Procedural reforms, technology upgrade under way to strengthen election exercise, says EC official

The Election Commission of India (EC) is in the process of implementing several technology-level changes and on-the-ground procedural reforms aimed at strengthening election integrity, boosting elector participation and improving voter convenience, said its Deputy Director P. Pawan on Wednesday, June 11, 2025.
While several improvements were targeted at electors, who were the building blocks of democracy, the EC has also initiated pan-India all-party meetings at the CEO/DEO/ERO level and interactions with the heads of national and State political parties, the deputy director at EC's media division said at an interaction with select media persons.
'This approach of proactively engaging with political parties is a paradigm shift,' Mr. Pawan said.
On the technology front, an upgraded digitisation effort to build an ECINET platform is under way to facilitate rapid dissemination of VTR (voter turnout) figures, other electoral data and statistical reports. It will feature an integrated dashboard that can replace at least 40 different apps/websites and provide all election-related information at a single point. The platform is being beta tested and is likely to be launched before the Bihar elections, expected later this year, Mr. Pawan said.
A new mechanism for unique Electoral Photo Identity Cards (EPIC) is also being put in place. This will largely eliminate duplication of EPIC numbers arising from increase in the proportion of voters that led to situations of different voters sharing identical alpha-numeric sequence. 'However, the instances of EPIC number duplication have been found to be minuscule,' Mr. Pawan said.
Meanwhile, the EC is also exploring modalities of EPIC-Aadhaar linkage to avoid duplication or abuse. Technical consultations are in progress in this regard.
According to Mr. Pawan, another measure was to break a nearly two-decade hiatus in conducting a special summary revision ahead of byelections scheduled in four places this month. 'While usually, these exercises are conducted annually, the law provides for undertaking a revision ahead of a byelection,' he said.
The other changes, among the set of 23 new initiatives launched since Gyanesh Kumar took charge as Chief Election Commissioner earlier this year, were to introduce mobile phone deposit boxes at polling stations and reduce the number of electors per polling booth from 1,500 to 1,200 per booth to ease crowding, the EC official said.
'The phone deposit facility follows an assessment that barring the device was a likely factor dissuading people turning out to vote,' the official added.
Another measure is to directly obtain particulars of death registration from the data base of the Registrar General to verify and update the electoral roll eliminating the need for the bereaved kin to submit Form 7 and to accentuate critical information in voter slips. The establishment of additional polling booths are envisaged in high-rises and residential colonies.
Structured capacity building workshops under the auspices of the India International Institute of Democracy and Election Management (IIIDEM) in Delhi have been initiated for booth-level agents of political parties with a priority on the States that would enter the election cycle next.
Booth-level officers are being assigned a standard photo id card while engaging in door-to-door visits. Also, a legal defence team is being constituted to disseminate outcomes of various writ challenges relating to the electoral processes via media platforms, he said.
P. Jawahar, Chief Electoral Officer, M. Adarsh, Deputy CEO and other Elections Department officials participated.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

