EU rules that push up car insurance to be scrapped in Brexit bonus
EU rules that force law-abiding British motorists to stump up for compensation claims made by uninsured drivers will be scrapped by ministers.
Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, will use Brexit powers to rip up the Brussels regulations and return to a 'common-sense' approach.
The UK was forced to apply the law by Eurocrats, despite ministers branding it 'morally questionable' and warning it rewarded criminal behaviour.
Car insurance firms pay into a pot, known as the fund of last resort, which pays out to drivers who have been hit by an uninsured or unidentified driver.
The cash pot means that, where costs cannot be reclaimed from the driver at fault, victims of crashes are still compensated for damage to their vehicle.
Originally, the fund was not open to claims from uninsured drivers, but in 2017, ministers were warned that their exclusion was illegal under EU rules.
As a result, the Government said it 'had no choice' but to change the law or run the risk of facing limitless daily fines from the EU Commission.
Since then, uninsured drivers who are either hit by another uninsured motorist or involved in a hit-and-run have been eligible for compensation.
The money for the fund of last resort is raised by a levy on insurance firms, which pass the cost onto their customers in higher premiums.
A Government source told The Telegraph: 'We are reintroducing the exclusion of property damage compensation for uninsured drivers.
'Uninsured drivers should not be able to benefit in the same way as those driving lawfully.
'The Transport Secretary will restore this common-sense agreement because this Labour government is tackling criminal behaviour and backing all road users to the hilt.'
Plans to repeal the EU law were drawn up by the last Tory government, which launched a consultation just before Rishi Sunak called the general election.
At the time, Guy Opperman, the then roads minister, said the EU rule was 'morally questionable at best, and a cost carried by all legal motorists'.
'When we were members of the European Union, we were obliged to allow this. Now we have left, we can determine our own course of action,' he said.
It has now been picked up by Labour, which will introduce the change.
The feedback showed there was 'overwhelming support' for changing the rules to demonstrate that 'uninsured driving is unacceptable'.
'The vast majority of law-abiding motorists pay for claims from uninsured drivers for property damage through their motor insurance premiums,' the Government said.
'Removing this right for uninsured drivers demonstrates that the government is focused on tackling criminal behaviour and sensitive to regulations that impact negatively on the general public.
'It will send a message that uninsured drivers should not benefit from being compensated by the fund of last resort for property damage.'
The Motor Insurers' Bureau, which oversees the fund of last resort, said it had been 'working closely' with ministers to reintroduce the exclusion.
'This will ensure uninsured drivers aren't able to claim compensation for property damage following collisions involving other uninsured or hit-and-run drivers,' it said.
'Uninsured drivers are not just breaking the law, but they make roads more dangerous and increase the cost of motor insurance for the honest majority.'
The change can be introduced quickly because it does not require new legislation.
Instead, the requirement to compensate uninsured drivers can be removed by amending agreements between Ms Alexander and the MIB.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
Petition questioning jail sentences for online posts hits target
A petition calling for an urgent review of sentencing after a woman was jailed for a racist social media post has hit its target of 100,000 signatures in under 24 Connolly, from Northampton, was jailed for 31 months in October after urging her followers on X to "set fire" to hotels housing asylum seekers on the day of the Southport UK MP Rupert Lowe's online petition said prison terms for cases of "opinion-based online speech" caused "serious public concern" and alternative sanctions would be more appeal was rejected in May, with the Court of Appeal ruling there was "no arguable basis" that her prison sentence was excessive. The 41-year-old childminder, the wife of a Conservative councillor, posted the swearword-ridden message on 29 July 2024, the day three girls were murdered at a dance class in calling for "mass deportations now", she wrote: "If that makes me racist, so be it."She urged readers to set fire to "all the hotels" that were "full" of those she wished to post had been deleted before Connolly was arrested on 6 August but had already been viewed 310,000 who represents Great Yarmouth as an Independent, said the jailing of Connolly was "morally repugnant" and his petition had the full support of her husband, Ray."Lucy, and others like her, should not be in prison for foolish things they posted on the internet," said Lowe in a post on X."It's all just so disgusting, and if I can use my elected position to do anything, it has to be worth a go." The petition says imprisoning individuals for posts on social media "sets a dangerous precedent and raises wider questions about freedom of expression, proportionality in sentencing, and the misuse of limited prison resources."The day after Connolly's appeal was rejected, Sir Keir Starmer said he was in favour of free speech and against inciting violence after Lowe used Prime Minister's Questions to ask if her jail term was an "efficient or fair" use of prison.A UK Government and Parliament petition that attains 100,000 signatures is assessed by the Petitions Committee for its level of support and whether the government could act on its demands. If approved for consideration, it is then debated in Westminster Hall. Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour must put energy security ahead of net zero ideology
