New London-Stirling train service expected to begin in mid-2026
New rail services between London and central Scotland are expected to launch in mid-2026 after an agreement was reached for the use of five trains.
Transport giant FirstGroup said it has secured a deal with rolling stock company Eversholt Rail in relation to its planned new route between London Euston and the city of Stirling.
Services will also call at Milton Keynes Central, Nuneaton, Crewe, Preston, Carlisle, Lockerbie, Motherwell, Whifflet, Greenfaulds and Larbert.
There will be four return services a day (three on Sundays) on the full route, with an additional daily return service between Euston and Preston.
This will provide more competition for several operators such as LNER and Avanti West Coast.
FirstGroup holds track access rights from regulator the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) for the route on the West Coast Main Line until 2030.
Trains will be operated under FirstGroup's Lumo brand, which currently runs only on the East Coast Main Line between London King's Cross and Edinburgh.
The new West Coast services were initially planned to start this year, but FirstGroup said they are 'currently expected to commence mid-2026 following the delivery of the trains and staff training'.
The company said the agreement with Eversholt Rail is for five Class 222 diesel trains, each with a capacity for about 340 standard-class seats.
It expects the services will achieve annual sales of about £50 million and a 'low double-digit' operating profit margin.
The Government started the process of renationalising all remaining franchised train services last month when it brought South Western Railway into public ownership.
Lumo runs on a separate open access basis, meaning it sets its own fares, takes on all revenue risk and receives no taxpayer-funded subsidies.
In January, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander wrote to ORR chairman Declan Collier expressing concerns that the open access model can cause 'potential congestion' and result in taxpayers being 'left to fill shortfalls' in maintenance costs.
She stated it is her 'expectation' that 'the impacts on the taxpayer and on overall performance' are 'given primacy' by the regulator when it analyses proposals.
FirstGroup chief executive Graham Sutherland said: 'The mobilisation of our new service between London and Stirling is another important step towards rolling out Lumo as a nationwide operator and growing our open access capacity, a key priority for the group.
'Our investment and capabilities in open access rail have delivered reliable, value-for-money services, grown rail demand and helped to spur economic growth and connect communities.
'We look forward to doing the same on our new services.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
EU rules that push up car insurance to be scrapped in Brexit bonus
EU rules that force law-abiding British motorists to stump up for compensation claims made by uninsured drivers will be scrapped by ministers. Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, will use Brexit powers to rip up the Brussels regulations and return to a 'common-sense' approach. The UK was forced to apply the law by Eurocrats, despite ministers branding it 'morally questionable' and warning it rewarded criminal behaviour. Car insurance firms pay into a pot, known as the fund of last resort, which pays out to drivers who have been hit by an uninsured or unidentified driver. The cash pot means that, where costs cannot be reclaimed from the driver at fault, victims of crashes are still compensated for damage to their vehicle. Originally, the fund was not open to claims from uninsured drivers, but in 2017, ministers were warned that their exclusion was illegal under EU rules. As a result, the Government said it 'had no choice' but to change the law or run the risk of facing limitless daily fines from the EU Commission. Since then, uninsured drivers who are either hit by another uninsured motorist or involved in a hit-and-run have been eligible for compensation. The money for the fund of last resort is raised by a levy on insurance firms, which pass the cost onto their customers in higher premiums. A Government source told The Telegraph: 'We are reintroducing the exclusion of property damage compensation for uninsured drivers. 'Uninsured drivers should not be able to benefit in the same way as those driving lawfully. 'The Transport Secretary will restore this common-sense agreement because this Labour government is tackling criminal behaviour and backing all road users to the hilt.' Plans to repeal the EU law were drawn up by the last Tory government, which launched a consultation just before Rishi Sunak called the general election. At the time, Guy Opperman, the then roads minister, said the EU rule was 'morally questionable at best, and a cost carried by all legal motorists'. 'When we were members of the European Union, we were obliged to allow this. Now we have left, we can determine our own course of action,' he said. It has now been picked up by Labour, which will introduce the change. The feedback showed there was 'overwhelming support' for changing the rules to demonstrate that 'uninsured driving is unacceptable'. 'The vast majority of law-abiding motorists pay for claims from uninsured drivers for property damage through their motor insurance premiums,' the Government said. 'Removing this right for uninsured drivers demonstrates that the government is focused on tackling criminal behaviour and sensitive to regulations that impact negatively on the general public. 'It will send a message that uninsured drivers should not benefit from being compensated by the fund of last resort for property damage.' The Motor Insurers' Bureau, which oversees the fund of last resort, said it had been 'working closely' with ministers to reintroduce the exclusion. 'This will ensure uninsured drivers aren't able to claim compensation for property damage following collisions involving other uninsured or hit-and-run drivers,' it said. 'Uninsured drivers are not just breaking the law, but they make roads more dangerous and increase the cost of motor insurance for the honest majority.' The change can be introduced quickly because it does not require new legislation. Instead, the requirement to compensate uninsured drivers can be removed by amending agreements between Ms Alexander and the MIB.
