Erdogan, Meloni hold talks to boost Italy-Turkey ties
Photo: AP
ROME: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan arrived in Rome for talks with Italy's Giorgia Meloni Tuesday, as the two Mediterranean countries seek to boost trade and cooperation.
Meloni and Erdogan will discuss the war in Ukraine and the "situation in the
Middle East
" before a summit where government ministers are expected to sign a number of deals, including on energy and defence, according to an Italian government source.
"The aim is to strengthen the cooperation and strategic partnership between the two nations" and foster "economic and trade relations, which have grown significantly in recent years", the source said.
The summit comes as Russia's invasion of Ukraine has pushed the European Union, of which Italy is part, to seek deeper security ties with Turkey, a
NATO
ally and long a candidate to join the 27-nation bloc.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Invest $200 in Amazon without buying stocks to earn a second salary
Marketsall
Sign Up
Undo
With arms industry orders soaring in response to the conflict, in March Italian defence firm Leonardo and Turkish drone producer Baykar agreed to jointly develop unmanned aerial systems.
Migration, a topic dear to Italy's far-right prime minister, is also high on the agenda, the source said.
Ankara has in recent years played a leading role in helping stem irregular arrivals to Europe -- receiving billions from Brussels in return.
The delegations will also work to enhance cooperation in transport, infrastructure, space, and sport, with Italy and Turkey due to joint hosts of the Euro 2032 football tournament, the source said.
Italy is Turkey's second largest commercial partner in Europe.
Bilateral trade
was worth $32.2 billion in 2024, according to Rome.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
US-Iran tensions: Tehran vows 'proportionate response'; key ways it can retaliate
Iran has promised a 'proportionate response' to what it calls the United States' 'criminal aggression' after President Donald Trump confirmed that American forces had 'obliterated' three of Iran's nuclear facilities. While Trump hailed the strike as a military success, warning there were 'many targets left,' Iran has vowed that its response will come; the only question is when and how. Iran's foreign ministry said the country would 'defend its territory, sovereignty, security and people by all force and means.' The Iranian military is now reportedly in charge of planning a retaliatory strike, according to Iran's UN envoy Amir Saeid Iravani, who told the Security Council that Washington had 'decided to destroy diplomacy.' 'We will take all measures necessary,' Iravani said, adding that Iran's response would be shaped by 'timing, nature and scale' determined solely by its military. Limited strikes or wider confrontation? Iran's dilemma lies in balancing a credible retaliation without triggering a full-scale regional war. It has experience with calibrated responses: following the 2020 US killing of General Qassem Soleimani, Tehran launched missiles at US bases in Iraq after warning them in advance. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo No lives were lost, but the message was clear. This time, however, experts suggest Iran may avoid advance notice. According to the BBC, Tehran retains roughly half of its original 3,000 missiles and has already drawn up a list of some 20 US bases in the region, including key sites like At-Tanf, Ain al-Asad, and Erbil in Iraq and Syria. Proxies could also be activated to carry out these attacks, mirroring past strategies. Sanam Vakil of Chatham House told The New York Times that Iran could strike 'largely evacuated' US bases or re-activate regional partners like the Houthis in Yemen. Such a cautious, asymmetric campaign would allow Iran to maintain its image without escalating into direct confrontation. The Strait of Hormuz and cyber warfare Another option is economic warfare. Tehran could attempt to choke the Strait of Hormuz — the strategic waterway through which nearly a third of global oil flows. The BBC reported that Iran might deploy sea mines or fast-attack boats to block shipping lanes, potentially causing a spike in global oil prices. Cyberattacks also remain a key tool in Iran's arsenal. Alongside China, Russia and North Korea, Iran has cultivated advanced cyber capabilities. Attacks on US infrastructure or commercial entities could inflict damage without triggering immediate military retaliation. 'Iran knew this was coming and will have prepared a chain of responses,' said Ellie Geranmayeh of the European Council on Foreign Relations, warning that attacks 'will be swift and multilayered.' Retaliation could be delayed — or abandoned There are voices within Iran's leadership arguing for restraint. A delayed response striking back when US forces are no longer on high alert could allow Tehran to save face without risking immediate retribution. Symbolic attacks on diplomatic missions or targeted assassinations of US-linked figures abroad are also being considered. However, such a strategy carries its own risks. Doing nothing may spare Iran further losses but risks weakening its domestic credibility. As conservative Tehran analyst Reza Salehi noted: 'If we do not react, the US will not leave us alone.' Some experts argue that the regime may ultimately choose to recalibrate rather than retaliate. This includes restarting diplomacy, potentially via neutral mediators in Muscat or Rome. Yet such a path would demand significant concessions, especially around its nuclear enrichment programme something the regime has historically resisted. The nuclear question looms large According to NYT reporting, Iran's long-term takeaway from the strikes may be the need for a nuclear deterrent. Vali Nasr, an Iran scholar at Johns Hopkins University, said the strikes may push Iran to abandon cooperation with the IAEA and move towards nuclear armament. 