flowing to oil-hungry buyers in China and elsewhere. Rystad Energy estimates that Iranian exports since the outset of Israeli strikes are actually as much as 30% to 40% higher than typical volumes this time of year. 'Their entire economy runs through the Strait of Hormuz," Vance said Sunday on NBC, calling a closure 'suicidal." 'I don't think it makes any sense." Hamidreza Azizi, a visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs said the likelihood of a disruption will ultimately depend on whether the conflict continues to expand—and if the regime itself is threatened in an existential way. 'Strategically, Iran could view short-term economic sacrifice as leverage," he said. 'But it would also sacrifice its sole global energy revenue stream, bear domestic blowback and risk long-term damage to its [reputation]." Naval analysts and tanker operators say the Iranian navy has increasingly projected power using what is called an asymmetric tool kit, including groups of small, speedy boats that swarm larger targets. Mines laid in the waterway could cripple ships, while sunken tankers could potentially block the passage for a longer period of time. 'They can also storm ships on helicopters and hold them for long periods," said Erik Hanell, the chief executive of Swedish-based tanker operator Stena Bulk, which has tankers in the area. Commandos from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps stormed one of the company's tankers, the Stena Impero, in 2019 and held it for three months in response to the U.K. stopping an Iranian tanker in Gibraltar. Ship crews said IRGC speed boats have come within yards of tankers. 'They are all over the place," said Mihai Barbu, an executive officer for a European tanker that is about to enter the strait from its north side. 'They can use high explosives on the hull, hit us with rocket-propelled grenades or use heavy artillery from their bases on the coast. It's scary." The saber-rattling has conjured memories of the attacks on oil tankers traded by Iran and Iraq during their broader conflict in the 1980s. U.S. warships patrolled the region and eventually began escorting some commercial ships, in operations that turned deadly. Iraqi forces accidentally fired on a U.S. vessel in 1987, killing 37 members of the crew. In 1988, a U.S. ship hit an Iranian mine but managed to stay afloat. Retired U.S. Navy Capt. Jim McTigue commanded a 453-foot frigate that was one of several U.S. vessels that destroyed two Iranian oil platforms in response to the mining incident. Soon after, he said, an approaching Iranian warship let loose a Harpoon missile that buzzed about 100 feet past another vessel in McTigue's group. McTigue's ship returned fire with four of its own missiles, helping destroy the largest warship the U.S. Navy has sunk since World War II. 'They called it a one-day war," McTigue said of Operation Praying Mantis, which also included additional U.S. ships that fought elsewhere. As for Iran's current threat, McTigue said, 'I don't think anybody in a one-on-one tactical situation can even come close to us. You really got to look at the strategic implications. That's where it's far more difficult to predict what the outcome would be." Write to David Uberti at and Costas Paris at
India Today
14 hours ago
- India Today
News Menu, June 23: Iran threatens Strait of Hormuz closure, rain alert for Delhi
Good morning. On June 23, 1980, Sanjay Gandhi died in a plane crash in New Delhi. A trained pilot and instructor, he was piloting a new aircraft, a Pitts S-2A, when it lost control and crashed shortly after takeoff from the Safdarjung Airport. The accident occurred around 8 AM, and Sanjay, who was 33 years old, was killed instantly. The crash was a significant event, given Sanjay's prominent role as a political figure and son of then-Prime Minister Indira Today presents a news menu dominated by fighter planes, bloodshed and fears of global geopolitical and oil crises amid escalating tension in the Middle Raita: Iran Threatens Strait of Hormuz ClosureIran's parliament approved closing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical choke point handling 20% of global oil consumption, following US strikes codenamed 'Operation Midnight Hammer' on its nuclear sites. The closure awaits final approval from Iran's top security authority. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, heading to Moscow to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin, called the US and Israel's actions a 'big red line.' The US, through Pentagon chief Hegseth, described the strikes as 'intentionally limited' and not aimed at regime change, involving over 125 aircraft and 75 munitions. UN Secretary General Antnio Guterres warned, 'Humanity has opened gates to hell.' EU Foreign Ministers will discuss the crisis on Monday, while the US has asked China to Take: Iran's defiance and US aggression mark a pivotal moment in the conflict. If Iran goes ahead with its plan to block the Strait of Hormuz, it will force the US to initiate steps to open up the choke dependent on imported oil, faces potential supply risks, though it placed bigger orders with Russia in June. The Nifty and Sensex will be under scrutiny for reactions to escalating tensions, while global indices like S&P 500 and Nasdaq brace for PM Narendra Modi spoke with Iranian President Pezeshkian, expressing deep concern over US airstrikes and urging immediate de-escalation through dialogue. Modi reiterated India's commitment to regional peace, stating, 'India is on the side of peace and humanity.'Political Spice: Bihar's Election Battle Heats UpThe BJP declared Nitish Kumar as its Chief Minister face for the 2025 Bihar Assembly elections, aiming to quell speculation over leadership. RJD's Tejashwi Yadav called Nitish 'tired' and a 'burden,' ruling out his return to the Lalu Prasad Yadav is poised to become the party's national president for another term on other political news, by-election results for Kadi, Visavadar, Kaliganj, and Ludhiana West are due Sizzler: Karnataka's Corruption AllegationsadvertisementCongress MLA BR Patil's leaked audio sparked a storm, alleging corruption in Karnataka's house allotments. He stood by his claims, while Minister HK Patil criticised the government over illegal mining, citing a Rs 1.5 lakh crore loss due to 'systematic loot.'Celebrity Soup: Vijay Deverakonda's Legal TroubleActor Vijay Deverakonda faces a case under the SC/ST Act at Rayadurgam Police Station, following complaints from tribal associations over his remarks on the CBFC demanded a title change for the film JSK - Janaki Vs State of Kerala, starring Union Minister Suresh Mix: Weather AlertsDelhi: IMD issues a 'yellow' warning for rain and thunderstorms on Monday, with monsoons expected in Delhi and Chandigarh within two States: Orange alert for heavy rainfall and widespread thunderstorms, per Bite: The June TragediesA cruel quirk of fate turned June into a tragic month for former PM Indira Gandhi. On June 25, 1975, she declared a nationwide emergency, leading to her downfall. Five years later, she lost Sanjay, her son and political heir, in the same month. And on June 5, 1984, she ordered Operation Bluestar in Amritsar's Golden Temple. The decision to send the Indian army into the shrine ultimately led to her assassination the same InMust Watch
