Army Futures Command prepares for ‘significant transformation' as warfare sees an evolution
AUSTIN (KXAN) — The group in charge of modernizing the military will soon undergo one of the 'most significant transformation(s) the Army has seen in a generation.' Army Futures Command (AFC), based in downtown Austin, will soon merge with the Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) after an order by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.
The order, issued on April 30, aims to divest 'outdated, redundant and inefficient programs.'
A spokesperson with AFC told KXAN the Army Transformation Initiative will 'make the Army more lethal.'
'These changes will help the Army transform with urgency to meet the challenges in the priority theater, the Indo-Pacific and breakdown institutional barriers and inertia that undermine our transformation efforts,' the spokesperson said.
ARMY-TRANSFORMATION-AND-ACQUISITION-REFORMDownload
The spokesperson did not have details on what the merger will look like at the time.
'The army headquarters in downtown Austin is here because we wanted to be in a tech hub. We wanted to be with startups. We wanted to be with venture capitalists. We wanted to be with a center of academia,' said General Michael C. McCurry, chief of staff at AFC.
AFC, according to McCurry, is designed to anticipate the future of war and figure out what technology and tools are needed.
'I was a young major in the Middle East during the global war on terror, and, you know, I remember the first day I saw a great big unmanned system,' McCurry said.
Today, unmanned systems are commonplace. They can even be spotted on Austin's streets in the form of driverless cars.
'My number one goal is just to make sure it's never going to be a fair fight,' McCurry said. 'That our soldiers are armed with things that make it not a fair fight for the guy on the other side.'
Driverless vehicles, like drones, once served as scouts that snapped photos of the enemy. The future could see these tools become the vanguard.
'I grew up in the cavalry, and we always said, 'make contact with the smallest element.' Well, now it's make contact with an unmanned element first,' McCurry said.
Technology to protect soldiers a cornerstone of modern warfare, Army Futures Command says
The general thinks first about protecting soldiers, whom he calls the 'silver bullet' of the U.S. Armed Forces. He has two children and a son-in-law currently serving.
'Other countries around the world fight a group of things, we fight with a formation of capability. And we try to build that around our soldiers,' McCurry said.
McCurry said integrating soldiers and technology is the real future of war.
'Is it something that has to be done a long time where somebody won't be able to go to sleep? Is it something that's exceedingly dangerous, like breaching a minefield or penetrating an air defense line? Those things we want to do with machines.'
Announced in July 2018, Army Futures Command's Austin headquarters was established by President Donald Trump during his first term in office.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Decoy Stealth Bombers and Tomahawk Missiles: How the US Hit Iran
(Bloomberg) -- The heart of operation 'Midnight Hammer' was a feint. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports A group of American B-2 bombers — the only jets capable of deploying 30,000-pound bunker-buster munitions with a shot at breaching the mountains shrouding Iran's Fordow nuclear facility — flew west across the Pacific Ocean. When those planes were spotted on flight-tracker data, they were seen as being deployed as a way to strong-arm the Islamic Republic into negotiations. But in reality, they were decoys meant to maintain tactical surprise, according to US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. While those planes got all the attention, another group of stealth B-2s flew east — under the radar. Those moves were part of a 37-hour operation that resulted in strikes at the Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites this weekend, plunging the US directly into a conflict between Iran and Israel in the Middle East and raising fears over deeper violence to come in the region and beyond. The concerns are extending to markets as well, with traders predicting stocks will drop, oil prices will spike and the dollar will strengthen. In the end, the Saturday night operation, which the US said was necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear bomb, was deemed a success by the Pentagon. No US servicemembers were lost, and Iran didn't fire at any of the US military assets, according to the officials. Hegseth said members of Congress were only notified after the planes were out of danger, contradicting earlier reports that President Donald Trump had informed Republican congressional leadership beforehand. Also read: Iran Stands Alone Against Trump and Israel, Stripped of Allies Addressing the nation late Saturday, Trump said Iran's 'key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' But independent analysis has yet to verify that claim, and the strikes may have created a new challenge to work out what's left and where of the Islamic Republic's atomic facilities. The extensive US operation included 125 aircraft overall, strikes by Tomahawk missiles launched from a submarine, and the use of 14 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs — the first time such bunker busters were used in combat. There were few hints that the mission was set to be carried out this weekend. The White House had promised on Thursday that Trump would make a decision on a strike 'within two weeks,' suggesting there might be more time. But the president — who often spends weekends away from Washington — landed in the capital from New Jersey for a meeting in the White House's Situation Room on Saturday. He was joined there by key members of his administration, including Vice President JD Vance, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Hegseth. Rubio signaled on Sunday that Trump didn't give his final go-ahead for the bombing campaign until the very last minutes before it was carried out. 