Why new liquor vendors in Noida are opting for container-based setups

Liquor vendors in Noida are increasingly choosing container-based outlets to navigate zoning bottlenecks, steep rents, and real estate constraints, after a policy shift in Uttar Pradesh formally permitted prefabricated setups.
According to a report in The Times of India, the first such outlet in Noida was opened in Delta 1 sector this April. Housed in a 40x12-foot prefabricated container, the store marks a departure from traditional liquor vends and aligns with Clause 5.16 (17) of the UP Excise Shops Number and Location (Amended) Rules, 1968, which were updated earlier this year.
The revised rules allow vendors to set up shops in prefabricated structures on both government and private land—provided local zoning and distance norms are met. The framework draws on models already implemented in Haryana and Punjab, and is aimed at plugging tax leakages while offering logistical flexibility to licensees.
'Legalisation of informal practices already in place'
District excise officer Subodh Kumar said the policy was shaped by the informal use of temporary structures by vendors in recent years. 'This brings such setups under legal oversight and helps ensure proper tax collection. Haryana had already implemented this, and UP is now doing the same,' The Times of India quoted him as saying.
In Gautam Budh Nagar district, 16 of the 501 new liquor licences issued this year have reportedly opted for container setups—12 in Noida and four in Greater Noida.
Land shortages, zoning hurdles drive shift
Though the policy has opened up a legal route for container-based shops, its implementation has not been smooth. Licensees say it is difficult to find commercial land that meets excise norms, especially the requirement of staying 50 metres away from residential areas.
'There's not enough compliant commercial land in Noida,' said a vendor who previously operated in Lucknow. 'I offered to pay rent to Noida Authority, but there was no response. Eventually, I rented a farmhouse for ₹75,000 a month just to get started.'
District urges land allocation for compliant setups
The district magistrate has reportedly written to the Noida and Greater Noida Authorities requesting land parcels suitable for container shops. However, excise officials said that no formal response has been received yet, though informal talks are underway.
Greater Noida Authority additional CEO Prerna Singh confirmed that the matter may be taken up in the next board meeting. 'These shops could be a controlled, high-revenue model. We are considering incorporating container-based formats into our bylaws,' she said.
Public resistance and enforcement action
Despite the regulatory backing, some container shops have met local resistance. Earlier this week, the Noida Authority dismantled one such outlet in Sector 129 after complaints from nearby residents.
Vendors argue that the container model provides a way to comply with government norms while overcoming urban constraints. 'We're not looking to break rules—we want to do business legally. But the system needs to support that,' said a licensee.
Excise officials maintain that regulated outlets are vital to state finances. 'For every ₹1 lakh in liquor sales, ₹70,000 is state revenue,' a department official said, reported The Times of India.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

4 hours ago

• Business Standard

Why new liquor vendors in Noida are opting for container-based setups

Liquor vendors in Noida are increasingly choosing container-based outlets to navigate zoning bottlenecks, steep rents, and real estate constraints, after a policy shift in Uttar Pradesh formally permitted prefabricated setups. According to a report in The Times of India, the first such outlet in Noida was opened in Delta 1 sector this April. Housed in a 40x12-foot prefabricated container, the store marks a departure from traditional liquor vends and aligns with Clause 5.16 (17) of the UP Excise Shops Number and Location (Amended) Rules, 1968, which were updated earlier this year. The revised rules allow vendors to set up shops in prefabricated structures on both government and private land—provided local zoning and distance norms are met. The framework draws on models already implemented in Haryana and Punjab, and is aimed at plugging tax leakages while offering logistical flexibility to licensees. 'Legalisation of informal practices already in place' District excise officer Subodh Kumar said the policy was shaped by the informal use of temporary structures by vendors in recent years. 'This brings such setups under legal oversight and helps ensure proper tax collection. Haryana had already implemented this, and UP is now doing the same,' The Times of India quoted him as saying. In Gautam Budh Nagar district, 16 of the 501 new liquor licences issued this year have reportedly opted for container setups—12 in Noida and four in Greater Noida. Land shortages, zoning hurdles drive shift Though the policy has opened up a legal route for container-based shops, its implementation has not been smooth. Licensees say it is difficult to find commercial land that meets excise norms, especially the requirement of staying 50 metres away from residential areas. 'There's not enough compliant commercial land in Noida,' said a vendor who previously operated in Lucknow. 'I offered to pay rent to Noida Authority, but there was no response. Eventually, I rented a farmhouse for ₹75,000 a month just to get started.' District urges land allocation for compliant setups The district magistrate has reportedly written to the Noida and Greater Noida Authorities requesting land parcels suitable for container shops. However, excise officials said that no formal response has been received yet, though informal talks are underway. Greater Noida Authority additional CEO Prerna Singh confirmed that the matter may be taken up in the next board meeting. 'These shops could be a controlled, high-revenue model. We are considering incorporating container-based formats into our bylaws,' she said. Public resistance and enforcement action Despite the regulatory backing, some container shops have met local resistance. Earlier this week, the Noida Authority dismantled one such outlet in Sector 129 after complaints from nearby residents. Vendors argue that the container model provides a way to comply with government norms while overcoming urban constraints. 'We're not looking to break rules—we want to do business legally. But the system needs to support that,' said a licensee. Excise officials maintain that regulated outlets are vital to state finances. 'For every ₹1 lakh in liquor sales, ₹70,000 is state revenue,' a department official said, reported The Times of India.