'This is the great irony,' Geranmayeh told NYT. 'Although Trump has sought to eliminate the nuclear threat from Iran, he has now made it far more likely that Iran becomes a nuclear state.' Ayatollah Khamenei could authorise withdrawal from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and expel international inspectors, effectively ending global oversight of Iran's programme. While the International Atomic Energy Agency reported no radiation leakage after the US strikes — implying enriched uranium was likely moved, concerns remain that Iran's stockpile is now hidden and unmonitored. 'Hardliners in the Iranian regime may ultimately win the day' Experts believe Iran now faces two critical choices. Jonathan Panikoff of the Atlantic Council explained: 'Iran can choose to strike US bases in a limited fashion… or it could go all in and trigger a regional war.' Refraining from retaliation may limit further military damage but risks weakening the regime's image. 'If we do not react, the US will not leave us alone,' said conservative Tehran analyst Reza Salehi. A calculated response—such as targeting symbolic US sites—could appease hardliners without escalating to full-scale war. However, given Trump's threats and the severity of the strikes, restraint seems unlikely. 'Hardliners in the Iranian regime may ultimately win the day,' Panikoff noted, adding that asymmetric attacks or overseas terror operations remain a possibility. Iran's past actions, like the Khobar Towers bombing and rocket attacks on US forces in Iraq, show both its capability and intent to retaliate. Its allies, including Yemen's Houthis, have already threatened US naval forces. Regional fallout and US response With over 40,000 American troops stationed across the region, in Bahrain, Qatar, Iraq and elsewhere, Washington is reinforcing its positions. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has confirmed the deployment of additional assets, and non-essential diplomatic staff have been evacuated. Trump, while portraying the US operation as restrained, has made it clear that more force will follow if Iran escalates. 'There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran,' he warned. Still, many in Tehran believe the real tragedy is already unfolding. Iran's UN envoy accused Israel of manipulating US policy, saying Netanyahu had succeeded in dragging the United States into 'yet another costly and baseless war.'
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
GOP tax bill would ease regulations on gun silencers and some rifles and shotguns
GOP tax bill would ease regulations on gun silencers and some rifles and shotguns (Image: AP) WASHINGTON: The massive tax and spending cuts package that President Donald Trump wants on his desk by July 4 would loosen regulations on gun silencers and certain types of rifles and shotguns, advancing a long time priority of the gun industry as Republican leaders in the House and Senate try to win enough votes to pass the bill. The guns provision was first requested in the House by Georgia Rep. Andrew Clyde, a Republican gun store owner who had initially opposed the larger tax package. The House bill would remove silencers - called "suppressors" by the gun industry - from a 1930s law that regulates firearms that are considered the most dangerous, eliminating a $200 tax while removing a layer of background checks. The Senate kept the provision on silencers in its version of the bill and expanded upon it, adding short-barreled, or sawed-off, rifles and shotguns. Republicans who have long supported the changes, along with the gun industry, say the tax infringes on Second Amendment rights. They say silencers are mostly used by hunters and target shooters for sport. "Burdensome regulations and unconstitutional taxes shouldn't stand in the way of protecting American gun owners' hearing," said Clyde, who owns two gun stores in Georgia and often wears a pin shaped like an assault rifle on his suit lapel. Democrats are fighting to stop the provision, which was unveiled days after two Minnesota state legislators were shot in their homes, as the bill speeds through the Senate. They argue that loosening regulations on silencers could make it easier for criminals and active shooters to conceal their weapons. "Parents don't want silencers on their streets, police don't want silencers on their streets," said Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY The gun language has broad support among Republicans and has received little attention as House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La, and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-SD, work to settle differences within the party on cuts to Medicaid and energy tax credits, among other issues. But it is just one of hundreds of policy and spending items included to entice members to vote for the legislation that could have broad implications if the bill is enacted within weeks, as Trump wants. Inclusion of the provision is also a sharp turn from the climate in Washington just three years ago when Democrats, like Republicans now, controlled Congress and the White House and pushed through bipartisan gun legislation. The bill increased background checks for some buyers under the age of 21, made it easier to take firearms from potentially dangerous people and sent millions of dollars to mental health services in schools. Passed in the summer of 2022, just weeks after the shooting of 19 children and two adults at a school in Uvalde, Texas, it was the most significant legislative response to gun violence in decades. Three years later, as they try to take advantage of their consolidated power in Washington, Republicans are packing as many of their long time priorities as possible, including the gun legislation, into the massive, wide-ranging bill that Trump has called "beautiful." "I'm glad the Senate