'There are multiple points along the way in which the President has decisions to make about 'go' or 'no-go,'' he said in a Fox News interview Sunday morning. 'And it really comes right up to 10 minutes before the bombs are actually dropped.' The flights in the mission amounted to the second-longest in the B-2's operational history, according to Hegseth and Air Force General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The longest was a 40-hour round trip in October 2001 in the initial phase of the Afghanistan war. US officials said 75 precision-guided weapons were used. The battle damage would take time to assess but 'all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction,' according to Caine. 'It would not be a surprise to me if, after an assessment period, we went back in and re-struck some of these targets to make sure that we achieved the effect,' said Joseph Votel, a former commander of the US Central Command and now a fellow at the Middle East Institute. 'That actually is a normal part of our military targeting process, is to strike, assess, and then if necessary, strike again to achieve the results that we're looking for.' Prior to the B-2 strikes on Fordow, a submarine with the Carl Vinson Carrier Strike Group in the Arabian Sea fired 24 Tomahawk cruise missiles, according to Caine and a graphic released by the Pentagon. Hegseth said earlier on Sunday that 'our boys in those bombers are on their way home right now.' A US official said a woman was among those who piloted the B-2s. The Defense Secretary also said the mission was focused on destroying Iran's nuclear program and not regime change in Tehran. 'The mission was not, has not, been about regime change,' he said. 'This is a plan that took months and weeks of positioning and preparation, so that we could be ready when the president of the United States called,' Hegseth said. 'It took a great deal of precision. It involved misdirection and the highest of operational security.' But Rubio made clear that Iran needs to abandon its nuclear weapons ambitions. 'At the end of the day, if Iran is committed to becoming a nuclear weapons power, I do think it puts the regime at risk,' Rubio said Sunday on Fox News. 'I really do. I think it would be the end of the regime if they tried to do that.' While the damage assessments are still coming in, Vice President Vance said he's confident the US strikes on Iranian sites 'have substantially delayed their development of a nuclear weapon — and that was the goal of this attack.' Iran's nuclear program has been pushed back 'by a very long time,' he said in an interview with NBC's Meet the Press. 'I think that it's going to be many, many years before the Iranians are able to develop a nuclear weapon.' --With assistance from Eric Martin, María Paula Mijares Torres, Natalia Drozdiak, Akayla Gardner, Ramsey Al-Rikabi and Pierre Paulden. (Recasts and adds details throughout.) Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Forbes
19 hours ago
- Forbes
Can Iran Close Strait Of Hormuz After U.S. Attack On Its Nuclear Sites
The Strait of Hormuz waterway between the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman. It is a very strategically ... More important shipping choke point with Iran to the north and UAE and Oman exclave Musandam to the south. It is the only sea passage from the Persian Gulf to the open ocean. Early on Sunday, the U.S. entered the cauldron of the Israel-Iran conflict with a bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities in support of Israel. The move has again prompted calls within Iran for a retaliation involving a shut down of the Strait of Hormuz, a key maritime artery for oil and gas shipments from the Persian Gulf out to the Gulf of Oman and beyond (see map). Overall, the U.S. dropped 14 'bunker buster' bombs against three nuclear facilities in Iran, namely Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan, according to defense secretary Pete Hegseth. Iran has vowed retaliation, with its parliament approving a closing of the Strait of Hormuz, although the ultimate decision rests with the country's military. Oil prices, already up 20% since last month, are expected to trade higher over the coming days if the conflict escalates and there is disruption in the Strait of Hormuz. Cargo volumes lend relevance to constant market chatter about a retaliatory blockade of the Strait by Iran. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, Iran and to an extent United Arab Emirates' crude roughly equating to 30% of the world's traded oil, as well as oil products, liquefied natural gas cargoes (equal to 20% of the global LNG trade primarily from Qatar) and one-third of the world's liquified petroleum gas shipments, pass through the Strait daily, according to Lloyds List. That's around 30 to 33 million barrels of oil equivalent per day. The figure includes 21 million barrels per day of crude oil and products or a fifth of the world's supply. So, will the Iranians attempt to shut the Strait and can they? The answer is that while they certainly can for a short period, they probably won't. Why It May Not Happen And Won't Last Even If It Does For starters, doing so would invite a near immediate naval and air response from the U.S. with President Donald Trump unlikely to sit back and let it happen. It would leave Iran's own coastline and all its ports vulnerable to a vastly superior American air and naval strike arsenal. Nearby Bahrain is home to the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet. Furthermore, the manoeuvre may not even get off the ground as at least four of the fleet's combined task forces routinely patrol the Persian Gulf and the Strait and their surveillance may take away the element of surprise. Secondly, the