'Prolonged campaign of cruelty': Inside the chilling maid murder by MasterChef finalist
SHAH ALAM – What began as the inspiring story of a university graduate from Sabah who once competed on MasterChef Malaysia ended in a horrifying tragedy.
A former MasterChef Malaysia finalist, Etiqah Siti Noorashikeen Mohd Sulong and her ex-husband Mohammad Ambree Yunos, have been sentenced to 34 years in prison for the horrific torture and murder of their 28-year-old maid, Nur Afiyah Daeng Damin, in December 2021. Etiqah (left) and her ex-husband, Mohammad Ambree Yunos.
The case, described by prosecutors as "a prolonged campaign of cruelty," has sent shockwaves through Malaysia and beyond.
A House of Terror in Penampang
Between Dec 8 and Dec 11, 2021, what should have been a safe workplace for Afiyah turned into her final days of terror.
Employed as a domestic helper in a condominium in Penampang, Sabah, she was systematically abused, tortured and ultimately killed by the very people tasked with providing her shelter and protection.
The Kota Kinabalu High Court, presided by Judge Datuk Dr Lim Hock Leng, delivered the sentence on the couple in June after concluding that the prosecution had proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
While Ambree, 44, received an additional 12 strokes of the cane, Etiqah, 37, was spared whipping under Section 289 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which exempts women from corporal punishment.
"This Was Not a Murder of Passion, It Was Deliberate Torture"
In court, Deputy Public Prosecutor Dacia Jane Romanus reportedly painted a chilling picture.
'This was not a murder out of anger or provocation. This was a prolonged, cruel and deliberate torture,' she said.
According to Dacia, the abuse was not impulsive, but methodically inflicted over time.
The couple had subjected Afiyah to such extensive physical torment that her body was unrecognisable.
'The condition of the deceased's body was so severely deteriorated that her husband was only able to identify her by the bangle she wore on her wrist,' she revealed.
The evidence was damning. Videos and images recovered from the couple's mobile phones documented the torture in gruesome detail, revealing not only the physical abuse but the chilling intent to preserve it.
'The deceased was a young woman who left her home and entered the home of the accused persons to work honestly and earn a living during a global pandemic.
"While others remained at home in search of safety and protection, the deceased experienced the opposite. She endured prolonged suffering in her place of employment, which ultimately became the site of her tragic demise,' Dacia said.
A MasterChef Finalist's Fall from Grace
Etiqah was just 24 years old when she appeared on MasterChef Malaysia Season 2 in 2012.
The show, a local adaptation of the global cooking competition, brought amateur home cooks into the spotlight, many of whom went on to launch careers in Malaysia's vibrant culinary scene.
She had been described then as a promising university graduate with a postgraduate degree in geology from Sabah.
Her appearance on the show gave her a platform, but what followed was a far cry from public admiration.
A Conviction Years in the Making
The case was first brought to court on Dec 29, 2021, and the couple claimed trial on Nov 17, 2022.
During the proceedings, Judge Lim stated the prosecution had succeeded in establishing all critical elements under Section 302 of the Penal Code, which relates to murder.
These included: That the victim died from injuries.
That the injuries were inflicted with intent.
That both accused acted with common intention.
Despite passionate mitigation pleas from their defence lawyers, Datuk Ram Singh (for Ambree) and Datuk Seri Rakhbir Singh (for Etiqah), the court found that the severity and nature of the injuries could not be ignored.
The Demand for the Death Penalty
Although the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023 was already in force, the prosecution had still urged the court to impose the death penalty, citing the cruelty involved.
'This case shocked the conscience not only of Sabahans but the nation as a whole. The law must reflect the value we place on human life and in this case, justice demands nothing less than the ultimate sentence,' Dacia reportedly told the court.
However, the judge opted for a custodial sentence of 34 years each, reflecting the current sentencing trends for deaths caused by prolonged abuse, while ordering Ambree to be caned 12 times.
A Public Reckoning
As the case gained national attention, it triggered intense public outrage. Many questioned how a figure once in the public eye, admired for her passion in the kitchen, could be part of such a monstrous act behind closed doors.
The verdict serves as a grim reminder that abuse of domestic workers remains an issue, even among the most seemingly 'respectable' employers. It also underscores the urgent need for better protection and oversight for vulnerable workers in Malaysia.
Justice Served But the Scars Remain
While justice has now been delivered in the courtroom, the psychological and social scars left by this case are far from healed.
