Does DOT's enforcement policy put truck safety at risk?
WASHINGTON — A new enforcement policy being considered by the U.S. Department of Transportation marks a significant change in enforcement of trucking violations, and crash-victim advocates are concerned it will make the roads less safe.
In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) issued in May, the DOT is proposing several administrative changes, including how it oversees enforcement procedures by several of its modal agencies, including the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
The NPRM 'proposes updates to the Department's procedural requirements governing the review and clearance of guidance documents, and the initiation and conduct of enforcement actions, including administrative enforcement proceedings and judicial enforcement actions brought in Federal court,' the proposal states.
Significantly for the trucking industry, DOT's proposal follows a trend within government to push adjudication out of the regulatory agencies and into the federal courts.
Unless a statute or regulation clearly authorizes an agency such as FMCSA to enforce a legal requirement directly through an administrative enforcement proceeding, DOT's NPRM states, 'the proper forum for the enforcement action is Federal court, and the enforcement action must be initiated in court by attorneys of the Department of Justice acting in coordination with DOT counsel.'
Zach Cahalan, executive director of the Truck Safety Coalition, a truck-crash victim advocacy group, believes that placing enforcement for truck industry violations in the hands of courts and judges unfamiliar with how the industry operates could result in less enforcement and riskier carriers.
'TSC is deeply concerned that these changes will severely diminish DOT's ability to enforce safety regulations against carriers,' Cahalan told FreightWaves.
'The notion that regulated entities should have their fate decided by federal judges rather than the DOT is absurd and unheard of. Make no mistake, this is a radical departure from the longstanding accepted norms and will only benefit industry. This will result in far less enforcement and more unsafe carriers operating discriminately on our roads.'
Cahalan also noted DOT's plan to adopt the 'Brady rule' in all enforcement actions, including those of the FMCSA, as part of the proposed rule. The rule states that the government has a duty to disclose exculpatory information – information that could clear someone of guilt or blame – in criminal cases.
Adopting the rule for enforcement actions 'will contribute to the Department's goal of open and fair investigations and administrative enforcement proceedings,' DOT stated.
'These disclosures should include any material evidence … that may be favorable to the regulated entity in the enforcement action—including evidence that tends to negate or diminish the party's responsibility for a violation or that could be relied upon to reduce the potential fine or other penalties.'
But adopting such a practice, Cahalan said, 'does strike me as favorable to industry.'
Brian Stansbury, who was chief counsel at FMCSA during the Biden administration, understands why safety advocates are concerned with the proposed policy shift.
'Giving members of the regulated community the ability to disqualify the enforcement official that they're dealing with gives the regulated community real power to push back on enforcement proceedings,' Stansbury, now a partner at the law firm Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, told FreightWaves in an interview.
'My concern is that it could make enforcement harder for the department if the first move every single time by a member of the regulated community is to try to disqualify the enforcement official. This could result in additional delays and wasted resources spent addressing requests to disqualify. This is an even greater concern with respect to FMCSA enforcement, where you have so many enforcement matters occurring at any given time.'
Regarding adoption of the Brady rule in administrative enforcement actions, 'I believe government enforcement officials should be held to a high level of impartiality with a focus on justice, not getting a favorable result, and I am comfortable with the regulated community to have tools to ensure they get exculpatory information,' he said.
'But it also gives bad actors a tool to delay and undermine enforcement actions, and those bad actors are probably the ones most inclined to operate unsafely. It's the risk of abuse that we have to be thoughtful about.'
P. Sean Garney, co-director of Scopelitis Transportation Consulting and an FMCSA regulations expert, said that while DOT's policy shift seeks to reduce regulatory red tape, it is no gift to the trucking industry.
'I think this is more about regulatory philosophy than an industry versus safety issue,' Garney told FreightWaves. 'Some regulations protect industry and keep bad actors out. Good actors in the industry have a vested interest in setting a reasonable standard through regulation.'
Garney pointed out that a provision within the proposal that weakens the power of guidance documents could actually work against the industry.
'Without this guidance they won't know how to stay compliant and will not have a reliable foundation on which to build their operations.'
The deadline for public comment on DOT's proposed enforcement changes is June 16.
Trump administration wants to cut FMCSA workforce by 7%
DOT's deregulation barrage raises compliance concerns for trucking
Freight industry: Which regulations should DOT cut?
Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher.
The post Does DOT's enforcement policy put truck safety at risk? appeared first on FreightWaves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
5 hours ago
- USA Today
Tesla prices in 2025: From $36K to $250K, here's what you'll actually pay
Everyone knows they're not cheap, but exactly how much does a Tesla cost? There's a huge difference in price between the cheapest Tesla and the most expensive Tesla. The EV lineup works for a wide variety of budgets and expectations. Tesla changes its prices and trim levels frequently now, but below you'll find pricing information for each Tesla model as of this writing, with reference points to how the prices most recently changed. Unfortunately, though the original Federal tax credits on Tesla vehicles have ended, the Inflation Reduction Act's revised credits are fair game for certain models. And you can still take advantage of state credits. Keep reading to learn how much you can expect to spend on a new Tesla. How much is a Tesla Model 3? As the cheapest Tesla available, the Model 3 has a lot to offer, including strong range and sleek styling that grows sleeker for 2024. Tesla has updated the 3 for the first time this year, and the enhancements are enough to earn the sedan the internal designation "Highland." You'll notice the thinner headlights, revised taillights, fresh wheel designs and the markedly nicer interior just from photos. Get behind the wheel to experience the improved ride quality and newly hushed cabin — it's much, much quieter than before thanks to acoustic glass all the way around, better insulation, and nicer interior materials. So, surely this improved Model 3 costs way more, right? Wrong! Even accounting for some late-2023 price changes — or, pricing rollercoasters — that saw fire-sale MSRPs on pre-Highland 3s, the new Model 3's $40,630 price tag was pretty much the same as before, including destination and the mandatory $250 order fee. That's for a rear-drive Standard Range Model 3, which arrives with a slight bump in estimated range, from last year's 267 miles to 272. Tesla didn't change any of the 3's mechanicals as part of the Highland updates, but improved aerodynamics and new, Tesla-specific tires are behind the mileage bump. At least, that was the Model 3 Standard Range's price — before Tesla discontinued the price-leader variant in fall 2024, leaving behind a version with longer range that actually costs even less, technically. Tesla Model Y joins the force: Why police departments are making the switch to EVs Wait, huh? That would be the Long Range model, which recently welcomed a lower-cost, higher-range rear-wheel-drive variant back into the fold. The Model 3 RWD Long Range hasn't been available since 2019, but is now back in new Highland form delivering a Model 3 lineup–topping 363 miles of range. Its price is a nice $44,130, just $3,500 more than the now-defunct Standard Range model, and even better, it qualifies for the $7,500 EV tax credit — effectively dragging its price down to just $36,630, lower than even the basic rear-drive Model 3 Standard Range (which didn't qualify for the same credit — a likely reason why it's now gone from the lineup, besides its China-sourced LFP batteries potentially spelling trouble with upcoming tariffs on China-sourced EV components). As the least-expensive, biggest-range Model 3, the Long Range is going to be tough to pass up for most buyers. Tesla is keeping the dual-motor Long Range variant around, too, which adds a front drive motor for all-wheel drive, along with the same larger battery for improved range. It now starts at $49,130 (including Tesla's $1,390 destination charge and $250 order fee). Its range dips slightly, from last year's claimed 353 miles (358 per the EPA's website), to 341. The racier Performance model is also back, with 510 hp, 303 miles of range, and a $56,630 price tag including destination. Like its big-battery stablemates, the Long Range models, the Performance also qualifies for the EV tax credit. So, while it's great that Tesla's lowered or held the line on the 3's prices and figured out a way for them to qualify for those credits, remember, the cheapest variant no longer qualifies for the full $7,500 Federal EV tax credit, thanks to its China-sourced batteries. And every paint color save the new Stealth Grey costs extra, from $1,000 for Pearl White and Deep Blue to $1,500 for Solid Black and $2,000 for the also-new Ultra Red. How much is a Tesla Model S? The all-wheel-drive-only Tesla Model S is significantly more expensive than the Model 3, but recently got a $2,000 price cut (as of April 20). The Dual-Motor Long Range variant (now just called "Model S" on the company website), which travels an estimated 405 miles on a full charge, is now priced at $74,380. After the tri-motor Plaid variant saw its price hiked, first from $119,690 to $131,190 after the news dropped that Tesla won't make the 520-mile, higher-performance Plaid+ model, which CEO Elon Musk claimed is no longer necessary, it saw yet another jump to a whopping $137,190. That was previously