logo
Louisiana Senate confirms Landry LSU Board appointee accused of harassment

Louisiana Senate confirms Landry LSU Board appointee accused of harassment

Yahoo12-06-2025

Clouds pass over Tiger Stadium on Monday, March 20, 2023, on LSU's campus in Baton Rouge, La. (Matthew Perschall for Louisiana Illuminator)
One of Gov. Jeff Landry's appointees to the LSU Board of Supervisors received Louisiana Senate confirmation Thursday, despite being the subject of multiple complaints alleging she harassed and threatened university employees.
Esperanza Moran, who openly rallied for the dismissal of former LSU Health Shreveport Chancellor David Guzick, is the subject of an anonymous whistleblower complaint, at least one Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaint and a separate complaint filed with the governor.
Moran is accused of trying to have multiple LSU Health Shreveport administrators fired.
Esperanza Moran lives in Shreveport and is married to wealthy businessman Scott Moran. The couple own several businesses, including Moran Oil Co., and give generously to Republican political campaigns, including Landry's.
Sen. Sam Jenkins, D-Shreveport, who represents the district where LSU Health Shreveport is, said that while questions were raised about Esperanza Moran, Sen. Alan Seabaugh, R-Shreveport, who represents her district, was steadfast in his support of her.
Senators rarely reject gubernatorial appointments. Appointees typically must only secure the support of their own senator to receive confirmation.
Senate confirmation allows Moran to serve on the LSU board until June 1, 2030, when she would be eligible to be appointed to another term.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US, POW/MIA flags turned upside down at three Brooklyn parks
US, POW/MIA flags turned upside down at three Brooklyn parks

New York Post

time30 minutes ago

  • New York Post

US, POW/MIA flags turned upside down at three Brooklyn parks

United States and POW/MIA flags were hoisted and hung upside down at three separate sites in southern Brooklyn Friday, infuriating locals who blamed the disrespect on anti-American, far-left policies being pushed by New York pols. The city Parks Department confirmed it sent crews Friday to fix the improperly-flying flags at John J. Carty Park and the Fort Hamilton Triangle in Bay Ridge, and Bath Beach Park in Bensonhurst. Carty Park is – next door to the Fort Hamilton Army base. Hanging the American flag upside down is considered a distress signal under the U.S. flag code, but it's also widely used as a stunt to show disrespect for the U.S. and its government. 'I'm honestly shocked this happened in Bay Ridge,'' said Michael Ragusa, a southern Brooklyn GOP operative and city correction officer. 'Just a few years ago, it was one of the last solid Republican neighborhoods left in Brooklyn. Now, it's clear that the same un-American behavior spreading across the country is taking root right here — and New York City politicians are helping fuel it.' 5 United States and POW/MIA flags were spotted hung upside down at three separate sites in southern Brooklyn Friday – including this one at John J. Carty Park in Bay Ridge near the Fort Hamilton Army Base. Obtained by the New York Post Ragusa ripped Democratic Councilman Justin Brannan, who represents Bay Ridge, for joking on X that state Conservative Party Chairman Gerard Kassar was behind the flag fiasco. 'It shows he's not serious — about his job, his constituents, or this country,' Ragusa said. 5 The flags at John J. Carty Park in Bay Ridge were fixed and flown correctly later Friday. New York Post The Parks Department said it alerted regional parks managers in Brooklyn to be on the lookout for similar incidents, but declined to say whether it had leads on who disrespected Old Glory. 5 Councilman Justin Brannan (D-Brooklyn) joked that state Conservative Party Chairman Gerard Kassar was behind the flag fiasco. Stephen Yang However, two patrons at Carty Park said they saw teenage boys Thursday pulling the flags down by a rope attached to the flag pole – and then moving them around – but they said they didn't stay around long enough to watch them turned upside down. 'It's disrespectful because a lot of vets gave their lives for this nation,' said John Meister, 29, who was at the park Friday with his two young children. 5 Republican Michael Ragusa said Brannan's comment 'shows he's not serious—about his job, his constituents, or this country.' Both Brannan, who is term-limited and running for NYC comptroller, and Brooklyn Republican Party Chairman Richie Barsamian took credit for calling the Parks Department and demanding the flags be properly displayed after fielding complaints from residents. 5 Brooklyn Republican Party Chairman Richie Barsamian said he called the Parks Department to demand action after fielding calls for constituents upset that the flags were being flown upside down at Carty Park. Brannan said he made a similar demand. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post Barsamian, who is running for Brannan's council seat, called the pol's joke about Kassar 'terribly inappropriate' — and likely a reference to a flag-raising event Kassar is part of each Memorial Day in Bay Ridge. Brannan through a spokesperson insisted he respects the American flag, adding it 'belongs to all of us – not any one political party.' 'Nobody should be messing with a flag like that,' he said. 'It's disrespectful to all who fought and died upholding our values.'