Time of India
14 hours ago
- Time of India
Fordoward Thinking
Iran may still negotiate with US, taking a long view, while skirmishing with Israel. Even if its nuclear infra is damaged, its knowhow isn't. But if the conflict spreads, welfare of 9mn Indians in the region will be New Delhi's first concern For two decades every United States administration said it might someday bomb Iran's enrichment plants. On Saturday night that 'someday' arrived. B-2 stealth bombers dropped 30,000-pound 'bunker buster' bombs while submarines and aircraft launched Tomahawks at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, the three most consequential nodes in Iran's IAEA monitored nuclear network. Trump declared that 'Fordow is gone', and that Tehran must 'agree to end this war'. The flourish was vintage Trump – muscular and headline grabbing. But behind the applause lines lies a strategic gamble whose downsides may echo far beyond Qom. Trump crossed a threshold earlier presidents tiptoed around, turning an Israel-Iran slugfest into a US-Iran confrontation. He insists the raid was a 'one-off', intended to cripple enrichment. Although neither US nor Israel has produced evidence that Iran was on the brink of building a bomb, the Pentagon's quick look report claims the strikes set the programme back by years at minimal cost. Physics, however, counsels humility. Centrifuges are hardware while enrichment expertise is software lodged in scientists' heads. Bombs can destroy cylinders but not knowledge. Hardliners in Tehran will now argue that only a nuclear weapon can deter the next bunker buster. Did the raid delay a bomb or make it inevitable? Iran accused US of a grave violation of the UN Charter, NPT and international law and vowed that it will not go unanswered. The easiest escalation is to menace the Strait of Hormuz through which about a fifth of global oil passes every day. Next may come missile salvos on Gulf energy infra or on US installations, and then the possible activation of proxies from Lebanon to Yemen. With Iran's parliament reportedly approving the closure of the strait, Brent could easily move past $100 a barrel. Oxford Economics projects $130 if flows are disrupted, a level that would push world inflation back toward 6%. Traders are already paying a war premium in afterhours quotes. Jerusalem meanwhile is jubilant. Netanyahu called the strike a bold decision. Strategically Israel has shifted part of the fight and the risk to Washington. If Iran retaliates, Americans rather than Israelis will calibrate the counterpunch. That is deterrence by entanglement in the short run. Over time it hands Iran a larger menu of US targets and risks dragging America into a war it does not want. Russia immediately cited the bombing as proof of US recklessness while Beijing called it a serious violation of international norms. Any condemning move at the Security Council will face a US veto. However, in the General Assembly the Global South is expected to side with Iran in significant numbers. For India the strike lands like a thunderclap at a cricket match. New Delhi has tried to balance a growing partnership with Washington, deep defence ties with Israel and consequential arrangements with Tehran, from the Chabahar port to International North-South Transit Corridor and once-robust crude imports. That balancing act has lately been criticised by the main opposition party. ● The immediate anxiety is economic. The Gulf supplies 54% of India's oil, generates about 40% of its remittances and accounts for more than $170bn in two-way trade. India imports more than 80% of its crude; every ten dollar rise in Brent adds about one billion dollars a month to the import bill and pressures the rupee. Consumer inflation just slipped below 5%; a Hormuz scare could undo that gain and complicate RBI's plan to cut rates. GOI is already moving to secure supplies, eyeing the strategic petroleum reserve and talking to several producers to ensure continuity. ● A second priority is the safety of nearly nine million Indians working in the region. Evacuation from Iran and Israel is underway. Operation Sankalp ships in the region can be helpful, if required. Diplomatically India has open channels with Washington, Tehran and Jerusalem, but leverage is thin while missiles fly. Still New Delhi may be able to offer discreet messages that help each side edge away from the brink, just like back-channel efforts by Qatar and Muscat. Meanwhile others such as Saudi Arabia and UAE are actively counselling restraint. The key actors need face-saving options. That also means Washington spelling out what de-escalation looks like. Would it accept enrichment capped below weapons grade? Does it envisage returning to the JCPOA framework with phased sanctions relief? Absent clarity Tehran will read 'time for peace' as code for surrender. In US, supporters have praised decisive action; critics have warned that the President had bypassed Congress and demanded a War Powers vote. Trump's boast that the mission was historic and limited is politically smart yet strategically ambiguous. If Iran swallows the blow and returns to talks the White House can claim victory. If Tehran retaliates Washington can strike again and say it had no choice. Either way the attack chips away at the nonproliferation regime and bets that humiliation will not ignite a wider war. The US entry into another West Asian conflict recalls 1991 and 2003, but this round involves nuclear facilities, peer power pushback and an energy hungry Global South. Fordow's tunnels may indeed be rubble, yet geopolitics rarely collapses neatly. US strikes may be tactically brilliant. Strategically they kick a radioactive can down a much steeper road. That road needs to be kept from becoming a cratered battlefield. The test is whether diplomacy can move faster than the bunker busters. The writer is former permanent representative of India to UN and served as an international civil servant at IAEA Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