slashed to just $116,380 — lower than the Plaid has ever been priced — it's current starting price is now $89,380, significantly cheaper than last year and also two grand cheaper now. This might just be worth it — although its driving range falls to an estimated 348 miles, the Model S Plaid benefits from a manufacturer-estimated 0-60 mph time of fewer than 2.0 seconds and a top speed of 200 mph. In our tests, a less powerful dual-motor Tesla Model S Plaid zoomed to 60 mph in just 2.1 seconds. That makes it the quickest production car we've tested. Love it or hate it: See the Tesla Cybertruck meet bold, modified styles How much is a Tesla Model X? With an estimated range of 348 miles, the dual-motor Tesla Model X now goes for $79,380, down big time from its recent charge of $122,190. The Model X Plaid's range drops to an estimated 333 miles, but like the Model S Plaid, it delivers quicker acceleration and a higher top speed. Prices for this trim had started at an eye-watering $140,190, but like other Tesla prices have plunged in recent months to $121,380, close to its original ask when it first debuted, and now it's priced at $94,380 in the latest model line update (as of April 2024). The Model X comes standard with five seats. A six-seat configuration costs an extra $6,500, and a seven-seat configuration costs $3,500. How much is a Tesla Model Y? The Model Y, Tesla's compact SUV, as of January 2025, is new. Tesla has introduced the new-gen Y referred to online as the "Juniper." After initially only selling the Launch Series special-edition launch version starting at $61,630 — and is based on the dual-motor, Long Range variant and is claimed to deliver 320 miles of range — Tesla has begun fleshing out the rest of the "regular" lineup, which was being covered by remaining previous-generation Model Y inventory until just recently. Those non-Launch Series Model Ys are the Long Range, Dual Motor example starting at $50,630 with destination and order fees included, as well as the more recently introduced Long Range, Single Motor variant going for the same $46,630 as the equivalent pre-Juniper model. The Dual Motor good for as much as 327 miles of range and qualifies for the $7,500 federal EV tax credit, too, though its price is slightly higher than last year's equivalent Long Range Dual Motor Y. The Single Motor version ups that range figure to 357 miles and also qualifies for the EV tax credit. So far, there is no Single Motor, Standard Range model, as was offered previously; that version was a price-leader, starting at $44,380 including the destination fees but before factoring in any incentives (namely the $7,500 federal EV tax credit it qualifies for), but only good for 260 miles of estimated range. The Performance variant offered previously is similarly on hiatus but expected to rejoin the lineup with Juniper upgrades soon. The Model Y comes standard with five seats; however, before Juniper, paying $2,000 extra added a small third-row bench to Long Range models, which brought the SUV's seating capacity up to seven; that option is missing from the new model for now, but we anticipate it's return soon. Drop another $1,000 and Tesla adds a tow hitch, which allows users to make the most of the SUV's available 3,500-pound towing capacity. How much is a new Tesla Roadster? Tesla has ambitious goals for its new Roadster: hit 60 mph in 1.9 seconds and achieve a range of 620 miles. Fittingly, prices will start around $200,000. The Founders Series, limited to the first 1,000 customers, is priced around $250,000. At this price, the Roadster is poised to become the most expensive Tesla in the lineup. As of right now, Tesla is taking reservations for the Roadster but the official on-sale date hasn't been announced. How much is a Tesla Cybertruck? The much-hyped and equally delayed Tesla Cybertruck all-electric pickup truck arrived for the first few customers in late November 2023. All other Cybertruck orders will be delivered through 2024 and start at $79,990 for the standard AWD version. If you want the most powerful version, you'll want the 845-hp Cyberbeast specification that's going on sale at $99,990 with its triple-motor layout and 35-inch tires on 20-inch wheels. Sad about that promised $39,900 version of the Cybertruck that's definitely no longer happening? There is a cheaper, rear-wheel-drive Cybertruck arriving in 2025 — that'll start at $60,990. Range estimates are early, but Tesla claims that rear-drive Cybertruck will deliver 250 miles of range, the mid-level AWD version will get 340 miles (or up to 470 miles with an available range-extender battery), and the Cyberbeast will do a lower 320 miles (or "440+" with the extender). All Cybertrucks will be able to DC fast charge on Tesla's V3 Supercharger at a 250 kW rate, which can add between 128 to 136 miles of range in about 15 minutes. Another feature new for Tesla bi-directional charging capability, turning the Cybertruck into a rolling battery generator for your house — or a charger for other Teslas. It also features a 120-volt and 240-volt inverter with plugs located in the bed. In related news, you can