logo
Bugs sent into battle — meet the SA team using insects instead of pesticides to tackle invasive plants

Bugs sent into battle — meet the SA team using insects instead of pesticides to tackle invasive plants

Daily Maverick11-06-2025

Sustenance farmers are hit the hardest by the impacts of invasive plant species. Scientists are working to change that, but they face challenges.
South African farmers spend about R1,200 per hectare on weed control, including herbicide application and other methods, according to an estimation from 2021. Their costs also include diesel for machinery, crop insurance and harvesting.
Although commercial farmers feel the costs, they often have resources to buy pesticides, herbicides and manual labour to ensure their crops do well and the land is workable.
Daily Maverick visited sustenance farmers in northern KwaZulu-Natal who were losing thousands of their goats to an illness they claim is from an invasive plant species – parthenium. In KwaNongoma, the weed is visible throughout the grazing land, and it is highly competitive with grass. It also causes rashes in children after long-term exposure, along with other effects.
Daily Maverick visited the Plant Health and Protection unit of the Agricultural Research Council (ARC-PHP) in Hilton, Pietermaritzburg, where scientists focus on ecologically sound management strategies for agricultural pests, plant diseases and invasive plants.
One of the researchers, Lorraine Strathie, said invasive plant species can be controlled by bringing insects from their country of origin to feed on them here. But if this sounds simple, it is not. The process takes devotion, trial and error and collaboration.
'For example, parthenium is indigenous to the lands around the Gulf of Mexico in North America. So in its native range, in their native range, plants have evolved for millions of years, and they have natural enemies in the form of insects which feed on them, fungi and other pathogens. So it's what we call top-down control,' she said.
'So, they reduce their reproductive output, the number of seeds they produce, and their growth rates. And these insects, many of these natural enemies, because the plants produce defensive chemicals, most of the insects and fungi that feed on them have become highly specialised to get around those chemicals and other defences. So they become highly, what we call host-specific – they only feed on one species of plant.'
Entomologists and those in related sciences dedicate years to understanding which control agents are likely to be suitable to bring to South Africa. When the insects get here they are quarantined and numerous tests and observations are done to make sure they don't have a taste for South African plants, which would add them to a long list of pests instead of control agents.
'So one of the main theories is that when a plant is taken out of its native environment and brought to another continent, the natural enemies don't come with it because it comes as a seed, and then it can grow without any kind of top-down control. And its growth rates increase, its seed output increases, and it outcompetes the local plants. Then it becomes invasive,' Strathie said.
The ARC-PHP was established in 1962 with the amalgamation of the divisions of eEntomology and plant pathology of the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.
Challenges
The challenge with this science is that it can take time and needs the land these agents have been placed on to not be disturbed by pesticides, herbicides and building. This requires land owners to cooperate with the team so they can check the population they have released every year to see how much it has grown, how far it has spread and the impact.
To achieve optimal biological control, studies have shown that 'integrating various biological control options that include classical biological control, mycoherbicides and suppressive plants with management tools such as chemical, physical, grazing management and cultural management is desirable'.
Dr Costas Zachariades, officer-in-charge and senior researcher in the ARC-PHP, explained that the population starts breeding by itself and feeds on the plant, and spreads by itself.
'So once we've got past that stage of what we call establishing the population, then it becomes self-sustaining, and it doesn't need any more human intervention. And so with weed control you have to keep on spraying with herbicide, uprooting manually, doing what you're doing. So there's always human intervention required on an ongoing basis, whereas with weed biocontrol, that is not needed. So it's a long-term, sustainable solution. The downsides are that it takes a long time,' Zachariades said.
It could take up to 20 years for the biocontrol agent to reach its full potential – that is, being widespread over large areas, the plant has decreased and invasive plant growth is naturally stifled. But it could be effective in three to five years, according to the scientists.
Community resistance
Affected people, such as those in agricultural communities with small-scale farmers, have been resistant to the idea, worried that the agents will start eating their crops once the weeds are gone.
Strathie emphasised that this is the core of their work in the quarantine lab, over and above growing the insect population – they do a number of tests to ensure the agent only eats that weed and nothing else.
'It's a very common perception. A lot of growers will know that some insects or pathogens can be highly host-specific,' she said.
Even in the case of lantana, which had many different hybrids and varieties, some of the insects were so specific that they might only go for a certain colour of a certain hybrid.
The agents could have certain chemical cues they required for attraction to a plant, as well as for mating and feeding. 'So the natural enemies we're using are really host-specific.'
In the lab the team showed how the insects are not only plant-specific but eat specific parts of the plant – some eat the stem, some like the leaves, some lay eggs on the flowers, thereby crippling the invasive plant's growth.
'… we ensure that whatever is released into the environment is completely safe. I mean, the science of weed biocontrol has been around for 112 years in South Africa, and South Africa is one of the leading countries in the world in this science. So it's quite a small community of weed biocontrol researchers in the country, but the science is very rigorous, we're not going to be introducing something that's going to be potentially harmful on other plants,' Strathie added.
Funding
This work appears to be significant in ensuring biodiversity, especially as civil society organisations are calling for the banning of a number of pesticides.
And this team considers itself lucky because it receives funding from the Department of Agriculture, while other teams doing similar work have stopped due to a lack of funding.
'Funding, I think, globally is challenging, and invasive species often are not recognised for the level of importance of how they impact on people's livelihoods, not only from conservation, but food production and health,' Strathie said
'And I think there's generally not a common understanding of what kind of impact they may have. And I think [that] for research it's critical, and especially this type of research needs sustained funding for long periods, and once you have a biological control agent to be able to reap the benefits of all that investment. Developing a biocontrol agent, you then need government's national support to ensure it's rolled out to its full benefit.'
Mass rearing for impact
The team explained that a mass release of the tried-and-tested control agents has made an impact in biocontrol in affected provinces such as Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal.
This is made possible by the Department of Agriculture, which has been supporting the programme since 2023.
'But also previously, the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE) were the major funders for biological control of weeds in South Africa. So there was a lot of R&D done in those decades with DFFE that we now also benefit from South Africa being able to [mass-rear] those agents,' Strathie said.
Zachariades added that they have six major weeds currently, for which they have multiple biocontrol agents being mass reared at the unit and at Brunner Plot in Pretoria, a sister institute. Which meant that, if there were no more funding to mass-rear the agents, 'we can hasten their impact by releasing more of them and more often at many sites'.
'So, for example, for parthenium insect agents, we've got three of them, and we've got something like 400 release points already, and those will just keep increasing in KZN and Mpumalanga, because those are where the weed is most prevalent at the moment. It's in other provinces as well, but those are where it's really severely invading.'
The team had also mass-reared agents for commelina, lantana pompom weed ('which is problematic on the high field at this stage') and Tecoma stans, or yellow bells ('it's become a big weed along the coast here') as well as the Mexican sunflower, all of which pose a threat to indigenous flora. DM