Afiyah's tragic end remains a symbol of the invisible violence domestic workers often endure and a call to action for Malaysians to demand better accountability and compassion for all lives, regardless of status or citizenship.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sinar Daily
4 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
'Prolonged campaign of cruelty': Inside the chilling maid murder by MasterChef finalist
SHAH ALAM – What began as the inspiring story of a university graduate from Sabah who once competed on MasterChef Malaysia ended in a horrifying tragedy. A former MasterChef Malaysia finalist, Etiqah Siti Noorashikeen Mohd Sulong and her ex-husband Mohammad Ambree Yunos, have been sentenced to 34 years in prison for the horrific torture and murder of their 28-year-old maid, Nur Afiyah Daeng Damin, in December 2021. Etiqah (left) and her ex-husband, Mohammad Ambree Yunos. The case, described by prosecutors as "a prolonged campaign of cruelty," has sent shockwaves through Malaysia and beyond. A House of Terror in Penampang Between Dec 8 and Dec 11, 2021, what should have been a safe workplace for Afiyah turned into her final days of terror. Employed as a domestic helper in a condominium in Penampang, Sabah, she was systematically abused, tortured and ultimately killed by the very people tasked with providing her shelter and protection. The Kota Kinabalu High Court, presided by Judge Datuk Dr Lim Hock Leng, delivered the sentence on the couple in June after concluding that the prosecution had proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt. While Ambree, 44, received an additional 12 strokes of the cane, Etiqah, 37, was spared whipping under Section 289 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which exempts women from corporal punishment. "This Was Not a Murder of Passion, It Was Deliberate Torture" In court, Deputy Public Prosecutor Dacia Jane Romanus reportedly painted a chilling picture. 'This was not a murder out of anger or provocation. This was a prolonged, cruel and deliberate torture,' she said. According to Dacia, the abuse was not impulsive, but methodically inflicted over time. The couple had subjected Afiyah to such extensive physical torment that her body was unrecognisable. 'The condition of the deceased's body was so severely deteriorated that her husband was only able to identify her by the bangle she wore on her wrist,' she revealed. The evidence was damning. Videos and images recovered from the couple's mobile phones documented the torture in gruesome detail, revealing not only the physical abuse but the chilling intent to preserve it. 'The deceased was a young woman who left her home and entered the home of the accused persons to work honestly and earn a living during a global pandemic. "While others remained at home in search of safety and protection, the deceased experienced the opposite. She endured prolonged suffering in her place of employment, which ultimately became the site of her tragic demise,' Dacia said. A MasterChef Finalist's Fall from Grace Etiqah was just 24 years old when she appeared on MasterChef Malaysia Season 2 in 2012. The show, a local adaptation of the global cooking competition, brought amateur home cooks into the spotlight, many of whom went on to launch careers in Malaysia's vibrant culinary scene. She had been described then as a promising university graduate with a postgraduate degree in geology from Sabah. Her appearance on the show gave her a platform, but what followed was a far cry from public admiration. A Conviction Years in the Making The case was first brought to court on Dec 29, 2021, and the couple claimed trial on Nov 17, 2022. During the proceedings, Judge Lim stated the prosecution had succeeded in establishing all critical elements under Section 302 of the Penal Code, which relates to murder. These included: That the victim died from injuries. That the injuries were inflicted with intent. That both accused acted with common intention. Despite passionate mitigation pleas from their defence lawyers, Datuk Ram Singh (for Ambree) and Datuk Seri Rakhbir Singh (for Etiqah), the court found that the severity and nature of the injuries could not be ignored. The Demand for the Death Penalty Although the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023 was already in force, the prosecution had still urged the court to impose the death penalty, citing the cruelty involved. 'This case shocked the conscience not only of Sabahans but the nation as a whole. The law must reflect the value we place on human life and in this case, justice demands nothing less than the ultimate sentence,' Dacia reportedly told the court. However, the judge opted for a custodial sentence of 34 years each, reflecting the current sentencing trends for deaths caused by prolonged abuse, while ordering Ambree to be caned 12 times. A Public Reckoning As the case gained national attention, it triggered intense public outrage. Many questioned how a figure once in the public eye, admired for her passion in the kitchen, could be part of such a monstrous act behind closed doors. The verdict serves as a grim reminder that abuse of domestic workers remains an issue, even among the most seemingly 'respectable' employers. It also underscores the urgent need for better protection and oversight for vulnerable workers in Malaysia. Justice Served But the Scars Remain While justice has now been delivered in the courtroom, the psychological and social scars left by this case are far from healed. Afiyah's tragic end remains a symbol of the invisible violence domestic workers often endure and a call to action for Malaysians to demand better accountability and compassion for all lives, regardless of status or citizenship.