India Today

an hour ago

• India Today

Cameras, courts and confidentiality: Inside Election Commission's 45-day rule

While one is hearing whispers from many quarters that videos from the polling stations should be made available, sources with the Election Commission have told India today that this is VOTER SECRECY COMES FIRST - ECIThe Election Commission of India (ECI) has taken a firm stance:It will not yield to political privacy and security are will not be released publicly except under court secrecy is a constitutional guarantee, protected under Section 128 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Any violation of this confidentiality is a punishable offence, inviting imprisonment, fines, or FOOTAGE: WHY IT'S STORED AND WHY IT CAN'T BE SHARED Despite mounting pressure from political parties and advocacy groups, polling station footage will not be made public, sources within the Election Commission told India video recordings related to polling are preserved for 45 days after election results are declared in line with the statutory window for filing an Election Petition (EP) under Indian such a petition is filed, the footage is retained until the legal proceedings conclude and may be submitted in court if EXACTLY GETS RECORDED?The Election Commission deploys video surveillance and webcasting extensively to uphold transparency and accountability throughout the election process. Recordings cover:EVM checking and storageMovement and transport of voting machinesActivities inside and outside polling stations on voting dayThe counting processCampaign events and public ralliesadvertisementThis system allows the EC to track expenditures, ensure compliance with the Model Code of Conduct, and address any electoral violations PUBLIC SHARING OF THIS FOOTAGE IS PROBLEMATICDespite its critical role in election monitoring, this footage is not intended for public release. Calls to make it public, although framed as transparency demands, are both misleading and dangerous, the EC cautions. Key Risks Include:Threat to Voter PrivacyPolling footage can unintentionally disclose:Identities of voters entering of individual about voter turnout or access to such data can lead to:Voter profilingTargeted harassment or intimidationRetaliation in areas with low or 'undesirable' turnoutSources in the EC stress that such risks strike at the heart of free and fair LEGAL SHIELD: SECRECY AND THE COURTSSupreme Court Precedent: Right Not to Vote = Right to PrivacyIn the landmark case People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (2013), the Supreme Court ruled that:Citizens have the right not to right is covered under the right to the act of abstaining from voting must be kept non-voters could expose them to coercion, pressure, or social discrimination, all of which are = A 'LIVE' FORM 17AadvertisementElection footage effectively mirrors Form 17A, a sensitive record maintained at polling stations that logs:Voter arrival roll from polling stations captures similar details, making it equivalent to a 'live' version of Form Rule 93(1) of the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961, Form 17A is protected from public access and can only be examined under court supervision. Since video footage captures similar data, its public release without legal sanction is equally OF MISUSE: A REAL POSSIBILITYMaking this footage publicly accessible can have severe consequences:Political actors may identify and target voters who didn't support may face harassment, inducement, or social can be edited or misused, fuelling conspiracy theories and prevent such scenarios, the EC discourages footage retention beyond 45 days unless a legal challenge necessitates MEANT FOR INTERNAL OVERSIGHT, NOT PUBLIC DISTRIBUTIONWebcasting serves as a real-time monitoring mechanism for the EC, helping prevent malpractice and streamline election its purpose is strictly a court requires this footage during an election petition, the EC will provide it with full assurance that judicial processes also safeguard voter Watch

India Gazette

2 hours ago

• India Gazette

Sharing video footage of polling stations during voting day breaches voters' privacy, may lead to discrimination: ECI sources