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Catch and release helps conserve fish, 20-year study finds
Catch and release helps conserve fish, 20-year study finds

The Citizen

time13 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Catch and release helps conserve fish, 20-year study finds

Marine life is rapidly declining, and urgent action is needed to protect it – one such action being the establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs). According to the Zululand Observer, in the build-up to MPA Day on August 1, South African scientist Dr Bruce Mann highlights the value of these 'nature reserves of the sea'. 'MPAs provide many benefits for both ocean health and human activities,' said Mann, a research associate at the Oceanographic Research Institute in Durban. 'One benefit is that they enable fish stocks to increase in abundance and biomass and, over time, these spill over into adjacent fished areas, improving catches and ensuring fisheries' sustainability.' One thing that stands out to Mann is that these conservation areas give a clear view of what nature looks like without human impact. 'This forms a useful 'control', which provides a solid foundation for our research into the natural world and the conservation techniques needed. By looking after these special places, we can make a real difference.' He shared three examples of MPAs: A Scotsman tagged in the Pondoland Marine Protected Area (Eastern Cape); a giant kingfish tracked from southern Mozambique to the Eastern Cape; and catch and release angling at iSimangaliso Wetland Park in KZN. A 20-year study in the iSimangaliso MPA tested whether catch and release can help conserve shore angling species. The study tagged fish caught by volunteer anglers in zoned areas within the MPA. The findings showed that when best-practice handling was used, catch and release angling had minimal impact on most species, though more sensitive species still showed higher post-release mortality, especially under increased angling pressure. The study concluded that while catch and release is not suitable in strict no-take zones, it offers real conservation value as a buffer around MPAs or in specially zoned areas. Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!

Why ex-Zambian President Edgar Lungu will be buried in Joburg
Why ex-Zambian President Edgar Lungu will be buried in Joburg

The South African

time14 hours ago

  • The South African

Why ex-Zambian President Edgar Lungu will be buried in Joburg

Ex-President of Zambia, Edgar Lungu, died on 5 June 2025, at the age of 68, while undergoing specialised medical treatment in Pretoria, South Africa. Edgar Lungu's daughter, Tasila Lungu-Mwansa, announced his passing in a video shared on the Patriotic Front's (PF's) official Facebook page. The family and PF have not disclosed the exact cause of death. On 10 March 2015, President Lungu visited Milpark Hospital in Johannesburg, where he commented on his health, according to SABC News Live and Contributing Editor Vuyo Mvoko. If surgery was necessary, he stated that it would take place in Pretoria. A Pretoria hospital admitted him at 22:15 that night. On 11 March 2015, Amos Chanda, who at the time served as the President's Special Assistant to the Press and Public Relations, reported the President's diagnosis of achalasia on the Zambian High Commission website. Achalasia is a rare condition that causes dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), chest pain, and weight loss because the oesophagus (food pipe) becomes too narrow. Drs. Dave Kishore and Dorothy Kasonde, who represent a seven-member medical team, approved the report. On 20 June 2025, the Lungu family announced their decision to bury the late former president Edgar Lungu in Johannesburg, South Africa, rather than at Zambia's Embassy Park. Continued disagreements with the Zambian government led to the decision, according to family lawyer Makebi Zulu. This caused the cancellation of the Zambian government's plans for a state funeral in Lusaka. The family's unwillingness to return the remains was due to their insistence on excluding President Hakainde Hichilema from the funeral. Hichilema, Lungu's longstanding political adversary, said on 20 June 2025 that the family blocked all governmental attempts to provide a decent state funeral. The family's hostility comes from Hakainde Hichilema's arrest and treason charges in April 2017 during Edgar Lungu's administration. For the first time, a former president of Zambia will be buried outside his homeland. The family praised the South African government's non-intrusive and respectful approach. The family has replaced the previously scheduled nationally recognised state funeral in Lusaka with a private one in Johannesburg. Following the unsuccessful talks with the family, the Zambian government officially ended the mourning period on 19 June 2025. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store