Joe Biden diagnosed with 'aggressive' prostate cancer
Ammon News - Former US President Joe Biden, 82, has been diagnosed with prostate cancer that has spread to his bones, a statement from his office said on Sunday.
Biden, who left office in January, was diagnosed on Friday after he saw a doctor last week for urinary symptoms.
The cancer is a more aggressive form of the disease, characterised by a Gleason score of 9 out of 10. This means his illness is classified as "high-grade" and the cancer cells could spread quickly, according to Cancer Research UK.
Biden and his family are said to be reviewing treatment options. His office added that the cancer was hormone-sensitive, meaning it could likely be managed.
In Sunday's statement, Biden's office said: "Last week, President Joe Biden was seen for a new finding of a prostate nodule after experiencing increasing urinary symptoms.
"On Friday, he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, characterised by a Gleason score of 9 (Grade Group 5) with metastasis to the bone.
"While this represents a more aggressive form of the disease, the cancer appears to be hormone-sensitive which allows for effective management."
After news broke of his diagnosis, the former president received support from both sides of the aisle.
President Donald Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social that he and First Lady Melania Trump were "saddened to hear about Joe Biden's recent medical diagnosis".
"We extend our warmest and best wishes to Jill and the family," he said, referring to former First Lady Jill Biden. "We wish Joe a fast and successful recovery."
Former Vice-President Kamala Harris, who served under Biden, wrote on X that she and her husband Doug Emhoff are keeping the Biden family in their prayers.
"Joe is a fighter – and I know he will face this challenge with the same strength, resilience, and optimism that have always defined his life and leadership," Harris said.
In a post on X, Barack Obama – who served as president from 2009 to 2017 with Joe Biden as his deputy – said that he and his wife Michelle were "thinking of the entire Biden family".
"Nobody has done more to find breakthrough treatments for cancer in all its forms than Joe, and I am certain he will fight this challenge with his trademark resolve and grace. We pray for a fast and full recovery," Obama said. In 2016, Obama tasked Biden with leading a "cancer moonshot" government-wide research programme. BBC
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ammon
2 hours ago
- Ammon
Russia condemns U.S. strikes on Iran
Ammon News - Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday condemned the U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran ahead of a meeting with Iran's top diplomat, describing the strikes as 'absolutely unprovoked,' but he has so far stopped short of any more concrete measures to assist Russia's regional ally. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi flew to Moscow on Monday to meet Tehran's key ally after Russia's Foreign Ministry condemned the U.S. strikes on Iran as a reckless and dangerous escalation and a 'blatant breach of international law.' 'The unprovoked aggression against Iran has no grounds and no justification whatsoever. For our part, we are making efforts to assist the Iranian people,' Putin said in public comments before his talks with Araghchi. Araghchi thanked Putin for Russia's condemnation of the attacks, describing the Israeli and U.S. attacks as a 'completely illegitimate' breach of international law. Washington Post
Ammon
2 hours ago
- Ammon
Gaza death toll surges to 55,998 with 131,559 injuries
Ammon News - Medical sources confirmed on Monday that the death toll in the Gaza Strip has risen to 55,998, the majority of whom are children and women, since the start of the Israeli aggression on October 7, 2023. The same sources added that the death toll has risen to 131,559 since the start of the aggression, while a number of victims remain under the rubble, unable to be reached by ambulances and civil defense crews. They indicated that 39 slain people, including one whose body was recovered, and 317 wounded were admitted to hospitals in the Gaza Strip during the past 24 hours. The death toll and the number of wounded since March 18, after the Israeli occupation violated the ceasefire agreement, has reached 5,685, while 19,518 others were wounded. The sources added that the number of aid victims taken to hospitals over the past 24 hours reached 17, with more than 136 injured. This brings the total number of the victims at hospitals to 467, and the number of injured to more than 3,602. They noted that a number of victims remain under the rubble and on the streets, and that ambulance and civil defense crews are unable to reach them. WAFA
Ammon
4 hours ago
- Ammon
The 'Washington Effect' could decide the AI race
Ammon News - BALTIMORE – Five months into his second presidency, Donald Trump is already ushering in a new era of imperial technological governance in which both domestic and foreign regulatory authorities are subordinated to a US administration increasingly dominated by Big Tech. Silicon Valley has cultivated its political influence through aggressive lobbying and strategic presidential appointments. Now, despite the tech industry's distaste for Trump's tariffs and policy priorities, its efforts are paying off, as Republican leaders work to stymie tech regulation not just in Congress – where legislative progress was always unlikely – but also at the state level and around the world. As part of Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill, lawmakers are considering a decade-long ban that would block US states from regulating AI. The proposed ban would