move itself would be self defeating for Iran as it would impact the country's own crude oil exports. According to industry data aggregator and research firm Kpler, Iran exports on average 1.65 million bpd of crude oil and gas condensate. Bulk (or 90%) of Iran's sanction-ridden discounted energy exports go to China. Furthermore, more than half of all energy exports passing through the Strait - whether Iranian or not - also head to China, the world's largest importer of hydrocarbons. A potential naval shutdown would be very difficult to maintain under pressure from Beijing, the world's main taker of Iranian crude. A U.S. navy aircraft carrier (left), assigned to the country's 5th Fleet, transits the Strait of ... More Hormuz on November 19, 2019. (File photo: Zachary Pearson / U.S. Navy via Getty Images) Thirdly, such an event, however temporary, has partially lost its potency given that not all regional crude exports would be knocked offline. Key exporters Saudi Arabia and the UAE have pipeline fall backs to pivot to. In the case of the Saudis, 5.1 million bpd can potentially be moved via the East-West pipeline and loaded up from the Red Sea. Although, that is currently susceptible to attacks by Iran-backed Houthi rebel forces in Yemen. The UAE is much better placed. Its Abu Dhabi to Fujairah pipeline – that went onstream in 2012 - has a capacity of 1.5 million bpd. Its end point - the port of Fujairah - is the only one of the seven emirates that make up the UAE with a coastline that's solely on the Gulf of Oman and not on the Persian Gulf that the Iranians are so fond of threatening to cut off. The port, which bypasses the Strait, has the capability to dispatch close to 75% of the UAE's total crude output if needed. However, minor skirmishes and general nuisance in the Strait by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps or Pasdaran cannot be ruled out, including, but not limited to attacks on energy cargoes that aren't for instance destined for Iran's primary client - China. There is also the potential random hijacking of energy cargoes in the Strait, which has precedent. But overall, a full blockade would be hard to set in motion and ever harder to maintain for long. All things considered, Iran has been threatening to shut the Strait of Hormuz for years but has never actually ever attempted to do it or done it. While the region now finds itself in uncharted waters and there's always a first, that fact in itself is quite telling.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Palantir, Meta, OpenAI, And Thinking Machines Just Had Their Executives Sworn Into The US Army Reserve
Four top tech executives have joined the U.S. Army Reserve as lieutenant colonels, skipping basic training and stepping directly into roles aimed at helping modernize the military. The initiative is part of a broader push by the Army to bring in private-sector innovation and reshape how the service approaches technology, talent, and modernization. The executives—Palantir (NYSE:PLTR) Chief Technology Officer Shyam Sankar, Meta (NASDAQ:META) CTO Andrew Bosworth, OpenAI Chief Product Officer Kevin Weil, and advisor at Thinking Machines Lab and former OpenAI Chief Research Officer Bob McGrew — will serve in a new unit called Detachment 201, also known as the Army's Executive Innovation Corps. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can 'Detachment 201 is being created to bring in tech innovation executives to help the Army ... on broader conceptual things like talent management, how do we bring in tech-focused people into the ranks of the military, and then, how do we train them,' Army Chief of Staff spokesperson Col. Dave Butler, told Breaking Defense on June 13. Unlike traditional recruits, these executives will not attend boot camp. Instead, they will go through an express training program that covers marksmanship, physical fitness, Army history, and protocols. They will be expected to serve about 120 hours per year and pass annual fitness tests. 'You could think of it as a pilot' of a lighter version of basic training, Butler told Business Insider. The detachment's name, 201, references the HTTP status code indicating a newly created resource—a fitting metaphor for a new kind of Army asset. Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . According to an Army statement, the new officers will work on 'targeted projects to help guide rapid and scalable tech solutions to complex problems.' Their advisory roles will include input on AI-powered military systems and optimization tools for soldier fitness. However, safeguards will be in place to avoid conflicts of interest with their current or former employers. 'We've done this over and over when our nation needed top talent,' Butler told Breaking Defense. 'The difference is we used to do it in wartime. Now we're doing it ahead of wartime so that we can prepare and deter.' This marks another move by the Trump administration to align more closely with Silicon Valley. Palantir, Anduril, and other VC-backed defense tech startups have increasingly become major players in national security. Meta recently partnered with Anduril to develop augmented reality tools and AI systems for military direct commissioning has been used to bring in specialized talent, such as doctors or chaplains, during times of war. This move represents a peacetime shift aimed at long-term transformation. 'Their swearing-in is just the start of a bigger mission to inspire more tech pros to serve without leaving their careers,' the Army statement said. 'Showing the next generation how to make a difference in uniform.' Read Next: How do billionaires pay less in income tax than you?.UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES (PLTR): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Palantir, Meta, OpenAI, And Thinking Machines Just Had Their Executives Sworn Into The US Army Reserve originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