Israeli-backed group seeks at least $30 million from US for aid distribution in Gaza
Israeli-backed group seeks at least $30 million from US for aid distribution in Gaza

Politico

time36 minutes ago

  • Politico

Israeli-backed group seeks at least $30 million from US for aid distribution in Gaza

WASHINGTON — A U.S.-led group has asked the Trump administration to step in with an initial $30 million so it can continue its much scrutinized and Israeli-backed aid distribution in Gaza, according to three U.S. officials and the organization's application for the money. That application, obtained by The Associated Press, also offers some of the first financial details about the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and its work in the territory. That includes a projection of a $150 million monthly budget once the group's current aid sites fully gear up — an amount equal to $1.8 billion a year. The foundation says it has provided millions of meals in southern Gaza since late May to Palestinians as Israel's blockade and military campaign have driven the Gaza to the brink of famine. But the effort has seen near-daily fatal shootings of Palestinians trying to reach the distribution sites. Major humanitarian groups also accuse the foundation of cooperating with Israel's objectives in the 20-month-old war against Hamas in a way that violates humanitarian principles. The group's funding application was submitted to the U.S. Agency for International Development, according to the U.S. officials, who were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. The application was being processed this week as potentially one of the agency's last acts before the Republican administration absorbs USAID into the State Department as part of deep cuts in foreign assistance. Two of the officials said they were told the administration has decided to award the money. They said the processing was moving forward with little of the review and auditing normally required before Washington makes foreign assistance grants to an organization. In a letter submitted Thursday as part of the application, Gaza Humanitarian Foundation secretary Loik Henderson said his organization 'was grateful for the opportunity to partner with you to sustain and scale life-saving operations in Gaza.' Neither the State Department nor Henderson immediately responded to requests for comment Saturday. Israel says the foundation is the linchpin of a new aid system to wrest control from the United Nations, which Israel alleges has been infiltrated by Hamas, and other humanitarian groups. The foundation's use of fixed sites in southern Gaza is in line with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's plan to use aid to concentrate the territory's more than 2 million people in the south, freeing Israel to fight Hamas elsewhere. Aid workers fear it's a step toward another of Netanyahu's public goals, removing Palestinians from Gaza in 'voluntary' migrations that aid groups and human rights organizations say would amount to coerced departures. The U.N. and many leading nonprofit groups accuse the foundation of stepping into aid distribution with little transparency or humanitarian experience, and, crucially, without a commitment to the principles of neutrality and operational independence in war zones. Since the organization started operations, several hundred Palestinians have been killed and hundreds more wounded in near-daily shootings as they tried to reach aid sites, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Witnesses say Israeli troops regularly fire heavy barrages toward the crowds in an attempt to control them. The Israeli military has denied firing on civilians. It says it fired warning shots in several instance, and fired directly at a few 'suspects' who ignored warnings and approached its forces. It's unclear who is funding the new operation in Gaza. No donor has come forward. The State Department said this past week that the United States is not funding it. In documents supporting its application, the group said it received nearly $119 million for May operations from 'other government donors,' but gives no details. It expects $38 million from those unspecific government donors for June, in addition to the hoped-for $30 million from the United States. The application shows no funding from private philanthropy or any other source.

Senate parliamentarian strikes key SNAP spending cuts from GOP megabill
Senate parliamentarian strikes key SNAP spending cuts from GOP megabill

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Senate parliamentarian strikes key SNAP spending cuts from GOP megabill

The Senate parliamentarian on Friday ruled against several more Republican provisions in President Trump's megabill, including language to bar immigrants who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents from receiving food assistance under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, also ruled against a key Republican pay-for in the bill, a proposal requiring states to pay for a certain percentage of food assistance under SNAP depending on those states' error rates in delivering aid. The proposal to shift SNAP costs onto the states was a sticking point with Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Susan Collins (Maine). The parliamentarian's ruling could make it easier for Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) to pick up Murkowski's and Collins's support as the SNAP-related pay-for will now need to be stripped from the legislation. The Senate bill as drafted would have required states to pay between 5 and 15 percent of food benefits in 2028 on their rate of error in paying out food benefits. Almost every state in the country has had error rates of 6 percent or higher, which would have shifted a significant percentage of the cost for delivering food assistance onto the states. The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities estimated that the Senate language would have cost North Carolina, for example, to pay up to $438 million for food aid in 2028. MacDonough struck another blow against the GOP leadership's agenda by ruling against a section to extend the suspension of permanent price support authority, something that traditionally has been part of the farm bill. Congress passed a one-year extension of the farm bill in December after Democrats and Republicans failed to reach a deal on a multi-year extension of the law due to disagreements over SNAP funding. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the ranking member on the Senate Budget Committee, applauded the parliamentarian's decision on Friday. 'The Senate parliamentarian has begun providing guidance that certain provisions in the Republicans' One Big, Beautiful Betrayal will be subject to the Byrd Rule — ultimately meaning they will need to be stripped from the bill or altered to comply with the rules of reconciliation,' Merkley said in a statement. 'As much as Senate Republicans would prefer to throw out the rule book at advance their conservative families lose and billionaires win agenda, this process has rules and Democrats are making sure those rules are enforced,' he added. 'We will be fighting this bill every single day until Republicans bring it to the floor.' Provisions of the reconciliation package that the parliamentarian decides violate the Senate's Byrd Rule are not eligible to pass with a simple-majority vote. If Thune and Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) don't remove provisions found to be in violation of the Byrd Rule, the Republican package would need to muster 60 votes to advance. The parliamentarian ruled against several provisions of the bill under the Commerce Committee's jurisdiction, including a section that appropriated $250 million to Coast Guard stations on South Padre Island, Texas, damaged by fire in 2025. She also ruled that language allocating $85 million to transfer the space shuttle on display at the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum to a non-profit group in Texas would not be eligible for the budget reconciliation fast track. Provisions found not to comply with the Byrd Rule would need at least 60 votes to overcome a point-of-order objection. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store