New Delhi [India], June 21 (ANI): Amid a demand for making available video or CCTV footage of the webcasting of the polling stations during the poll day, EC sources said on Saturday that it is 'entirely contrary to the privacy and security concerns of the voters' and sharing of the footage would leave both, the elector, who has voted, as well the elector, who has not voted, vulnerable to 'pressure, discrimination and intimidation by anti-social elements'. EC sources also justified the decision in which Election Commission has asked its state poll officers to destroy CCTV camera, webcasting and video footage of the election process if the election result is not challenged in a court in 45 days. EC sources said some people are raising the demand for making available the video or CCTV footage of the webcasting of the polling stations during the poll day. 'While this suits their narrative in making the demand sound quite genuine and in the interest of voters and safeguarding the democratic process in the country, it is, in fact aimed at achieving exactly the opposite objective. What is veiled as a very logical demand, is actually entirely contrary to the privacy and security concerns of the voters, legal position laid down in the Representation of the People Act, 1950/1951 and the directions of the Supreme Court of India,' a source said. 'Sharing of the footage, which would enable easy identification of the electors by any group or an individual, would leave both, the elector who has voted as well the elector who has not voted vulnerable to pressure, discrimination and intimidation by anti-social elements. For instance, if a particular political party gets lesser number of votes in a particular booth, it would easily be able to identify, through the CCTV footage, which elector has voted and which elector has not, and thereafter, may harass or intimidate the electors. Thus, what exactly lies beneath this layered demand of such persons or interest groups needs to be deciphered and exposed, the source added. EC sources said that the Election Commission retains the CCTV footage, which is purely an internal management tool and not a mandatory requirement, for a period of 45 days which aligns with the period laid down for filing an Election Petition (EP). Since no election can be challenged beyond 45 days of the declaration of the result, retaining of this footage, beyond this period, makes it susceptible to misuse of the content by non-contestants for spreading misinformation and malicious narratives, EC sources said. They said in case of an election petition being filed within 45 days, the CCTV footage is not destroyed and also made available to the competent court when asked for. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Saturday said that 'fixed election' is poison for democracy and slammed the EC over its recent decisions, saying 'the one who has to answer, they are destroying evidence'. The Leader of Opposition raised concerns about the integrity of the electoral process, citing the destruction of evidence as a potential indicator of election rigging. 'Voter list? Will not provide machine-readable format. CCTV footage? It was hidden by changing the law. Photo-video of the election? Now, not in 1 year, we will destroy it in 45 days only. The one from whom the answer was needed - is destroying the evidence. It is clear - the match is fixed. And a fixed election is poison for democracy,' Rahul Gandhi said in a post on X. EC sources said that for the Election Commission, safeguarding the interests of its electors and maintaining their privacy and secrecy is of prime concern, even 'if some of the political parties/ interest groups mount pressure on the Commission to abandon the laid down procedures or to ignore the security concerns of the electors'. 'Maintaining privacy and secrecy of the elector is non-negotiable and the ECI has, never in the past, compromised on this essential tenet laid which is down in the law as well upheld by the Supreme Court,' the source said. 'Sharing of video footage may result in violation of the right of secrecy of electors who have decided not to vote: In any election, there may be electors who decide not to vote. Sharing of video footage of the poll day may result in identification of such electors. This can also lead to profiling of the voters who voted as well as those who did not vote, which may become the basis for discrimination, denial of services, intimidation or inducement,' the source added. Sources said that the apex court has held that that right to vote includes right not to vote and right of secrecy is accorded to even those persons who have decided not to vote. The sources said that providing videography is akin to providing Form 17A. Videography of polling day essentially captures the sequence in which electors enter the polling stations and the photo/identity of such electors. This is akin to a live Form 17A (Register of Voters) under Rule 49L of CE Rules, 1961 which contains information pertaining to sequence in which electors enter a polling station, serial number of the elector in the electoral roll, details of the Identification document produced by the electors and their thumb impression/signature, the sources said. 'Both videography and Form 17A contain information which is critical for upholding the secrecy of voting. It can also establish who has voted and who has not voted as can be ascertained from Form 17A. Form 17A is mandated to be provided only under order of competent court under Rule 93(1) of CE Rules, 1961. Therefore, video footage can also be provided only under the orders of a competent court as whatever is not intended under law cannot be allowed to be achieved by obtaining the video footage,' a source said. The sources said that violation of secrecy of voting is a punishable offence under Section 128 of RP Act, 1951. They said ECI is legally bound and committed to protect the privacy of the electors and secrecy of voting, so video footage from polling station cannot be given to any person, candidate or NGO or any 3rd party without the express consent of the electors. They said webcasting is used basically as an internal management tool by ECI for monitoring poll day activities. (ANI)

Time of India

2 hours ago

• Time of India

School turns pink to teach democracy during student polls

Mangaluru: In a display of creativity and learning, government high school, Machina, in Belthangady taluk, recently transformed into a pink-themed polling centre to conduct its student parliament elections. The unique initiative aims to instil democratic values among students, while promoting gender sensitivity. Inspired by the Election Commission of India's Pink Booth concept, where polling stations are entirely managed by women to encourage female voter participation, the school adopted the model for its campus elections. The idea was brought to life by Venkappa B, the school's social science teacher, with support from staff and students. With 172 students from classes 9 and 10, including 96 girls and 76 boys, the entire election process mirrored that of a real-life democratic setup. The campus was decked in pink, from table covers and chairs to the attire of teachers acting as polling officers, bringing to light the school's commitment to creating a child-friendly and gender-aware environment. The election process followed a strict timeline, beginning with a notification on June 9, nomination filing on June 11, scrutiny on June 12, withdrawal on June 13, campaigning on June 17, and polling on June 18. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ask A Pro: "I'm 70 with $1.4M in IRAs. Should I convert $120K/Year to a Roth?" SmartAsset Undo Voting was conducted through an EVM app on tablets, and students were required to present their Aadhaar cards, offering a real-world voting experience. For school chief minister's post, four candidates contested, and students even had the NOTA option. Of the 172 students, 164 cast their votes, recording an 95% voter turnout. Yajnesh of class 10 won with 54 votes and was sworn in as chief minister. Aseera Banu secured 41 votes to become the opposition leader. Prathvik and Ashwija polled 39 and 27 votes respectively, with three NOTA votes also registered. Other cabinet positions were filled, and an oath-taking ceremony was held.