IMF says July forecasts to take into account trade deals, uncertainty
By David Lawder and Karin Strohecker
(Reuters) -The International Monetary Fund said on Thursday that its next global growth forecast in July will take into account both positive and negative trade developments but declined to predict a tariff-driven GDP downgrade similar to that released by the World Bank this week.
IMF spokesperson Julie Kozack said that since the last release of the Fund's World Economic Outlook in April, there have been some positive developments that could support improved economic activity, including a major tariff reduction between the U.S. and China and an initial trade deal between the U.S. and Britain.
"So taken together such announcements combined with the April 9 pause on the high level of tariffs, these could support activity relative to the forecast that we had in April," Kozack told a regular IMF news briefing. "But nonetheless, we do have an outlook for the global economy that remains subject to heightened uncertainty, especially as trade negotiations continue."
The IMF also will take into account U.S. President Donald Trump's added steel and aluminum tariffs, she said. These have now reached 50% for all exporters.
The World Bank on Tuesday slashed its 2025 global growth forecast by four-tenths of a percentage point from its January forecast to 2.3%, saying that higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a "significant headwind" for nearly all economies.
The development lender cut forecasts for nearly 70% of all economies - including the U.S., China and Europe, but the prior forecast came before Trump took office and imposed tariffs on nearly all trading partners.
The IMF's steep April forecast cut did take into account Trump's initial tariff assault, reducing the 2025 global growth outlook by half a percentage point from its January forecast to 2.8%, with a slower decline in inflation.
Kozack said the next IMF World Economic Outlook update will be issued toward the end of July, but did not provide a specific date.
Trump's "reciprocal" tariff pause is currently scheduled to expire on July 8, with many countries seeking to negotiate tariff-reducing deals before then. And Trump has said there could be extensions of that deadline for countries engaged in good faith negotiations with the U.S.
Kozack said that more recent activity indicators reflect "a complex economic landscape" with first quarter front-loading activity to beat tariffs, while there has been some diversion of trade and an unwinding of import activity in the second quarter. There also could be more trade deals or other developments to take into account.
"So all of this creates kind of a complicated picture for us, with some upside risk, some other developments, and we'll take all of these developments together into account as we update our forecast," Kozack said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
U.S. Bombing of Iran Keeps Oil Markets on Edge
If the United States had acted a couple of decades ago to bomb Iran's nuclear weapons program, as it did on Saturday, oil prices would have soared. But even though prices might jump when trading resumes this week, the longer-term effect is far less clear. Oil traders must weigh whether the American attack will lead to wider fighting that harms exports from the Persian Gulf, said Muyu Xu, senior Asia crude oil analyst at Kpler, a global commodities and shipping data firm. Wider fighting could drive up prices if oil-loading facilities are damaged or tanker traffic is interrupted. There have been no major disruptions so far since the Israel-Iran conflict escalated this month, though Israel's air attacks did set fire to a refinery and refined products depot supplying Tehran. 'Until now, we haven't seen a single barrel removed from the market,' Ms. Xu said. Military action by Iran to interrupt the flow of oil would mostly harm China, which is closely aligned with Iran and buys nearly all of Iran's oil exports. Oil prices have risen about 10 percent since the recent eruption of hostilities, which began with a surprise attack on Iran by Israel on June 13. They fell on Friday after President Trump said he would decide within two weeks whether to enter the war against Iran. Ever since the Iranian Revolution in 1979, American policymakers worried that Iran might act against the United States by using mines or missiles to block tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. The strait is the entrance to the Persian Gulf, through which a sixth of the world's oil moves on tankers, and the northern side of the strait is Iran's coastline. China buys a third of all oil coming out of the gulf, according to Kpler's data, and helped broker a rapprochement two years ago between Iran and Saudi Arabia, another big exporter of oil from the Persian Gulf. By contrast, the United States buys less than 3 percent of the oil coming out of the Persian Gulf, notably from northern Saudi Arabia. The United States became an overall net exporter of oil in 2020 as fracking technologies enabled a big increase in domestic oil production. Iran's oil exports have declined steeply in recent years, although there was a partial rebound last year as China stepped up purchases from Iran following the rapprochement with Saudi Arabia. The United States and Europe have imposed broad prohibitions on the purchases of Iran's oil so as to pressure Tehran to abandon its nuclear weapons program. China has bought Iran's exports at a deep discount to world prices. Beijing leaders have long contended that the sanctions against Iran are not binding on China because the United Nations has not endorsed them. Even more unclear is what could happen to Iran's oil long-term oil exports. The sanctions that have curtailed much of Iran's exports were aimed at forcing it to stop developing nuclear weapons.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Republican plans to cap student borrowing could shatter an everyday profession