The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Court overturns order for MACC to share favourable facts
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal today overturned a High Court decision that had ordered the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) to provide a written statement containing favourable facts to company director Datuk Seri Sim Choo Thiam in relation to four graft charges involving RM15 million. A three-member panel led by Justice Datuk Hashim Hamzah, ruled unanimously that the High Court was wrong in compelling the prosecution to furnish facts that are favourable to the defence. He said the High Court also erred in its decision that Section 51A(1)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) stands on the same legal footing as Section 51 of the CPC. Sitting with Justice Hashim were Justices Datuk Azizul Azmi Adnan and Datuk Faizah Jamaludin. The court allowed the prosecution's appeal to set aside the High Court's order, reinstating the Sessions Court's decision that had rejected Sim's request for the statement. Section 51 pertains to summonses for production of documents or other things, while Section 51A (1) (c) requires the prosecution to provide the accused, prior to trial, with a written statement of any facts that are favourable to the defence. The Sessions Court has fixed June 30 for mention of Sim's graft case. On May 10, 2023, Sim, 55, was charged with allegedly soliciting a RM15 million bribe from Hep Kim Hong, the managing director of Asia Coding Centre Sdn Bhd, through Syed Abu Zafran Syed Ahmad, as an alleged inducement for former minister Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainuddin to award projects to the company. He was also charged with three counts of accepting RM15 million in bribes from the same individual as an inducement for Hamzah to do similar things. The offences were allegedly committed at two different locations - Shaas Holdings office and a parking lot at Solaris Dutamas, Jalan Dutamas 1, Kuala Lumpur, between June and July 2021. The charges were framed under Section 16(a)(B) of the MACC Act 2009, which is punishable under Section 24(1) of the same Act, which carries a maximum imprisonment of 20 years and a fine of not less than five times the amount of the bribe or RM10,000, whichever is higher, upon conviction. On July 4, 2023, Sim filed a revision application seeking the prosecution to furnish written statement of facts favourable to his defence under Section 51A (1) (c) of CPC after the Sessions Court, in Sept, the same year, dismissed his application for the written statement of facts. Sim claimed the MACC had recorded a statement from Hamzah, whose name was mentioned in Sim's charges, only after he (Sim) was charged in court. On March 21, last year, the High Court allowed the revision application, directing MACC to furnish the statement after finding there were favourable facts to be disclosed by the prosecution to Sim before the trial. This prompted the prosecution to file an appeal to the Court of Appeal. In today's proceedings before the Court of Appeal, Deputy Public Prosecutors from the MACC, Farah Ezlin Yusop Khan, Dr. Ifa Sirrhu Samsudin, Nurul Qistini Qamarul Abrar and Muhammad Asraf Mohamed Tahir appeared for the prosecution while lawyers Datuk Hisyam Teh Poh Teik, Low Wei Loke and Kee Wei Lon represented Sim.
Barnama
5 hours ago
- Barnama
Court Of Appeal Overturns High Court Order Compelling MACC To Furnish Favourable Facts To Company Director
REGION - CENTRAL > NEWS PUTRAJAYA, June 23 (Bernama) -- The Court of Appeal today overturned a High Court decision that had ordered the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) to provide a written statement containing favourable facts to company director Datuk Seri Sim Choo Thiam in relation to four graft charges involving RM15 million. A three-member panel led by Justice Datuk Hashim Hamzah, ruled unanimously that the High Court was wrong in compelling the prosecution to furnish facts that are favourable to the defence. He said the High Court also erred in its decision that Section 51A(1)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) stands on the same legal footing as Section 51 of the CPC. bootstrap slideshow Sitting with Justice Hashim were Justices Datuk Azizul Azmi Adnan and Datuk Faizah Jamaludin. The court allowed the prosecution's appeal to set aside the High Court's order, reinstating the Sessions Court's decision that had rejected Sim's request for the statement. Section 51 pertains to summonses for production of documents or other things, while Section 51A (1) (c) requires the prosecution to provide the accused, prior to trial, with a written statement of any facts that are favourable to the defence. The Sessions Court has fixed June 30 for mention of Sim's graft case. On May 10, 2023, Sim, 55, was charged with allegedly soliciting a RM15 million bribe from Hep Kim Hong, the managing director of Asia Coding Centre Sdn Bhd, through Syed Abu Zafran Syed Ahmad, as an alleged inducement for former minister Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainuddin to award projects to the company. He was also charged with three counts of accepting RM15 million in bribes from the same individual as an inducement for Hamzah to do similar things. The offences were allegedly committed at two different locations - Shaas Holdings office and a parking lot at Solaris Dutamas, Jalan Dutamas 1, Kuala Lumpur, between June and July 2021.