Times
15 hours ago
- Times
HS2 boss took home £4.5m during ‘appalling mess' of project
The former chief of HS2 took home £4.5 million of taxpayers' money while presiding over an 'appalling mess' of a project that wasted billions. Mark Thurston was at the helm of the disgraced scheme for six and a half years before leaving in September 2023 and then becoming chief executive of Anglian Water. He has been banned by ministers from receiving a bonus at the water company for the last financial year because it was found to have polluted our rivers. While at HS2, Thurston's pay ranged from £585,000 to £676,000 a year including bonuses and other taxable benefits. During his time at the government-owned company he took home £4,449,977. He joined HS2 in 2017, shortly after parliament signed off the building of the project's first phase. He previously worked on the 2012 London Olympics and Crossrail, now the Elizabeth Line, the heavily delayed new railway through central London. Thurston's oversight of HS2 was put under the spotlight this week when his successor's initial findings into the failures of the project were published. Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, told the Commons on Wednesday that the scheme had become an 'appalling mess' after years of mismanagement. She said: 'It gives me no pleasure to deliver news like this. Billions of pounds of taxpayers' money has been wasted by constant scope changes, ineffective contracts and bad management.' Mark Wild, who took over the running of HS2 in December last year, has been carrying out a root and branch review of the scheme in an bid to stem ballooning costs and restore proper oversight. Wild's salary will be declared in accounts published this summer although his base salary is said to be lower than Thurston's. The project was originally due to cost £32.7 billion — in 2011 prices — with the first leg between London and the Midlands opening in late 2026. The pared-back scheme could now cost more than £100 billion. In a letter to Alexander, published on Wednesday, Wild said: 'The position I have inherited in HS2 Ltd is unacceptable; the organisation has failed in its mission to control costs and deliver to schedule.' It was announced that Thurston, 58, was leaving HS2 in July 2023. He said the project was the 'highlight of my career', adding: 'I have agreed with the board that someone else should lead the organisation and programme through what will be another defining period for HS2.' His appointment to Anglian Water, which he joined in July last year, caused much comment, not least because of government criticisms of the financial stewardship of HS2. Responding in November last year, he told The Times: 'If customers want to challenge my appointment, all I can say is that it was a very thorough and comprehensive process. 'The board clearly thought I was a good fit. They have to account for that and only time will tell whether it was a good appointment.' Transport bosses are traditionally the highest paid public servants in the country, with those in the rail industry in particular receiving the biggest remuneration packages. The last time the Cabinet Office reported on senior civil service pay was in 2023 with figures for the previous year. The list was not updated in 2024 by the Conservatives before the election. It revealed that the 45 highest paid staff at HS2 had a combined pay packet of £8.9 million. Of the top 20 best paid, only six still work at the company three years later. It is understood that many senior executives left the company after Rishi Sunak cancelled the northern leg of the project in October 2023. A spokesman for HS2 Ltd said: ' Mark Wild is leading a comprehensive reset of HS2 to ensure the project can be delivered for the lowest reasonable cost. This includes reviewing and simplifying the structure of HS2 Ltd itself — putting more focus on front-line delivery of the railway and bearing down on unnecessary costs. 'This year, we have frozen pay and withheld all bonuses for staff in the highest grades at HS2 Ltd.'
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Train ticket website sues Transport Secretary after making claims about 'secret' £32million agreement involving state-owned firm
Trainline has sued Labour's Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander over allegations she snubbed them by offering a £32million contract elsewhere. State-owned London North Eastern Railway (LNER), which has been run by the Department for Transport (DfT) since 2018, was said to have recently extended a ticketing sales platform contract. But the company did not offer rivals like Trainline the chance to bid for the 10-year-deal, it is claimed. Trainline has alleged the failure to seek alternative bids means due process was ignored - as were the best interests of passengers and the taxpayer. LNER reportedly awarded the contract for the central booking engine that supports its digital ticket sales to Australia's Vix Technology. Trainline also alleges the publication of the award on the Government's website on December 23 was too opaque as it buried the news during Christmas week, limiting the ability of other parties to respond. It comes as Trainline, who would have expected to compete for the work, has its own rival division which provides a similar 'white label' service to train operators. The company is understood to be claiming that a direct award of the contract was not permissible under procurement law because the terms were varied in scope, duration and beneficiaries. Given the terms of the award, the ticketing platform used by LNER, which operates between London Kings Cross and Scotland via Leeds and Newcastle, could be extended across the rail network. However, both LNER and the DfT have denied a new contract exists saying the allegations are 'categorically untrue'. Rail Unions have previously raised concerns about third party ticket operators like Trainline, accusing the company of being engaged in 'relentless profiteering'. Despite the government's plans for simplification through the nationalisation of its railway, it has maintained there would still be a need for 'an innovative and competitive third-party retail market'. Labour also ruled out establishing a national website and app to promote to promote cheaper fares in competition with the firm. But in guidance from January it said a plan to bring together ticket websites of individual operators was now in the pipeline. An LNER spokesman said of Trainline's allegations: 'This is unequivocally untrue. No such contract exists. Trainline is aware this is the case as we explicitly advised them as much earlier this month.' A DfT spokesman added: 'This is completely and categorically untrue – not least because no such contract exists, which Trainline is well aware after being explicitly told as much by LNER earlier this month. 'The Department has been clear we are working industry to simplify ticketing for customers, as part of the biggest overhaul of our railways in a generation.' Trainline has suggested it is challenging the lack of opportunity for alternative providers to bid, regardless of whether a contract has been entered into at this point in time. The company has filed a claim at the Technology and Construction Court.