British Government ministers appear to enjoy nothing quite so much as interfering with complex systems they don't entirely understand. Research commissioned by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has highlighted one set of clearly unintended consequences that could soon come about as a result of Energy Secretary Ed Miliband's fanatical pursuit of his 2050 target. Interactions between high temperatures, solar panels, heat pumps and the transmission network may result in a greater likelihood of 'electricity shortfalls and loadshedding', a polite euphemism for controlled blackouts. The driving mechanisms are straightforward: heat pumps, soon to be mandatory in newbuilds, and highly incentivised in older properties, offer cooling capabilities that are likely to increase electricity demand during hot periods. At the same time, Britain's distributed renewables grid will be more exposed to degradation of performance due to these same high temperatures as solar panel efficiency falls and transmission networks are pushed to their limit as carrying capacities fall, increasing 'the likelihood of widespread blackouts'. It is a fascinating combination of incentives and outcomes, particularly for a department with 'energy security' in its title. It is also an excellent illustration of why we should be deeply sceptical of government schemes that seek to remake society on a grand scale: the choices to push certain approaches has created this pathway to instability. It is far from the only way in which net zero puts energy security at risk. There are the dark, windless winter days where neither solar nor wind provide significant inputs into Britain's grid, potentially leaving us reliant on backup power sources – an additional source of capital costs – or on interconnectors to European countries, which may also find their generating capacity limited. At the other end of the spectrum, a report into Spain's April blackouts has highlighted that particularly sunny days may drive prices negative, causing producers to switch off in a cascading failure. Britain does at least seem to have learnt this lesson ahead of time, taking steps to prevent a similar incident here. As the UK report has highlighted, however, it would be foolish to assume perfect foresight of future risks. It is surely time the Government put energy security ahead of net zero ideology.
Sky News
37 minutes ago
- Sky News
Belarus opposition leader Siarhei Tsikhanouski freed from jail after rare visit by top US envoy
A jailed opposition leader in Belarus has been freed and is now in Lithuania. Siarhei Tsikhanouski was released along with 13 other political prisoners following talks between Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko and Keith Kellogg, who is President Trump 's envoy for Ukraine. Mr Kellogg became the highest-ranking US official in years to visit Belarus, which is a close ally of Russia. Mr Tsikhanouski, a blogger and activist, was arrested after announcing he would run for the presidency against Mr Lukashenko in the 2020 election. He was sentenced to 18 years in prison the following year after a court found him guilty of organising mass unrest and of inciting social hatred. After he was detained, his wife Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya ran in his place and she became an opposition leader who is now in exile in Lithuania. Although Mr Lukashenko was officially declared the winner of the election, the result was denounced by the opposition and the West as a sham. On Saturday, a video on Ms Tsikhanouskaya's social media showed Mr Tsikhanouski getting out of a minibus and smiling despite his emaciated appearance. He and his wife hugged as their supporters clapped. She said: "My husband is free. It's difficult to describe the joy in my heart." She thanked Mr Trump, Mr Kellogg and "all European allies" for their efforts in getting him released. But she added her team's work was "not finished", with more than 1,100 political prisoners still locked up in Belarus. The 14 who were freed on Saturday included five Belarus nationals as well as three Poles, two Latvians, two Japanese citizens, one Estonian and one Swede. Among those released was Ihar Karnei, a former journalist at Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 'Free world needs you' European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on X the release was "fantastic news and a powerful symbol of hope for all the political prisoners suffering under the brutal Lukashenka (sic) regime". "The free world needs you, Siarhei!", Poland's foreign minister Radoslaw Sikorski said on X. At the meeting between Mr Lukashenko and Mr Kellogg in the Belarusian capital Minsk, the pair hugged. Mr Lukashenko said: "I really hope that our conversation will be very sincere and open. Otherwise, what is the point of meeting? "If we are clever and cunning in front of each other, we will not achieve results. You have made a lot of noise in the world with your arrival." Mr Lukashenko, who has been in power since 1994, secured a seventh term in office following an election in January this year that the opposition called a farce. It was not immediately clear whether Mr Kellogg's visit might pave the way for the lifting of some US sanctions against Belarus. They were imposed over the crackdown on the 2020 protests and Mr Lukashenko's support of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