severely undermine efforts to mandate transparency in AI systems, protect consumers from algorithmic price fixing, and curb worker surveillance. Although it's unlikely to survive the Senate's procedural rules, Republican Senator Ted Cruz has pledged to pursue a similar prohibition in future legislation. For the tech industry, federal preemption has long been a reliable strategy for avoiding troublesome state laws. It also dovetails with Republican efforts to centralize AI regulatory authority within the White House. This may explain why the debate over the proposed ban has largely focused not on states' rights, but on geopolitical anxieties. For example, at a congressional hearing on the proposal, lawmakers and expert witnesses turned what should have been a conversation about the role of statehouses in Sacramento and Denver into sprawling diatribes against overregulation in Brussels and authoritarianism in Beijing. If the United States ends up with a patchwork of state AI laws, the argument goes, American companies will struggle to innovate and compete with China. Throughout that hearing, industry speakers repeatedly cited flagship European Union regulations like the GDPR and AI Act, arguing that regulatory overreach has hindered Europe's ability to produce world-class tech companies. The message was clear: to defeat China, the US must not become another Brussels. But is Brussels still Brussels? Well before any discussion of AI preemption, the Trump administration had begun pressuring the EU into watering down tech laws like the Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act. In February, speaking before a room of EU and world leaders at an AI summit in Paris, Vice President J.D. Vance decried the 'onerous international rules' that apply to US businesses. At the same summit, French President Macron signaled his desire for the EU's tech laws to 'simplify' and 'resynchronize with the rest of the world.' There are signs this strategy is working. The EU's recent AI Continent Action Planreflects a softer approach to regulation, and enforcers are scaling back fines on US tech firms. Meanwhile, those same US companies are keeping up the pressure, lobbying the European Commission to keep AI rules 'as simple as possible.' Tech regulation also remains a point of contention in Trump's trade policy. In May, Trump threatened to impose 50% tariffs on EU imports as negotiations over digital taxes and tech regulation remained deadlocked. US politicians often portray the 'Brussels Effect' as a cautionary tale, based on the largely discredited notion that the EU, obsessed with setting de facto global standards, overplayed its hand and ultimately sabotaged its own tech sector. But now we are witnessing the emergence of a 'Washington Effect': a contraction of tech governance at all levels – local, state, and multinational – aimed at shoring up the supremacy of US firms, with regulatory power increasingly concentrated in the federal government's executive branch. In pursuit of global tech dominance, former President Joe Biden – a staunch advocate of the US-led liberal world order – worked with allies to coordinate 'AI safety networks' and reconfigure key lines of tech hardware production. By contrast, as historian Jake Werner observed, Trump 'conceptualizes the economy as a market where those with bargaining power squeeze profit out of those who lack it, rather than as a supply chain in which power accumulates at strategic nodes associated with scarce goods or technologies.' With its decision to abandon Biden's semiconductor export restrictions, the Trump administration has shown that it sees no need to weaponize access to high-end graphics processing units (GPUs) to bring other countries to the table; nor does it show much interest in multilateral coordination. Speaking about the recent EU tariff announcement, Trump was characteristically blunt: 'I'm not looking for a deal. We've set the deal.' That same logic is playing out in US domestic politics. Gone are Biden's 'legislative convenings' that brought together state lawmakers to address nationally significant issues. Instead, Republicans want to turn the White House into the central clearinghouse for all AI policy, even if that means banning state officials from introducing protections against abusive practices. These measures complement each other: while administration officials pressure foreign governments to ease up on US firms, Congress moves to block state-level oversight altogether. Washington, in short, is being positioned as the only place where decisions can be made. The irony is this: even in an age of regulatory retreat, federal authority will shape the future trajectory of US tech. 'Winning the AI race,' a vague and largely undefinable goal, will depend as much on US state power and political coercion as on private investment. However slim the prospects for multilateral collaboration may be, the Washington Effect is rapidly diminishing them. Much will depend on how China responds. Still, with the exception of those who stand to profit directly from the tech arms race, the outlook is bleak: as nationalist rhetoric intensifies, the interests of dominant tech firms increasingly outweigh the vision of an innovation system that serves the public good. The US likes to cast itself as the world's foremost champion of democracy and innovation. But its strategy for achieving AI primacy depends on imperial overreach and the unchecked expansion of executive power. The Trump administration isn't favoring red states over blue, or cooperating with European allies to beat China. Instead, it is seeking to strip power from state authorities and foreign partners alike, prioritizing predation over effective governance.
