Appi Reddy knocks HC doors against govt
Amaravati: YSRCP MLC Lella Appi Reddy on Friday filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Andhra Pradesh High Court, strongly objecting to the State government's move to permit a private party to approach the RBI and access the Consolidated Fund of the State.
This development is with respect to the proposed Non-Convertible Debentures issuance by the Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation (APMDC).
He argued that this provision is unconstitutional, as it bypasses legislative approval and violates Articles 203, 204, and 293 of the Constitution. He urged the Court to declare the move illegal and sought a stay on further proceedings.
In the PIL, Appi Reddy expressed serious concern that private bond holders or debenture trustees could be allowed to withdraw funds directly from the State's consolidated fund in total violation of the Constitutional provisions providing for legislative oversight. He stated that such access undermines the principles of financial accountability and violates the Constitution's framework for public finance.
The PIL also questioned the government's decision to grant lease rights over 436 minor mineral quarries to APMDC without any open bidding or competitive process.
He argued that this violates the AP Minor Mineral Concession Rules and allows public resources to be used without transparency or oversight.
Further, the APMDC was permitted to mortgage these mineral rights to private entities, who were also empowered to transfer or sell them without government approval. The petitioner termed this a dangerous and unlawful handover of State-owned assets. Appi Reddy requested the High Court to strike down the entire scheme as unconstitutional and arbitrary, and to halt the issuance of NCDs backed by public assets. The PIL aims at safeguarding the State's resources and financial integrity from being misused for private financial arrangements.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
Suvendu Adhikari slams Bengal govt for skipping Yoga Day, says
Kolkata (West Bengal) [India], June 21 (ANI): On the occasion of International Yoga Day, West Bengal's Leader of Opposition and BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari criticised the state government for not participating in the nationwide celebration. He alleged that while both NDA and non-NDA ruled states observed the day, West Bengal deliberately skipped it. Speaking to ANI, Adhikari said, 'NDA and non-NDA state governments are celebrating Yoga Day today, except West Bengal, because West Bengal follows Bangladesh. It does not follow Delhi. More than 180 countries are celebrating International Yoga Day today. As Indians, we are proud of this.' The sharp remarks came as International Yoga Day was celebrated across the country, promoting the physical and mental health benefits of yoga. Earlier on Saturday, senior BJP leader Dilip Ghosh said, 'Yoga is our country's heritage. We have given yoga to the world. It is a very good medium to keep the body healthy. Prime Minister Narendra Modi promoted it globally, and now yoga is being practised in about 200 countries, so the credit for this goes to Narendra Modi, who revived and promoted yoga in the world again.' Meanwhile, on the occasion of International Yoga Day, West Bengal Governor CV Ananda Bose highlighted how the practice of Yoga was earlier 'confined to India,' and the efforts of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to spread it internationally has led to people accepting it the world over. As part of the 11th International Yoga Day celebrations, Prime Minister Narendra Modi is leading the effort to promote a healthy lifestyle while performing Yoga with others in Vishakapatnam. Meanwhile, multiple other Chief Ministers and Union Ministers are participating in Yoga events in their respective cities. 'Yoga is universal in nature. Yoga connects the mind and the body. This is something which belongs to the entire humanity. It was confined to India, but our Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, took it to the whole world. Now it is for the world, and the world is accepting it,' Governor Bose told ANI. (ANI)
The Wire
2 hours ago
- The Wire
Amit Shah's Attack on English Betrays India's Pluralist Foundations
Union home minister Amit Shah's outrageous statement that 'In our lifetime, we will see a society in which those speaking English will feel ashamed…' is not only an affront to the legacy of freedom struggle stalwarts like Mahatma Gandhi, Rabindranath Tagore and Maulana Azad, but also a blatant violation of the Constitution, which explicitly provides for the use of both Indian languages and English in several of its articles. That Shah made this remark on the 75th anniversary of the Constitution of India adds an element of contempt to the occasion. By making such a remark, which borders on hate speech, Shah undermined the very idea of India, an idea rooted in linguistic diversity and cultural plurality. In his statement, he claimed that the languages of our country are ornaments of our culture, asserting that without them we could not call ourselves Bharatiya. 'Our country, its history, its culture, our Dharma — if these have to be understood, it cannot be done in foreign languages,' he declared. This assertion disregards the historical reality that several foreign languages, including English, have helped transmit the treasures of Indian culture to the wider world. Gandhi and the English Gita Mahatma Gandhi never read the Bhagavad Gita in its original Sanskrit. His first encounter with it came in London, where he read The Song Celestial, the English translation by Edwin Arnold. So profound was its spiritual impact on him that it played a transformative role in shaping his life and thought – thoughts that later became central to the freedom movement. The Gita's message was not devalued simply because it was rendered in English. Shah's logic, which disparages English speakers, is thus an insult to Gandhi's legacy. While Gandhi strongly championed Indian languages and expressed himself with excellence in his native Gujarati, he was also one of the most articulate Indian writers and speakers in English. Writing