see how much the Cybertruck will cost Tesla to build, and how much it could cost buyers to insure. How much is a Tesla Semi? Tesla's Semi, which has already received orders from companies like Walmart and J.B. Hunt, is expected to start around $150,000. Founders Series models are expected to go for around $200,000. Here again, an exact on-sale date has not been announced. But Tesla says the first Semi deliveries have already taken place as of early 2023, though they were originally promised way back in 2021. Full Self-Driving capability Tesla offers what it calls Full Self-Driving Capability as a $15,000 option (it used to be $10,000). Tesla promises this hardware package will someday allow the car to drive itself without any input from the driver, but as of today, it is limited to advanced driver aids that fall short of allowing completely autonomous driving. *Prices listed do not include available government incentives How much does a Tesla cost? Photos by manufacturer
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
It's Official: Social Security Retired-Worker Benefits Have Made History
Social Security provides a financial foundation for aging workers who can no longer do so for themselves. Based on the latest statistical snapshot from the Social Security Administration, the average monthly payout for retired workers hit a historic level in May. On the other hand, the purchasing power of a Social Security dollar simply isn't what it used to be. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › In August 1935, the Social Security Act was signed into law, with the first retired-worker benefit being issued in January 1940. For decades, this prized social program has been providing a financial foundation for those who could no longer do so for themselves. Based on a recently updated analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Social Security helped pull more than 22 million people above the federal poverty line in 2023, 16.3 million of whom were aged 65 and above. It's also reduced the federal poverty rate for seniors to 10.1% from an estimated 37.3% if the program didn't exist. Separately, national pollster Gallup has been surveying retirees in each of the last 23 years to gauge how important their Social Security income is to making ends meet. Anywhere from 80% to 90% of respondents noted it was necessary, in some capacity, to cover their expenses. In May, the average Social Security check for retired-worker beneficiaries, who comprise the bulk of recipients, made history by surpassing a psychological milestone. Every month, the Social Security Administration (SSA) publishes what's known as its "Monthly Statistical Snapshot," which provides a detailed rundown of where every dollar in traditional Social Security outlays ends up. "Traditional" benefits refer to payouts for retired workers, survivor beneficiaries, and workers with disabilities. For example, the June statistical snapshot from the SSA shows that 69.628 million people received a benefit in May 2025. This includes more than 52.8 million retired workers, close to 5.9 million survivors of deceased workers, and 7.1 million workers with disabilities. You'll note these figures don't add up to 69.628 million, with the difference made up by spouses, children, widow(er)s, and parents of current/former beneficiaries who also qualify for a monthly check under select circumstances. The SSA's detailed monthly breakdown also allows anyone to see how much in benefits was outlaid, which includes the average benefit paid for each specific category. As a whole, $129.351 billion was dispersed in May to the aforementioned 69.628 million beneficiaries, which worked out to an average payout, across all beneficiary types, of $1,857.75. However, the highest average check of all beneficiary categories went to retired workers. For the first time in the program's 90-year history, the average Social Security retired-worker benefit crested $2,000 -- officially, it came in at $2,002.39. This average payout for retired workers has risen on a month-to-month basis for as long as the SSA has been publishing its Monthly Statistical Snapshot. This is because of the dynamic of new workers filing for and receiving initial benefits, as well as some beneficiaries dying. With wages and salaries nominally increasing over time, as well as near-annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) boosting how much Social Security beneficiaries receive, it was simply a matter of time before the average Social Security retired-worker benefit hit the psychologically important $2,000 level. Unfortunately, this nominal achievement isn't reason to cheer. Despite the average retired worker now receiving a payout that begins with a "2" for the first time in the program's storied history, studies have shown that Social Security payouts have done a very poor job of keeping up with the inflationary pressures retirees have contended with since this century began. Prior to 1975, there was no rhyme or reason to how Social Security COLAs were determined or passed along. Following an entire decade without a COLA in the 