A ‘new' old war: Why Jammu & Kashmir is more vulnerable than ever

The line between war and peace is increasingly blurred in Jammu and Kashmir, and Punjab as well, as proxies and hybrid non-state actors of Pakistan could adopt drone warfare tactics to create a disproportionate impact read more
Let me recall moments from mid-1999, when I served as Colonel of the Rashtriya Rifles, an experience that profoundly shaped my understanding of Kashmir's counter-insurgency dynamics. While Operation Vijay was being fought on the heights of Kargil, the valley floor was also under siege — albeit of a different kind. The ISI, innovating once again, had infiltrated special suicide squads of highly trained and motivated terrorists, many led by Pakistani regulars.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Beginning July 1999, they launched sneak attacks on army and police camps that were then poorly secured by non-existent or minimal perimeters. It forced us into reactive postures. A large number of troops had to be diverted to static guard duties — defending installations, logistics hubs, and communication centres — all of which were vital not just for counter-insurgency (CI) operations but also for any future war. This diluted the effectiveness of our offensive posture; fewer troops were available for area domination, raids, and ambushes.
Cut to 2025. While India analyses the success of Operation Sindoor through the lens of conventional escalation — targeting key assets in Pakistani Punjab and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir — one cannot ignore that the ISI and its ecosystem will also be conducting their own war games. Their objective would be to re-establish relevance in the Kashmir theatre and reclaim psychological initiative.
Remember the Pahalgam attack of April 22, 2025, a brutal assault on tourists; it was not an isolated act. It was, in many ways, a copycat replication of Hamas' strike of October 7, 2023, on Israel — a sudden and high-visibility operation meant to create shockwaves and provoke.
If we view Pahalgam in that light, it becomes clear that a new asymmetric campaign would be under contemplation — one that could integrate novel tactics and technologies for infiltration, recruitment of youth and management of hideouts. Also remember that the communication systems being used by terrorists are of the advanced Chinese versions, which are difficult to intercept. Enter drones, the bane of today's warfare.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Operation Spider Web: The New Template
One of the most significant evolutions in modern warfare has been unfolding before our eyes in Ukraine. On June 1, 2025, Ukraine launched what is being referred to as Operation Spider Web — a sophisticated, long-range drone and sabotage operation deep inside Russian territory. The operation had reportedly been in planning for nearly 18 months. Small, innocuous-looking trucks — some pre-positioned and others inserted covertly — carried armed drones hundreds of kilometres into Russian territory.
These were launched against airfields, command and control nodes, early warning systems, and other critical infrastructure. The results were spectacular; not just in terms of physical damage but also psychological disorientation. For a country like Ukraine with limited air power, this operation represented a stunning workaround, achieving strategic effects without traditional air superiority.
The second Israel–Iran conflict of 2025 has added yet another layer of validation to this emerging pattern. For the second time in a single month, drones have not just crossed borders but have been launched from within adversary territory — in one case, reportedly from civilian rooftops in central Iranian towns.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Israel's imaginative use of small, autonomous drone swarms, leveraging both prepositioned assets and internal collaborators, illustrates the new grammar of warfare. It is a compelling real-world demonstration of how state-level actors are operationalising asymmetric drone strategies to create strategic surprise and psychological shock.
If this is what state-on-state drone warfare looks like today, one can easily see how proxies or hybrid non-state actors in South Asia could mimic such tactics at a smaller scale with equally disproportionate impact. Just transpose this template to a sub-conventional, asymmetric theatre like J&K combined with Punjab. The implications are chilling — and very real.
Drone Wars in the Kashmir–Punjab Belt
Even though the number of terrorists operating inside the Kashmir Valley has dwindled, the threat is far from over. The conflict has been seeping southwards — into Rajouri, Reasi, Kathua, and even parts of Punjab. This southward spread coincides with the steady increase in drone sightings and recoveries along the Punjab border — originally attributed to narcotics smuggling, arms drops, and infiltration aids. If these drone operations are recalibrated for pure terror purposes, can one imagine the impact? It could also ensure the activation of all three target zones with lessened risk and yet a high scope for denial for the terror perpetrators.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Unlike 1999, today's terrorists can do far more damage with fewer men. The cost-benefit ratio of drone warfare is heavily tilted in favour of the attacker. Even low-cost recreational drones, assembled from commercial kits, can strike convoys, helipads, or civilian targets and create an impact in the information domain.
GPS-guided kamikaze drones of the loitering variety can be launched from rooftops, fields, or moving vehicles. Encrypted communication apps, AI-assisted navigation, and satellite imagery make planning both detailed and deniable. The same open-source tools used by civilian OSINT communities — such as Google Earth and others — can be used for target acquisition, route mapping, and surveillance.
A series of micro-drone attacks in a short span of time — on convoys on the Jammu–Srinagar highway, fuel dumps in rear logistics areas, or crowded civilian spaces — could paralyse response grids, spark panic, and create disproportionate psychological effects.
That is exactly what terrorists sought in 1999 and managed to achieve for some time. This time the numbers could be higher as also the impact before the security forces find answers to neutralise them.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A 'New' Old War
What makes this emerging threat even more serious is that it blurs the line between war and peace. A drone strike from within Indian territory — launched from a hut, an orchard, or a cattle shed — does not carry the signature of cross-border infiltration.
Attribution becomes tricky. This strategy suits the adversary perfectly; it revives terrorism without increasing physical infiltration. It creates 'ghost threats' — attacks without visible footprints. And it pulls in security forces into high-alert static duties, just like 1999 — thereby reducing proactive engagement options.
In a sense, this becomes a hybrid warfare layer built on top of a disaggregated insurgency — a low-cost, high-impact model aimed at strategic paralysis and political destabilisation. Since the line between targeting civilians and security personnel has blurred with the Pahalgam attack, tourist spots would be constantly under threat, robbing both sides of the Pir Panjal of the tourist footprint. Even the Amarnath Yatra could come under threat.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Lessons from 1999, Warnings from 2025
If the post-Kargil 1999 asymmetric surge forced India to rethink perimeter security, troop deployment patterns, and intelligence integration, the post-Pahalgam, post-Spider Web world of 2025 demands even more. This is a battlefield of algorithms and altitudes, where satellites meet sabotage and where drones replace the fidayeen.
The war in Ukraine has shown what's possible — and the threat landscape in Kashmir and Punjab is evolving to reflect that. It is time we anticipate what comes next — because the adversary could already be contemplating the next moves. It's not as if there aren't counters to this threat, but that will need a full essay to cover, perhaps in the near future.
The writer is a member of the National Disaster Management Authority. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