in Young India on 26 January 1921, Gandhi stated: 'I would have our young men and women with literary tastes to learn as much of English or other world languages as they like and then expect them to give the benefits of their learning to India and to the world, like a Bose, a Ray or a Tagore.' He added forcefully: 'But I would not have a single Indian to forget, neglect or be ashamed of his mother tongue or to feel that he or she cannot think or express the best thoughts in his or her own vernacular.' Gandhi's views were rooted not in narrow nationalism or linguistic chauvinism but in a universal, inclusive ethos that rejected hatred. Tagore and English Rabindranath Tagore never formally studied English, yet he wrote essays in the language with as much brilliance as he did poems, plays and other works in Bengali. The Sahitya Akademi's publication English Writings of Tagore captures the richness and exuberance of his literary expression in English. Globally, Tagore is celebrated for his creative excellence in Bengali, and his compositions continue to be recited across linguistic and cultural platforms in India and abroad. Maulana Azad and English Maulana Azad too had no formal education in English, yet he fully grasped its significance in the modern world. He wrote: 'Howsoever wrongly the English language made its way into our life, the fact remains that it has influenced our mental and educational outlook for the past one hundred and fifty years.' While he acknowledged the harm English had caused in some respects, he also highlighted its contributions: 'The greatest advantage that we gained from the adoption of English was that many of the obstacles were automatically removed from our newly born national life. It has led to the unification of the whole of the country. All the different parts of the country were brought together in spite of distances and different languages. In this respect, it can be said that English has played the same part in cementing and uniting India as did Persian in Moghul times.' At the same time, he warned that English could not remain dominant forever and that Indian languages must be given their rightful place. 'We have to decide after mature deliberation how to bring about this change,' he said. A constitutional violation Amit Shah's remarks lack such 'mature deliberation' and directly contravene the constitution. Article 120 allows members of parliament to speak in Hindi, English or their mother tongue. In state legislatures too, members are permitted to speak in English in addition to the language of the state. Article 348 stipulates that English can be used in the Supreme Court and high courts, and in the authoritative texts of laws, bills and acts. The constitution also mandates the translation of every amendment, originally drafted in English, into Hindi. During the 2024 Lok Sabha election campaign, when the opposition raised concerns about saving the Constitution, Shah professed a newfound reverence for secularism and even declared that the word would not be removed from the Preamble. Now that he has poured scorn on English, will he have the courage to propose that all references to the English language be struck from the Constitution? Shah must move beyond his party's outdated and narrow ideology of 'one nation, one culture.' He must embrace the pluralism that defines India, an essential part of which is linguistic diversity. That diversity includes Indian languages, English and other foreign tongues, all of which have contributed to the richness of our civilisational experience. S.N. Sahu served as Officer on Special Duty to President of India K R Narayanan.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Murder over peeing near shop: Cops draw flak for accused getting bail
Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: The city police arrested the five accused following the murder of a man and the injury of two people during a brawl over urinating near a chicken shop in the Mukundwadi area late on Thursday. However, the accused obtained bail within 24 hours of their arrest, drawing criticism of the city police. On Friday, special judge (SC & ST Act) A R Ubale granted bail after ACP Sudarshan Patil presented the accused in court seeking their police custody. Judge Ubale ruled the arrest illegal due to non-compliance with constitutional and legal safeguards, notably article 22(1) of the Constitution and section 47 of the BNS. In his order, Judge Ubale stated: "Apex Court cast duty on the trial court to declare the arrest to be illegal and to release the accused on bail, forthwith, if there is non-compliance with the constitutional mandate. As in the present case, the grounds of arrest are not communicated to the accused Nos.1 to 5 in writing, their arrest becomes illegal. Therefore, the accused Nos. 1 to 5 are entitled to be released from custody on furnishing bail and bonds. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo " The court noted although the investigating officer, ACP Patil, claimed to have informed the accused of the grounds of arrest, he admitted that no written communication was made. Though there were station diary entries in this regard, the arrest memo entries lacked any mention of specific grounds for arrest. Judge Ubale relied on key Supreme Court rulings, including Vihaan Kumar vs State of Haryana, Pankaj Bansal v Union of India, and Prabir Purkayastha v State (NCT of Delhi), reaffirming the mandatory requirement to inform an arrested person in writing and in comprehensible language about the reasons for arrest. The court held that any violation renders the arrest and remand process illegal, though it does not affect the validity of the investigation or trial. The five accused — Mastan alias Nanna Husain Qureshi, Samir Khan Sartaj Khan, Babar Shaikh Afsar Shaikh, Sajid Quresh alias Sajju Ahmed Qureshi, and Nasir Khan Mohammad Munir Khan — were granted bail on a personal bond of Rs25,000 each, along with one solvent surety. The court directed them to cooperate with the investigation and attend the MIDC Cidco police station every Saturday and Sunday until the chargesheet is filed. Meanwhile, Satara area police station arrested the five accused in a pending dacoity case.