1940s, Congress passed a whopping increase to benefits of 77% in 1950. Beginning in 1975, the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) was "adopted" as Social Security's measure of inflation, which would allow for annual adjustments, if necessary. The CPI-W has in excess of 200 spending categories, all of which have their own unique percentage weightings. These weightings are what allow the CPI-W to be chiseled down to a single number at the end of each month, which makes for easy year-over-year comparisons to determine if this broad basket of goods and services is rising (indicating inflation) or declining (indicating deflation). Though you'd think a broad-basket inflationary index would be perfect for mirroring the prevailing rate of inflation, this simply hasn't been the case. The inherent flaw with the CPI-W can be easily seen in the latter half of its full name: "urban wage earners and clerical workers." This inflationary index is tracking the spending habits of mostly working-age Americans who aren't currently receiving a Social Security benefit. In comparison, more than 85% of Social Security beneficiaries are 62 and older. Working-age Americans and retirees budget their money differently. Whereas the former are likely to spend a higher percentage of their monthly budget on education and apparel expenses, seniors dole out more for shelter and medical care services than the typical working-age American. Unfortunately, the CPI-W doesn't account for the added importance of shelter and medical care service expenses, thus leading to a fairly persistent decline in the purchasing power of a Social Security dollar over time. According to a July 2024 study from nonpartisan senior advocacy group The Senior Citizens League, the buying power of a Social Security dollar has dropped by 20% since 2010. As long as the CPI-W remains Social Security's inflationary tether, even a record-breaking monthly benefit for retired workers is unlikely to keep pace with the pricing pressures beneficiaries are contending with. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. It's Official: Social Security Retired-Worker Benefits Have Made History was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Time Business News
2 days ago
- Time Business News
Should You Hire a Driver After SAP Program Completion? Pros and Cons for 2025
Should you hire a driver after SAP program completion? This is a common question many fleet managers and employers in the trucking industry are asking in 2025. With FMCSA and DOT compliance requirements growing stricter, understanding the benefits and risks of hiring SAP-cleared drivers is essential for making informed staffing decisions. The DOT SAP Program (Substance Abuse Professional Program) is designed to rehabilitate drivers who violated drug and alcohol policies. After successful SAP program completion, these drivers are legally eligible to return to safety-sensitive duties — but does that mean you should immediately put them back on the road? ✔ For complete guidance on DOT SAP compliance, visit our DOT SAP Program page. Drivers who finish the SAP process meet DOT's Return-to-Duty standards, ensuring your company remains legally compliant. Drivers given a second chance may demonstrate improved loyalty and commitment, reducing turnover risks. SAP-cleared drivers are subject to follow-up testing, making them one of the most monitored groups on the road — reducing immediate safety concerns. ✔ Learn more about SAP Evaluation to understand the process drivers undergo. Some insurers may raise premiums if your fleet includes drivers with past DOT violations, impacting operational costs. Despite SAP clearance, employers may still worry about reliability or potential relapse, affecting team trust. Clients or partners may view employing SAP-cleared drivers as a liability, influencing business relationships. Employers have the right to make hiring decisions even after SAP program completion but cannot discriminate solely based on past SAP participation. Decisions must align with EEOC guidelines and internal company policies. ✔ For a detailed compliance guide, check the FMCSA Clearinghouse Rules. Q1: Is it mandatory to rehire a driver after SAP program completion? No, employers are not legally required to rehire SAP-cleared drivers but must document valid, non-discriminatory reasons for refusal. Q2: Does SAP program completion erase a driver's past violation from records? No. The violation remains on file in the FMCSA Clearinghouse for five years or until follow-up testing is complete. Q3: Can a driver apply to other companies after SAP program completion? Yes, drivers are free to seek employment elsewhere, but all prospective employers must review Clearinghouse records. Deciding whether to hire a driver after SAP program completion requires balancing safety, cost, legal compliance, and company culture. While SAP-cleared drivers meet DOT standards, your final decision should align with fleet risk management goals. For trusted DOT SAP Evaluation and employer compliance solutions, visit: 🔗 Or explore SAP services at: 🔗 TIME BUSINESS NEWS