A series of changes to long-running federal student loan programs tucked into the Republican tax plan has doctors panicked and struggling to find GOP allies. The Senate education committee's portion of President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill includes a new cap on how much people can borrow for medical school and other professional programs that is well below the sticker price most students are facing. Lawmakers are also proposing to nix a class of federal loans graduate students use to cover housing and other non-tuition expenses. For low-income and first-generation college students with aspirations of becoming physicians, these plans, if enacted, could squash their dreams, according to medical college leaders. As the full Senate irons out the bill and Trump rattles school finances with funding freezes, doctors' groups are asking Congress to preserve the more generous loan options or risk a sharp drop in who's studying medicine — a profession that's already facing a shortage. While part of the stress on poorer students comes from the ever-increasing cost of higher education, the bill would likely push more of them toward private loans that require a co-signer, which are out of reach for many, and come with steeper interest rates. 'A lot of our medical schools, mine included, have a lot of first-generation college students. When they come into medical education, more times than not, they don't have co-signers,' said John L. Hummer, president of Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine, a school with campuses in New Mexico and Florida for which 81 percent of students depend on the federal Grad PLUS program Republicans are looking to eliminate. The Senate education tax bill establishes a $200,000 ceiling on federal student loans for professional degrees, like medicine. But the median cost of attending four years of medical school for the class of 2025 is $286,454 for public institutions and $390,848 for private schools, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges. It's a range that exceeds the costs many doctors now serving in Congress paid when they earned their degrees. Many did not respond to inquiries from POLITICO about how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would affect medical school enrollment — and those that did were not sympathetic about student debt. 'You're looking at a person, a first-generation college student, who went to medical school, and didn't borrow money,' Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), who sits on the Senate HELP Committee, said. 'I worked my tail off. Anyone who is paying more than $100,000 to go to school is making a huge mistake.' Marshall graduated from the University of Kansas School of Medicine in 1987, when the average in-state tuition for a public medical school nationally was around $4,696. That sum in today's dollars is about $13,300 — far less than what the Kansas program costs in 2025. Members of the medical community believe limits on federal loans or steering students to borrow from private lenders will exacerbate a long-running national physician shortage the Association of American Medical Colleges projects could be as high as 86,000 doctors by 2036. David Bergman, senior vice president of government relations and health affairs at the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine, said students at medical schools his group represents have said it's been difficult to access private loans. Some lenders, like PNC Bank, hold student debt for which about 90 percent of private loans have a co-signer, while others had interest rates as high as 16 percent — nearly twice that of a Grad PLUS loan. 'The consequence of all this, of course, is that it's the low-income students who are going to suffer the most,' Bergman said. 'They may not have great credit, so then they may not be able to get the loans. Or they may get higher rate loans that put them further in debt.' One former Trump administration official shares this concern. 'I do worry about the assumption that the private sector is going to step in,' said Diane Jones, a former Education Department official from Trump's first term. 'Maybe they would, but I'm not sure they would step in to make loans available to low-income students.' Even some people in the lending business are skeptical the industry's bigger players will change their rules around co-signers. 'It just takes a lot more energy because it's riskier. Period. Banks aren't in the business of doing riskier products,' said Ken Ruggiero, co-founder and CEO of Ascent, a private loan company that will lend to applicants without a co-signer. 'They are in the business of talking to a person who has a very good income and credit score and letting the student sign the agreement.' The House version of the bill would also shut down Grad PLUS and put a cap on lending to graduate students for professional programs, putting pressure on the Senate to change course. But HELP Committee Chair Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) said there needs to be more accountability for the high tuition prices writ large that aren't exclusive to medical schools. 'There should be some ratio between earning potential and what it costs,' Cassidy said. 'I met with neurosurgeons and cosmetologists and they had the same discussion about the cost of education.' Jason Goldman, president of the American College of Physicians, which represents internal medicine doctors, related specialists and medical students, is skeptical that capping loan amounts would force medical schools to immediately lower tuition. Over the span of 21 years, medical school tuition has gone up 81 percent, outpacing inflation, according to AAMC. 