China warns its leftover men against ‘buying foreign wives'
The Chinese government has warned its citizens in Bangladesh against "buying a foreign wife" amid growing reports of marriage scams and human trafficking in the South Asian country.
The Chinese embassy in Dhaka late on Sunday urged Chinese citizens not to be 'misled' by posts on social media offering quick marriages abroad.
The embassy stated that, according to Chinese law, no marriage agency was allowed to offer international matchmaking services, while citizens were barred from hiding such activities through deception or for profit.
Chinese citizens were advised to stay away from commercial cross-border marriage agencies and remain vigilant against online romance scams to avoid both financial and personal losses, the embassy added.
China has a reported surplus of 35 million men who are unable to find brides in part due to the Chinese government's three-decade-long one-child policy, which pushed families to prefer male children. Girls were either selectively aborted or abandoned.
China has also witnessed a steep decline in marriages, with 6.1 million marriage registrations nationwide in 2024, compared to 7.7 million the previous year. The decline is mostly driven by factors such as increased economic pressures, rising cost of living, and Chinese women pushing back against patriarchal gender expectations.
There are growing reports that a generation of so-called "leftover men" (shengnan shidai in Chinese) are looking towards Pakistan, Russia, Bangladesh and other nations to "purchase" brides.
The growing demand for these brides has fuelled human trafficking, with children and women from South and Southeast Asian countries being smuggled into China. Bangladeshi women are among those who have been allegedly being sold in China by criminal gangs under the pretext of marriage, according to a Daily Star report.
The embassy warned that those involved in illegal cross-border marriages in Bangladesh may face arrest on suspicion of trafficking.
Ding Changfa, an associate professor from the School of Economics at Xiamen University, faced backlash after suggesting that men in China could consider marrying women from Russia, Vietnam and Pakistan to end the marriage crisis.
'In rural China, we have approximately 34.9 million 'leftover men' who might face the marriage pressures of providing housing, cars, and bride price totalling between 500,000 yuan (£51,100) and 600,000 yuan (£61,400)," he was quoted by the South China Morning Post as saying.
'Last year [2023], the average disposable income per capita in rural areas across China was just over 20,000 yuan (£2,000). Solving this issue could involve attracting a significant number of eligible young women from overseas,' he added.
Pakistan has been at the heart of the trafficking ring, where parents in poor Christian families were being pressured to offer up their daughters to Chinese men, according to reports.
Human Rights Watch in a 2019 report said women were trafficked to China through 'a porous border and lack of response by law enforcement agencies on both sides [has] created an environment in which traffickers flourish.'
The group called on China and Pakistan to act in the face of 'increasing evidence that Pakistani women and girls are at risk of sexual slavery in China'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
25 minutes ago
- UPI
Britain, U.S. warn Iran against Strait of Hormuz blockade
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio (R) and Britain's Foreign Secretary David Lammy (L) at a meeting at NATO Headquarters in Brussels in April. File Photo by NATO/UPI | License Photo June 23 (UPI) -- Britain cautioned Iran Monday that attempts to block the Strait of Hormuz or to strike at American military facilities in the Middle East could lead to escalation, even as Israel continued its strikes on Iran. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said Monday that such actions would be a "catastrophic mistake." "It would be a huge, catastrophic mistake to fire at U.S. bases in the region at this time. We have forces in the region at this time," said Lammy in an interview with BBC Breakfast. The Iranian parliament moved Sunday to approve a measure to close the Strait in response to the American strikes on Iran over the weekend. The strait serves as a critical route for oil being shipped from Persian Gulf countries, but ultimately it will come down to whether Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei decides to move forward with such a plan. Close to 30% of the world's seaborne oil shipments are moved through the strait. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio also commented Sunday against Iranian interference with movement through the strait. He spoke with Fox News and called on China to prevent Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz. "I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil," said Rubio, as China is a key oil customer of Iran. "The Persian Gulf and nearby waters are important route for international trade in goods and energy. Keeping the region safe and stable serves the common interests of the international community," Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun said in a press conference Monday. "China calls on the international community to step up effort to promote de-escalation of the conflict and prevent the regional turmoil from having a greater impact on global economic growth." Meanwhile, Israel Defense Forces announced Monday on social media that it "struck routes in order to obstruct access" to the Fordow nuclear enrichment site in Iran's Qom province. The IDF also proclaimed it attacked six Iranian airports "across western, central, and eastern Iran, destroying runways, underground hangars, refueling aircraft, F-14, F-5 and AH-1 aircraft." It further alleged the strikes "impaired takeoff capabilities from these airports, as well as the Iranian military's ability to operate its air force from them."