India Today

25 minutes ago

• India Today

'Zero dignity': Pak faces brickbats within and outside over Trump Nobel proposal

Pakistan's move to nominate US President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize seems to be a bolt from the blue, not only for geopolitical experts, but for Pakistanis and the country's leaders the government of Trump's support to the "genocidal war" in Gaza and Israel's bombing of Iran, several Pakistani activists and authors took to social media to slam Pakistan. advertisementThe brickbats on X followed shortly after Pakistan formally announced it had proposed Trump's name for the Nobel Prize, crediting his "decisive diplomatic intervention" during the hostilities between India and Pakistan. This despite India making it clear on several occassions that the ceasefire was directly negotiated between the two nations upon Pakistan's insistence at the height of Operation Sindoor.'INGRATIATION CAN'T SERVE AS POLICY'Pakistani journalist and author Zahid Hussain said it was pathetic that the government recommended the Nobel for a person who backed the "genocidal war in Gaza" and was planning to invade Iran."Trump has called Israel's attack on Iran 'excellent'. And the Pakistani government has recommended him for the Nobel Peace prize... So pathetic on the part of the Pakistan government. A man who has backed genocidal war in Gaza and planning to invade Iran," Hussain Lodhi, who previously served as Pakistan's ambassador at the United Nations, said "ingratiation" cannot serve as policy and called the government's move unfortunate."It is unfortunate that the govt is recommending Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize. A man who has backed Israel's genocidal war in Gaza... This move does not reflect the views of the people of Pakistan," Lodhi announcement came days after Trump hosted Pakistani army chief, Field Marshal, Asim Munir at the White House spokesperson Anna Kelly previously said that Trump invited Munir for lunch after the army chief promised to nominate him for the Nobel Peace Prize for preventing a nuclear war between India and SENATOR CALL OUT PAKISTANSeveral Pakistani activists also called out the government, slamming the "puppet regime" for having "zero dignity"."The genocide in Gaza is still happening because Trump wants it. Another war in the Middle East is brewing because Trump called for it. And yet, Pakistan's puppet regime, eager to please the empire, recommends him for the Nobel Peace Prize. Zero dignity," Rida Rashid activist, Noor-e-Maryam Kanwer, said Pakistan has once again proved that it would "remain a rentier state".Perhaps the strongest criticism came from Senator Allama Raja Nasir, who called Pakistan's move a "deeply misguided and ethically hollow decision".advertisement"Such a nomination undermines the very principles of peace and justice the award purports to uphold. Moreover, this gesture matters little, as the Nobel Peace Prize has long served as a Western tool to honour its own and advance its geopolitical agenda," he EXPERTS WEIGH INGlobal foreign policy experts also weighed in, with national security expert Derek J Grossman saying, "Whatever dignity Pakistan had left, and there wasn't much, is now gone".Mehlaqa Samdani, director of the Community Alliance for Peace and Justice, called it an open display of "cringe-worthy pandering"."This is embarrassing beyond belief. Pakistan's government recommending Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize reeks of servility and a colonised mindset," she NOBEL PRIZE PUSH FOR TRUMPBut, why has Pakistan suddenly warmed up to Trump despite slamming Israeli aggression in Gaza on several forums, knowing fully well that it had US backing?Officially, Pakistan cited Trump's "robust diplomatic engagement" with both Islamabad and New Delhi in helping stop the hostilities last month. The statement called Trump's intervention proof of his role as a "genuine peacemaker".The timing of Pakistan's recommending Trump for a Nobel Prize is also worth noting. It comes as Trump, on several occasions, offered to resolve the Kashmir will work with you both to see if, after a thousand years, a solution can be arrived at, concerning Kashmir," Trump had said earlier this as well as Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as recently as this week, have told the US President that Delhi would never accept third-party mediation with Pakistan on the Kashmir has long maintained Kashmir as an integral part of its territory and said any future talks with Pakistan would be on the Pakistan-occupied its strategic Nobel Prize push, Pakistan seems to be seeking US support for its position on Watch