'The reality is it's very expensive to train a physician — the amount of hours that go into lectures, labs, professors and housing and everything it takes to graduate is expensive,' Goldman said. He fears that some students may be dissuaded from becoming primary care doctors, a specialty where shortages are profound, especially in rural areas. Some in Congress have pushed Education Secretary Linda McMahon to address proposed limits to federal lending for student borrowers pursuing health care-related degrees. During a House Appropriations Committee hearing in May, Rep. Lois Frankel (D-Fla.) asked McMahon to take a look at aid programs that help students complete their degrees. 'We do know we have a shortage of nurses and doctors,' McMahon said. 'I think there are a lot of programs we can look at to train nurse technicians to get them into the marketplace faster.' Other Congress members have proposed student loan changes outside of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act to address health care shortages. Sens. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Jackie Rosen (D-Nev.) introduced legislation in April that would create a student loan repayment program for specialists within medical professions who practice in rural areas. They also introduced the Specialty Physicians Advancing Rural Care Act in previous legislative sessions citing a dearth of providers in rural communities. 'The entire nation is dealing with a physician shortage, and rural communities in Mississippi have been particularly affected,' Wicker said in a statement. 'Congress can help provide a solution.' Jones, the official from Trump's first term, also worries that some students may have to forgo medical school because they won't be able to secure financial assistance. She attended medical school in the 1980s when the loan program she was using was suspended, ultimately leading her to drop out because she could no longer afford the program. 'I didn't have a parent who could co-sign for a private loan, and I didn't have access to any other resources,' she said. 'I personally lost the opportunity to pursue the career that I wanted, that I had earned the right to pursue.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Oil Prices Poised to Soar After U.S. Attacks Iran Facilities
In a dramatic escalation of Middle East tensions, the United States launched targeted strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities—Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordo—late Saturday, prompting fears of soaring oil prices, market volatility, and a deepening U.S. role in the region's conflict. President Donald Trump, announcing the attack on Truth Social and in a televised address, hailed it as a 'spectacular military success,' claiming Iran's 'key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' The move has drawn sharp reactions from global markets, U.S. lawmakers, and Iran, raising questions about the conflict's trajectory. The strikes, involving B-2 stealth bombers and Tomahawk cruise missiles, targeted Iran's nuclear infrastructure, with Trump warning Tehran to seek peace or face further attacks. Iranian state media acknowledged damage to parts of the Fordo site but downplayed the extent. Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi condemned the strikes as 'outrageous' and reserved 'all options' to defend Iran's sovereignty. Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation called the assault 'savage' and criticized the International Atomic Energy Agency for complicity. In retaliation, Iran fired missiles at Israel, with blasts reported over Jerusalem, signaling a potential widening of the conflict. Global markets are bracing for impact as trading resumes. Investors predict a 'knee-jerk' reaction, with oil prices expected to spike due to fears of disrupted Middle East supplies. Brent crude, already up 20% over the past month to $79.04, could climb toward $130 per barrel in a worst-case scenario, according to JPMorgan. [Brent crude oil futures] 'Oil will open higher,' said Mark Spindel of Potomac River Capital, noting uncertainty over Iran's response and damage assessments. Rising inflation could erode consumer confidence and reduce prospects for U.S. interest rate cuts, complicating an economy strained by Trump's tariffs. The U.S. involvement has intensified the Iran-Israel conflict, drawing mixed reactions domestically. Republican Senator Mitch McConnell praised Trump's 'decisive action,' arguing it counters Tehran's aggression. However, Democrats, including Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, condemned the strikes as a 'grave violation' of constitutional war powers, calling them 'grounds for impeachment." Congressman Jim McGovern labeled the move 'insane,' warning of another 'open-ended' war. The political divide underscores Trump's gamble, which risks backlash from his 'America First' base, wary of foreign entanglements. Analysts see broader implications. Jamie Cox of Harris Financial Group suggested Iran, stripped of nuclear leverage, might seek a peace deal, potentially stabilizing oil prices after an initial surge. However, Oxford Economics warns that a severe escalation, like a Strait of Hormuz closure, could devastate global markets. Historically, Middle East conflicts have caused short-term equity dips, with the S&P 500 recovering within months, but the dollar could see a temporary safe-haven boost. As Iran weighs its response and markets prepare for turbulence, Trump's strikes have thrust the U.S. into a volatile conflict, with economic and political consequences hanging in the balance. The world awaits Tehran's next move and the Pentagon's forthcoming damage assessment, set for Sunday, to gauge the path toward peace or further chaos. By MIchael Kern for More Top Reads From this article on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