37 minutes ago
Pakistan condemns Trump for bombing Iran a day after recommending him for a Nobel Peace Prize
ISLAMABAD -- Pakistan condemned U.S. President Donald Trump for bombing Iran, less than 24 hours after saying he deserved a Nobel Peace Prize for defusing a recent crisis with India. Relations between the two South Asian countries plummeted after a massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir in April. The nuclear-armed rivals stepped closer to war in the weeks that followed, attacking each other until intense diplomatic efforts, led by the U.S., resulted in a truce for which Trump took credit. It was this 'decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership' that Pakistan praised in an effusive message Saturday night on the X platform when it announced its formal recommendation for him to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. Less than 24 hours later, however, it condemned the U.S. for attacking Iran, saying the strikes 'constituted a serious violation of international law' and the statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, in a phone call Sunday with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, expressed his concern that the bombings had targeted facilities that were under the safeguards of the IAEA. Pakistan has close ties with Iran and supports its attacks on Israel, saying it has the right to self-defense. There was no immediate comment on Monday from Islamabad about the Trump Nobel recommendation, which also followed a high-profile White House lunch meeting between the president and Pakistan's powerful army chief, Asim Munir. Thursday's meeting, which lasted more than two hours, was also attended by the Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff, the U.S. Special Representative for Middle Eastern Affairs. According to a Pakistani military statement, a detailed exchange of views took place on the 'prevailing tensions between Iran and Israel, with both leaders emphasizing the importance of the resolution of the conflict.' While Pakistan was quick to thank Trump for his intervention in its crisis with India, New Delhi played it down and said there was no need for external mediation on the Kashmir issue. The Himalayan region of Kashmir is divided between Pakistan and India but claimed by both in its entirety. India accuses Pakistan of backing militant groups in the region, which Pakistan denies.
Buzz Feed
2 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
People Explain Why Conservative Men Go After Liberal Women
Dating across political lines can be complicated, but we've all heard the stories about one particular pattern: Conservative men who actively seek out liberal women, only to spend the relationship trying to change their partner's views and values. So when u/Historical-Body-3424 asked why this dynamic is so common, the responses revealed some uncomfortable truths about power, conquest, and what some men really want from relationships. From strategic convenience to psychological manipulation, here's what women think is really going on: "I saw a TikTok of a conservative man who said he liked dating liberal women because he could be himself and not have to perform hypermasculinity constantly. Apparently, the conservative women he had dated demanded he have a certain persona at all times." "I think a lot of conservative men date liberal women because there are so many liberal women. I live in the Los Angeles area, and I've heard men say if they weren't open to liberal women (and leaving their political affiliations blank or listed as 'moderate' on dating apps), they'd be single without any dates. As far as why they then try to change the women they date? Because they're assholes." "They don't actually want a conservative woman because they don't want to genuinely perform as a traditional man. They want a woman who wouldn't expect the same level of work it would take to truly succeed in a traditional male role. With that being said, if they can 'change' her instead of finding someone who has already formed these views, then they can feed her the parts they want to do and leave out the parts they won't or can't do — like being the sole breadwinner and such." "They don't want women who already want a traditional lifestyle. It's like how men are worried about gold diggers — they're suspicious of women who aspire to be provided for by a man. They would rather trap a woman into the lifestyle because they feel like she did it for them, so, as a bonus, it boosts their ego." "Because they don't actually want a conservative relationship. They want sex before marriage and dual-income households, which conservative women are less likely to prefer over liberal women. They basically want all the benefits but none of the downsides." "They don't think politics are a dealbreaker. I also don't think there are that many conservative men. They might call themselves conservative, but their values aren't conservative, and they don't want to be providers. For