News18

26 minutes ago

• News18

Who Was Saeed Izadi, Iranian Commander Behind Hamas' Oct 7 Attack, Killed In Israeli Strikes?

Saeed Izadi was the head of the Palestinian division in the Revolutionary Guards' Quds Force, who allegedly facilitated financial assistance to Hamas to carry out the Oct 7 attack. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) on Saturday confirmed that Saeed Izadi, head of the Palestinian division in the Revolutionary Guards' Quds Force, had been killed in an overnight strike in the Iranian city of Qom. 'Saeed Izadi, a founder of the Iranian regime's plan to destroy Israel, was eliminated in a precise IDF strike in the area of Qom," said the IDF on X. Israel Defence Minister, Israel Katz, had earlier confirmed Izadi's death in overnight Israeli strikes in Qom. This came as Israel's war with Iran has entered its second week with Israel's foreign minister saying its strikes have delayed Tehran's potential to develop a nuclear weapon by at least two or three years. Israel's army chief warned that the country could be engaged in a 'prolonged campaign" against Iran. Who Was Saeed Izadi? According to the Israeli military, Izadi was the commander of the Palestine Corps of the Quds Force, a key coordinator between the Iranian regime and Hamas, and one of the main orchestrators of the October 7 attack in 2023, in which 1,200 people were killed. The attack sparked a deadly war in Gaza that left over 54,000 Palestinians dead. 'He was responsible for military coordination between the senior commanders of the IRGC and the Iranian regime with key figures in Hamas. As part of his role, Izadi was responsible for increasing the financial funding from Iran to Hamas for terrorist activities against Israel," said the Israeli military. Izadi was also allegedly responsible for directing Hamas forces operating from Lebanon and his efforts were directed to rebuilding Hamas' military wing and ensuring that Hamas remains the controlling authority in Gaza. Katz said Izadi 'funded and armed Hamas" ahead of the October 7 attacks. He called Izadi's death a 'huge achievement for Israeli intelligence" and 'justice for murdered civilians and hostages". First Published: June 21, 2025, 13:13 IST

Time of India

31 minutes ago

• Time of India

Israeli military says killed Iran's coordinator with Hamas

Israel's military said Saturday it had killed a top Iranian commander in charge of military coordination with Palestinian militant group Hamas in a strike on Qom, south of Tehran. Israeli "fighter jets struck and eliminated in the area of Qom the commander of the Palestine Corps of the Quds Force , and the key coordinator between the Iranian regime and the Hamas terrorist organisation, Saeed Izadi ," the military said in a statement. The Quds Force is the foreign operations arm of Iran's powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Bank Owned Properties For Sale In Khu Doc Don (Prices May Surprise You) Foreclosed Homes | Search ads Search Now The military said Izadi had directed Hamas forces operating from Lebanon, and helped Hamas rebuild its armed wing in Gaza. Hamas sparked the ongoing Gaza war with its unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. Live Events A military official also told reporters during a briefing Saturday that Israel had killed two other Iranian commanders overnight, Behnam Shahriyari and Aminpour Judaki . Shahriyari was the head of Unit 190 in Iran's Quds Force, whose goal was to "annihilate Israel", the official said. "What Izadi was for Hamas, Shahriyari was for Hezbollah," the official said on condition of anonymity, adding that he "was responsible for transferring funds to these terror organisations who aimed to destroy Israel". Judaki was in charge of the drone unit in the IRGC, said the official, adding that he was "responsible for hundreds of UAV attacks against Israel". Fighting between the two foes began last week when Israel launched a massive wave of strikes on Iran, arguing that Tehran was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. The Israeli military campaign has combined targeted assassinations of key Iranian military personnel, destruction of Iran's air defences and repeated strikes on nuclear sites. The death toll in Israel from retaliatory Iranian missile strikes since June 13 is 25 people, according to authorities. Iran said on Sunday that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians, but the toll has not been updated since.