is joining the House to stand up for the Second Amendment and our Constitution, and I will continue to fight for these priorities as the Senate works to pass President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill," said Texas Sen John Cornyn, who was one of the lead negotiators on the bipartisan gun bill in 2022 but is now facing a primary challenge from the right in his bid for re-election next year. If the gun provisions remain in the larger legislation and it is passed, silencers and the short-barrel rifles and shotguns would lose an extra layer of regulation that they are subject to under the National Firearms Act, passed in the 1930s in response to concerns about mafia violence. They would still be subject to the same regulations that apply to most other guns - and that includes possible loopholes that allow some gun buyers to avoid background checks when guns are sold privately or online. Larry Keane of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, who supports the legislation, says changes are aimed at helping target shooters and hunters protect their hearing. He argues that the use of silencers in violent crimes is rare. "All it's ever intended to do is to reduce the report of the firearm to hearing safe levels," Keane says. Speaking on the floor before the bill passed the House, Rep Clyde said the bill restores Second Amendment rights from "over 90 years of draconian taxes." Clyde said Johnson included his legislation in the larger bill "with the purest of motive." "Who asked for it? I asked," said Clyde, who ultimately voted for the bill after the gun silencer provision was added. Clyde was responding to Rep Maxwell Frost, a 28-year-old Florida Democrat, who went to the floor and demanded to know who was responsible for the gun provision. Frost, who was a gun-control activist before being elected to Congress, called himself a member of the "mass shooting generation" and said the bill would help "gun manufacturers make more money off the death of children and our people." Among other concerns, control advocates say less regulation for silencers could make it harder for law enforcement to stop an active shooter. "There's a reason silencers have been regulated for nearly a century: They make it much harder for law enforcement and bystanders to react quickly to gunshots," said John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety. Schumer and other Democrats are trying to convince the Senate parliamentarian to drop the language as she reviews the bill for policy provisions that aren't budget-related. "Senate Democrats will fight this provision at the parliamentary level and every other level with everything we've got," Schumer said earlier this month.
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
UK's Farage promises non-doms protection from tax on overseas assets
Nigel Farage 's Reform UK party is offering non-doms full exemption from tax on their overseas assets for a fee of £250,000 ($335,000) every 10 years with the revenue redistributed to lower income workers, drawing a new battle line with Britain's traditional parties. Farage's proposal pits him against both the Conservatives, which last year abolished non-dom status for those who live in Britain but have their permanent home abroad, and the Labour government, which went one step further after winning the election last July by imposing inheritance tax on their global wealth. Thousands of people in Britain have left in protest at Labour's inheritance tax measure, including some of the country's wealthiest individuals. Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves is now exploring changes to bring them back. Inheritance tax is charged at 40% in the UK, one of the highest rates in the developed world. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If You Eat Ginger Everyday for 1 Month This is What Happens Tips and Tricks Undo Farage would reinstate the old non-dom regime that protected them from tax on their overseas income, including inheritance tax, to reverse the exodus of the rich and business elite. Under Reform's so-called 'Britannia Card,' non-doms would have to pay the £250,000 fee. The Times first reported the story. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Proceeds from the levy would be transferred directly into the bank accounts of the lowest-earning 10% of workers. Reform estimated about 2.5 million people on a full-time salary of less than £23,000 would get £600 each if 6,000 non-doms paid for the Britannia Card. Live Events You Might Also Like: UK may rethink non-dom inheritance tax as wealthy foreigners exit Reform has become a credible threat to Britain's traditional two party system. It is leading in the polls and Farage is developing a more coherent policy agenda than with his former UKIP and Brexit parties, when he led largely single issue campaigns against the European Union. Critics warn that his plans for big tax cuts on working people paid for by slashing the size of the state could prove undeliverable. Reform's £250,000 'landing fee' is a little cheaper than the former non-dom regime under which there was an annual fixed charge of £30,000 if an individual lived in the UK for seven of the last nine tax years, rising to £60,000 if it was 12 of the last 14 tax years. Restoring the non-dom status would also cost Reform the £33.8 billion of income that the Office for Budget Responsibility estimated the Conservative and Labour changes will generate over this parliament. Companies House data compiled by Bloomberg found evidence of an exodus of more than 4,400 directors of UK businesses since last July. In April alone, when the tax hikes kicked in, departures were up about 75% from 12 months earlier. You Might Also Like: UK replaces passport stickers with eVisas for some: What you need to know if you're planning your travel UK's tougher immigration stance may undermine efforts to meet net zero by 2050