example, any woman who wants a traditional relationship based on Christian values is going to tell them to kick rocks." "From my observation, women think more about compatibility and shared values than men do." "It's a challenge to them. A lot of men enjoy conquest, and if there's resistance or obstacles, it's even more exciting for these types to potentially 'win.' I'm not saying everyone who likes a challenge is a creep, but it's overrepresented among these conservative men. They get a jolt of pleasure from bending women to their will — more so than from someone who is subservient to them right off the bat. I've also heard that a lot of men think liberal women are just more physically attractive." "A lot of conservative men also don't consider our political leanings to be 'serious.' We're just silly girls, y'know? Our politics and beliefs aren't real. They're a frivolous, stupid little trend we've jumped on. But for the right man (which, of course, these conservative dudes are), we'll drop everything to pump out their unvaccinated babies and die of listeria from drinking raw milk." "For some of them, I think it's a long-term project to try and break them into submission. It's a challenge and a win, like an 'owning the libs' relationship style. For others, they think they'll have easier access to sex than they would with a conservative woman. In a similar vein, some don't actually like conservative women because they have specific expectations about gender roles. These men don't want to do the whole 'man of the house' or 'breadwinner' thing, so they're seeking out a more progressive woman who won't expect those roles." "They want the wild, fun, kinky, party girl stereotype liberal woman — but to tame and make their own. Someone who'd be down for threesomes, but only with other women. Someone who's into doing all the wild and kinky things in the porn they watch, but will be subservient to them and respect their sexual boundaries while having none of their own. In other words, they think liberal women are potential personal sex slaves who would choose to be such for them, as long as they're tamed." "I have a theory that it's about indoctrinating them in their own special way, based on their definition of a conservative woman rather than the varying views within that community. For example, some conservative women are extremely religious to the point of rejecting certain music or activities they see as offensive to their god. Others are extremely prudish and nun-like because they interpret conservatism as being about the sins of the flesh and modesty. So these men want to be the ones to shape these women according to their unique blend of conservative ideals — ideals of womanhood that serve their fantasies the most. They'd rather do this than try to make it work with a conservative woman who already holds incredibly strong, irrationally devoted beliefs and values that may differ from their own." "From Trevor Noah's Born a Crime: The way my mother always explained it, the traditional man wants a woman to be subservient, but he never falls in love with subservient women. He's attracted to independent women. 'He's like an exotic bird collector,' she said. 'He only wants a woman who is free because his dream is to put her in a cage.'" "It's the same reason why horses are broken, why exotic pet owners keep wild animals, why suburban lawns are monoculture grasses, why land is colonized, why neighborhoods are gentrified, and why space is the final frontier. The act of taming something wild, cutting off all its unrefined natural parts, and grooming it into something refined is an act of power. The completion of such an act is demonstrable evidence that power is real. In short, it's the theft of agency that fuels the drive of conquest." "I think it's similar to the guys who don't bother reading a woman's profile on an app. They like how she looks, and the inside doesn't matter to them." "They want all of the social benefits of hegemonic masculinity, but none of the restrictions. Pathetic." "They don't view women — any women — as actual human beings with actual feelings and thoughts that matter. They take care of us, and we give them household chores, emotional labor, and sex in return. Sweet! They do not view us as equals. A disturbing number of conservative men will keep it from their partners for a long time and actively date women they hate. But they will still marry and have children with women they literally despise because they're expected to get married and have kids. They want the sex on tap and the domestic labor, even if it's coming from someone they hate. That's how valuable women are." Have you dealt with this kind of situation yourself? Maybe you've been the liberal woman in this scenario, or watched friends navigate these frustrating dynamics. What's your take? Is it possible to date across political lines, or are some values just too fundamental to compromise on? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below.
