Pietermaritzburg High Court upholds life sentence for rapist of eight-year-old
life sentence has been upheld for rapist man by the Pietermaritzburg High Court
Image: File
The Pietermaritzburg High Court has dismissed an appeal on conviction and life imprisonment sentence for a man who raped an eight-year-old girl multiple times in 2010, gave her R1, and threatened to kill her.
The appeal was heard before Judge Robin Mossop and Judge Mahendra Chetty.
The rapist was described as the brother-in-law of the young girl's mother.
During the trial, the State led evidence and relied on minor children. The Ulundi Regional Court found the evidence of the victim and other minor children corroborative. Hence; the rapist was sentenced to life imprisonment.
The victim told the regional court that she was raped on five separate occasions in 2010. The first rape happened in daylight hours when she visited the homestead of the rapist accompanied by two other young children. She said they went to visit the rapist's child but instead found him.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
She said that at some stage, the man sent one of her companions to the shop to buy a loose cigarette for him. While the other child had gone to the shop, the man told the victim to brush her hair inside the house and he followed her in, locked the door and raped her. When she cried, he threatened to kill her. After that, he gave her R1 to buy ice lollies.
When the companion came back from the shop, she testified that she had slightly pushed the door, but the man told her not to get in. She testified that she saw him on top of his victim naked. This was also corroborated by another child who had peed into the window of the room. Moreover, at night, the victim was raped again.
One child who had peed through the window said he saw the man again. He said he entered the bedroom where all four children slept. He said that despite being dark, he saw him as he was wearing a white T-shirt.
The child also stated that he was the only adult in the house. The victim did not report the incident until a year later, as she was fearful. She and other children were watching a digital versatile disc (DVD) movie where the issue of sex was alluded to.
The children mentioned loudly that the victim knew something about sex, her mother overheard this, and inquired more.
The victim was taken to Dr Salona Prahladh, who stated that the victim had been raped and the last sexual assault was more than a year ago.
The High Court found that the magistrate who sentenced the man did not make any error in finding him guilty.
Judge Mossop said there was no doubt that the magistrate applied the cautionary rule used when dealing with evidence of children.
'The person who she was entitled to believe that she would be safe with, the appellant (rapist), turned out to be a predator intent on abusing her,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Pietermaritzburg High Court upholds life sentence for rapist of eight-year-old
life sentence has been upheld for rapist man by the Pietermaritzburg High Court Image: File The Pietermaritzburg High Court has dismissed an appeal on conviction and life imprisonment sentence for a man who raped an eight-year-old girl multiple times in 2010, gave her R1, and threatened to kill her. The appeal was heard before Judge Robin Mossop and Judge Mahendra Chetty. The rapist was described as the brother-in-law of the young girl's mother. During the trial, the State led evidence and relied on minor children. The Ulundi Regional Court found the evidence of the victim and other minor children corroborative. Hence; the rapist was sentenced to life imprisonment. The victim told the regional court that she was raped on five separate occasions in 2010. The first rape happened in daylight hours when she visited the homestead of the rapist accompanied by two other young children. She said they went to visit the rapist's child but instead found him. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ She said that at some stage, the man sent one of her companions to the shop to buy a loose cigarette for him. While the other child had gone to the shop, the man told the victim to brush her hair inside the house and he followed her in, locked the door and raped her. When she cried, he threatened to kill her. After that, he gave her R1 to buy ice lollies. When the companion came back from the shop, she testified that she had slightly pushed the door, but the man told her not to get in. She testified that she saw him on top of his victim naked. This was also corroborated by another child who had peed into the window of the room. Moreover, at night, the victim was raped again. One child who had peed through the window said he saw the man again. He said he entered the bedroom where all four children slept. He said that despite being dark, he saw him as he was wearing a white T-shirt. The child also stated that he was the only adult in the house. The victim did not report the incident until a year later, as she was fearful. She and other children were watching a digital versatile disc (DVD) movie where the issue of sex was alluded to. The children mentioned loudly that the victim knew something about sex, her mother overheard this, and inquired more. The victim was taken to Dr Salona Prahladh, who stated that the victim had been raped and the last sexual assault was more than a year ago. The High Court found that the magistrate who sentenced the man did not make any error in finding him guilty. Judge Mossop said there was no doubt that the magistrate applied the cautionary rule used when dealing with evidence of children. 'The person who she was entitled to believe that she would be safe with, the appellant (rapist), turned out to be a predator intent on abusing her,' he said.
Eyewitness News
19 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Judge in Mapisa-Nqakula's corruption matter unhappy with progress of case
JOHANNESBURG - The judge presiding over the corruption case of former Defence Minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula is unhappy with the progress of the case, following yet another appeared at the Pretoria High Court on Friday, where she faces 12 counts of corruption and one of money alleged that as defence minister, she solicited and received kickbacks, amounting to R4.5 million from a defence April, Judge Mokhine Mosopa made a ruling that Mapisa-Nqakula's lawyers should be given access to a Dequar Military Police docket. ALSO READ: Court denies corruption-accused Mapisa-Nqakula access to investigation diary This is the docket of the State's star witness, Nombasa Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu, where she is charged with corruption in a separate case was eventually struck off the court roll due to persistent delays, leading to Mapisa-Nqakula's lawyers suspecting she may have made a quid pro quo deal with the State. READ: High Court says State isn't infringing on Mapisa-Nqakula's right to a fair trial Prosecutor Paul Louw said that since the docket was from another court, he could not disclose it."I only received confirmation from my colleagues in the SCCU (Specialised Commercial Crimes Court), where the military matter was being held yesterday afternoon, that the docket is available to me as a member of the investigating director. I cannot disclose it, it must formally happen via the office of the national director of public prosecutions." Judge Mosopa adjourned the matter to 18 August for a progress report on the disclosure process.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Nafiz Modack seeks judge's recusal in tax fraud trial
Nafiz Modack, right, with his counsel, Advocate Bash Sibda. Modack is accused, along with others, of defrauding the South African Revenue Service of R146 million. The State alleges that a host of businesses and trusts registered by the 'Modack Family Business' were set up merely to claim tax returns. Alleged underworld kingpin Nafiz Modack is pushing for the recusal of a judge who is expected to preside over his 'Tax Matter' trial. This, after the judge had already dealt with a previous bail appeal in the Western Cape High Court. Advocate Bash Sibda, representing Modack in the trial following his arrest by the Hawks in 2020 on charges of defrauding the South African Revenue Service (SARS) out of R46 million with other co-accused, told the court yesterday that in order for his client to have a fair trial, Judge Mark Sher would need to step down from the matter.