Time of India

9 hours ago

• Time of India

Noida: Liquor sales go modular as prefab shops roll out under new UP excise policy

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Noida's Delta 1 became home to the city's first liquor store operating from a 40-by-12 feet prefabricated container in April, following changes to Uttar Pradesh's excise policy earlier this year. The state, taking cues from Haryana and Punjab, amended the rules to simplify business operations and plug revenue new excise policy, introduced on February 13, allows license holders to set up shops inside prefabricated containers on both private and government land—provided they comply with the UP Excise Shops Number and Location (Amended) Rules, 1968. Clause 5.16 (17) of the updated policy permits such outlets specifically in urban and industrial authority areas like Noida, Greater Noida, YEIDA, and Mandi Samiti zones, with rent determined by local excise officer Subodh Kumar said the move is aimed at regulating previously informal setups and ensuring proper tax revenue. 'Haryana has already implemented this model. We saw vendors in UP starting to do the same informally, which led to revenue loss. Legalising it helps the government ensure proper tax collection,' he Gautam Budh Nagar district, 16 out of 501 new liquor licences issued this year have opted for container shops—12 in Noida and four in Greater implementing the policy on the ground hasn't been easy. Zoning constraints, lack of landlord support, and steep rental demands are hampering progress. 'There's a shortage of commercial units in Noida, and landlords are often unwilling to rent to liquor vendors. Some demand exorbitant prices, others outright refuse,' Kumar address these challenges, the district magistrate wrote to the Noida and Greater Noida authorities in May, urging them to identify appropriate plots for container-based liquor outlets. As of now, no formal response has been received, though informal consultations are underway, officials Ghaziabad has already set up two prefabricated liquor shops, located in Sahibabad and Rajnagar Extension.

Indian Express

10 hours ago

• Indian Express

Punjab & Haryana HC terms shifting of RERA HQ to Dharamshala ‘mala fide', slaps Rs 5L fine on govt

Reacting sharply to the state government for shifting the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)'s headquarters from Shimla to Dharamshala, a division bench of Himachal Pradesh High Court Chief Justice GS Sandhawalia and Justice Ranjan Sharma on Friday termed the move 'mala fide' and slapped a penalty of Rs 5 lakh for failing to appoint the authority's chairman and members despite the necessary process being completed two months ago. The bench also directed, the detailed order released on Saturday, that Chief Secretary Prabodh Saxena should 'come present on June 25 if the necessary notifications about the appointments of RERA chairman and members were not issued'. The court directions came during the resumed hearing on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by one Atul Sharma, challenging the extension of Saxena's tenure 'on multiple grounds and the delay in appointing the RERA chairman as well as members'. The order reads, 'It is also to be noticed that in the interim period, after the recommendation sent, the office of RERA has been relocated to Dharamshala on June 13 without even identifying the alternative office place. We are also of the prima facie opinion that the whole purpose of dragging the appointments and shifting the HQ of RERA is with a mala fide purpose, and at this stage, we do not wish to say anything more.' The order further states, 'Necessary notifications shall also be issued regarding the appointments by the said date (June 25), failing which the Chief Secretary shall come present on the said date.' The division bench also reprimanded the state government for dragging its feet in notifying the appointments of the chairperson and members of the HP RERA. The court, while hearing the matter on Friday, observed that the authorities failed to act despite prior directions and imposed a cost of Rs 5,00,000 on the state government for its inaction. The order states, 'The matter was first listed on May 9 when it was brought to the court's attention that respondent No. 3 (Chief Secretary) had applied for the post of Chairperson of HP RERA. During the same hearing, the bench noted that the Registrar General of the High Court had forwarded the recommendations for appointments to the state government on March 13. Despite this, no official notification regarding the appointments had been issued. The court had also taken judicial notice of the numerous representations it received, expressing concern over the prolonged delay in filling these key regulatory positions.' Among the representations placed on record was a letter dated April 16, 2025, from one Sunil Kumar, highlighting the state's inaction. The matter was then adjourned to May 15, with the court directing the Secretary to file an affidavit in light of Rule 18(5) of the Himachal Pradesh Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017, which mandates the selection process be completed in a time-bound manner. On May 26, the court recorded that the affidavit dated May 15, 2025, filed by the Secretary, admitted the state government's obligation to appoint the chairperson and members. However, it was stated that the RERA office had been relocated to Dharamshala, District Kangra, in accordance with a broader policy decision. During the last hearing on June 20, the state government informed the court through a status report that only one member— Vidur Mehta — had been appointed via notification dated June 19, 2025. An affidavit filed on the same date stated that the appointment process for the remaining members and the chairperson was still under consideration. Taking a dim view of the situation, the court observed, 'The above sequence of events shows that the State Government is deliberately delaying the notification of appointments, despite recommendations being made over three months ago.' Consequently, the court imposed a penalty of Rs 5 lakh on the state government, directing that it be deposited in the Registry by June 25, 2025. The bench also ordered that the necessary appointment notifications be issued by the same date. In the event of non-compliance, the Chief Secretary has been directed to appear in person before the court. Senior advocate Peeyush Sharma, representing the petitioner, had told The Indian Express, 'The division bench has firmly instructed the state government to file its replies by June 25. Although the government informed the bench that a HPRERA member was appointed yesterday (Thursday), the bench questioned why the statutory body's chairperson had not been appointed yet, despite the selection committee, headed by the Chief Justice, High Court, already clearing the name.'